Revisiting the 1995 Redwoods Footage


Editor’s Note: This is a post by Bigfoot Evidence contributor Vicki W.

Although this footage has been around for a long time, it's pretty interesting despite being blurry (if it's a Bigfoot, it has to be blurry, right?). In the original video it's difficult to see anything, however the enhanced version shows a definite silhouette of a large, upright figure. It was shot by Craig Miller back in 1995. Originally called the "Playmate Footage", Dr. Jeff Meldrum suggested a name change, for obvious reasons. (The crew had been filming Playboy Playmate Anna Marie Goddard for a Playboy TV special.)

Here's the story behind the film via Bigfoot Encounters:

The crew of Adventures television were shooting an episode featuring a drive up the California coast highway in August 1995. The fifth and final day of shooting was in a redwood forest near Cresent City, in Del Norte County, California. After finishing, the camera crew were breaking down the equipment and the other 5 were relaxing by driving around through the redwoods and partying. The music was up, they were goofing off for the hi-8 camera that they used for behind-the-scenes shots and just to generally document the trip when the betacam wasn't on. They had turned onto a narrow side road and realized there was nowhere to turn around. It was getting dark and had started to rain and they were finding it rather difficult to back the 34 ft. RV out.

At some point the driver spotted what he thought was a bear on the road about thirty-five yards ahead. Their first thought was wouldn't it to great to have some wildlife footage to include it the episode. But as the object walked at an angle across the road and away from them bipedally, arms swinging, they began to question whether it was a bear. They drove forward to within about 5 yards of it, when it retreated back across the road in the direction it had come, directly in front of the RV, the headlights illuminating it up to about the waist. It appears a little startled or intimidated by the RV and lights, but continues across the road to disappear behind a large redwood. Two of the witnesses immediately ran outside to try to get more footage but it was too dark and the forest was extremely dense.

What one sees on the video is a large (about 7.5 ft. tall) somewhat shaggy male "Sasquatch", that bears a striking resemblence to the subject of the Patterson-Gimlin film. In fact, I have juxtaposed frames from both in which the subjects are in similar poses and the similarity in posture, shape of head, configuration of neck and shoulders, proportions of torso and limbs, et., is very clear.

There are a number of anatomical features suggested on the video that are very intriguing -- head shape and position, genitalia (?), muscle definition and action, foot and ankle anatomy, and more. These observations alone are enough to cause me to give the video serious consideration. I have arranged for two independent enhancements of the video, giving particular scrutiny to the points I mentioned. There is a frame that should give some detail of facial features as well. We will have the results in the near future. I have also been at the site, personally interviewed one of the witnesses, and read the testimonies of the others. So far nothing to suggest any lack of credibility in their account. ...Jeff Meldrum.

The 1995 Redwoods Footage
Jedediah Smith Redwoods State Park

Enhanced (Loop)

Read complete story at www.bigfootencounters.com

Comments

  1. I can't make out anything in that video.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Try this one to see how truly fake this is, including the flopping willie...
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=intHl9JvLY4&feature=youtube_gdata_player

    ReplyDelete
  3. Truly, the blobsquatchiest video in history.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Blocky 240 video you can't see crap !

    ReplyDelete
  5. that video looks like they filmed someone trying to take a dump in the woods

    ReplyDelete
  6. playmate video huh, was patty the centerfold with her hairy titties hanging out. did she strike a sexy pose like frame 352 for the camera?

    ReplyDelete
  7. what's up with that bigfoot sketch. looks like a meth squatch trying to hide his shit from the bfro. they might catch him blazing that shit up with their thermo imagery!

    ReplyDelete
  8. I suppose if a film can be cleaned up, one from 1955 would be much easier, than a digital video from today, as witnessed what was accomplished with the Patterson/Gimlin film. However you are starting with a far inferior quality subject due to the darkness. Good luck with the project and just maybe you will have something. Since this is a project involving Dr. Jeff Meldrum there is a good chance something is here.

    Chuck

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Chuck,
      I don't think anything is being done today. That was from back when it happened around 1995. The enhanced video is the result as far as I know. It does make me wonder if any more work could be done now, however, as technology is always advancing. This one is interesting, and the original video I posted mostly so you can hear the reaction of the people in the car, as to judge whether you think it sounds genuine. (I know you can't really see much of anything in it before the enhancing was done.)
      Also, I want to say thank you for kind and encouraging comments. You have no idea how much I truly appreciate it. My confidence is a little shaky, but I try to do a good job! Thanks again.

      Delete
    2. Boy am I a dufess. When I briefly looked at this this morning I thought it was from 1955 and I did not have the audio on. Just watched now. It is quite interesting and at least 1995 was before much went on the internet and there was no you tube.

