This Is Why Randy Brisson Is The Best Sasquatch Hair Snatcher Ever
A few days ago, Canadian Bigfoot researcher Randy Brisson posted this Sasquatch hair sample photo on Facebook and added this comment: "And some say there is no Sasquatch Hair, Well I saw the Sasquatch leave this Hair on a branch, Proof is in the Bag."
Brisson is well-known for his involvement in the Erickson Project and has sent multiple hair samples to Dr. Melba Ketchum for the Bigfoot DNA project.
What's Randy's secret and how did he get these hair samples from Bigfoot? We're not sure, but it's probably the same way scientists have been using hair traps with barbs wires to snag hairs from elusive animals such as the wolverine and grizzly.
Here are some of the hair samples Brisson sent to Dr. Ketchum:
 |
| Bigfoot hair from the Erickson Project gathered in Canada in 2008. |
 |
| Bigfoot hair from British Colombia via Randy Brisson. |
 |
| Bigfoot hair from Golden Ears Provincial Park, British Columbia. |
Watch how scientists snag hair samples from elusive creatures:
Connecting with Carnivores from Science Learning Network - NPS on Vimeo.
Neat? Now catch one.
ReplyDeleteEver stop to think that Bigfoots are smarter than human? They avoid humans at all cost, that sound pretty smart to me, LOL
DeleteI gotta say -- smart guy. Who'd have thunk it - Bigfoot fly tape? Tree sap like that scene in "Christmas Vacation" with Clark and the magazine... However he does it, I'm glad to see people thinking outside the box a bit. There is nothing more easily recoverable than footprints and hair. Good boy!
ReplyDeleteHe's also one of the best rock throwing hoaxers ever. Oh and nice hoaxed bigfoot head picture as well. Randy's credibility is zilch.
ReplyDeleteIf you are standing there as the bigfoot leaves the hair, and close enough to see this happen, why not take a picture or video? Why not tranquilize him?
ReplyDeleteIf it was dark the flash might have spooked the animal into getting violent. And not everyone has access to tranquilizers, and it wouldn't be easy to dose correctly. It also takes a few minutes to take effect and by then the animal could be long gone and/or act violently first. Any traumatizing experience may mean the end of visitations from them, so it would be more wise to wait to do such a thing.
DeleteExcuses are like assholes...
DeleteDoes seem like for every announced bit of evidence there is some kind of "disqualifier". I mean come on, if these samples came from a known site of visitation from some creature, then would not a (cough) "researcher" pull out all the tools at once? For example, film traps surrounding said hair and dna collection devices, while Bocephus sits high above in a balloon whooping, ever at the ready to shoot a tracking device? I'm sorry, I would really like to believe, but a lot of these people out there looking for evidence just seem....retarded. I'm sure mainstream media's push for entertaining shows has something to do with it, but jesus h. christ some of these people need to take some night classes to increase their ability for rational thought.
DeleteBrisson is a proven hoaxer. Do you people even pay attention to the players in Bigfootery.
ReplyDeleteWhat I pay attention to is every time anyone presents any evidence, they are immediately called a hoaxer.
ReplyDeleteThose who shout "hoax" for every incident are as narrow minded as those who shout that every shadow or strange noise is a sasquatch. There is absolutely no difference between the two.
Regardless of whether this man has "hoaxed" or not in the past; if he is sending these alleged sasqautch hairs to any DNA lab, they will be the ones to determine its authenticity. If the results are wrong then you can say "I told you so." If the results come back as unknow primate hair, then you can scream, "the lab is in on the hoax too", or "They are all a bunch of idiots......."
Isn't that the way you guys operate?
The cognitive dissonance, it is strong with this one.
Delete+1
DeleteYes, it is the way these guys operate.
I have to agree whole heartedly.
DeleteThe skeptics will scream hoax no matter what evidence is presented and no matter who it is. I dissaggree with any statement that says someone is a "proven" hoaxer because unless the person confesses or is caught in the act by a third party, there is no way to "prove" someone is a hoaxer.
I believe skeptics wear ignorance glasses similar to beer gogle glasses drunks wear, except their not drunk. Just arm chair skeptics who know nothing and think they know everything!
Chad W
If the bleevers ever presented any empirical evidence we wouldn't have to yell hoax. But the TRUTH of the matter is that EVERY time someone in footery claims to have the big piece of evidence, it turns out to be a hoax. Just like Ketchum's DNA malarky. She announced today on her FB page that she doesn't HAVE to be secretive, yet she chose to. There was a paper submitted that involved weaponizing diseases that didn't have a NDA on it. yet Bigfoot DNA does? What are the odds she claims intellectual property on her samples and requires fees to be paid to try and verify any "data" she claims to have?
DeleteIt's a con, and you people are all going to be suckered in by it. The paper will show modern human DNA, and she won't be able to give any evidence it isn't you or me. It won't be published by a quality journal. It's all a scam to separate you from your dollars.
I can't figure out why skeptics even read these blogs, if i didn't believe in something i wouldn't waste my time reading their stories just to bad mouth the comments. Just saying.
DeleteGood point Anonymous at 9:04pm.
