Dr. Meldrum And "Dr. Stephen Hawkings" of Human DNA Working On Bigfoot DNA Project? Blurry Stick Structures Are Just As Important Says One Ketchum Follower

Dr. Bryan Sykes

Bigfoot Lunch Club reported this morning that Dr. Jeff Meldrum of Idaho State, and Dr. Bryan Sykes of Oxford University, is currently working on a "a parallel Sasquatch DNA research". Who is Bryan Syke, you ask?:

"Bryan Sykes is professor of human genetics at Oxford University. His company, Oxford Ancestors, traces human genetic backgrounds. Sykes's books include the New York Times best-selling The Seven Daughters of Eve."

According to Guy Edwards,  the president of Bigfootology, Rhettman Mullis Jr., said that they were also participating in the project. Edwards cites a discussion from Steven Streufert's Facebook page where Rhettman spilled the beans about the project:

Guy, yes, and depending on the outcome we may ask Dr. Sykes to become an official member of Team Bigfootology. We asked Meldrum and Bindernagel last year but they chose to remain neutral at the time, even though Dr. Anna Nekaris accepted the offer. We were approached to do this project by Dr. Sykes through Dr. Anna Nekaris, who is our United Kingdom Bigfootology representative. They are currently filming a pilot show right now. There are two different things happening. Dr. Sykes is writing a book on the findings and their invitation for us to be a part of this project is the equivalent of having Dr. Stephen Hawkings ask to help identify a new star, or Einstein asking us to be a part of developing quantum-mechanic theories. We are honored and privileged to be included. So Dr. Sykes will write his book, but they are also filming a documentary that will be three one hour shows about the event. Soon we will be asking for DNA samples from all over the world and Bigfootology will assist in the accumulation of those samples. We are also in the process of reaching out to some known hybrid-offspring of human and Bigfoot joining. Because this work is being done by scientists using scientific method and Bigfootology being the only actual scientific organization, the outcomes will not be questioned or doubted critically, because the scientists involved are at the top of their field. It is a very exciting time and we are awaiting our next marching orders from Sykes through Dr. Nekaris, when that happens we will make a formal announcement and really get things moving. We have been working on this project behind the scenes, quietly, for about 3 months now, so regardless of what other DNA projects find, their work will either be validated or invalidated by Sykes outcomes.
[...]
I had samples but they went to another researcher before we got invited to be a part of this project. I have met two people in my time of doing this who claimed to be a joining of Bigfoot and a human (Native American) and looking at them there was little to cast doubt on their claim. We are aware of one such person living in Eastern Washington and we are attempting to find this person to acquire samples from him. We have team members all across the United States, Anna is handling samples out of Asia, we are hoping to get samples out of Russia from Igor Burtsev, who is also a member of Team Bigfootology, as well as our team members in Australia. We are hoping to acquire samples around the world which would also put to rest any possible local or regional anomaly. The great thing about Sykes is that he specializes in relic samples, and contaminated samples.
[...]
We are also being sent official DNA kits from Sykes in the United Kingdom and if they approve the final show, we will have film crews come out to film the work here, as well as in other areas of the world.

Comments

  1. Replies
    1. Wow, the bigfooters are falling for it again!!

      Did Melba's awe-inspiring paper come out yet? Exactly.....SSDD

      Delete
    2. It won't come out but they call me the hoaxer because I challenged this

      Delete
    3. Tim you seem like a great guy, but seriously, do you really believe in this crap? I mean bigfoot not this Ketchum horse shit. Thanks.

      Delete
    4. Yeah we know you ugly piggy. And then your cowardly ass went right back and apologized for doing it like the bitch you are. Fatsino you are a disgrace. Your considered scum among the bigfoot hoaxers. Wow congrats. Every damn statement you make as a lie and a hoax. Here piggy piggy piggy. Your gonna regret the day you showed your face

      Delete
    5. Trolls have such a hard time with reality again.

      Delete
    6. Why does everyone pick on Tim seriously? I dont know him, not much about him, but what did he hoax? I do know the he misidentified a pelvic girdle as a skull in a recent video, but look at the religious defense of obvious bullshitter Melba Ketchum on this board When BFRO was exposed by that Caleb-guy from OKLA, he said they got half of all money from the snipe hunting coordinated by their "field experts" -again, total bullshit as we are talking about zero tangible, physical evidence collected. Will Monkeyfaker ever "find Bigfoot"? Will anyone else? Hoaxers are lowest of the low, but blind bigfoot followers arent exactly smart/intelligent either. I have seen no evidence of Tim hoaxing, and he is basically no different than any of the rest on this board who believe in this mythical animal, i guess you all have your reasons.

      Delete
    7. The answer to your question is below where Fasano openly admits what he hoaxed, but says it doesn't count because only 10 people saw it. YCMTSU.

      Delete
    8. Jimmy B, the only mythical animal is the one in your pants

      Delete
  2. I've been super-excited to see where this one goes...
    David from the PAC/NW

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yee-ha!!! Finally, some REAL scientists!!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. yes......enough with Melba Ketchup real scientific study and scrutiny instead of constantly leading leading leading only to produce nothing.

