July 4th Weekend Bigfoot, Daddy and Baby



This could be Leroy Blevin's attempt to go viral. This video featured a couple of Bigfoots in the area. One scene had a mommy or a daddy Bigfoot carrying it's baby, how cute. It's a terrible FAIL, or an EPIC FAIL if it is him in the costume. Nice try though, and he couldn't pick a better time to do it than July 4th Weekend. We're declaring this footage the Independence Day Weekend Bigfoot video. Update: Here is Leroy Blevin's response to FB/FB:
The video on here that claims FB/FB about Leroy Blevins making a video hoax is all lie's I am Leroy Blevins Sr. and I never made a video on a hoax and that is not me in the video and that is not me suit. This hoax was made up by FB/FB and posting it to making false claims and pointing the finger at me when in fact it was them that pulled off this hoax and not me. FB/FB does not know one thing about Bigfoot so that is why they pull off these hoaxs to full people and making people think they know what they are doing in in fact they are clowns and they don't know nothing.
Adult Bigfoot and Baby Bigfoot
Uploaded by SasquatchWatcher on Jul 4, 2011
Blevins goes for it!! Hey its July 4 weekend and it's time to try to fool the world with the suit I have been doing for the last 10 years. Candy (one of our fave's) at Sasquatch Watcher sent this to us, and what hoot! This is actually one of the best hoaxes we have ever seen.
FB/FB's breakdown of Leroy Blevin's Bigfoot Costume

Comments

  1. I want to post one more comment....my family live up in northern wisconsin....my brother and i were fishing the Murphy flow age just outside of birchwood Wisconsin....as we were fishing i heard wood knocking in an area where there are swamp and bogs no dwellings at all....i thought it was weird at the time....and this was way before i found out that big foots do this wood knocking thing....of course i cant prove anything...but wanted to pass on this strange story..

    ReplyDelete
  2. the picture looks as though it was taken at the zoo. A real animal, but a captive gorilla and friend.

    ReplyDelete
  3. A complete fake. These ruin it for those of us who really believe. Those fakers really need to stop. Once known as a liar, always a liar.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ah, come on! Without the fake videos, what else would there be to look at? Videos of real ones? Like which ones are those???

      Delete
  4. has anyone seen or heard anything in the st charles county area in missouri

    ReplyDelete
  5. The video on here that claims FB/FB about Leroy Blevins making a video hoax is all lie's I am Leroy Blevins Sr. and I never made a video on a hoax and that is not me in the video and that is not me suit. This hoax was made up by FB/FB and posting it to making false claims and pointing the finger at me when in fact it was them that pulled off this hoax and not me. FB/FB does not know one thing about Bigfoot so that is why they pull off these hoaxs to full people and making people think they know what they are doing in in fact they are clowns and they don't know nothing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They don't know nothing? You talk like an idiot; it's they don't know anything. Otherwise you're just using a double negative which would mean that they do, in fact, know everything.

      Delete
    2. Thank you, Kristina....I was just about to point out that exact same thing. Blevins talks like an idiot.He basically just said that FB/FB knows EVERYTHING about bigfoot! LOL!

      Delete
    3. C'mon now Kristina, what fun would it be if he wrote like a poet?

      Delete
    4. WTH?? Where did this guy learn english and grammar?? I had to stop reading the post because it was so ridiculous and moronic. Is English his second language or was he so blind with rage that he was found out that he just scribbled out a rebuttal furiously and illegibly. WOW he needs to buy English and Grammar for Dummies asap!

      Delete
  6. SLANDER: A FALSE STATEMENT THAT DELIBERATELY DOES HARM TO ANOTHER'S REPUTATION.

    By stating that Blevins did this hoax, you are ruining his reputation as a serious researcher. Only someone juvenile would do this.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It aint SLANDER until its proven to be SLANDER, so shut your pie hole.

      Besides, Blevins has already ruined his own reputation way before this video came out.

      Delete
  7. @Anonymous You're talking to FB/FB right? Leroy had already commented on this and said it was a lie put out by FB/FB.

    ReplyDelete
  8. and yet, they still post it........

    ReplyDelete
  9. OK. Just updated this article with Mr. Blevin's response to FB/FB.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Thank you. Leroy has been working really hard on his research and people have either been using his research as their own or have been mocking him without talking to him. If someone was to talk to him, they would see that he has invaluable information.

    ReplyDelete
  11. @Anonymous Do you how we can personally get in touch with Mr. Blevins? Please have him email us at bigfootevidence@gmail.com. Does he have a blog?