DeleteBrisson wasn't labeled a hoaxer because those who caught him were skeptics - just the opposite as they believe in the existence of Bigfoot. Many of them must fund their own research, so they don't take kind to being invited to pay ferry fees to bring their vehicles to the mainland to have someone running a hoax on them. As far as anyone knows to date - none of Brisson's hair samples were found tied to a Bigfoot. Most of them appeared to be from someone's damn hairbrush! Right now the same sort of nonsense is being done by a man named Todd Standing. His story, like Brisson's also changes as time goes by. Like Brisson's, Standing's accounts of how he got his evidence doesn't hold up to scrutiny at a Keystone Cop level - let alone from a scientific level. If such antics are going to continue being embraced by those who romanticize the idea that every claim should be accepted without some level of skepticism, then one cannot expect the world at large to think anything other than this field is run by crackpots. Thomas Steenburg has gone on record as saying that "The Bigfoot field has become an asylum that is being run my the inmates".
DeleteThe statement he makes that he had seen what left the hair is what matters to me.
ReplyDelete1%
Sure, he may have hoaxed in the past, he doesn't do that anymore though. Since he's joined the Erickson team, he's discovered that the only way to prove that the Squatch exists is to be an honest researcher. I think this guy needs to be given another chance. He has the potential of being one of the top Bigfoot experts.
ReplyDelete*facepalm*
DeleteHardly worth the comment, but people that have ruined their own credibility, such as Brisson, Wallace, Marx, Fasano, Dyer, Standing, et.al. are doing it for attention - acclaim - money. Those core issues that drive their very being won't change. They will continue hoaxing because it gets them what they desire.
"..potential of being one of the top Bigfoot experts."?
I hate to think this post was made in all seriousness by a casual reader. Please let this be a post by SnowWalkerPrime!
R
He didn't hoax or fake evidence. One douche nozzle said he threw a rock at them and claimed is was a squatch. Big deal.
ReplyDeleteWhen you put it that way...yep, still sounds like a hoax.
DeleteAn entire group of people said he threw many rocks and was even seen doing it. There is a video of the incident. His photo of a Bigfoot has been proven to be a hoax. Go watch another episode of finding Bigfoot.
DeleteThat douche nozzle was a guy named Steenburg, and he is one of the most respected researchers in the field. Brisson would have to be reborn 10 times to match his credibility.
Deletehe can make a bigfoot weave-extension's for the soon to be announced sasquatch species! hey timmy FATsano, there's a new business for you timbo. instead of that cab you can make wigs for skunk-apes now get a-steppin, boy!!!!
ReplyDeleteI watched 'Assault of the Sasquatch' on Chiller last night and the hair on that Bigfoot was clearly longer and of a different texture than what Mr. Brisson shows.
ReplyDeleteJohn here, Listen, There never was any Hoaxing going on, Thats all talk from West Coast Sasquatch guys.
ReplyDeleteThey were trying to find his areas, They made up lies to make him look bad,They have nothing to show after years of Research, Check out there site, you will see the lies, They are in Golden Ears all the time, They dont tell you that, I am sure that these guys will be in the back trying to hide, Once the truth comes out, I would bet Money on it, John Brisson. Port Coquitlam, B.C.
I'm with u John. I'm a langley BC, resident myself, and I frequent the bc sasquatch forum as well. Seems to me there a lot of haters on their forum. They seem to stay in their own little bubble and cut down and ridicule new ideas and evidence. Hard to have conversations on that site.
DeleteKeep up the good work Brissons!
John- I understand he's your brother, but...he's a known hoaxer, no way around it. I'm sorry.
DeleteThanks, unfortunately it seems that happens about 98% of the time with Bigfooters. I just don't understand it.
ReplyDeleteI am beginning to notice that it seems the ones who are joining or being invited to join the Ericskon project are ones who have submitted evidence to Dr. Ketchum.
I can't help but wonder Do they all share successful lab reports/results in common? That seems to be a common thread.
If someone counters this post with it's all a hoax how does one know it's a hoax is my question.
They don't know. It's just a knee-jerk reaction. Everything that is published by a group other than their own is a hoax. It's just part of being in this dysfunctional bigfoot "community."
DeleteBecause Bigfoot isn't real..... That's why it's a hoax.
DeleteI read recently that the scientific community discoveries atleast 10 different species of animal every year. Recently, a large ape was discovered. A type of deer was discovered that was thought to be a myth. Well, according to most of the people who comment on this page, I guess that those people were lying then, and are now in on an elaborate hoax too.
DeleteWhen the rumors of these animals were only talked about with circumstantial evidence, the sad faced naysayers were saying, "Not real", "hoax", "tom-foolery". Now they are saying, "lies", "bad-science", "gossip magazine journals", etc.
You sad faced skeptics have lost ALL credibility. If The president held a prime time news conference to announce the existence of sasquatch, you would moan"liar...hoaxer....dummy...simpleton"
Regardless of ANY evidence presented, you will always snort that everything everywhere is a hoax and you are the center of all knowledge.
Education leads to open-mindedness.
I appreciate the post at 6:55pm. Thank you. Your words are so true. Education is the key.
ReplyDeleteAs mentioned above, Brisson is a proven hoaxer.
ReplyDelete