      I do not know why your confidence is shaky. You put out some of the best material that comes on this site. I know that there is so much nonsense and negative posts here, but in the Bigfoot world they about as important as a pimple on a dimple on a flea's left ball, and same goes for me. However if a person is trying to put out honest work, I may disagree on some things but I will do it politely, as I do not have most answers, only opinions. Hang in there and keep churning out what you feel is important.

      Chuck

      Delete
    3. I enjoy your're posts also. thanks and keep up the good work!:)

      Delete
    4. Ditto. The subject matter might get ranked on, but that doesn't mean there is anything wrong with the presentations. Thanks!

      Delete
    5. Vicky, I don't know why your confidence would be shaky, your posts are the only ones I bother to read on this site. Keep up the good work.

      Delete
  9. This clip is also known as the baggy pants bigfoot. Some have commented that the costume didn't fit that well and was baggy.

    ReplyDelete
  10. The aliens plan is to harvest the cellulite from our morbidly obese women as an endless fuel supply for there home planet. The bigfoots part in all of this is they are the only thing strong enough to lift the women onto the transport ship. So the next time you go to a supermarket and you don't have to detour around some pig blocking the whole isle thank the bigfoot and the aliens.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. When it comes to bigfoot you must always expect small-brained juveniles in their ignorance to stoop to idiocy, it's like the subject attracts the worst in man with lots of both hate and jealousy. Maybe it's that deep-rooted primal fear of big hairy things affecting trolls in a more serious way. I'm on the fence regarding this video thinking it could be fake and the goofy witness reactions sound planned, but I see some signs of it being genuine too like those pointed out in the description.

      Delete
    2. i guess thats proof that bigfoot doesn't exist around my neck of the woods :( I swear its like a fat chick obsticle course

      Delete
    3. When it comes to Bigfoot you must always expect small-brained juveniles in their ignorance to stoop to idiocy and attack posts that accurately represent Bigfoot's role in removing fat women from our society, its like the subject attracts angry chubby chasers who do not want to live without fat women, with lots of both hate and jealousy. Maybe its the primal fear of big hairy things affecting chubby chasers in a more serious way. I am on the fence regarding this video.

      Delete
    4. Maybe Bigfoot will remove Sharon Lee, we can only hope.

      Delete
    5. 8:47 proving that troll point nicely, thank you.

      Delete
    6. Looks like someone touched a nerve with the fatty BFers. There are plenty of them. Put the donuts down and get off your asses.

      Delete
  11. Sally here

    I just wanted to step in and set the record straight. Dr. Melba Ketchum will prove the existence of Bigfoot because she is the greatest american to ever walk the face of the earth. Her paper will soon be published by one of the leading scientific journals- The Weekly World News.

    Once it is published Dr. Ketchum will be elected ruler of the world and all who doubted her will perish at my hand. She will control the force and there will be no Jedi's left to stop her. Meldrum and Bindernagel will be forced to bow at her feet or they will feel the wrath of her light saber. I will then be called Darth Sally and will learn from her how to control the force. It will be then that I will learn to control the voices I hear in my head on a daily basis.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Will there be any bat-boy samples in the paper?

      Delete
    2. Sally here

      How dare you joke about the great Dr. Ketchum. There is no such thing as bat-boy and Dr. Ketchum wrote about this extensively early in her career.

      Delete
    3. I'm so sorry I was hoping dna evidence would prove the existance of bat-boy. PLEASE, for the love of Melba, Don't hurt me!

      Delete
    4. that dna paper will not prove shit, we need a body dead or alive, then its open season on trolls.

      Delete
    5. I could have sworn weekly wold news already proved bigfoots existance. dna test confirmed the big guy as some fat chicks baby daddy. or was that just preliminary results from the "big paper"

      Delete
    6. Sasquatch is a kind of human,Bat boy is a type of human. Therefore, Batboy is a type of Sasquatch. Ergo, if Ketchum's paper proves Sasquatch it also validates Batboy. Case closed. No need to thank me people.

      Delete
  12. In one of the enhanced versions, Bigfoot has a hardon. LOL. He must have seen the Playmate girl in the van.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. bigfoot jerking off, they take our women & eat our children.

      Delete
    2. Well he wasnt looking at Sharon Lee, that would cause any creature to shrivel up.

      Delete
    3. Leave it to a deviant to notice such a thing.

      Delete
    4. Ha. Hi Robert. This is the real problem with this footage. Everything about this suggests to me that this is a genuine sasquatch... even the penis, until you consider the Playboy connection. Too much of a coincidence, surely? Tim, U.K.

      Delete
  13. That has got to be the worst footage ever shot.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Why? The profile has the typical coneshaped head, fakes rarely if ever get something like that correct much less everything else.

      Delete
    2. we need fb/fb's yellow outline on that first one

      Delete
    3. Oh my god! We need a female who is a cock expert and who is also a bigfoot expert. Does anyone know who would best fit this job???