    ReplyDelete
  12. My kid owns a very high dollar gorilla suit and oftens begs me to make a Bigfoot video...why? Why would one do that even if a "non-beleiver?" It isn't funny, or sute or even entertaining in anyway...
    When I first filmed a Bigfoot I of course went to the web to see if there were others.... and the sad fact is there are...many, that are ignored because there are so many fakes...

    every kid and parent, etc thinking they are unique. It is very strange our desire to somehow imitate "wild primates."

    Whatis more eciting than the videos are the people who put out the long and tedious work of recording night sounds... we need to understand more about their communication so we can initiate more meaningful contact/study...

    I saw Nelson's stuff back when I first got accidently involved (haha three years and thousands later) and tucked under hat...seemed plausible. Even more so now, the level of communication is efficient and deep.

    Homo something...

    oh well, perhaps they shall always refuse to be studied...they seem to have a definate plan to stay away!

    ReplyDelete
  13. Considering the mess we've made of things on this planet it does not surprise me that they avoid interaction with us.
    Nor have I any doubt as to which is the more intelligent species.

    ReplyDelete
  14. The square butt on the figure in both videos is a dead give-away. It's the same suit.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I am a skeptic who has been lurking on this site. I don't believe in god. I don't believe in ghosts. I don't believe aliens have visited earth. I don't believe in the paranormal. I also don't believe in conspiracy theories (JFK, 9-11, etc. etc. etc.) The reason I don't believe is there is no good evidence for these claims.

    I also don't believe in bigfoot, but don't get your panties in a bunch until you've read all I've written here. And BTW, you really shouldn't diss all skeptics. Those who pull the weeds are just as important to the garden as those who do the planting.

    Having said that, the Patterson-Gimlin film intrigues me. It has ALWAYS intrigued me because even after 44 years, it still looks real to me. The film in and of itself is not enough evidence to prove the existence of bigfoot. Outrageous claims require outrageous proof and one film does not meet the necessary criteria.

    However, the PG film and some of the physical evidence make me more open-minded toward the possible existence of bigfoot than most other outrageous claims.

    Skeptics are open-minded if you give them proper proof. Show me something irrefutable and I'll be on your side in a heartbeat. (That goes for all the other things I listed, too.)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wow...what DO you believe in? I just can't imagine what a hollow life it would be to walk around not believing in anything. Sad.

      Delete
    2. Then you obviously havent studied the JFK assassination. those involved in the Warren Comission knew it was a cover up, LBJ said there is more to it, JFK's personal aides in the car directly behind him said in Tip Oniel's book that they believed it was a massive plot and that the FBI pressured them to change their story. Oswald could have got a gun anywhere in Texas but chose a way so cops could link it back to him? Oswald also has several strange connections like former FBI chief in Chicago, Guy Bannister, CIA pilot Dave Ferrie, oil millionaire/ intel agent George DeMorenshlidt. look into the case again. there is a ton of non-sense out there but the government knew "if the truth ever came out abaout the JFK assassination, we would be ripe for a revolution." thats a quote from the creator/ producer of 60 minutes also the producer of the JFK vs Nixon 60' debates.

      Delete
  16. So funny.....You believe in God..But, Nothing else....due to lack of evidence? I myself have studied many religions, and have found no evidence of God. People choose to believe what they want to..... Wow !! You chose ignorance. Fine. Keep it to yourself. One HUGE problem with humanity is that we, as individuals, like to think we know everything. Guess what.....we don't know shit!! The chance of there being bigfoot or aliens, in my opinion, is much greater than the chance that there is a god like man believes in.

    ReplyDelete
  17. It looked real at first until I saw the god-awful neckline. But it is a great suit, I recommend that the tailor who made it to work for a Hollywood costume/effect company (which they might already be doing).

    ReplyDelete
  18. Mr.Chastain, who are you responding to? The person above you says they don't believe in God either.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Anonymous above who thinks the film looks real. I used to believe so too. Please check this link:

    http://www.bigfootencounters.com/images/facial_profile.htm

    These are rapidly advancing and retracting photos of the facial profile of the creature. Please look intently just to the right of the creatures left cheek area (right side of film just right of cheek area).

    You will note that a frame (which flashes twice) has the profile of a man's face--you can see nose, unsmiling lips, and chin. Whether the face is part of a mask, in the background, or part of another film which was spliced over, it shows that there is something seriously amiss with the film footage.

