TBRC: Photographs of a Possible Unrecognized Bipedal Hominoid From Oklahoma
Alton Higgins, a wildlife biologist, and member of the Texas Bigfoot Research Conservancy recently submitted an article to The Relic Hominoid Inquiry website, created by Dr. Jeff Meldrum. The article contains an investigation of two wood ape photos from Central Oklahoma. The photos were taken by Russell Lumpmouth, a member of the Arapaho tribe, in November 2000 during an outdoor tribal function. According to Lumpmouth, an office secretary felt the photos were so disturbing that she deleted the files from her computer. The only copies left are some scanned copies that were printed on high quality 8×10 photo paper.
TBRC's Alton Higgins writes:
Oklahoma has a long record of sightings of large apelike creatures resembling what people often refer to as the sasquatch or Bigfoot. Most of these accounts originate in the mountainous eastern areas of the state; however, sightings are also affiliated with locations along or near Oklahoma’s major rivers. One such area with a history of accounts pertaining to mysterious manlike creatures is the Cheyenne and Arapaho tribal trust lands in Canadian County, located west of Oklahoma City.
In November 2000 Russell Lumpmouth, a member of the Arapaho tribe, took two photographs that appear to feature a sasquatch-like figure. According to his account, he and several co-workers were cleaning up after an outdoor tribal function. His supervisor walked over a short distance from their vehicles to pose for a picture with a piece of litter seen lying on the ground. Lumpmouth followed with a borrowed digital camera. As he looked through the viewfinder and took the picture, he noted the appearance of a dark object in the background, visible through gaps in the foliage that aligned from his position. Advancing a step or two out of curiosity, he took a second picture as the subject turned and departed. The men did not initiate a pursuit. The photos were printed on high quality 8×10 photo paper. According to Lumpmouth, the office secretary said the images disturbed her and the files were deleted from the computer. Higgins corroborated this description of events during on-site visits and conversations (Higgins, 2004). Further details regarding area investigations are available online via the “Sasquatch on the Oklahoma Prairie” interview available here (MP3).
You can read the full report here.
Amazing. From my experience , these are genuine.
ReplyDeleteShaun, UK
this is the best news yet! thanks casandra
DeleteWeren't you struck by how every shot's got a leaf obscuring the face/head?
DeleteAlan, that's how they operate, how the fuck do you think they've stayed hidden all this time, and NO, I wasn't struck by that
Delete'from your experience',what are u Albert ostman. u r some nomark from the bigfoot capital of the world,the UK[lol. prick
DeleteThese photos are very interesting I would like to hear and/or see more analysis done on these...
ReplyDeleteThey;re fake.
DeleteThe first and third pictures I can not tell much. The creature in the first picture looks absoulutely huge. We could get some perspective if we knew how high the prairrie type grass is. The fourth picture is a comparison with the Patterson/Gimlin creature and similarities abound. Digital cameras in 2000 did not have great a lot of pixels like today, but not bad here.
ReplyDeleteChuck
It would be nice if, when a clickable photo is posted on this site, the resulting photo was bigger than a postage stamp. I swear they're so small as to be completely useless. Very lame and unprofessional.
ReplyDeleteI can't stand the stamp size pictures either. If you save the picture to your computer, then you can enlarge it. The quality suffers a little, but you can zoom in as much as you like.
DeleteYou can also right-click and open link in new tab, then use ctrl+ and ctrl- to zoom in and out.
DeleteDr. Meldrum's "Relict Homind Inquiry," so far shows just one research paper, by Kathy Strain on Hairyman Pictographs.
ReplyDeleteIt will be interesting to see this website/online Journal develope and if this submission is accepted.
I think we need a serious venue and who better than Dr. Meldrum to begin.
The standards seem within reach of many in the field.
And, I see now a very long list of well qualified editorial board members.
This effort is good news for us all really. But, I did notice, this peek is in advance of review, but submitted. Humm? LOL!!
I hope we see many more submissions.
Apehuman is a psycho. She tried to keep people in the field when they want to leave?
DeleteBecause she didn't want them telling the truth~~~she made this person sign a NDA to not disclose the truth about her research~~~or lack there of~~~Research that was actually someone elses...