      Delete
    2. Doesn't matter who proves the species real as many of us already know the Sasquatches exist so it's always been just a matter of time and who, proven it shall be relatively shortly in any case.

      Delete
  4. I are Serious Scientific Organization and I are Serious.
    http://www.seriouscat.com/serious_cat_is_serious.jpg

    And you named your organization Bigfootology?

    "...who claimed to be a joining of Bigfoot and a human (Native American) and *looking at them* there was little to cast doubt on their claim."

    O.o
    Red flag! Red flag! Warning Will Robinson! Warning!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You display your intelligence so well. A quote from a show watched by 12 year olds no less. How erudite!

      Delete
    2. And you highlight a very real issue with discussion here: attack commentators but don't EVER question the source of the information you rely on to draw conclusions. My intelligence is not the focus - the article is.

      It's so sad... there is no debate in this country anymore. No one has a command of reason or how to refute arguments - you all just rely on personal attack to gain popularity, but it doesn't speak well of your own intelligence. I don't care if there are 80 nasty comments about me - please just refute my point - provide evidence that I'm wrong.

      Please.

      Delete
    3. Red flag for me was when he said Hawking was an observational astronomer. Don't get me started on that whole Einstein quantum physics thing. This guy is claiming he hangs with bigfoots kid, and people are getting slandered for questioning it? All this dna buisness is ass-backwards: You find the freaking thing, and use morphology and dna to classify it.
      Tony

      Delete
    4. 4:29 -- Spot on. An eloquent and troubling assessment of our times.

      Delete
    5. Anon at 404 total dumbass, more like 72 year olds not 12 year olds,

      Delete
    6. I think he meant it was watched by 12 yr olds at the time it aired. That's fine, I made a silly jab and he/she didn't like it, but no counterpoint, just an attack on me. Just like you are attacking 4:04 with no relevant point to the article. Name-calling is not debating, it's what neighborhood kids did before Gilligan's Island.

      Delete
  5. Yes,it is. It is good to see experts of this calibre, who appear to have actually looked at the science and results, realise that this is going to be one of the most important investigations in our lifetime and that it may open more of an insight into the history of mankind. Perhaps the slanderous trolls here might have to actually educate themslves, or are their objection to everything related to unusual hominids no more than a futile attempt to hide their own lineage.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello. I'm the alleged "troll" who posted above and below you. I had an encounter; I know they exist. But feel free to jump to conclusions because folk here are really good at that.

      Please please please look at the source:
      Guy says that this person says that he saw on another person's *Facebook* page..."
      Because all serious scientific announcements are done via bean spillage on Facebook. :P

      Are all journalists dead? Was there a round-up? Guy seems a likeable fellow but evidence needs citations. Show me legitimate proof - an actual announcement from Meldrum even - that this is a real endeavor and I'll shut up.

      I hope it is legit, I really do. But there are red flags all over that 'bean spillage'.

      Delete
    2. Granted, and likewise. I do not direct my comments at those who support good scientific investigation, regardless of how it's existence is spilled. Many are released on organisations FB pages. Don't shoot the messenger.

      Delete
    3. This was not an organization Facebook page, but rather an individual's. Given all the false information posted here we ALL should be poised to shoot the messenger IF the message can not be validated. Heresay is not an announcement.

      Delete
    4. Proof of the pudding is in the eating:
      "Later this afternoon we will post the video of Dr Jeff Meldrum's presentation at the Pacific Northwest Conference on Primal People (Sasquatch). In his presentation he mentions Bryan Sykes and the Parallel DNA study". That is either true or not. Seems to be destined to not remain hearsay for long!

      Delete
  6. "the outcomes will not be questioned or doubted critically, because the scientists involved are at the top of their field."

    HAhahahahahahaha... and that is your 2nd red flag. ALL scientific results are scrutinized, especially from top-flight scientists! How do you think they become top-flight? From heavy review and analysis!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 3rd red flag: "They are currently filming a pilot show right now."

      Delete
    2. To ?
      I find it helpful to read the blog post before the comments. Try it and you might not be so confused all the time.

      Delete
  7. Sally Here,

    Melba is hard at work, she's been out all day taking lots pictures with our phone. She has contacted the McDondald's Hamburger University and will include a free happy meal toy with purchase.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. How do you cope with the rest of the day once you have used up your full daily allocation of neuron activity to compose that tripe?

      Delete
    2. Sally: will you and Melba be submitting any biological samples to the Sykes dna study?
      Signed
      #1 Fan

      Delete
    3. Sally Here,

      Yes we will #1 Fan! As you know Melba frequently sits for dinner with a family of 5 sasquatch. She will be bringing in used silverware and a tea set to take saliva from.

      Delete
    4. Arla here, Melba and I are out Bigfooting and eating peyote right now! I will soon venture to the spirit world and invite Bigfoot to knock me up on one of the new birthing tables they've constructed. State of the art, complete with woven branch stirrups and a symbol of the four winds, something I quickly recognized because of my people's heritage.

