Newly Found Stone Age People Discovered To Have Lived 11,000 Years Ago


Scientists have recently unearthed fossils of a new species of Stone Age men called "Red Deer Cave People", who lived in southwest China some 14,500 to 11,500 years ago. They say this is a significant find because it represents a new species of human. Until now, no hominid remains younger than 100,000 years old have been found in mainland East Asia resembling any other species than our own.

Here are some interesting facts about these prehistoric humans:

  • Skulls are an unusual mosaic of primitive, modern and unique features -- "like nothing we've seen before".
  • They have rounded brain cases with prominent brow ridges, flat but short faces with a broad nose, jutting jaws that lack a human chin.
  • Their brains are moderate in size with modern-looking frontal lobes but primitive short parietal lobes.
  • They have large molar teeth.
  • Lived in areas with a lot of sunlight and ultraviolet radiation, they were likely dark-skinned.
  • They clearly had a taste for venison, with evidence they hunted and cooked these large deer in the cave.
  • These people may represent an entirely new evolutionary line on the human family tree.
  • They look very different to all modern humans, whether alive today or in Africa 150,000 years ago.


Here's the story from Fox News written By Jennifer Viegas:
A newly found Stone Age people featured darker skin, an unusual mix of primitive and modern features and had a strong taste for venison.

Fossils of the so-called "Red Deer Cave People" were unearthed in southwest China and may represent a new species of human.

The fossils from two caves, date to just 14,500 to 11,500 years ago. Until now, no hominid remains younger than 100,000 years old have been found in mainland East Asia resembling any other species than our own.

"We have discovered a new population of prehistoric humans whose skulls are an unusual mosaic of primitive, modern and unique features -- like nothing we've seen before," said Darren Curnoe, associate professor in the School of Biological, Earth & Environmental Sciences at the University of New South Wales and lead author of a study about the find in the journal PLoS One.

"They have rounded brain cases with prominent brow ridges, flat but short faces with a broad nose, jutting jaws that lack a human chin, their brains are moderate in size with modern-looking frontal lobes but primitive short parietal lobes, and they have large molar teeth," added Curnoe .

Since the prehistoric humans lived in areas with a lot of sunlight and ultraviolet radiation, they were likely dark-skinned.

Ji Xueping of the Yunnan Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology, Curnoe and their colleagues studied the fossils, which represent the remains of at least three individuals.

For now, the mysterious humans are being called the "Red Deer Cave people," since one of the caves where they were found is Maludong (meaning Red Deer Cave) and these individuals loved that animal.

"They clearly had a taste for venison, with evidence they hunted and cooked these large deer in the cave," Curnoe explained.

These people may represent an entirely new evolutionary line on the human family tree.

"First, their skulls are anatomically unique," he said. "They look very different to all modern humans, whether alive today or in Africa 150,000 years ago. And second, the very fact they persisted until almost 11,000 years ago when we know that very modern-looking people lived at the same time immediately to the east and south suggests they must have been isolated from them."

The isolation suggests that if the Red Deer Cave people did interbreed, they did so in a limited way. The nearby modern humans at this time were the last hunter-gatherers known to this region. They had just begun to make pottery for food storage and to gather rice. Both activities mark the first steps toward full-blown farming.

It is possible that the mysterious Stone Age people might represent a very early and previously unknown migration of modern humans out of Africa. This population may not have contributed genetically to living people.

"What the discovery shows is just how complicated, how interesting, human evolutionary history was in Asia right at the end of the Ice Age," Curnoe said.

"We had multiple populations living the area, probably representing different evolutionary lines: the Red Deer Cave people on the East Asian continent, Homo floresiensis (aka the "Hobbit" human) on the island of Flores in western Indonesia, and modern humans widely dispersed from northeast Asia to Australia.

He added, "This paints an amazing picture of diversity, one we had no clue about until the last decade. It's probably the tip of the iceberg of diversity, the opening of a new chapter in recent human evolution: the East Asian chapter."

Colin Groves, a professor in the School of Archaeology & Anthropology at the Australian National University, told Discovery News that the new humans "are clearly related to Homo sapiens in general, but if they differ absolutely, then by definition they are a different species."

"In the present case, one can envisage the stem that eventually gave rise to Homo sapiens emerging from Africa and spreading over much of tropical and subtropical Asia, perhaps never very numerous or widespread, and becoming divided into several isolated or semi-isolated populations; and when Homo sapiens later spread out of Africa, these earlier sapiens-like species disappeared, being out-competed with some interbreeding with Homo sapiens," Groves continued.

