New Breakdown of New York Baby Bigfoot Footage by FB/FB Confirms Nocturnal Abilities, Observing From Strategic Position, Arboreal, Long Arms, and Inhuman Abilities
If Bigfoot experts keep this up, the Baby Bigfoot footage may become the most analyzed piece of evidence since the Patterson-Gimlin film.
FB/FB did a breakdown on the New York Baby Bigfoot video about two years ago and they confirmed a coned head and said that there were no known apes or creatures with that kind of size and ability:
#4. New York Baby Bigfoot 1997 (extended): Upstate New York, camping at a music festival a 5' tall creature is lifted into tree, climbs around effortlessly at night for 44 seconds. Coned head BF sits in view. Discovered 5 years after filming. No known ape/creature has that size and ability. BF has need to observe or listen, to survive all known predators, (American lion, cougar) juveniles would have to be able to move this quickly in trees.
On their Facebook page, they recently posted a second breakdown of the footage and their expert analysis confirms even more details such as nocturnal abilities:
#11 of 72 "New York Baby Bigfoot" 1996, Modena NY. **New Analysis** FB/FB did it's original authentication almost two years ago. This is an improved analysis considering our experience and knowledge. Confirms on Nocturnal abilities, observing from Strategic position, Arboreal, Long Arms, Inhuman abilities. The entire analysis is by Steve Kulls is at the end of the video
I hate Facebook find Bigfoot. All the 'confirms' rubbish. They'll confirm on anything. Confirms on fedora, scarf and eating pizza.
ReplyDeleteSigh.
Gee, maybe they were gonna take the baby to ride on the ferris wheel. What a load of crap. Has this outfit ever seen anything that wasn't bigfoot?
ReplyDeleteNice drawing, lol. I was wondering what that thing looked like up close.
ReplyDeleteCampground, tree not moving at ALL, it's a black trash bag. End of story.
ReplyDeleteI do not like the way they read everything that is right on the screen..Follow the bouncing ball
ReplyDelete(for all of you that remember that)..Joebblack1963 sees more then everyone else too..Look bigfoot has a pig slung pover its shoulder..Jesus H. It is a 1 second clip..But he sees everything
After bascially identifying it as a gibbon they call it a clear sasquatch...nope....how about a green spotted gremlin? I do not see a head shape other than round. How can they act like they know the behavior of bigfoot when they have not been studied. Plus, in NY? At a concert?
ReplyDeleteNope, one will see what one wants to see.
Anon. Previous post. You are 100% right when you say they see what they want to see. I see no proof that this is a 5 ft tall Bigfoot, I also see no proof that this is anything at all. My first thought is that it reminds me of the scene in Wizard of Oz where the Munchkin hangs himself but its a mechanical bird. This could simply be a kite or a trash bag or anything. Bigfoot, while not impossible its highly improbable.
ReplyDeleteLawsy lawsy, Now the baby bigfoot I'd like to see is pictured on the page in the left column of pictures
ReplyDeletedated Oct.11,2011.
I'm so sorry I'm obiviously directionally challenged. It's the picture on the right side of this page dated October 11,2011-Kansas baby bigfoot.
ReplyDeleteShawn, I do wish we could edit our posts once they're posted.
A trash bag is the worst explaination. The trash bag is blowing the in the breeze but not the tree limbs or even a single leaf? It's a primate but not a baby Bigfoot. I say someone brought the monkey there and it let either get some play time or it got too big to keep so they let it go. Even though Cliff says in the baby bigfoot breakdown video on youtube that no animals were allow, I'm sure someone snuck one in.
ReplyDeleteThe FBFB guy is an idiot. Stop posting his videos.
ReplyDeleteIt was at a music festival in upstate New York. I'm sure we know how many things happen at music festivals in upstate New York that aren't supposed to be.
ReplyDeleteLOL bigfoot broski, I'm telling my age but I remember Woodstock. I wasn't there but oh so remember those days. ;)
ReplyDeleteTrash bag is the BEST explanation because it's A) true and B) hilarious. I'm now in love with Autumnforest for her wit, insight and intelligence.
ReplyDeleteBut I'll wait the proper mourning period. R.I.P. Mr. Naturalist, you died a noble death.
BTW: I love hot cocoa and Fig Newtons too. I had no idea they were such an effective Bigfoot lure!
Trash bag is the BEST explanation because it is A) true and B) hilarious.
ReplyDeleteI am now in love with Autumnforest for her wit, wisdom and insight.
But I'll wait the proper mourning period. R.I.P. Mr. Naturalist, you died a noble death. Who knew hot cocoa & Fig Newtons were such an effective Bigfoot lure?
Is there an echo in here?
ReplyDeleteDer Golem?....Trashbag, gibbon, hippie whatever you want to call it- I like the idea of immature squatch being highly arboreal. It may increase the feeding envelope for the species where the young could retrieve food from the trees for the whole family or flush game towards the ground for the adults to kill, squierrels, raccoons. Get bird eggs.
ReplyDeletethe best part about FB/FB
ReplyDeletethe author tripping over the subtitles in nearly every video.
FB/FB makes me lauggh everytime, "see this indistinguishable blur of pixels, thats splayed fingers, and there is the coned head"
ReplyDeleteOn my list of creatures that might be swinging in the tree, baby Bigfoot came in at #2280, right behind Quetzalcoatlus and D.B. Cooper.
ReplyDeleteMy take on it is that the entire clip was staged. It was likely done in someone's backyard and not at a music festival with thousands of people in the area.
ReplyDeleteSomeone involved either has or knows someone who has a pet monkey (most likely a pet gibbon). During the taping, on cue, a human (you can see the head) lets the monkey go in the tree, probably on a thin leash, like a thin dog leash. Then the person filming pans over to the monkey swinging off in the distance.
Of course this is turned into a baby bigfoot. 998 people out of 1,000 if shown the clip and asked to identify the subject would probably say that it's a monkey. 1 out of 1,000 would say it's a piece of debris blowing in the wind, and 1 out of 1,000 would classify it as a "baby bigfoot."
It's most likely a pet monkey.
I think it was some kids from the city playing hoop
ReplyDeleteFor the record, I was the anon who originally proposed the trash bag theory when the video was first posted on december 19. I'm pleased that a few of you support my theory including you Autumn. Not saying you're trying to take credit for my brilliant idea, but...
ReplyDeleteI disagree that it was staged, and yes, I do beleive it was a garbage bag.
ReplyDeleteIt was a staged hoax. It was not a garbage bag.
ReplyDeleteDoes anyone else think that it's funny that the Facebook analysis shows swinging gibbons and then states with certainty that the subject in the clip is a baby bigfoot? Wouldn't a monkey (pet gibbon on leash?) be far more likely to be the subject in the tree than a bigfoot?
ReplyDeleteYeah, but who brings a gibbon to a music festival? While he was out taking his monkey for some exercise, some dude was in his tent banging his girlfriend.
ReplyDeleteIt wasn't taken at a music festival. That's just a back story for the hoax. It was taken in someone's backyard.
ReplyDelete