    There were only two men there on horse-back, according to their sworn claims---yet here is a third man, caught on film. I smell a hoax. :)

    ReplyDelete
  20. Poor old Leroy's totally lost it now, talk about desperation in his on-going attempts to disprove the PGF, which of course is no fake like this video.

    ReplyDelete
  21. I don't care what they say, but this to me LOOKS REAL... I have learned people talk ( nd do) so much bullsh#it when it comes to the authenticity of Bigfoot. Some have nothing better to do with their time, but to make hoaxes, while others, will purposedly lie, fabricate an explanation and cover stuff up to protect them. I do really believe the DO EXIST. Way too many sightings throughout the years and specifically more in some areas.

    ReplyDelete
  22. havent read comments. the baby is a dummy clearly. its not moving ,it shakes a bit. same as 99% of BF videos.the bst one is still P/G one. why hat one is held up as 'it hasnt ben proven a fake et' beats me. i guess it could be true. i watched the documentry on the tall guy[7 2"]forget his name but u will all no him! he passed the polygraph test to say he was in it. which iscrazy as did patty pass it. I guess Patty could have been hoaxed but that was a big chance to take. It would acount for Pattys' BF looking back as he did. I doubt he would have looked back as much as his senses would have picked up Gimln had trotted across the creek[or crick if u listen to Gimlin,the last of the cowboys,in more than one t seems
    maybe its time to face up to the Fact that BF isnt there sadlyI mean guys where is the proof. these blobsquatches andhoaxes on here. even the reserchers[so ive read]have succummed to hoaxing as tey havent seen it themselves,fasano etc...even cliff barackmann hasnt seen it and hes been lookingfor 25years and Moneymaker hasnt seen zip. Bobo saw a glimse once or twice[no camera when on a BF night search,lolye right]

    lets face it its joke subject. if im wrong please use this post to point to good 'evidence'. i mean that! not taking thepiss as i would love there to be Bf out here but cant see where the evidence is. we r tlking USA/canada not Tibet here. i know the rockies etc...r mssive but not enough to stop HD footage from time to time not once 50years ago

    ReplyDelete
  23. the suit's ok, but that rock was awesome!!

    ReplyDelete
  24. LOL

    Moved just like a normal sized man in a suit.
    Bigfoots are faster & stronger than horses & move effortlessly.
    Bigfoots have a shoulder width 50% to twice proportionally of a human. The furred head is almost as wide as the shoulders - even most humans have proportionally wider shoulders to head ratio. LOL

    ReplyDelete
  25. An obvious hoax. Why would such elusive and intelligent creature always walk 'across the view'? Hoaxers always seem to get this wrong. Wouldn't best way to create distance be to walk directly away from the camera, especially when there is as much cover in that direction? Again, it's the old 'right to left' hoax 'technique'...

    ReplyDelete
  26. Looking at the frame by frame I would just like to say has anyone noticed the feet? The bottoms look similar to the bottom of footsie pajamas with toes. They are so pale...how is it that there is no dirt on it if they live in forests. I'm not doubting the possiblity of BigFoot, just the credibility of the film.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Blevins tried forever to prove Patty a fake and like all others...he failed miserably. I pay him no attention,he is only seeking it.

    ReplyDelete
  28. This is the best footage i've seen yet, Much better than Blevins' half-assed GORILLA suit ( not 'ghillie' that annoys the fuck outta me)

    ReplyDelete
  29. We have proven that even the most elusive animal can be caught on camera, day or night. So the explanation that Big Foot photos are rare and poor quality because Big Foot is elusive is a lame explanation.

    ReplyDelete
  30. We can photograph your mailbox using a satellite in Space but we can't get a single clear shot of Big Foot? How ridiculous is that?

    ReplyDelete
  31. How come all Big Foot videos are shot with lousy cameras and amateur photographers?

    ReplyDelete
  32. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    3. I cant believe how hardly no 1 talking about whats going on this video, yer it could be a really good suit and some people said about the neck line, I could not see the neckline move as it turns it head but then again things in the wild could look hand made but i Like to think its real because how the big foot keeps looking at you knowing your there, feels unsafe for the baby and don't care to been seen and goes to the baby and pick its up and if you LOOK CLOSELY at the baby you can see the mum/dad put its arm onto the baby back that moves the baby head with little bit of force to the chest but then baby moves its own head back to where it was as the mum/dad arm still on the baby back so that must have be a real baby to force its own head back to the same position when the mum/dad arm Still on the baby back, to me saying it got a mind of its own and don't want to be pushed into the chest, and as they start to walk away you can see the baby arm stretches out straight (like pushing away) then bends it to get closer to the mum/dad chest just before they go behind the tree,and then near the end the baby head turns at you a little bit to take a look because mum/dad keeps looking in shock you could say that you got so close to the baby.i did found it was taking small steps as many others said they take big steps but then again it was holding a baby and just like real people,as real people act different to others same can go for the big foot each one acts different to each other I hope what i found helps people to see what im on about. love watching videos of Bigfoot as so far i can tell this is a good quality video to the rest i have seen... Sorry for my bad English ^^ Thank you... change my mind about leaving my email here as i dont know what might happen so that enplanes the deleted posts, my bad >.<