Meldrum's friends know the truth as they have been to the area~~~LOL! Your posts trying to earn favor with Jeff won't hit home.
These photos were not given to the TBRC. They were given to Alton as a representative of the BFRO, at the time. Alton was the point-of-contact for Oklahoma.
ReplyDeleteOf course, the TBRC did their own thing, and eventually came out of the closet for being pro-kill.
Needless to say, the native tribe that provided the photos to Alton back when he was a BFRO investigator, would not even allow him on their land if this incident happened more recently.
Very accurate comment.
DeleteIt looks like an overstuffed suit. Basically worthless pictures, again.
ReplyDeleteOr a guy in a hoodie. Look at that top photo and tell me you don't see a hood around the face or mask.
DeleteNo. I don't see a hood on a face, nor do I see a gorilla costume, etc. The photo is not clear enough to shout "saquatch" but it is clear enough to see that this huge figure isn't simply Andre the Giant coming back from the grave wearing a hoodie. What ever (or whomever) this is, they are huge and heavy set and wearing a fur suit.
DeleteHaven't you noticed? Those "critical thinking" intellects have trouble seeing. They mistake everything for a person wearing a hoodie. The "critical thinkers" babble on and on about blobsquatch this and that, yet they have poor vision and intelligence; So, everything looks unfocused to them. Their "cover all" explanation is always that people are liars and everything is a blurry photo of a fat man wearing a coat. You know, the "higher plane", "critical thinking" type of stuff talked about on JREF. Wow, if only we could be so smart.
DeleteWait, the "crirical thinkers" are dopes because they can't draw a conclusion from all this crystal clear footage and these blobby stills. Or are you swerving me?
Deleteanother blurry photo..I assume this is a very blury being
ReplyDeleteRoflmao
DeleteLOL @ the comparison with patty another suit
ReplyDeleteLOL. A poor little "critical thinker" regurgitating the same puke.
DeleteDoes the person who takes the 1,000,000th blurry blobsquatch photo win a prize or something?
ReplyDeleteLarge being walking on two feet. Check.
DeleteHair covered. Check.
Brown in color. Check.
Head shape similar. Check.
Long arms. Check.
Large trunk. Check.
Eye witness who seems credible. Check
Simple minded "critical thinkers" who refuse to even look before regurgitating their vomit. Check
Tired of reading their simple minded spoutings. Check
Go back to the intellictual "critical thinkers" site-JREF. (Not) Check
Great work, well written article.
ReplyDeleteIf it is a BF, it looks pregnant to me. Seeing as I couldn't see a BF having a pot belly. They don't eat McDonalds food afterall. LOL.
ReplyDeleteIt does look real to me. But figures some dumb panicy person would delete them!
Chad W
I wonder if she's a native american. Some of them view this topic a bit differently then us immigrant types...
DeleteImmigrant types? Nope, I was born here, I immigrated from my mother's womb.
DeleteI think "Patty" was pregnant given her girth and enormous breasts, and her uniwllingness to run. She was either leaving behind something she didn't want to, or just couldn't move too fast safely. The PG massacre theory arose b/c all is not right with the story from that week, and anytime things don't add up people look for explanations. This could be a pregnant Bigfoot, or just fat, or malnutrition.
Deletethe struggle is the lack of orginal negatives/or digital file. 10 years ago using a digital was leading edge, so that sounds odd also, in that many consumers were still on emulsion film with negatives.
digital was not leading edge 10 years ago.
DeleteIt very well could be a photo of a real Sasquatch. But, it's just to blurry to make any definite conclusions. We need long (10-15 mintues), HD, crystal clear footage in broad daylight with the photographer placing the camera on a tripod. That is the only type of footage we should even consider, because when it comes to blurry photos and videos, they're a dime a dozen.
ReplyDeleteWell I must say, the pictures taken today 12 years later with more advanced cameras haven't provided much better pictures, so I'm impressed.
ReplyDeletei agree with you blondie.these pic are better than most.im not saying that they are the magic pic that prove bf is real.all and all nice pic to all to the list.
