OMG: FB/FB Says Kansas Bigfoot Photo Is For Realz
It's confirmed folks! FB/FB, after viewing the original photo in context and checking up on other Bigfoot sighting reports in Kansas, has concluded that the photo taken by Greg Wood is "likely" authentic.
Here's what they wrote on their Facebook wall:
After viewing this original and the Kansas sighting record. We will say that the Kansas photo is most likely authentic. Here is the original. If you would like we can email the original. From Greg Wood. "Yep, it was the Ninascah River all right. 2/5/12 Around 2 p.m" Live in Kansas? Might pay to have a responsible researcher to canoe down Ninascah and look in the remote sandy beaches for tracks...
Original view |
Zoomed |
FBFB must be smoking something, if this is real then that Sasquatch must be eating at McDonald's every single day, coz it looks like it.
ReplyDeleteHey, I'm smoking something and I don't think this is real!
DeleteThey must have made a mistake here. I don't think this objects arm length confirms with their 64% stuff.
ReplyDeleteAgreed, arms are way too short.
DeleteIt does have the shape and color of one and appears of a very large build. I agree with above subjects arm length, however really can only see the left arm and it appears to be in a backward swing mode, thus we can not tell the true arm length. All in all the subject is just to far away with a digital camera to make any kind of conclusive proof. That is what I see.
ReplyDeleteChuck
Shape and colour of one? Going by what exactly? The multiple bodies we have to compare to? The verified videos and photos?
DeleteFact is your comparing this inconclusive photo to other inconclusive photos or "evidence". Just because more than 1 inconclusive piece of "evidence" has some similarities does not therefore mean they both must be real. Science does not work like that.
I would definitely not say that the Patterson/Gimlin film is "inconclusive" photo evidence.
DeleteTwo-dimensional the PG film is conclusively a hoax.
DeleteI cant tell if the thing is coming or going....
ReplyDeleteNow that I look at this again I think it is going and we are seeing the back with swinging arms and can not get accurate measurement of arm length. The back fits a Sasquatch profile with what we know, of course can not say for sure. This guy must have more pictures of this.
DeleteChuck
Seriously Chuck? Is that what you're seeing? You must have really good eyes or some shit because I'm not seeing that at all Chuck. I'm seeing a dark object with an undefined shape.
DeleteCould be a goddam cedar tree for all I know.
You go ahead and make it what you WANT it to be.
I am seeing a large object w/o facial features. The biped has a consistent color from top to bottom which appears to look like fur/hair. Because the facial feature are not apparent, a reasonable person would assume that you are looking at the "back side" of the animal. No different when you look at someone from a far distance. If you don't see their eyes, mouth, etc. Unless they are faceless, I realize I am looking at their back. So Chuck; I agree with you whole-heartedly. Common Sense. I ain't saying this isn't a hoax, but we are looking at the back of a large biped, hair covered something walking away.
DeleteThanks for the replies Alpha and Anons. I'm glad to read it is an issue, so I might not need stronger lenses after all.
DeleteTony
OMG, it's a UWO! (unidentified walking object)
ReplyDeleteFb fb, where the conclusion is determined first and then the "evidence" is made to fit
ReplyDeleteRick dyer is an ugly bastard
ReplyDeleteNonetheless, he will put an end to the mystery of Bigfoot and prove them once and for all to be real.
DeleteOf course that moron finds it real. He also found a stupid kid making a snapping noise behind his retarded friend real too. What a looser.
ReplyDeleteBut then again he seems to be mixed up with dyer and shawn who runs this site, so he fits right in with the loosers
well folks...thats the headline of the day...we have all been holding our breath FB/Finding Bullshit has spoken..its not a man in a fur suit...this is the real deal. Quick call CNN....these guys are worse than a bad case of painful acne and open sores on the bottom of a very tender ass
ReplyDeleteSkin problems eh? Bet that goes over real well with the ladies.
Deleteespecially when I fart..nuthin like a blast of methane and puss all at once....thatl do wonders for yah!!
DeleteCan't any of you morons see the Ostman's pad. Just look at the compliant gait on that thing.
ReplyDeleteWhat's that other thing off to its right? I don't go outdoors much, but it seems to be the same color.
ReplyDeleteI noticed this too but did not say anything yet. It is a bit further away and more out of focus. It could be a younger smaller one sitting on some kind of formation, or it could be something entirely different. Sure would be nice to get some more information about this from Greg Wood.
DeleteChuck
It's a shadow on a rock. Or a chupacabra. Either one.
Delete451 you seriously need a hobby. Maybe if you found some joy in life you wouldn't find the need to waste your time here insulting peoples intelligence. Food for thought.
