NCBDT retrieves trailcam photos from Sierra Nevada Mountain, sees no sign of Bigfoot
 |
| "No cryptozoological trailcam project would be complete without the one picture that raises eyebrows with its inconclusiveness. It appears to be the limb of a hairy creature. Personally, I think it may be a bear’s leg, but we encourage you to draw your own conclusion…" - NCBDT |
The Northern California Bigfoot Discovery Team had been experimenting with trailcams in the Sierras since August. They setup their first trailcam on the Western slope of the Sierra Nevada mountain. The team strategically selected a spot that was based on topography, seclusion, and the type resources available.
36 days later, on September 17, the NCBDT went back to retrieve the trailcam, and while they didn’t capture any images of Bigfoot, they did manage to photograph some deer and even a bear!
Here's what they said about the Sierra Nevada mountain range and why they think it's an ideal place to find a Sasquatch:
The Pacific Northwest contains vast expanses of mountains and forestland, and the Sierra Nevada Mountain range is one such example. Extending for hundreds of miles, the alpine forests of the Sierras would theoretically provide an adequate home for the elusive Bigfoot. Having spent a considerable amount of time in the mountains, I can say that I think it would definitely be possible for Bigfoots to exist here, especially if they have nomadic tendencies, moving to and fro in search of food and/or temperature change.
Using logic and tools such as Google Maps, Bigfoot researchers can attempt to identify locations where the Big Ones may be found. For example, a Sasquatch may prefer spots that are the farthest from human habitation and where hunting is not allowed. They may also prefer spots where abundant food sources are found at certain times of the year. The NCBDT feels that factors such as these may help determine the best places to search for our brother, the Forest Giant.
Check out some of their trailcam photos below:
The NCBDT trailcam (a Bushnell “Bone Collector Trophy Cam”) operated well during daylight hours as well as at night. A total of 130 pictures were taken during its first 36 day period of operation. The first three pictures below show the site during different lighting conditions. The first was taken in full sunlight, the second on a cloudy day, and the third at night.
 |
| "The NCBDT was extremely pleased to capture the next pic. It appears to be a small black bear walking away from the camera. And while it’s not the hairy, omnivorous mammal we were officially looking for, it is a magnificent creature nonetheless." - NCBDT |
Related:
looks like a right back leg of a bear. but i just hope they keep putting up those trail-cams! they from what i've read seem to be in a good spot for these trail cams. with a little luck we may just get that picture that we all know is only short time away!
ReplyDeletewe all know is only a short time away". where do u get that from? we are further away from having the money shot of a bigfoot hence people are increasingly realising they dont exists. just genuine misidentification of bears!
DeletePatty ewas 50 years ago and is the only interesting film out there,certainly the best given the time it was made.
My issue with is Patterrson himself. he was a conman ,not Gimlin he seems a cool guy, Pattersson drew a female squatch a year beforhand and filmed the EXACT creature a year later. what are the chances of that happening
the FACTS are Pattersson wasgiven a remit by the wildlife film crew to film a BF[if there was 1]. The lot nxt door were shooting planet of the apes[fact]. so a suit from their with added on bear hide[he was a hunter afterall] then you can see[with help as Pattersson was a hillbilly with not the most intelligence in the world] .He used Gimlin rep as a straight upstanding guy who wouldnt take part in a hoax a validity[my opinion,as Gimlin seems ok a genuine to me, he was hoaxed too]you can see how such a suit could have been made
facts. Planet of apes being filmed in same studio
he is got remit to soot BF
he is a jack the lad[could be british saying but im sure u get the idea]
so where ypou think the"picture is just round the corner" is baffling to me
please upload the pics that give u such belief as i would love to beklieve in BF,as i did as a kid, but ere is only blobsquatches,shadows,bears and hoaxes is all i see
but each to their own. i hope u r right and i am wrong
with charcters like sdmeja going about i hold little hope
Even if they don't get a definition pic they'll still have the pathetic morons that see a blurry spot in the bushes and swear its a sasquatch. Just get a life that's why no one believes anything because all the idiots saying look at this blurry spot here, that's a sasquatch. Stop trying to make every abnormality in the woods out to be a squatch. If u can't clearly see it keep it to your selves you TOOLS.
ReplyDeletewhat the bear pic shows us is single pics taken of bears in starnge angles can show peculiar images. IE a bear standing up can look like a VF! probably 90% of BF photos are bears! 8% hoaxes 1% other animals and 1% who knows. Its the 1% that keeps our interest going if you havent seen a BF with your own eyes! lets face it if you havent there isnt muych ewvidence to go for the reality there are 1000's of 8ft apemen and their families walking about North America
Deletewe live in hope. which is fast dying of for me