M.K. Davis Releases Extended Version of White Bigfoot Clip To Prove It's Not a Bicyclist, Still Unsure Where the Squeaking Noise Is Coming From


Here's the full view of the purported white Bigfoot footage that M.K. Davis has been reviewing. This is to take a look at the "mechanics of the walk, and also clear the air about it riding a bicycle."

So far, there's no word if he is planning to replace his squeaky chair however...

Comments

  1. you do good work my friend keep it up enjoy it

    ReplyDelete
  2. He's right...it's not a bicycle. He's on an all-terrain unicycle!
    Seriously though, pretty cool stuff. Anxious to see more.

    ReplyDelete
  3. seriously, heres a tip, show the full clip with no edits in normal speed no zoom FIRST, then talk about it for aslong as you want

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes! This. In clip at the end uninterrupted is the best. Keep up the good work. Love the break downs

      Delete
    2. I was going to say the same thing.I prefer to see the full clip,unedited and no commentary. I don't care if the video is an hour long, I like to analyse as I watch it.
      If a person wants to offer their own analysis afterwards, I'm fine with it.
      I do appreciate M.K. sharing additional footage though.

      Delete
  4. Must be a hot day. Bigfoot has unzipped his white hair jacket.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Right, I think he's wearing a blue tshirt and a baseball cap too.

      Delete
  5. People-this is my Uncle who wears his white suit with a black Harley-Davidson Bikers for Christ t-shirt. He's a big fella', and I'm certain this is him.

    ReplyDelete
  6. He wears this 2 piece white linen suit everywhere-Even when going out into the country. You can see his black t-shirt through his white jacket. thats my Uncle you guys. I've emailed him to see if he can identify this area and what he was doing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your uncle is a natty dresser with sweet 80's style shoulder pads. That's hot.

      Delete
  7. If this a fake then good job to whoever did it. If its just a guy walking in a forest that got caught on video by accident he should go a doctor and get checked out something must be wrong with him if hes walking like that. lol Great video and kinda creepy.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Why does anyone think that this cannot be a human?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's human alright. Sub-human. That's the real deal folks: Silver Squatch, the rarest of the rare.

      Delete
    2. Silver squatch? Real deal? If you asked 100 people on the street what that is in the out of focus blur, 100 out of 100 would say it's a human (unless of course you're a subjective bigfoot believer, then everything is a real deal squatch).

      Delete
    3. Ya dude, your right, except we don't give a fuck what you think. Bug out already.

      Delete
  9. Examine the clip in full-motion at 5:20 without all the stopping and starting, reversing and forwarding. Click on the button to expand full-screen. The subject is obviously gliding along, bouncing up and down just slightly because it's a trail. Pay particular attention to the last few feet it travels before it disappears as there are no branches obscurring it at all like when it first appears.

    There is also no proof that this is not two different individuals as the first subject travels southwest straight out of view, then something, which seems to have dark colored legs or pants, appears traveling northwest. But this second figure is so obscurred it is next to impossible to tell what it is.

    A dark-colored backpack is clearly visible on the first sighting of this.

    But yes, I agree with Anon 1:52. If you're going to make these videos, show the unedited, uncropped footage in real-time first - preferably via digital upload please.

    ReplyDelete
  10. why show a video of a video??? duhhh

    ReplyDelete
  11. kill that white bigfoot, I want a body already!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes. Enough with the crap. It's high time for a body instead of more blurry asinine crap like this.

      Delete
  12. There is nothing that suggests "bigfoot"...it is a human.

    new anony

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes. That is far more likely than a white sasquatch on a unicycle.

      Delete
  13. These guys should do a breakdown on the Zupruder film. I'm sure they would identify all the shooters!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And they would also see the bigfoot in the grassy knoll.

      Delete
    2. MK did a Zapruder breakdown. It's on his website.

      Delete
  14. Please buy some software and quit video taping the monitor with a camera. So ghetto.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I seen one. Tweren't white though, he was a greenish brown color and tall as the low branches on a knotty pine. I figure upwards of 15 feet. He left tracks as big as the imprint my ottoman makes on my shag rug when I lift it so's the wife can vacuum. I got pitchers of the whole thing, the prints I mean, and a pretty clear pitcher of the fellar walking away at a high rate of speed.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Wow his arms are massive and upper body.Seeing that in the woods would be terrifying.Even if these guys are gentle i dont think i would stick around to find out.Nice breakdown MK. matt

    ReplyDelete
  17. BTW, the "beep" sound you hear in some of his videos is not a squeaky chair, it's a bird - probably an african grey parrot. I should know, I live with one that does the same thing. It let out a whistle in one of his other videos.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Hmmm...watching it in full screen trying to focus on the front looking for a moving wheel, the first impression was an ATV. It's so hard to tell what the legs are doing, whether they are actually moving up and down, or is it just uneven terrain making it look that way.

    ReplyDelete
  19. COOL!!!

    So, it's not some guy on a bike riding through somebody else's property!!

