Robert Lindsay: Great new Bigfoot photo may be revealed this week!
 |
| *Not the photo, just an example. |
Robert Lindsay just published this tidbit for those who have been waiting for a clear photograph of Bigfoot since Patterson-Gimlin. Robert speculates that the
A great new trailcam photo of a Bigfoot has been taken and may be released this week. I don’t know precisely who took the photo, but it may have been the Olympic Project. The photo shows the creature from the rear as it is walking away from the cam. It may be a daylight shot, because the color has been described as coyote-like. In terms of quality, it is said to be better than the Patterson film. The Bigfoot is huge!
The photo is slated to be released this week by whoever has it. If they don’t release it, I am going to try to get a hold of a copy and release it myself.
- Robert Lindsay
[via robertlindsay.wordpress.com]
Have u seen it, Robert? Guess not or u would've posted it.....
ReplyDeleteNo, I have not. Guy Edwards saw it and he says he's not sure about it. He says it could be a BF, or it could also be a ghillie suit. It's very hard to tell. Some BF witnesses really like it. It's going to be very controversial, and it should stir up a huge debate.
DeleteSomething may or may not happen! Oh me oh my! And Robert Lindsay is bringing us the story? It must be so! This is weak even by your standards Robby. John
DeleteWell said. How is this even a story? Something might happen that may be the clearest Bigfoot photo since PG, but could be someone in a ghillie suit???
DeleteWhat?.
Is this like the DNA paper that may be possibly definitely released by the end of February, but the author has categorically stated it won't?
Robert, you're a desperate, attention seeking, full of shit fool.
Shaun, UK
And boy do you ever enjoy stirring up debates.
DeleteYes, one could say that Robert mass-debates on a daily basis. Probably more than once.
DeleteShaun, UK
Translation- blobsquatch.
DeleteI remember when that photo above was being passed around as the real deal.....
ReplyDeleteThere is a comment left by Guy Edwards on Robert Lindsay's sight where this article came from. Sounds like they are talking about the same trail cam photo that was reported on here last week. Once again, not news.
ReplyDeleteIt was given to Melissa Hovey a few years ago. She mentioned it on her web site.
ReplyDeleteThe photo may or may not be released. However, my sources have confimed that Robert Lindsay is, indeed, a genuine DICK HEAD.
ReplyDeleteRobert Lindsay just trolls the Bigfoot Forums and calls that investigative reporting.
ReplyDeleteyes, you are correct sir! that david koresh want's to be big and someone important in the sasquatch community no doubt. just look how the super-tool treated Dr. J. Meldrum. all we have to say. he want's meldrum's fame and when he dosen't get it he'll try to bring meldrum down to his low-life level. yea robert you are a supertool and you own that title. bitch!
Deleteincredible..first in the caption it says "bigfoot in this new shot is better in quality than the "Patty stills" and now this jerkoff Lindsay is telling us that some other guy says it could be some dork in a gillie suit....??
ReplyDeleteLindsay should be banned from these blogs...hes full of it.
ReplyDeleteTotally agree. He must hate coming here as he can't ban everyone that doesn't kiss his arse.
DeleteHis view on life doesn't meet reality at all.
Shaun, UK
I think Roberto Lindsayo looks like Moe from Moes Tavern in the Simpsons. When I read any of the crap her writes I hear Moe's voice. You know, that really annoying nasal tone?
ReplyDeleteShaun, UK
One tell all sign of fakery is the refusal to quickly publish any photos that are not commonly known as the "blobquatch". Think about this for a moment, a clear and compelling photo is in your possession and you decide to not release the photo? How could any individual possibly sit on such a photo when instant fame and possibly fortune (tabloids pay huge sums)is finally within his/her grasp. There can be only 1 answer and that is the possessor knows the photo to be a very detailed fake. Granted, I have not seen the photo but until it is released and authencated my view remains the same. A fake.
ReplyDeleteTabloids pays huge sums of money for photos that haven't been released. If someone did have a really crystal clear photo of a sasquatch, chances are they are gonna hold out for the highest bidder before it is ever released for the public to view. When we finally see it, the photo is posted in some magazine.
DeleteI am banking on this being a fake though.
No, yer wrong. You don't know what yer talking about. You are speaking out of frustration because you don't want people to keep their photos confidential. You're also assuming that everyone is thinking like a bigfoot researcher. Yer wrong wrong wrong, and your sentiments are just sour grapes.
