Is Sasquatch Responsible For The Legends Of Werewolves, Trolls, and Goblins?


Editor’s Note: This is a guest post by Damian Bravo, a Sasquatch believer. You can join Damian's group Sasquatch Lives? on Facebook and the group's official page at www.sasquatchlives.com.

During my search for answers of the existence of Sasquatch (Homo sapiens hirsutii), I wondered if this creature is responsible for the legends of werewolves, trolls, goblins and giants. We all know that Neanderthal did in fact exist and his demise lead the way for us Homo sapiens. But what if the existence of Sasquatch had already been documented in medieval times and the legends of such monsters are just misidentifications of the hairy creature we all know and love.

Humans still retain certain characteristic of our primal beginnings. For example, Hypertrichosis (also called Ambras Syndrome) is the rare genetic condition which some associated with people believing that Wolfmen existed in medieval times. This gene can sometimes appear in families and usually the males are the ones that exhibit these traits, but some female cases have been recorded.

Petrus Gonzales (1648), is the first recorded case of hypertrichosis.

Within these recorded cases in the last hundreds of years, science has studied and researched many of these strange anomalies which occur at certain points in human development.

Let’s take a look at some stories and legends recorded in books during the middle ages, the period before modern science.

In his essay “Historical Evidence For The Existence Of Relict Hominoids”, cryptozoologist Dmitir Bayanov of Russia explains how countless stories and books had been written in medieval times about the existence of a hairy Wildman. He points out that this evidence should be seen as relevant information for the case and study of Sasquatch existence.

According to one account, Persian scholar Nizami al-Arudi (12th century A.D.), wrote in his book “Chahar maqala”, that the lowest animal is the worm and highest is Nasnas:

"a creature inhabiting the plains of Turkistan... This, after mankind, is the highest animal, in as much as in several respects it resembles man: first in its erect stature, secondly in the breadth of its nails, and thirdly in the hair on its head."

As you can see, he was talking about something not exactly human but closely related to Homo sapiens.
Bayanov also wrote that the Wildman’s presence in medieval Europe is well documented by U.S. scholar Richard Bernheimer (1952) in his book, “Wild Men in the Middle Ages”. The author describes these hairy creatures as if they actually existed at the time. Here is a quote from the book:

“About the wild man’s habitat and manner of life, medieval authorities are articulate and communicative. It was agreed that he shunned human contact, settling, if possible, in the most remote and inaccessible parts of the forest, and making his bed in crevices, caves, or the deep shadow of overhanging branches. In this remote and lonely sylvan home he eked out a living without benefit of metallurgy or even the simplest agricultural lore, reduced to the plain fare of berries and acorns or the raw flesh of animals.”

It’s fascinating to see how similar some points from the author closely resemble certain traits of Sasquatch and its habitat. In some of the stories from medieval times, the Wildman would even be captured and dragged to the local castle. Believing that it was a hairy man, the captors would try to educate the creature, thinking the Wildman would become more like them.

In many cultures, beliefs were based on actual events that became part of their folklore and legends. Other mythical creatures have been described with traits similar to Sasquatch, but the most significant similarity is their ability to walk on two feet, bipedalism.

These are only stories, but how did man get the idea of such creatures? People have been writing about these creatures for centuries, but because of the lack of true scientific understanding at the time, Sasquatch-like creatures were more of a novelty.

Read more: http://www.isu.edu/rhi/pdf/Bayanov.pdf

Read more: www.livestrong.com

Damian Bravo
www.sasquatchlives.com

Comments

  1. Hey, if it turns out bigfoot doesn't exist we could make him in a lab. If combine Shaquille O'neil's DNA with that of somebody with hypertrichosis it could be pretty close.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not many ppl know that tolkien was fan of medieval legends, many of creatures from his books are based on medieval myths and strorys.
      Hobbit - little specie of bigfoot.
      Troll- classic sasquatch,
      Im 100 % convinced that all reports of bipedal,hairy man like things living in forest(like trolls,hobbits) are just bigfoot encounters

      Delete
  2. We know people suffer from hypertrichosis, so its more reasonable to assume that "werewolf" and "wildman" sightings are hypertrichosis victims who have been shunned by their family/village and forced to live as an outcast in remote areas.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I would not doubt for a moment that some sightings are hypertrichosis or even some feral humans who either chose to live in the wild or were forced out. I am also quite sure that a lot of the legends of a more ancient time resulted in Sasquatch encounters then as they do today. Hypertrichosis is an ailment that leads to an abundance of hair, not 8 to 10 foot height and a tremendously massive build.