      Delete
  14. This is a punch to the gut to Bigfooters who believe Sasquatch is "human". You can clearly see he has a spaghetti noodle for a cock. That is evidence of animalistic genitalia. If he was human he'd have a cock much closer looking to a humans but he doesn't. Hell, even horses have cocks that look much closer to human cocks. Bigfoot is an ANIMAL and not human.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yep, the proof is all in the cock.

      Delete
    2. Your a SMF......very funny

      Delete
    3. "You're" a what? You have to admit, he brings up a compelling point in regards to the "Human vs. Animal" debate. He may be a cock mongrel but you have to give him credit for his foresight on this as I don't recall this ever being discussed.

      Delete
    4. Its a Twisted sister song.....SMF, and I meant it in a good way. You really think this guy was serious? He was joking, and it was very funny. Btw it stands for Sick Mother Effer. Peace.

      Delete
    5. Wait a minute.....650. You are not serious either. I keep getting hoaxed!

      Delete
    6. Anon 7:32,

      I'm glad it was "Sick" instead of "Stupid". ;-) Thanks for the comment. Sometimes I can be a sick individual indeed. Haha.

      Anon 8:22,


      Actually, I was being partly serious there. I mean it was intended to be a funny post BUT when you think about it as if this is legit footage, then that argument could be a valid one. ;-)

      All in good fun though guys. Have to keep this blog interesting.

      Delete
  15. it is not possible to film something this badly even if you tried

    ReplyDelete
  16. Take a look at the sketch over on the far right of the Justin Smeja drawing that Robert Lindsay posted recently, and compare it to the face drawn in from the Redwoods silhouette.

    Kinda' similar.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Lets talk about the Ketchum paper and Erickson project. Robert Lindsley has stated he thinks Ketchum has "a huge ego " regarding this field and i tend to agree. Do people think this DNA study is going to "prove" the existence of Sasquatch once and for all? I for one do not. What I think is going to happen is: the announcement of "unknown" DNA in her paper and thats going to be bottom line after you cut out all of the BS. Which by the way, we already have in this field (unkown DNA), yet, look where we're at to this day with that information, NOWHERE. Furthermore, she will have FAILED at doing what she said she would do and that is "prove the existence of Sasquatch", period. IMO, this paper is going to do ZILCH in the grand scheme of mainstream science. I also think the Erickson project is going to be rehashed footage (all the inconclusive stuff already out there) coupled with some footage from Kentucky that will also in the end be inconclusive and or blurry. If people are expecting this paper and Erickson stuff to be the end all in this field, they are going to be sorely disappointed. What I think this will be in the end, is a big time attempt at loading their pockets with money from the general public. If they had "undeniable proof" of Sasquatch we would already know about it, period. The excitement and thought of being "the discoverer" of Sasquatch would be too much, too big of a discovery to keep under wraps this long. People are in for huge disappointment in the end.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Just to let you all know, the Erickson project is done, it's over. He has much more important things to be concerned about. Smeja's story is a farce and Dr. Ketchum is done as well, it's all BS. Let's move on from all of this.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. releasedcould Adrian Erickson be doing thats more important than the Erickson Footage being released at this time? Smeja's story is a farce? Well, he deserves a "Radio Oscar" for his interview back in January because that was one of the more convincing stories I personally have EVER heard. You could just hear and feel the excitement, the fear, anticipation and nervousness in his voice. All tell tell signs that the person is telling the truth.

      As far as Ketchum goes, who cares what she's up to. Everyone should be able to tell she's FOS. What a monumental waste of hope and faith a lot of people had in her and still have in her. When someone (Ketchum) is associating Bigfoot with paranormal activity, telling stories of Sasquatch braiding her horses hair, says she spends time with a family of 5 of them (while never showing proof), telling stories of Bigfoot making stick structures as fact (yet she didn't see how it was built), delay after delay after delay with her papers release date, people should be able to figure out that she's FOS.

      Delete
    2. Anon @ 7:08 Well people do have normal lives other than bigfoot. Erickson is at the mercy of the economy like most of us. Land development isn't the best business to be in right now, and Bigfooting doesn't pay the bills lol.

      Delete
  19. Should we still talk about the Hovey photo?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No, please don't, it's over with. Photos will never prove anything to most people, so why waste time arguing if it is real or not, it doesn't matter!

      Delete
  20. Man, what's with the creepy looking bigfoot sketch?

    ReplyDelete
  21. Didn't see anything in the video. But the enhanced illustration sold me.

    ReplyDelete
  22. You can see the toes separate when it steps behind the tree.... That's pretty cool... Also there sure are a lot of men talking about penis on this post and not in a medical way... Hmmm skeptic = closet homo?! The world may never know...

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story