Richard Stubstad comments about Erickson Project's frustration, cites dark forces at play
 |
| Richard Stubstad |
The Erickson Project's website is still down and the reasons are still unknown at this point. The Erickson Project has not responded to our email about this, but there's a comment left by Richard Stubstad about this matter posted on Robert Lindsay's blog:
Richard Stubstad[via: robertlindsay.wordpress.com]
November 10, 2011 at 12:28 PM
The Erickson project to be sure is certainly in flux; we are still working hard to get the most important part of it going again, seeing that Ketchum hasn’t delivered even yet on her promises. Why am I not surprised about the latter?
In short: Simone Erickson is also frustrated, but in fact we are making some progress on all fronts; it’s just painfully slow.
About a “kill”. I believe (but do not know) that there in fact have been several if not dozens of kills over the past few decades alone; not just Smeja’s (assuming that story isn’t a cover for something even more sinister). In each and every case, when the “authorities” have gotten involved, the evidence mysteriously disappears; possibly with a pay-off; sometimes sizable.
I believe this will continue to be the case; the authorities (or some key authorities, that is) know full well about the sasquatch; for many reasons, some of the valid from their point of view, it would simply make life too difficult for them to deal with this.
By now, they (the “key” authorities) probably know we’re going to figure this out, with or without a body or capture. But they are in no hurry to help us along; quite to the contrary.
This news WILL be a blockbuster — and one cannot imagine the long-term implications from the point of view of both government and industry. The longer they can put this off, the better.
Richard
Richard Stubstad was the person who leaked info from the Erickson Project and has worked with Dr. Melba Ketchum in the past.
Click here to read the article about Richard Stubstad.
Related:
You know, when it starts getting all men-in-black on us, I begin to wonder if perhaps there is something about knowledge of BF changing some belief systems that are very set in America involving religion versus evolution.
ReplyDeleteI've always thought that religious beliefs were a strong driving point to suppressing Bigfoot's existence. Just think how many people would lose their minds if it was proven. People would start to question every aspect of their lives, when the truth of it is at least how I see it "they're just another one of God's creatures." Not to get into the whole religious thing. Just an opinion. Think about it though sounds plausible.
ReplyDeleteSo,the points to remember;
ReplyDelete1.) If you shoot or accidentally kill a Bigfoot,don't tell the "authorities".
2.)Don't get involved with a "Project" if you've committed #1.
3.)Don't give samples for testing.
Autumnforest,I honestly think it all has to do with money.The government and big industry could care less about Bigfoot,or you,or me.
mankind only cares about raping the land and making lots of money.
Most of the companies with green initiatives do it as marketing."Buy our crap,it's green".
With all the technology we have do we still need to build houses from wood?
The logging,mining and oil/gas sectors would come unglued if Bigfoot was discovered.
The men in black are just making sure the wheels of commerce and stock markets keep on rolling.
If I ever came across a deceased Bigfoot it would go right to YouTube.And many,many copies would be made.
Really? A conspiracy? That flapping sound you just heard was reason flying out the window.
ReplyDeleteExactly Citizen, EVERYTHING comes down to money. Good or bad if we can profit from it were gonna do it. They suppress the info in the USA to keep industry moving, the promoted the info and hoax in Russian to promoted tourism. Currency is the currency that rules the world.
ReplyDeleteMake sure of what you are seeing through the scope. Take the kill shot. Sprint to body and hack off a hand (most easily removed part). Wrap hand in something scent proof. Wash any blood off of yourself. Stand up, and run faster than you ever have. If you aren't killed on your way out of the woods by another Sasquatch, drive directly to the nearest news station. In five minutes you have done more to preserve the species than any video evidence could ever hope.
ReplyDeleteHow bad would that hurt all the new natural gas lines/wells, and there really depending on this to solve many energy issues.
ReplyDeleteIf bigfoot is "scientifically" proven, the logging and mineral industries would be banned in order to preserve bigfoot territory and migration routes.
ReplyDeleteStart yelling "conspiracy!" and watch me become even more skeptical. I knew if this thing wasn't for real, those involved would have to come up with a way to end it all without showing us any evidence.
ReplyDelete"OMG! The government took our evidence!"
^^^That (or some derivative thereof) works for me.
As for religious people and their denial of evolution, believe me when I say they would find a way of explaining away bigfoot. They have explained away everything else, including DNA evidence that absolutely seals the deal. Go Google "Kirk Cameron" and his crocoduck.
I grew up in a fundamentalist subculture that denies evolution. I still live in the area where that subculture exists. I have a pretty good working knowledge of paleontology / evolution and a small business largely based on fossil jewelry.
I get into arguments with creationists all the time, mostly when they comment on my jewelry.
They are in such denial that most of them will not accept evolution no matter what. I used to be one of them. I still live among them. They are set in their ways. So, no. Don't muddy the waters by throwing in a government conspiracy. That's just silly. You don't have to coddle these people's belief systems because they will hang onto them no matter what facts you throw in their faces. Only a few people escape such subcultures.
It takes a full onslaught on all levels of belief to change the mind of a religious person. Usually this means college. Now with the help of the Internet, "non-belief" is the fastest growing position when it comes to religion. But older people usually will not give up their faith no matter what. Younger US citizens are already doing it in droves.
Reason is, of course, more important than any position on religion. If you don't believe in god and yet persist in believing in UFOs, ghosts, psychics and (perhaps) bigfoot, you may want to think a bit about the WAY you think.
The default position for any outrageous claim is disbelief. The burden of proof is on those making the outrageous claim. Outrageous proof is needed. I believe Melba Ketchum herself repeated that old axiom, so she shouldn't get her panties in a bunch when others are skeptical.
When the Erickson Project collapses and there is friction between them and Melba Ketchum (whose DNA results are being delayed), any reasonable person would see this as a bad omen, that there's a real possibility these people don't have jack.
Vaporware?
-Atheist in FundyLand
-Bigfoot is Probably Bullshit
As an aside, remember that I want bigfoot to be real. I still have to function as a skeptic if I want to think clearly.
ReplyDeleteAtheist in FundyLand
Bigfoot is (sadly) Probably Bullshit
Christians as a whole have no fear of the existence of bigfoot challenging our belief system, and there is certainly no concerted effort to suppress evidence of the creature's existence, especially when the majority of the nation and world do not even believe that it exists. If we wanted to suppress evidence of evolution, time would best be spent sabotaging paleoanthropological dig sites rather than scouring the globe for traces of evidence of potentially mythical beasts, don't you think? It might come as a surprise, but a large number of creationist scientists actually support the idea of the existence of sasquatch and other cryptozoological beasts.
ReplyDeleteBy the way, I am a wildlife biologist and an anthropologist (yes, I have degrees in both from a major non-Christian university and am about to start grad school), so if anyone cares to debate about the supposed "facts" about macro-evolution, I am certainly game and am qualified both by education and experience. The holes in the fossil record are more numerous and much larger than any of the actual specimens, and the dating methods are entirely subjective, based on estimations, and do not account for environmental condition variations, which have tremendous effects on the subject materials.
birthday quotes funny castleofquotes.com
ReplyDelete