      Delete
    5. Melba here,

      Hey Arla, goodtimes. Bigfoot did me raw, how's your bum? Can you walk okay?

      Delete
    6. Your trolling's being skipped and not read, just letting you know that nobody's reading it but scrolling it.

      Delete
    7. I read it and laughed a lot

      Delete
    8. Bigfoot here,

      and you call ME an ape!?

      Delete
  8. "Known hybrid of human and bigfoot joining"

    Yikes.

    "Bigfootology"?

    Double yikes.

    This is Ketchum debacle 2.0

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A conclusion even before the research begins. Triple yikes, how clever is that? Ssssh!Don't worry 451, we won't tell anyone you are the product of a joining.

      Delete
    2. 451 is a hybrid of 1930s and 1940s Hollywood ape suits.

      Delete
  9. A known bigfoot-human hybrid? What did I miss?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nothing. Just the usual from the 'footers... Outrageous claims with zero evidence to back them up. Business as usual.

      Delete
    2. Thanks. I was bout to comb thru the archives. Wow. Outrageous does not begin to describe it. Not only does bigfoot exist, I can talk to him. Its gonna be hard, because I am dumb-founded.
      Tony

      Delete
    3. 451's troll business as usual more like it.

      Delete
  10. I had to go to other sites to make sure what I am reading is real. Seems it is so. This is pretty big news. There are credentialed folks all over the place here, and if it is done right. Well we will see. Glad to see Dr. Anna Nekaris onboard also. Besides being easy on the eyes, I feel she just carriers herself with a certain air of confidence and knows the right things to say. I had a feeling Dr. Meldrum would try to cook up something along these lines, but this is more far reaching than I would have thought going across the world. I have never heard any kind of modern news about a Bigfoot, human hybrid, only older stories. I sure would like to get some more info. about this. I imagine we will be hearing of other heavy hitters involved soon, or maybe they will just keep wraps on this project until complete and I would suggest such an approach.

    Best of Luck to this Bigfootology project and Godspeed.

    Chuck

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Alpha Dog: can you please provide links or the names of those other sites so that others can read more about this?

      Thank you

      Delete
    2. You were right, dr Nekaris is super hot.

      Delete
  11. Writing books? Filming pilots? How about using your time to prove your claims?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. But but but they can't do that because they don't have any. Furthermore, this is the perfect bullshit story to line their pockets with. I mean, they wouldn't sabotage their monetary gain by admitting they don't have proof first.

      Delete
    2. You only prove skepticism today more and more equals flat Earth idiocy.

      Delete
    3. You are confusing skepticism with trollism. The difference is personal attack. The skeptic addresses the argument/position/message, not the messenger. Trolls don't care about the message they always reach for that emotional trigger that makes others respond. Essentially they are attention whores: "Look at me! I have no clue what the argument is but I sure am funny! Haha. It's all about me!!"

      This is what passes for debate today - argumentum ad hominem - personal attacks - that rather than focus on the message seek to destroy the credibility of the messenger. What is lost is that truth is true no matter who delivers it. ultimately, truth is the victim.

      Delete
  12. Alright guys let's start taking bets now. The odds start at 3 to 1 that this report from the respected Dr. Meldrum comes out sooner than the Ketchum or Erickson projects do.

    Anyone game?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. My bet is that neither will have anything ever published in a real science journal.

      Delete
    2. Not taking that bet.

      Meldrum = legit.

      Delete
    3. It's soon game over for the flat earthers, time's fast approaching where trolls will squirm in crow baths.

      Delete
  13. [reads comments & sighs] ...Dr. Sykes has no idea what he's gotten himself into. Someone should explain to him that it's not worth it... That was some top-notch shitstorming, Trolls.
    I'm outta here...
    David from the PAC/NW

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dr Sykes doesn't care about you, me, or anyone else posting here. If he does, he's in research for all the wrong reasons. Don't focus on comments here - the comments aren't the story and people's opinions don't alter facts. If his research is legit, that's the story and that's where you should hang your hat.

      Comments here have no relevance to the actual work being done. Look, if there were no comments, Meldrum would have folk with pitchforks surrounding his home. Instead, all the nuts are directed here to warble on. The system works. ;)

      Delete
    2. Could not agree more. What happens here in the world of bigfootology is the equivalent to a pimple on a dimple on a flea's left ball.

      Chuck

      Delete
    3. Isn't it amazing, if this sasquatch species really exists as it likely does it means they're so much smarter than all the world's skeptics and trolls combined. That's true cause for celebration.

      Delete
    4. lol David! let's hope from his lofty place the fog rolls beneath the view.... I have hopes. But, the attention prior to proof and some Public Policy of study and/or legal protection feels vaguely scary on a few levels, especially given this climate of
      race to prove.
      But, yes to this reported study, YES.
      And after that? Well perhaps we can settle down to understanding and associated study rather than getting that "million dollar shot."