      Chuck

      Delete
  3. Great post. I love to see people correlating folklore with sightings of Bigfoot because many cultures have had mysterious creatures they spoke of that were later found to be real cryptids. If you hear a lot of legends in one area, you have to start wondering. We can assume that a BF population has greatly diminished by the simple fact that he once had unlimited terrain and would now be more limited in his habitat. Encounters had to be more common long ago. In fact, one could assume that Native Americans lived amongst he populations without any concern or fear. The coming of Europeans and man taking over and constructing roadways and buildings and railroads made it inhospitable and changed his lifestyle from being one of the population of America to an outcast suspicious hermit.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I completely agree. This could very well be the origin of things like the Werewolf. I mean howls, claws, feeding at night, seen on full moons (only kind of nights you would be able to see on in older times). Things like this make me believe that the creatures do exist or there was some sort of BF like animal/hominid that did roam the world during our history. I am still torn between if I believe they still exist or not. It could easily be that by our industrializing this country we have killed off many of these creatures or that they were/are at the end of the species by natural means.

      No matter what, it has been shown the "legends" of old are based on things that the current people couldn't really explain and I believe that BF type creature could easily be what spawned many of these "legends" or at least what kept them going.

      Delete
    2. Oh just to add another behavior would explained by a BF creature would be the at times a man, other times a beast. It would have the appearance of human but would be left driven by more primitive/animal urges and follow animal behavior

      Delete
    3. Why not believe that the tales of werewolves are true: that people actually witnessed werewolves. There is literally just as much evidence for werewolves as there is for bigfoot.

      Delete
    4. "In fact, one could assume that Native Americans lived amongst he populations without any concern or fear."
      You assume very wrong. When we came to this continent we drove out the Sasquatch. But they are feared heavily. In nearly every tribes spoken history they are taught to us to be the wild men of the woods. They are canabals that will hunt and take women and especially children. We are told to leave them be or pay with your life. Please don't assume something about a culture when you're ignorant if it. It only does a disservice to us.

      Delete
  4. Are there very many european sightings? Besides in Russia and Siberea?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wildmen are reported from all regions of Europe, and the reports continue today in far lesser quantities. The wildman is also known as the woodwose and the wooser. Both wildmen and wildwomen became popular illustrations in books, and were also widespread in carvings and heraldry.

      Some scientists working in the field of cryptozoology think that the European wildman was Europe's version of Bigfoot. Believers in the European Bigfoot tend to think that this creature is now extinct. Both believers and skeptics tend to blame the small number of modern wildman sightings on deranged, heavily bearded men, possibly wearing animal skins, who have decided to live wild for reasons of their own, though some propose that Eastern European wildmen could be wandering almas or yetis.

      Delete
  5. There just are not any reports coming from Europe of Bigfoots, until you get deep into Russia and then Asia. I agree with you in that if there were European ones, they were either driven into extinction or high tailed it into Asia.

    Chuck

    ReplyDelete
  6. How bout you stop calling them Homo Sapiens Hirsuti. It was shot down months ago and no you're not going to get it to catch on. You have no business calling these Homo Sapiens when there is zero proof that's what they are. It's speculative douchery.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I would have to respectfully disagree with most of the above comments relating werewolves to sasquatch.

    If one looks at the lore, the werewolf is basically one of many different sorts of shape shifters found in legend. This particular "species" shifts from a human to a wolf. No problem with mistaken identity there - the being is either a human or a wolf.

    Where we run into difficulty is with the few times in lore where the person has that manwolf look (I am thinking of O'Donnell's book on werewolves where he describes such things on at least once occasion) and with the relatively new phenomenon of the manwolf/dogman sightings in places like Michigan and Wisconsin. I would argue that such a creature can and is easily distinguished from a sasquatch since the manwolf is not of the same size nor does it have the ape-like characteristics of the sasquatch. It is most accurately described as a canid that has adapted to bipedal loccomotion.

    While physical conditions such as hypertrichosis and mental conditions such as lycanthropy MAY have contributed to the werewolf mythos, I seriously doubt that this is a case of one creature of legend being mistaken for another creature of legend. Shape shifters of all sorts haunt the myths of nations across the world and I think we need to look deeper for an explanation than simply trying to group of hairy bipedal creatures into one category.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Good day! Do you know if they make any plugins to safeguard against hackers?

    I'm kinda paranoid about losing everything I've worked hard on.
    Any tips?

    My web page; airplane simulator

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story