New Breakdown of New York Baby Bigfoot Footage by FB/FB Confirms Nocturnal Abilities, Observing From Strategic Position, Arboreal, Long Arms, and Inhuman Abilities


If Bigfoot experts keep this up, the Baby Bigfoot footage may become the most analyzed piece of evidence since the Patterson-Gimlin film.

FB/FB did a breakdown on the New York Baby Bigfoot video about two years ago and they confirmed a coned head and said that there were no known apes or creatures with that kind of size and ability:

#4. New York Baby Bigfoot 1997 (extended): Upstate New York, camping at a music festival a 5' tall creature is lifted into tree, climbs around effortlessly at night for 44 seconds. Coned head BF sits in view. Discovered 5 years after filming. No known ape/creature has that size and ability. BF has need to observe or listen, to survive all known predators, (American lion, cougar) juveniles would have to be able to move this quickly in trees.

On their Facebook page, they recently posted a second breakdown of the footage and their expert analysis confirms even more details such as nocturnal abilities:

#11 of 72 "New York Baby Bigfoot" 1996, Modena NY. **New Analysis** FB/FB did it's original authentication almost two years ago. This is an improved analysis considering our experience and knowledge. Confirms on Nocturnal abilities, observing from Strategic position, Arboreal, Long Arms, Inhuman abilities. The entire analysis is by Steve Kulls is at the end of the video

Comments

  1. I hate Facebook find Bigfoot. All the 'confirms' rubbish. They'll confirm on anything. Confirms on fedora, scarf and eating pizza.

    Sigh.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Gee, maybe they were gonna take the baby to ride on the ferris wheel. What a load of crap. Has this outfit ever seen anything that wasn't bigfoot?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Nice drawing, lol. I was wondering what that thing looked like up close.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Campground, tree not moving at ALL, it's a black trash bag. End of story.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I do not like the way they read everything that is right on the screen..Follow the bouncing ball
    (for all of you that remember that)..Joebblack1963 sees more then everyone else too..Look bigfoot has a pig slung pover its shoulder..Jesus H. It is a 1 second clip..But he sees everything

    ReplyDelete
  6. After bascially identifying it as a gibbon they call it a clear sasquatch...nope....how about a green spotted gremlin? I do not see a head shape other than round. How can they act like they know the behavior of bigfoot when they have not been studied. Plus, in NY? At a concert?
    Nope, one will see what one wants to see.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anon. Previous post. You are 100% right when you say they see what they want to see. I see no proof that this is a 5 ft tall Bigfoot, I also see no proof that this is anything at all. My first thought is that it reminds me of the scene in Wizard of Oz where the Munchkin hangs himself but its a mechanical bird. This could simply be a kite or a trash bag or anything. Bigfoot, while not impossible its highly improbable.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Lawsy lawsy, Now the baby bigfoot I'd like to see is pictured on the page in the left column of pictures
    dated Oct.11,2011.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I'm so sorry I'm obiviously directionally challenged. It's the picture on the right side of this page dated October 11,2011-Kansas baby bigfoot.

    Shawn, I do wish we could edit our posts once they're posted.

    ReplyDelete
  10. A trash bag is the worst explaination. The trash bag is blowing the in the breeze but not the tree limbs or even a single leaf? It's a primate but not a baby Bigfoot. I say someone brought the monkey there and it let either get some play time or it got too big to keep so they let it go. Even though Cliff says in the baby bigfoot breakdown video on youtube that no animals were allow, I'm sure someone snuck one in.

    ReplyDelete
  11. The FBFB guy is an idiot. Stop posting his videos.

    ReplyDelete
  12. It was at a music festival in upstate New York. I'm sure we know how many things happen at music festivals in upstate New York that aren't supposed to be.

    ReplyDelete
  13. LOL bigfoot broski, I'm telling my age but I remember Woodstock. I wasn't there but oh so remember those days. ;)

    ReplyDelete
  14. Trash bag is the BEST explanation because it's A) true and B) hilarious. I'm now in love with Autumnforest for her wit, insight and intelligence.

    But I'll wait the proper mourning period. R.I.P. Mr. Naturalist, you died a noble death.

    BTW: I love hot cocoa and Fig Newtons too. I had no idea they were such an effective Bigfoot lure!

    ReplyDelete
  15. Trash bag is the BEST explanation because it is A) true and B) hilarious.

    I am now in love with Autumnforest for her wit, wisdom and insight.

    But I'll wait the proper mourning period. R.I.P. Mr. Naturalist, you died a noble death. Who knew hot cocoa & Fig Newtons were such an effective Bigfoot lure?

    ReplyDelete
  16. Der Golem?....Trashbag, gibbon, hippie whatever you want to call it- I like the idea of immature squatch being highly arboreal. It may increase the feeding envelope for the species where the young could retrieve food from the trees for the whole family or flush game towards the ground for the adults to kill, squierrels, raccoons. Get bird eggs.

    ReplyDelete
  17. the best part about FB/FB

    the author tripping over the subtitles in nearly every video.

    ReplyDelete
  18. FB/FB makes me lauggh everytime, "see this indistinguishable blur of pixels, thats splayed fingers, and there is the coned head"

    ReplyDelete
  19. On my list of creatures that might be swinging in the tree, baby Bigfoot came in at #2280, right behind Quetzalcoatlus and D.B. Cooper.

    ReplyDelete
  20. My take on it is that the entire clip was staged. It was likely done in someone's backyard and not at a music festival with thousands of people in the area.

    Someone involved either has or knows someone who has a pet monkey (most likely a pet gibbon). During the taping, on cue, a human (you can see the head) lets the monkey go in the tree, probably on a thin leash, like a thin dog leash. Then the person filming pans over to the monkey swinging off in the distance.

    Of course this is turned into a baby bigfoot. 998 people out of 1,000 if shown the clip and asked to identify the subject would probably say that it's a monkey. 1 out of 1,000 would say it's a piece of debris blowing in the wind, and 1 out of 1,000 would classify it as a "baby bigfoot."

    It's most likely a pet monkey.

    ReplyDelete
  21. I think it was some kids from the city playing hoop

    ReplyDelete
  22. For the record, I was the anon who originally proposed the trash bag theory when the video was first posted on december 19. I'm pleased that a few of you support my theory including you Autumn. Not saying you're trying to take credit for my brilliant idea, but...

    ReplyDelete
  23. I disagree that it was staged, and yes, I do beleive it was a garbage bag.

    ReplyDelete
  24. It was a staged hoax. It was not a garbage bag.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Does anyone else think that it's funny that the Facebook analysis shows swinging gibbons and then states with certainty that the subject in the clip is a baby bigfoot? Wouldn't a monkey (pet gibbon on leash?) be far more likely to be the subject in the tree than a bigfoot?

    ReplyDelete
  26. Yeah, but who brings a gibbon to a music festival? While he was out taking his monkey for some exercise, some dude was in his tent banging his girlfriend.

    ReplyDelete
  27. It wasn't taken at a music festival. That's just a back story for the hoax. It was taken in someone's backyard.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?