      Delete
    5. Yes, somebody please get that "million dollar shot" so we can move on from the petty cheapshots, withholding potential evidence, and ridiculous in-fighting. Oh but, I'M NOT doing this for the money! (but they are, and he is, and she is, and they are.... )

      Delete
  14. I find myself being cautious because of claims made by people in the past.
    I don't want to hear "I heard it from a friend who told two friends, and so on".
    If anybody can provide a link, or links that can verify this story then I'll consider it as a serious endeavor by these scientists.
    I keep hearing "soon, very soon, sooner than later" in my head.
    In the words of Dubya- "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, can't get fooled again".

    I never liked Bush but that line still makes me laugh.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sasquai, I heard about Dr. Sykes from a conversation with Dr. Meldrum at the Primal People Conference, but it didn't sound like fully-public knowledge. Public enough to share a little with "some dude" at a conference. An interesting prospect, to be sure.
      David from the PAC/NW

      Delete
    2. I always respect what you have to say David, but it would be nice if this story could be confirmed, that's all I'm saying.
      If it is true then it certainly is very interesting.

      Delete
    3. David and SN...I was there at the conference too. I think it was "leaked" (OMG not that AGAIN!!) but confirmed kind of covertly. Now, it seems the cat's out of the bag so to speak. Or the BF DNA I guess, in this case. :)

      (SN - nice to see you here again...!)

      Delete
    4. I totally understand. Hard to hang your hat on much, these days. Here's to hoping...
      David from the PAC/NW

      Delete
    5. It's always a pleasure to see you too SasGirl.

      Delete
    6. Sidebar for SN - You don't have give Bush credit for that one any longer. It's an Italian proverb from the 1600s.

      Delete
    7. Leaked? LOL....it is on Bigfootology now, and sounding well received....nice to see you all here as well..hard to find you in 128 comments! Which is good, I think?!

      Delete
  15. Dr Anna Belarus has been working with Tom Biscardi in England on a pilot for Sky-Fy channel since December of last year (Tom submitted many samples to Ketchem). Dr Sykes writing a book. Talk about putting the cart before the horse. Screw the research, just cash in.

    Meldrum involved no longer seems credible to me. There is a money pit people have mined for years. That seems to be the only goal now.

    All I do is walk in the woods and I'm hated for that.

    Keep in mind folks, not all hoaxes are as crude as a frozen monkey suit. Many come under the guise of science. Buyer beware.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Been hoaxing any lately? You have at "LEAST" two under your belt at the moment. When are you planning on gracing us with the 3rd?

      "All I do is walk the woods" and try to hoax people.

      Are you seriously pouting about people calling you on your hoaxes? Strange.......

      Delete
    2. What are the hoaxes. Just simply name them. You can't because there are none. Unlike Biscardi, Standing, Timbergiantbigfoot. Ivan Marx and others that are known for specific hoaxes, nobody can point to any hoaxed videos by me. Just name one.

      The publisher of this blog and I talk all the time on the phone. He says he would do a post about my hoax but he can't find it. Perhaps you should educate him. I have never hoaxed a damn thing and i am challenging you anons to PROVE IT OR SHUT UP.

      Delete
    3. I think you will be proven correct. Seems like they learned from the Ketchum debacle, and are not claiming they will "prove the existence of bigfoot in a credited journal". Nope. Bigfoot is a given this time and its straight to the bookshelf and telly.

      Delete
    4. Here you go, Shawn.

      Post away....

      The Palmetto Monster


      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RL1_Od3-Nww

      Delete
    5. I shouldn't have to tell you which ones were FOR SURE hoaxes. However, I guess I am in an exchange with the guy who "criticized himself" on a blog. Talk about strange, shewwww, thats taking it to a whole new level. There's only two I'm positive of but I'd wager there's more and not think twice about it. Does the Chimp pic ring a bell Mr. "I was just testing people"? The other for sure one is actually a hoax/frame job. You know all about it Mr. "For the record I didn't see what Damian saw". That frame job was so obvious that Forest Gump could've seen the transparency. You're a terrible "actor".

      Delete
    6. I'll correct myself above. It was a bonobo and not a chimp but the hoax still rings true regardless.

      Delete
    7. "All I do is walk in the woods and I'm hated for that." This is what you said Tim.
      First of all, I don't hate you, but you've done and said things in the past that have upset quite a few people. You have associated yourself with a known hoaxer, and in my opinion, a liar.
      It's because of your past behavior that's getting you flack.
      I agree that there are many hoaxers out there, but we can't truly call them hoaxers unless they are proven to be hoaxers. Some of them are quite slick so I understand why you get upset.
      If you're truly interested in finding what you seek, be the smarter person and ignore the hoaxers, money grabbers etc.

      Delete
    8. Yes, please post away. In June 2009 when I had about 150 subs and had not had a comment in days, I posted a seven minute video in which I posted a photo on the very end of a Photoshop image of a burnt tree that looked like Bigfoot. The video got 64 views on a slow weekend. According to YouTube stats 98% of the people that watched the vid ever made it to the end. The video was up for about 36 hours. I did it to see if anyone was paying attention. At no time on the video did I ever mention it or claim I was videotaping a Skunkape. It was a Easter egg I put at the end.