Delete451 is right on!!!! It is you anon who need the hobby. If youve got so much time that you sit and stare at a pic until you start seeing bigfoots everywhere you need a hobby. The pic is fake. its from rick dyer. Enough said
DeleteWhat are you people, a bunch of shut-ins that live in your little bubble and fantasize what's out there in the woods? You're all pathetic.
ReplyDeleteIt is just another BlobSquatch.
ReplyDeleteArla here - That's me in the background of the pic. The big guy was just on his way over to get the chimichangas that I picked up for him at taco bell. He seemed to be a little upset that I didn't get him a happy meal from mickey dees. He just loves those chicken nuggets and gets so excited about the toy inside.
ReplyDeleteSally here,
ReplyDeleteI just wanted to confirm this is a real bigfoot. Melba, overlord of the earth, told in bed this morning that the squatch in the picture is one of the family group she frolics around with. She informed me that stroking his inner thigh will cause him to release a dna sample which she collected and put in her study. All you non believers will be ground beneath all might Melbas boot when the paper is released soon.
All hail Melba
Sally forth
Seriously with the sally here Melba here IS SO OLD AND OVER DONE! just speak as yourself and say what you need to say already. Good Lord at least be man enough or woman enough to post as yourself not this crap! Anyway FB/FB Rock on! No one really knows anything it is seriously all speculation!
ReplyDeleteSally here - Again, if all people want to do is complain or start an argument, their posts will be deleted. Posts from fake-appearing profiles also will be deleted.
DeleteFake DNA research papers and bigfoot habituators will also be deleted Sally. You suck at PR btw.
DeleteYou're right, Lisa. It IS all speculation, and personally I enjoy being entertained as we wait for the pa....zzzzz...zzz...zzz
DeleteMelba here: All you posters need to stop picking on Sally she has my authorization to post anything about my work on this blog, so be nice to her. It all in the report thanks. Melba
DeleteJohn loyd Scharf here
ReplyDeleteI just got out of bed with Dr. Melba Ketchum and I have to say it was not the spectacular experience that Sally promised. I beat women off me with a stick on a daily basis and let me tell you I regret not doing that to Ketchum before things got started. She ripped my clothes and polyester liesure suits are not easy to come by let me tell you.
The worst part is I left my big gold chain hanging on the bed post and Sally says if I want it then I have to earn it.
JLS
WHAT'S THE SURPRISE THE GUY FROM FB/FB BELIEVES EVEYTHING DARK IN THE WOODS IS A SQUATCH !
ReplyDeleteno tree peeking?
ReplyDeleteAnother nicely done and fully scientific approach by Jeff at FB/FindBullshit; where conclusions as made first and suppporting evidence applied when needed. Objective evidence (common sense) need not apply.
ReplyDeleteAnd what exactly are you doing if not leaping to a conclusion without objective evidence. Not all sense is common it seems.
DeleteConfirms on 16 points; coned head, brow ridge, cranial cavity, compliant gait, 64% arm length, coned head, ostman pads, tree peeking, white palms, coned head, no neck, cheek bones at nose level, coned head, broad shoulders, long upper lip and finally a coned head.
ReplyDeleteI think its bigfoot looking down zipping up his zipper cuz he had to take a leak in the tall grass and got upset cuz he got his foreskin stuck in there too. Musta hurt bad cuz the photo was taken and the poor galoot is still staring at the wound which he is happy didnt include the tip of his "helmet" which is prolly purple at this point.
ReplyDeleteI would bet that 99% or better of all the young males here that visit this website have yet to se their first real vagina.
ReplyDeleteEven with the poor resolution of the zoomed in photo, this costume looks fake.
ReplyDeleteYou can see it carrying an Ipad in its left hand.
It does look like its holding a brown notebook.
DeleteIve told everyone time and time again. This is a still from Rick Dyers movie "Peekaboo in the Bushes". This animal in the pic is really rick dyers gay brother dressed in a monkey love suit. Rick is just off camera dressed as a giant banana. Its a classic film in the dyer family library. Its right next to the video of rick getting beat up by his coworkers and the yearly videos of rick dyer getting beat up for being so damn ugly.
ReplyDeleteStay tuned, i hear theirs a new vid in the making starring Fatsino and Shawn from bigfootevidence.
You are all wrong... it is quite obviously photographic evidence that the new fall color offerings in coveralls went over gangbusters at co-op this WINTER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ReplyDeletered hooded snow suit...dip dip dip...snow suit... rama lama ding dong.
ReplyDelete