DeleteThe Freeman footage also had a bigfoot with a pot belly. This is due to protein-deficiency and makes these photos very interesting to me, especially since this is 25 miles from my house. Rumor at the Finding Bigfoot show in Yukon was something around Stinchcomb Park was about to get exposed with photo's and video
ReplyDeleteFreeman's bigfoot shows a female carrying a young one in front. The lumbering walk, looking down, only the left arm swings. I believe it was being supported with the right arm.
DeleteNear the end of the film you can see the infant and the female separately.
Just an opinion
1%
The Freeman footage is one of the fakest videos I have ever seen. If you think it is real then you need to get out of the BF field now!
DeletePretty neat. Looks similar to Patty.
ReplyDeleteso bob heironimous in a suit again? cool
DeleteIs it your lifes work to get on here and annoy people?
DeleteJust another blurry photo, of course. Nothing here, at all.
ReplyDeleteWhy regurgitate then?
DeleteA friend of mine was privey to the investigation of these photos. They went to the location and used a stand in for where the bigfoot was and shot a photo from where the photograper was. The stand in was 6'-6". Based on the estimates the BF is around 10' tall. This same one has been sighted around that area many times. This is the real deal folks.
ReplyDeleteShould be pretty easy to get some clear photos and videos then.
DeleteI can maybe believe that based on how much taller it is than the grass which I estimate at least 3 foot maybe four and it only comes to its knees.
DeleteFrom the pictures I'm not sure you can get an accurate measure of where the stand in should stand, however it is quite clear if you just know the height of the grass which should be easy to find out.
When I look at this creature I'm seeing at least 8 foot, hardly a man stuffed into a suit. Ask your friend for me if possible.
Thanks
Chuck
Or it could be standing on a small bank we cannot see due to the grass.
DeleteAs for it being the "real deal", i am also privey to the investiagtions of these photos. The stand-in was 5.8ft tall and estimated height is only 6.6ft as there was a bank which suggests it is not so tall as it appears.
I don't have any names or pics or videos to back this claim of how i know, do you?
Yet ANOTHER blobsquatch.
ReplyDeleteYaaaaawwwwnn.
If you are so tired, why post?
DeleteOh goody a BlobSquatch
ReplyDeleteYeah! We get to hear the gagging regurgitations of a "critical thinker".
DeleteMan just stop posting. You are annoying. You make yourself sound ridiculous posting on every person who doesn't agree with you.
DeleteOne of these days, perhaps we'll see a sharp, in focus picture of what may be a bigfoot. Today is not that day.
ReplyDeleteDo NOT hold your breath cuz you will be stained like the blueberry girl in Willy Wonka. There are good sharp photos of them (I've seen some) but mainstream won't ever because there is too much money tied up in the MYSTERY!!! Why would anyone really want it to be solved when there is so much intrigue? More money there than any DNA paper and subsequent gobbblygook that comes from it.
DeleteHey dumbass the picture was taken of a person picking up some trash. The camera was not focused in on the BF which was in the background. It was focused in on the person picking up the trash, so of course the BF in the background is out of focus!
DeleteOf course the original image files were deleted. I wouldn't expect anything less from the world of Bigfoot.
ReplyDeletecomment +1
Delete"...the office secretary said the images disturbed her and the files were deleted from the computer..."
ReplyDeleteSorry, but this sounds like a typical bigfoot BS line.
Where was Melissa Hovey working at this time?
DeleteYup. Also, if you ever read the words
Delete"secret" and/or "undisclosed location" in a bigfoot story, you know it's a BS story.
Either the same large fat guy is wearing the same costume all over the country over multiple years..or these creatures pack on allot of body fat to survive the winter..like many large North American mammals. Yes the photos suck..like most..but I am seeing the same body shape over and over. The recent cell phone footage from the PNW, the Freeman photo and now this photo and all have a rather fat Sasquatch in them. Or perhaps, Sasquatch has succumbed to the American obesity epidemic..I have found empty big gulps deep in the woods..thirsty hunter?..I think not!
ReplyDeleteor Patty and this one are fullyu preganant, it happens.
DeleteHere's the formula for a hoax.
ReplyDeleteTell 90% of a 100% bullshit story then the sheeple will fill in remaining 10% with thier own ideas/imagination/conjecture and the sum of this = Hoax which can then be converted into a product that will remove the fleece from said sheeples. Rinse/repeat.
