Real Sasquatch?
Was this strange creature accidentally photographed on a game camera a real Sasquatch?
In 2007, a media flurry ensued when Pennsylvania hunter Rick Jacobs released a recent photo of what some enthusiasts claim to be a Sasquatch. Jacobs obtained the photo by affixing a camera with an automatic trigger to a tree in the Allegheny National Forest. When he saw the photo, Jacobs contacted the Bigfoot Research Organization, which is dedicated to pursuing information about the legendary Bigfoot or Sasquatch. You can read the full report on BFRO and see the photos by clicking here.
This is DEFINITELY a chimp. Looks just like one. It's the same size, shape, and color. Then again, how did a chimpanzee get to PA? Who knows, right?
ReplyDeleteThe upper,lower arm, shoulder and hand bones of a chimp over Jacob's creature show how close it really is to a primate. I'm convinced this is some kind of primate.
ReplyDeleteIt's a bear.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.doctoratlantis.com/jacobs.htm
It's arms and legs are too long to be a bear and its legs are too long to be a chimp...dunno what to make of it. If I were to guess, I'd say a young Sasquatch.
ReplyDeleteIts my uncle Hairy... lol
ReplyDeleteScroll down this page to the video bigfoot and bears, oh my. Keep that in the frame and scroll down a little further to this video. Keep both of them in the frame. Now tell me this isn't a scrawny mangy bear.
ReplyDeletewow.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.doctoratlantis.com/jacobs.htm
yup. that is a bear.
That is not a scrawny mangy bear, but you can tell yourself that if it makes you feel better. You are crazy to think the Jacob's creature is a bear. Bears don't stand on thier heads, and they do not look anything like that, give me a break. Keep thinking its a bear and living in lala land...
ReplyDeleteScientists worked out the size of this, according to Scienteriffic magazine: November 2008 on page 17. At the site a reenactment revealed this had 22 inch arms and an 18 3/4 torso. That's impossible for a bear because a bear's torso is longer than their legs.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZhCpKMs2_aM
ReplyDeleteTry this one I found. Bigfoot and bears on this video shows bears are not a match like the chimp was. That my friend was no bear.
Size, musculature, and general shape do not match up with a bear.
ReplyDeleteI've seen scrawny black bear cubs and this still doesn't fit.
As to it being in PA, my guess is it was someone who had a chimp as a pet and as it got older and became unmanageable, they let it loose. Happens with more exotic pets than you would think.
The Jacobs photos show a young Sasquatch, for some reason we've only seen those with the head covered, probably because the other pictures actually reveal its face to be Bigfoot.
ReplyDeleteSorry, but this is a very scrawny, very mangy, little bear. I have photos from my own trail cameras of a young healthy bear of the same age and stature, in roughly the same position. Put the two side by side and there's no doubt.
ReplyDeleteLOL That isn't a bear. The people that put up the biggest fight saying it is a bear are people from the organizations that are trying to protect the Squatches. That is most assuredly a young careless Squatch.
ReplyDeleteSure if there's no such thing as bigfoot this has to be something else. If bigfoot is real there's no doubt this was a young bigfoot.
ReplyDeleteI did a couple sketches on this on my blog. At first I wasn't sure but I checked it out really good and I now think this one was real.
ReplyDeleteCool
ReplyDeleteTo me it seems like skeptics have such a closed mind towards anything they can't touch. They jump right in and believe anything they say about evolution even though there is just as little clear evidence for BF as there is for evolution. Makes one wonder.
ReplyDeleteI like how some of you say, it's not a bear because bears don't do this or that. have you ever seen a bear in a circus, Ride a bike, Walk on a ball, Stand on it's Head? So it is possible that a bear is acting differently than you think they would, It might be rare but it's not impossibe.
ReplyDeleteNo it's impossible to be a bear because the proportions were not a bears. Show me just one reliable source that investigated at the site and found it was and I will shut up. There is a well respected and published fact from a Duke Univesity scientist that shows it's not a bear. This fact comes from the measurements off of a model filmed at the location standing in the same spot.
ReplyDeleteA simple solution to this photo is that it easily could have been a chimp in a zoo at night.
ReplyDeleteIt is probably some redneck's pet monkey used on a game cam to create a bigfoot hoax. There are a number of people that keep chimps as pets, this is the most logical solution.
ReplyDeletei have no clue what that really is, do they not have any more stills from the camera? surely there would be multiple pictures for when the thing came and left the area.
ReplyDeleteand to add if a bear wouldn't you be able to see the muzzle?
ReplyDeletei have hunted bears a lot, i know their is no bear with that long of limbs yet a small body, who ever said this is a bear is a idiot.
ReplyDeletei have hunted bears a lot, i know their is no bear with that long of limbs yet a small body, who ever said this is a bear is a idiot.
ReplyDeleteim an idiot a well as are he peole who prooved it was bears. look at the whole sequence of picture ,you know likein any investigation[only 'idiot' wouldnt]. in the others 2 balck bears[small ones the same colourexactly] are in shot. the this
Deleteyes it ;ooks a weird shape,but as usual its 1 shot,why not 3 or 4 ,whichHAD to be taken],becuse it would have shown a bear in a normal position.
so you think BF have exactly the same size a nd hair colouring as bears,lol,and you are calling others idiots