The people may be linked to the Skhul/Qafzeh people out of Israel and/or the equally mysterious Denisova people from Altai, Groves said. Curnoe and his team are now attempting to recover DNA from the samples, which could answer these and other questions.

Comments

  1. Awesome! Now this is my kind of mystery... Denisova, please. Now THAT would complicate things in the family tree. :)
    David from the PAC/NW

    ReplyDelete
  2. If you saw this fellow on the street, you may think: "He is kind of odd looking", but that is about it. He would draw some uncomfortable stares. People would think he was born with some kind of odd genetic malformation.

    new anonymous

    ReplyDelete
  3. Google search Aborigines and other peoples and you will see some not too different facial features in modern humans.

    http://acidcow.com/pics/14148-australian-aborigines-11-pics.html

    The range of human appearances is huge. Isolation frin other peoples and environmental influences are key.

    ReplyDelete
  4. There has been some discussion about early humans in Australia and China and they seem to have exchanged (Australoid) populations in ancient times. The Wadjak skulls in Java are somewhat in between the similar skulls and this skull shows some resem,blances. It is possibly a "Robust" aboriginal related via Wadjak man: also there are several older skulls in China which resemble the skull I saw while looking this up, especially in proflie. On the other hand, the cheekbones are not only unusually broasd, they are distinctive from the more modern type of broad cheekbones.

    Best Wishes, Dale D.

    ReplyDelete
  5. whos going to be the first nutter to claim these are alien hybrids

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I thought WE were the hybrids??? LOL
      But seriously, this is an awesome find!
      David from the PAC/NW

      Delete
  6. Does kinda look like Larry Surfaces model...or maybe just another dingy, dirty southern Ohio hillbilly with sideburns!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ohio doesn't have hillbillies, they come from WV, KY, TN. We do, however, have plenty of white trash.

      Delete
  7. That drawing looks like the guy just got his hair buzzed with electric clippers, and whats with the amish beard? I seriously doubt anyone looked like that 11,000 years ago, especially a different species of human.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I have to wonder: Is there any way the scientists can determine just how devoid of hair or covered with hair any of these ancient peoples were? I tend to think they are making an educated guess, and as time and studies progress, some of them might turn out to be fairly fuzzy, just like our forest friends...

    FWIW,

    Grant in Iowa

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I was wondering the same thing Grant. My guess would be that they are making an educated guess. Even with the skin tone.........sounds like an assumption. I guess dna will help, once they know the relation/ethnicity of the find.

      Great discovery though!

      Delete
    2. Of our own line, hairlessness (nudity?) was calculated by the genetic analysis of lice.

      Delete
  9. I-I-I-I.. wonda if dem red deers peoples be havin da big feets like dim ones dey be talkin bout on dat show bout findin bigfeets?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, I read the FoxNews headline, then proceeded directly to read the MSNBC article. Headline fail.
      David from the PAC/NW

      Delete
  10. It is a man in a monkey suit.

    ReplyDelete
  11. How long until some religious wackadoo comes on here telling us this is all a lie?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Right after some asshole brings up religion where it didn't need bring up
      ------------------dip-shit

      If religious people are wrong about what they belive, after-life, or lack there of will be the same for you and them.

      However, if the religiuos people are right and you are wrong,
      Well then, you have a hell of a problem!

      You just here looking to start shit you dense lib.

      Delete
    2. Also, as a religious person, I have absolutely no problem with this article. so what!

      And, I've seen a Bigfoot!

      Delete
    3. Aside from that the Bible supports "Giants" and other people as if they were the norm.

      And this only helps to debunk macro evolution, not support it. Why on earth would any "Religious wackadoo" speak out against it?

      Delete
  12. Exciting article, more in depth here:
    http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0031918

    ReplyDelete
  13. Looks like the dude that runs my local 711.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I just read this story on another website and immediately came here. It is an extremely interesting story that could lead to even more exciting DNA evidence!

    ReplyDelete
  15. looks sort of like an african man today...wonder if he has a pistol to LOL

    ReplyDelete
  16. 11,000 Years ago, nuthin'. I am 99% sure this guy was working on my uncle's farm in South Carolina in the 70s.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Amazing find. Have to admit when I saw the headline on TV (text) about a possible new human species discovered, I thought it was the Ketchum paper about the tall hairy species living among us today. Well, that one's coming so get ready for an even bigger headline there.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story