V.P.
Sounds like you have some personal knowledge of hoaxing. Who is worse, the person falling for the hoax because they want to believe, or you the hoaxer?
DeleteIt looks like the Bigfoot is getting a BJ. Maybe Patty is on her knees. This is actually Bigfoot porn.
ReplyDeleteAwesome!
DeleteThats you mom giving the BF a BJ!
DeleteSorry my mother is dead. Must be your mom whose working name is BigWhore or Skanksquatch.
DeleteFiles deleted on a computer are usually still there and can be recovered by a computer forensics tech.
ReplyDeleteLet me at the computer that has the "deleted" photos. It will take a little time to work through the encryption but it can be done. I bet the computer was replaced years ago and no telling where it is now.
ReplyDeleteI want to believe, but I need something more..........
Agreed, these deleted digital photos can be recovered. My IT team is always assuring/warning us that all deleted (purposeful or not) files can be recovered.
Deleteif these pic where of a known ape .everyone would think they were real.
ReplyDeleteI wonder how people would react if i had a footage of a Sasquatch who's giving birth...
ReplyDeleteIf you've watched the old series Mysterious Encounters with Autumn Williams, these photos are presented on the "Oklahoma Wildman" episode. Doug Hajicek examined them on the show and declared them fakes.
ReplyDeleteActually Doug Hajicek did not use these photos in that episode. You are full of shit!
DeleteI own the DVD's, and just finished watching it. He did in fact use those photos, and did declare them fakes.
DeleteSide note: Autumn Williams = YUMMY!
DeleteIt's unrecognized alright.
ReplyDeleteI saw the episode too! He did use these photos, and he DID call them fakes.
ReplyDeleteAnon at May 4, 2012 08:15 PM is either a liar, or an uninformed idiot! Period.
Another Hoax, just a guy in a suite, when will this end? i really hope all blurry cameras from the past can be destroyed so we can at least move forward
ReplyDeleteMichelle Obama
ReplyDeleteehy are people aying these r interesting,wed all love them to be. the FACTis they r pics of men in suits. how do we know this is a living apeman. we can all speculate,just some blobs[a per] ad balck figures. utter shit
ReplyDeleteWow that was odd. I just wrote an very long comment but after
ReplyDeleteI clicked submit my comment didn't appear. Sucks! Anyway, just wanted to say great blog!
My wife and I often write guest articles or blog posts for other weblog owners to help gain publicity to our work, as well as provide superb content to site owners. It really is a win win situation! If you are interested feel free to e-mail me so we can discuss this further. Thanks alot :)!
Feel free to surf to my blog post fungi nail
Hi,
ReplyDeleteThis is my first comment here so I just wanted to give a quick
shout out and tell you I really enjoy reading your posts.
Can you suggest any other blogs/websites/forums that go over the same
subjects?
Appreciate it!
Feel free to surf to my site: Pro Vehicle App on RSS
Outstanding share on Blogger: Bigfoot Evidence..
ReplyDeleteIt is without doubt amongst the most helpful that I�ve
read through in a very long time.
My site Top iPhone Apps
Greetings.
ReplyDeleteThis is my first visit to your blog! We are a collection of volunteers and starting a
new initiative in a community in the same niche. Your blog provided us beneficial information to work on.
You have done a wonderful job!
Look at my blog: how to golf
Hola,
ReplyDeleteI've been following your web site for some time now and finally got the bravery to go ahead and give you a shout out! Just wanted to say keep up the excellent work!
Visit my page; best sleep aid
I have loaded your site in Several completely different internet browsers and I must say this website loads a lot quicker
ReplyDeletethen most. Would you mind emailing me the company name of your
website hosting company? I'll sign up through your affiliate link if you'd like.
Thankyou
Visit my web blog Beginners Golf
my site - Beginners Golf Putting
Hi there, just became alert to your blog through Google,
ReplyDeleteand found that it is truly informative. I'm going to watch out for brussels. I'll be grateful if you continue this in future.
Numerous people will be benefited from your writing.
Cheers!
My blog post: filereaper.com
looks like a fat dude in a suit. i dont think a ape could get that big in central oklahoma.
ReplyDelete