      On Tim Stover radio show the next month I explained how my feelings were hurt about not getting comments. That was 2009.

      I put photos on my taxi blog all the time that shows Bigfoot standing between Yellow cabs at Tampa airport. It is all meant as a goof. Sorry, you will need to try harder.

      Palmetto was not a hoax when only 10 people saw it. Unfortunately Melissa Hovey's right hand man Tobby Toleman saw it and he tried to crush me with his troll blog

      Gee, a photo 10 people saw 3 years ago, wow. That is the hoax of the century. Was CNN covering it.

      If that is all you got on me? I rest my case.

      Delete
    9. Sorry, Tim, you asked for this.

      Definition of a hoax:

      hoax (hks)
      n.
      1. An act intended to deceive or trick.
      2. Something that has been established or accepted by fraudulent means.
      tr.v. hoaxed, hoax·ing, hoax·es
      To deceive or cheat by using a hoax.

      Explain the Bigfootbuster blog then.

      :)

      That's 2 hoaxes so far... any more out there?

      Delete
    10. "Burnt tree". Lmao, why are you even lying about that as well. Its clearly the widely known bonobo pic. Furthermore, a hoax isn't defined by "how many" people saw it. A hoax is an intentional attempt to deceive people, period, and that's what you did. You're only sorry now because you got caught. The gig is up Fasano, you are FOREVER going to be known as a HOAXER just like your boy Dyer, thick as thieves you two. I rest MY case. Yours has been blown out of the water, hoaxers. Now, back to your Pareidolia blobsquatching routine.

      Delete
    11. Was not a hoax because only 10 people saw it? An admitted hoax, but it doesn't 'count' and shouldn't harm your credibility?

      Had a low sub and viewer count, so you deliberately set up a hoax to boost those numbers. You've just admitted your search is not for a swamp-ape, but YouTube money. FAIL.

      Delete
    12. I might watch your videos if they weren't half filled with close-ups of your ugly, yapping mug.

      Delete
    13. There was no intent to device because the image was not congruent to the video it was attached too. It was only to who was paying attention. Going on Blogtalk radio 3 days later and talking about it only because Toleman and the insane BFresearchSE were blocked and crying like bitches does not make a hoax. Seriously, is this all you got on me? It sounds like 2008!

      Delete
    14. Fatsino you are an ugly fat bastard. And a horrible bigfoot hoaxer. Your mother must be real proud of your inbred ass. You and your buddies dyer and snowpacker are the biggest looser hoaxers around. You cheeto eating piggy. Try showing yourself at a respected bigfoot event and see how quick they play a game of smash the ugly pig

      Delete
    15. Again, the Bigfootbuster blog was a HOAX.

      Scroll up and read the definition of the word again, plz.

      Explain your reasons for that HOAX.

      Thanks.

      Delete
    16. Tim Fatsino:
      Hey Broski, im a fat ugly bigfoot hoaxer. I play find the salami with rick dyer and his gay brother for fun. I cant find a damn thing better to do than take pictures of people in monkey suits and rag on an old crone named Melissa Hovey. I have no balls so i have to go after the smallest people in the bigfoot field. But hey im the great FATSINO, i can do anything

      Delete
    17. Don't talk so brazenly about others Tim when you associate yourself with that Dyer dude, funny you don't see the irony in that.

      Delete
    18. Ah hahahaha. Was there EVER any doubt about his credibility? Tim Fatsano is a giant waste of space. Just look at that slob, you can tell he's a couple short of a six-pack just by looking in his eyes. He's an extremely troubled individual and just another example of the ever growing number of hacks trying to gain popularity in this field by posting Pareidolia induced blobsquatches AND hoaxes. He's NEVER brought ANYTHING credible to this field, EVER. Pareidolia induced blobsquatches do NOT count as credible evidence; sorry guys, that's just the cold hard TRUTH. NOBODY should give blobsquatches 2 minutes of their time, it's POINTLESS. The "so-called researchers" out there (you know the list is long but not very distinguished) who rely on scanning the woods and then analyzing the footage looking for shadows, branches, leaves, bushes, tree's that could be mistaken for Sasquatch are a COMPLETE joke. That is NOT "research", that IS the equivalent of walking oitside and looking into the clouds to see what kind of animals/faces you can make out. What a monumental waste of time for EVERY serious person in this field, be it researchers or bystanders. STOP watching their garbage and they'll go AWAY. They're a mockery of serious researchers and do NOTHING but SET THIS FIELD years and years with their "crap".

      Delete
  16. I meant Dr Nekaris & Sci-fi Channel. Damn this android with small keyboard.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tim, where are you researching? The Hillsborough River State Park?

      Delete
    2. Yes. We have trail cams all over the park and have great images of RV and tent campers. Plus, we got hikers, scouts, Brownies park rangers and Damian Bravo. How did you know?

      Delete
    3. I upset people because I called timber & Ketcum hoaxers over a year ago. Nothing since then has shown me wrong. In fact, many on this blog have underscored what I said. It seems I am not alone.