    It's some guy running through the property!!!

    AWESOME!!!

    Still just a guy...

    Thanks for the video though, Mr. Davis. The work you do is much appreciated.

    ReplyDelete
  20. WHY THE FUCK DOES THIS GUY FILM A SCREEN???
    UPLOAD AN ACTUAL CLIP DAMN IT!!!

    ReplyDelete
  21. I'm impressed. For one of the first times in the BF carnival, these vids have my attention. I truly think if this location is a habitat for these beings, then this is how you'd capture them on film, unlike Matt Moneymaker trudging into the woods with screaming baby dolls and torches. The gait makes sense to me when out in the open. We're talking about a white creature that is tall. It's a real beacon out in the open. You learn to either gallop on all four, or crouch walk or run like hell in tall grasses. The bent-knee walk is just like Patty and that would almost validate the Patterson-Gimlin film. I just freaking appreciate that MK is explaining stuff, focusing on our concerns as viewers looking for explanations. I hope he keeps more coming. I am enthralled at this point.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. How many pints of ice cream did you inhale before you came to that very astute opinion?

      Delete
    2. I agree, Autumn! This seems like the real deal to me. They are often reported as moving with a bent knee and appearing to "glide", just as this fella does. Also, notice the extremely large torso and no neck. Sound familiar?

      Delete
    3. I agree Autumn. The Peanut Gallery in the bigfoot world is never satisfied and always more wiser than those who specialize and present in their respective areas of expertise. This field is full of a bunch of people who demand proof just they can bitch and attempt to impart their wisdom (or lack thereof) as would-be scientists or better yet...cryptozoologist (LMAO).

      Delete
  22. It still looks like it could be a guy on a bicycle. You can't see it as readily when it's constantly edited to show the motion back and forth back and forth.

    What the heck. This clip is so blurry that you can't make out what it is. This clip is so inconclusive that it's entirely irrelevant. Those who believe in bigfoot's existence and want to make it a bigfoot will argue that it's a bigfoot. Those who doubt the existence of bigfoot will argue that it's a human in the footage.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You're right. Even if it's compelling, it's still just more blurry footage, not proof of anything.

      Delete
  23. Since when does bigfoot wear an unzipped jacket?

    ReplyDelete
  24. Let's forget just for a minute whether it's a guy on a bike or a guy walking through the woods or an actual bigfoot here. Here's what just does not make sense about this whole situation: Why on earth would someone go through all the trouble of filming this area with multiple cameras for such a length of time believing there was some sort of bigfoot or extraordinary activity going on, and then sit on the footage for so long? Were they watching TV one day and all of a sudden recalled, "Hey, remember that bigfoot footage we captured ten years ago? Let's get someone to check that out for us."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is a link debunking that footage back in 2006. As Shawn says, "Draw your own conclusion."

      http://www.network54.com/Forum/23217/message/1161998332/More+about+the+hoaxed+video

      Delete
    2. Yes. It's another example of someone taking some footage and then later trying to make bigfoot out of it.

      Delete
  25. I agree that in THIS clip the guy is not on a bike. The leg movements and posture are not anywhere near what they have been in the other clips though. The things that still bug me are:
    1.the distance from the subject. Even with multiple clips, same blobsquatch distance. As the subject gets to where it might get closer, flips direction and walks away.
    2. The color. Just doesn't seem right.
    3. The plausible back story that has been floating around about the origin of the clips.
    4. The editing too. MK can figure out Photoshop, but not screen capturing?

    ReplyDelete
  26. "This is a link debunking that footage back in 2006. As Shawn says, "Draw your own conclusion."

    http://www.network54.com/Forum/23217/message/1161998332/More+about+the+hoaxed+video"

    Apart from the mention of a white bigfoot in the post you linked to how do we know this is the same footage, there are no links to video to validate they are one and the same and as far as I am aware M K Davis does not mention who or where they are from.

    ReplyDelete
  27. I don't know about the bike, but there does appear to be something dark on it's back and the dark object seems to move with the subject.
    The thing that makes seeing it so difficult is that MK Davis only lets us see what he wants us to see. I see that as a major red flag.
    He needs to jog it back and forth, like he did with the cow video. Better yet, why doesn't he just post each video on it's own and let everyone else decide. That would be the most objective thing to do.

    Perhaps there are slaughtered Bigfoots in the video and he doesn't want us to see them. Bigfoot carnage everywhere.

    ReplyDelete
  28. ye,still guy on a bike. another hoaxed effort from this man. sits alongside his little white pony one!
    i would say its clever but still aboax.
    is it an americn thing to miss spell things so much. whats a bicyclist? We have cyclists in UK,also the color grey is grey,not gray! hmm,curious I even spelt colour color for Americans sake.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Howdy! I could have sworn I've been to this blog before but after reading through some of the post I realized it's new to me.
    Anyhow, I'm definitely delighted I found it and I'll be
    book-marking and checking back frequently!

    My web-site :: vakantiehuisje frankrijk huren

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?