DeleteSome people don't want to share their photos (photos that might show a bigfoot) for variety of reasons. One reason might be that the photo was taken on their own property. Another reason might be that they don't have time for all the complications and distractions that might result from going public with it. There are all sorts of reasons why a non-bigfooter might not want to release an image.
Not frustrated as I just dont care when it becomes some 80 year old granny who does not want her lawn jockeys and pink flamingos broken. I can understand that reasoning but what I cannot understand is all the "researchers" constantly throwing out how they have the evidence. At that time I know its all a crock and that person can never be trusted. Another day another "researcher" claiming the evidence is in the vault. Some day soon I hope the acid blot high wears off. But, what would we have to discuss then, the propensity of my cat to climb my curtains I guess.
DeleteI asked Moneymaker about the photo above. No matter what you may think about the guy he is a walking encyclopedia about all things bigfoot, especially photos and videos. So I figured he would know about this one too. Of course he knew about this photo, and he asked me to pass this along to you all.
ReplyDeleteThe photo above shows a life-size wax sculpture of a bigfoot in a diorama at a museum. He says it is the only wax sculpture of a bigfoot in a museum.
The sculpture and diorama can be seen at the "Wax Works" in Newport, Oregon. The Wax Works is part of "Ripley's Believe or Not Museum" in Newport, Oregon.
Someday I hope to find the good photo that Moneymaker doesn't know anything about or hasn't already seen before.
Greetings! We already knew that. Shawn wasn't claiming that was 'the' photo, he was using it as an example.
DeleteOh, and MM is still a dick.
Shaun, UK
I dont know who Matt Moneymaker is or what if any credentials he has. Well I do know he is on that television show (we watch but it is getting painful) and thats about it. To me as with any evidence somebody other than those in the bigfoot community would need to authenticate any photographs. I simply believe the opinions are biased if the person has ties to the bigfeet community.
DeleteI think a person is biased if he/she reads this blog. Bigfoot photos should be authenticated by someone who will refuse to authenticate them.
DeleteI am not sure i understang your argument. Are you saying any person who puts forth an opinion contrary to yours is to be sent to the gallows? I just do not understand all the fighting amongst the bigfeet community. I guess its due to 99% of those involved being meth heads, driving a camaro and living in a trailer?. I could understand your position/statement if you believe the bigfeet are best left alone in the woods and not harmed-is that your position? Actually, I would endorse that position on face value. But we all know when this is resolved what will occur. Drunks carrying boom sticks will be all over in the woods and that i have no doubts.
Deleteok bigfooter's tell me this pig lindsay dosen't look like DAVID KORESH. that's bozo's new name. he's a socialist liar. yea i don't like the weasel but you know i got this one pegged! if you don't laugh. then i will laugh for you.
ReplyDelete90 percent inaccurate
ReplyDeleteLOL!!!!!!!!
ReplyDeleteBetter than Patty but may be a ghillie suit. Well, which is it?
ReplyDeleteObviously, if it were better than the Patty video then it would not be mistaken for a ghillie.
The story is already raising red flags but I'll wait and see what happens.
Scott McMan
Ghosttheory.com
how can you take a photo of a creature that does not exist?
ReplyDeleteFocus!
DeleteHow can a still photo be better than Patty/PGF's moving images? You know how skeptics are just waiting to tear that apart, it may very well be real but they'll have all kinds of excuses ready, like why is it from the rear not the front, etc. I'm still betting on the DNA study setting the Sasquatch record straight, photos no matter how good will not change those already against the idea of this species. Also, people have many different reasons not to come forward with photos in the first place, anything from personal ethics and faiths to businesses.
ReplyDeleteAnon 10:37. How come people who apparently don't think this species is real, still show up on such subject sites?
ReplyDeleteWell, I see we're back up to our normal daily quota of Robert Lindsay crap.
ReplyDeleteI don't know Robert Lindsay but you know his name but you Puke's that talk sh@# and post it anomynous are the Dick heads or pussies should I say. Real tough guys and if you take offense and you lively remotely close to East TX please message me back and I will gladly give the opportunity to tell me in person. In the mean time get a girlfriend...pack your shit...move out of yo mommas basement and grow a set of huevos (testicles that's Texican for balls) and get a job or something. If you don't believe I gladly take out the to the Sabine river bottom or Big Thicket and let you spend the night out there. That's if your egghead buddies will let you get off yo mommas computer playing World of Warcraft.
ReplyDelete