      Delete
    4. I was just wondering if that was the location, as I know there have been sightings there before. I've done some small searches there myself, but its a big park! I've seen almost every kind of animal there except for panthers, bears, and bigfoot of course. Best of luck on your future investigations there.

      Delete
    5. Sorry, I thought you were a troll. The entire Hillsborough River complex is the actual west florida flood plane zone. The army corporation of engineers channeled the area after hurricane donna in 1961 to force water into the area. With storm srason coming up, kevin and I have loaded the area with cams

      Our theory is that a swamp ape will move into a swamp when it fills with water. We think we know what we are doing.

      Delete
    6. Does Bigfoot Busters ring a bell Tim? That was less than a year ago. Hanging out with the biggest hoaxer of them all, and he's a liar to boot. I know that hoaxing is lying, I'm referring to his out right lies by verbal means.
      If you believe TGBF and Ketchum are hoaxers, go out and prove it, or at least show good evidence that might cause a listener/reader to agree with your opinions.

      Delete
    7. "Kevin and I have loaded the area with cams." Are you simply incapable of telling the truth? You've put up two that you visit every other day. Nothing like contaminating the area.

      Delete
    8. You must be new
      Bigfoot Busters was a blog in 2009 by Toby Toleman who was attacking Tim Stover and I. My version was to give him a taste of his own medicine.

      You need to get your facts straight pal. Oh, just what was my great hoax? I am at a loss.

      Delete
    9. Try harder. I believe in you. There is hope. In fact, kevin and I will be out tomorrow and we just might record meawaa, seeaawa, jerawaa, or how ever it goes from your group. I know who you are mehawaa

      Delete
    10. Dude, you are chum in shark infested waters now and forever after. You should've never hoaxers people. Now you're a joke, well, not that you weren't before with all of your Pareidolia induced blobsquatches, its just that now you're an OBVIOUS hoaxer, you're never going to be taken seriously. A washed up joke.

      Delete
    11. Again, name the hoax. You can't. It sucks to be you

      Delete
    12. Same to you Broski (cheer for the packers Browski) where's the hoax. Didn't I see you in the woods last week?

      Delete
    13. Oh and I do not know or care if your a hoaxer or not. Not really a concern in my life and if your not so be it just let your evidence speak for you.

      What annoys me is you act like you know it all! You constantly have to include your 2 cents and if anyone really honestly cared about your videos or your knowledge believe me you would "cash in" just as quick.

      Another thing! You say Meldrum is no longer credible to you. Is it out of jealousy because nobody calls him a hoaxer? Is it out of frustration because someone offered him a financial opportunity to do what he enjoys? What is it?

      Delete
    14. Cheer for the Packers? Kind of lost me on that one. I never called you a hoaxer at all and really have not looked at many of your photos because you associate yourself with a very well known hoaxer. I mean you are the friends you keep.

      You may have seen me in the woods last week if you were in California. I believe you are in Florida where things go to die.

      Delete
    15. I spent four hours in the woods last memorial day. Have not seen him since. Have not spoken on the phone since last year. Not much company here pal.you will have to try harder to cast me as something i am not. I am somebody you can't be. I work in the field and have three years of vids unedited. You have nothing. That is what you are ..
      Nothing.

      Delete
    16. Yeah TIM I wake up every morning next to a beautiful women, take my lab for a run, go to a great job which has allowed me to own property in CA, a rocks throw from Yellowstone, and on the Oregon/CA border, get off work and donate my time to coach High School Baseball, all the while wondering how can I be more successful in Fasanos eyes.

      The only reason I care about Bigfoot is to find out what made this horrific sound and killed a Bull on my dads land when I was a kid.

      Believe me bro its not to have 3 years of unedited footage and have nothing to show for it. (Like 100% proof)

      Now be a big boy and explain why your hating on Meldrum? A guys hand I shook and seems like a genuine man to me.

      Delete
    17. Sorry, misunderstanding. I love Dr Meldrun and respect him. His kindness is the flaw. If circumstances were that he came to florida to examine some of my claims, I would say that lacked credibility, considering what is commenly said about me. That is what I meant. Just because Jeff is working with you, that does not make YOU more reputable. Who you wake up too each morning is not relevant.

      Delete
    18. Fasano quote: "They're just jealous because they can't be me."

      Delete
    19. Ummmmmmm I think who I wake up to and what I do with my day is pretty relevant bro. Anyway time to watch my Lakers get spanked and go back to nothing.

      May Bigfoot bless you!

      Delete
    20. @anon 8:14 kind of like a grown up version of Cartman

      Delete
    21. Fatsino, how does it feel to be a fat ugly pig who will never be married, whos life ambition is to be rick dyers boy toy. Who has embarrassed his family and the few friends he once had. Who is a disgrace to america and mankind in general. Who thinks a real job is bigfoot hoaxing, eating doritos, and collectin foodstamps. Who has to grease the kitchen door just for your next fix of donuts.

      Delete
    22. You bet your ass 451's a troll.

      Delete
    23. Correct. A troll = anybody that doesn't blindly accept everything you pull out of your ass and call proof.

      Delete
    24. Incorrect. Troll= A punk, a person of low I.Q,; someone who is very narrow minded and still believes the world is flat. OR, someone who believes that they know everything about everything and everyone else is inferior to their intellect. Basically a nitwit who is laughed at, yet thinks that those people who are laughing are laughing with them, not at them. A great example of this can be found by a few people who repeatedly post profane, narrow minded, "know all" comments on this site.

      The truth

      Delete
    25. Ah hahahaha. Was there EVER any doubt about his credibility? Tim Fatsano is a giant waste of space. Just look at that slob, you can tell he's a couple short of a six-pack just by looking in his eyes. He's an extremely troubled individual and just another example of the ever growing number of hacks trying to gain popularity in this field by posting Pareidolia induced blobsquatches AND hoaxes. He's NEVER brought ANYTHING credible to this field, EVER. Pareidolia induced blobsquatches do NOT count as credible evidence; sorry guys, that's just the cold hard TRUTH. NOBODY should give blobsquatches 2 minutes of their time, it's POINTLESS. The "so-called researchers" out there (you know the list is long but not very distinguished) who rely on scanning the woods and then analyzing the footage looking for shadows, branches, leaves, bushes, tree's that could be mistaken for Sasquatch are a COMPLETE joke. That is NOT "research", that IS the equivalent of walking oitside and looking into the clouds to see what kind of animals/faces you can make out. What a monumental waste of time for EVERY serious person in this field, be it researchers or bystanders. STOP watching their garbage and they'll go AWAY. They're a mockery of serious researchers and do NOTHING but SET THIS FIELD years and years with their "crap".

      Delete
  17. I *FART* all over this horrendously contrived debacle.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Boy, if Anna is involved I would certainly be willing to let her take a dna sample from my Mongolian Death Worm.

    ReplyDelete
  19. If the issue with Ketchum is her *ahem*unique*ahem* perspective on religion and science, how is an organization run by Rhettman Mullis going to be any better? The guy's a fundamentalist Christian with no hard science in his background.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Science -Shmience. He said he is friends with bigfoots offspring and that is good enough for me!

      Delete
  20. Does any one else hear Danny Devito's voice when you read Tim's comments?

    ReplyDelete
  21. People going into the woods looking for a relic population of gigantopithecus is cool. Pseudo-science is lame. Not to mention boring and insulting. Adios.
    Tony

    ReplyDelete
  22. Why does it always circle back to Biscardi?

    ReplyDelete
  23. Why am I the only one with the courage to show themselves on this blog?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Believe me, I wish you wouldn't. What's your deal always sticking your face in the camera? Trust me, the only you're impressing is yourself.

      Delete
    2. I have found a new home. I am here to stay brother!

      Delete
    3. Wow Fatsino, your ugly and FAT!

      Delete
    4. It is you're not your, fat brain.

      Delete
    5. Ah hahahaha. Your credibility is up there with Bernie Madoff! Fatsano is a giant waste of space. Just look at that slob, you can tell he's a couple short of a six-pack just by looking in his eyes. He's an extremely troubled individual and just another example of the ever growing number of hacks trying to gain popularity in this field by posting Pareidolia induced blobsquatches AND hoaxes. He's NEVER brought ANYTHING credible to this field, EVER. Pareidolia induced blobsquatches do NOT count as credible evidence; sorry guys, that's just the cold hard TRUTH. NOBODY should give blobsquatches 2 minutes of their time, it's POINTLESS. The "so-called researchers" out there (you know the list is long but not very distinguished) who rely on scanning the woods and then analyzing the footage looking for shadows, branches, leaves, bushes, tree's that could be mistaken for Sasquatch are a COMPLETE joke. That is NOT "research", that IS the equivalent of walking oitside and looking into the clouds to see what kind of animals/faces you can make out. What a monumental waste of time for EVERY serious person in this field, be it researchers or bystanders. STOP watching their garbage and they'll go AWAY. They're a mockery of serious researchers and do NOTHING but SET THIS FIELD years and years with their "crap".

      Delete
  24. Tiim Fatsino you ugly fat pig. You are the biggest dbag known to man. Why dont you and rick dyer go back to the inbred factory where you came from

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You need to up your insult game. This is repetitive and boring. Find an Aussie pissing contest for some pointers. Here's a good example for you: Fasano, I wouldn't do you the favor of pissing in your mouth if your tonsils were on fire.

      Delete
  25. Shawn at this site is deleting any comment that makes him look bad or that is attacking rick dyer and his cronies. Yet hes leaving up every inappropriate comment about any other researcher. Keep deleting comments shawn and ill make it a full time job for you to delete comments telling the world what your doing and how much of scum you and your friends are. Comign from more IP addresses than you can possibly imagine.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. you are quite possible more stupid than anyone else on this blog, and that's sayin something

      Delete
    2. What anon 9:50PM says. And BTW it's well within Shawn's right to delete ANY comment he wants - it's his site. To our benefit it's a free site - no one is forced to read or post nor are we charged to do so. Likewise, if you think it sucks, start your own BF news site - it's not like this is the only one. There are a lot of choices for you that do not require malice.

      There are also programs that allow a site owner to ban entire banks of IP addresses. So unless you are planning to make significant geographic moves, you are still sol. Now a good hacker might be able to circumvent these programs, but a good hacker doesn't announce his intentions to Earth like you did.

      And just saying you intend to commit malice and intentionally spam a Bigfoot blog (of all things), well if you are not quite stupid, then you are certainly mentally ill. Seek immediate medical attention.

      Delete
  26. I have emailed Bryan Sykes to confirm his involvement. There are lies, damned lies, and then there is BlurFoot and Blogsquatch gossip.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Everyone can relax the narcissistic windbag is on the case!

      Delete
    2. John, I would be interested in his reply... I know you don't shy away from following up on claims like these, so please share. Thanks! :)
      David from the PAC/NW

      Delete
  27. Hi Tim, good to see a real celeb on here. I've heard rumours there is a secret video of the big woman and the little woman (in bikinis) as featured on this fine site. Can you shed any light on this rumour? I love this site by the way...apart from there is too much stuff posted about bigfoot and not enough about the big woman and little woman (in bikinis). Just my opinion.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The short girl reminds me of Mila Kunis.

      Delete
  28. Tim Fatsino you are a horrendous crap stain in the pants of rick dyer. Ugliness has no cure. I guess you could work off the fat but that will never happen.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Generally speaking, people who immediately resort to using profanity or attacking someone personally are low IQ. I also find it very amusing to see where some of you are still complaining about how people are getting ripped off by paying to go on the BFRO expeditions. Get a life!! If someone wants to throw down their own money to do something, who is it to you? I am sure that you have paid to watch a movie, go to a ballgame, etc. (Maybe not based on some of your comments) But my point is this; entertainment is what it is. If I want to shell out $150.00 to see the Steelers play, what am I getting in return? Answer: Absolutely nothing other than the entertainment aspect. No different with a BFRO expedition. Unless I have missed some fine print that is guaranteeing a run-in with a bigfoot when you go, these people realize that they probably will not see or hear anything out of the ordinary.

    If you hate the subject of Sasquatch so much, if all people who acknowledge the existence of sasquatch are idiots, if you are so much more of an intellictual giant than the rest of us, then why pray tell do you "critical thinkers=aka: boobs" visit this site on a daily basis to run down people we enjoy reading about.

    I assure you that the majority of us who visit this site enjoy MM articles, like hearing about what FB/FB has to say, etc. So, you and the rest of your "smart", "intellectually superior" friends should go back to the JREF Forum where you were probably banned from for being to open minded.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You constantly criticize "Anons", Blondie, and here you are posting as one ... tsk tsk. I am a skeptic and I love the subject of sasquatch. I also enjoy MM articles and reading FB/FB. As a critical thinker with an open mind, I also enjoy the articles posted by Tom, Vicki, and TeamTazerBigfoot. I think most skeptics here would be very excited to have BF proven as a species. Open your mind and grow a sense of humor, because this blog has it all. If you can't, there are well-established "serious" blogs and forums for you.

      Delete
    2. Thanks for enlightening us all tim! Or is this dyer, or snowpacker? Or maybe shawn? We all know that when attacked you always come to the defense of yourselves under the anon name. Please please throw more wisdom our way about how great the BFRO is and how cool the bigfoot hoaxers are.

      Delete
  30. http://www.complaintsboard.com/complaints/dna-diagnostics-dba-shelterwood-laboratories-timpson-texas-c344359.html (ketchum's BBB fraud listings- she has had two years to clean up that record!!)

    and as for Meldrum, we all wondered how he would figure out a way to chase Ketchum's DNA publicity train.

    If he was truly interested in DNA BEFORE Ketchum arrived on the scene, where was Meldrum's interest back then?? Where ever publicity is being generated, you'll find Meldrum riding the charge horse.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Meldrum a publicity hound? I've never seen anybody accuse him of that before...

      Delete
  31. Say what you want about Meldrum (I don't agree with every thought or theory he has either) but one thing about him is that I've NEVER witnessed him trying to construe evidence to support his theories or claims. What I mean is: when and if he's wrong about something, you can just about guarantee he genuinely believes what he's saying. There are very little of those people in this field and its refreshing to have a "straight shooter" speak his mind on the subject.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Dr. Steven Hawkings? I don't know who that is, but Steven Hawking (no s) - the physicist- is not a Dr., but has a lot of other pieces of education. If this is the type of scientific background we are dealing with then this will be added to the list of fraudulent research attempts.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dr. Bryan Sykes, MA PhD DCs, was a Professor at Oxford University (now Ameritus) and sits as Chair of their Human Genetics Program. He has published many groundbreaking papers and books in his field. No credibility issues here...
      Let's hope this study evolves into something interesting. :)
      David from the PAC/NW

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story