      Delete
    4. When costume is shown second time,the hand around the baby doesn't move because it is a puppet I believe,far arm is being used to move the baby while arm doesn't move from where it is.But I could

      Delete
  33. be wrong.fake right arm behind baby.

    ReplyDelete
  34. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Ok, not bad drama. One thing I observe is the skirt of the head hood draping across the back of the costume as it runs away from the rock. Pretty good film quality. As I have stated before, every bigfoot seems to be a different species in terms of their look or their behavior. This one runs quite differently from PG, don't you think? More human like (*wink*).

    ReplyDelete
  36. No, no, no; not a suit. Obvious CGI. Look closer.

    ReplyDelete
  37. please tell me someone didn't put a child in a gorilla suit and place him alone in the woods while they filmed this

    ReplyDelete
  38. I have mixed feelings about this but idk it screams fake but and yet it screams real idk

    ReplyDelete
  39. Now that's laughable! Should be charged form child cruelty for dressing that baby in that costume!

    ReplyDelete
  40. Hello there! This is my first comment here so I just wanted to give a quick shout out and say I truly enjoy reading through your
    posts. Can you recommend any other blogs/websites/forums that deal with the same topics?

    Thank you!

    Also visit my site: raspberry ketone reviews

    ReplyDelete
  41. The subject in this footage moves very slowly from right to left, unlike the subject in the Patterson-Gimlin film, which moves from left to right. Normally, this would be a HUGE red flag. But folks, this is not a normal piece of footage. What astonishes most is the creature's gait. I'll go ahead and say it here first: I'm dubbing this the "WOW Footage."

    I've run this video through several filters, including one that allows me to superimpose bones on everything and the one that turns everything pointlessly green.

    Starting with the Bone Superimposer Filter, I spent several hours going frame-by-frame and adding in femurs, hipbones, a skull, tibulas — even the coccyx; bone — using known, hard-science biometrics; folks, this is not a guy in a suit.

    But if it is a guy in a suit, it is a very, very good one.

    Next I used the filter that turns everything pointlessly green. If anything's going to expose a hoax, it's the filter that turns everything pointlessly green. Now, I'm a serious researcher and not one of these wing-ding "Bleevers" who obsesses about the telenovelas on cable. I don't even get cable. Haven't for years. Cable's a scam. But I watched this footage over and over using the filter that turns everything pointlessly green until a boy no older than 12 who came for the children's story hour wandered over and looked over my shoulder and said to his mother, "Mom, what's that man doing?"

    "THIS IS NO MAN!," I roared back at him like some triumphant Attenborough, "THIS MAY BE THE REAL DEAL!"

    What happened next would be hard to explain. Not everyone is ready for the truth. Obviously.

    The subject confirms on the following points:

    • Between two and six arms;
    • Between six and two legs;
    • Sighted near water;
    • Confounds the Bone Superimposer Filter;
    • Overall redish in color, or maybe it changes some to white or something; and
    • Frightens children.

    This may be the real deal, folks.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Hi there friends, its great article concerning teachingand entirely defined, keep it up all the time.



    Feel free to visit my web page Sac Guess Pas Cher

    ReplyDelete
  43. Good day! This is my 1st comment here so I just wanted to give a quick shout out and tell
    you I really enjoy reading through your posts. Can you recommend any other blogs/websites/forums that deal with the
    same topics? Thanks a ton!

    Here is my weblog ... Louis Vuitton Outlet

    ReplyDelete
  44. Fantastic goods from you, man. I've take note your stuff prior to and you are just extremely excellent. I actually like what you have received here, certainly like what you're saying and the
    best way through which you say it. You make it enjoyable and you still care for to stay it sensible.
    I can't wait to read far more from you. That is actually a tremendous web site.

    Here is my homepage - Chaussure Air Jordan

    ReplyDelete
  45. What's up to every one, it's actually a pleasant for me to pay a quick visit this web site, it contains precious Information.


    my website - Cheap Louis Vuitton Handbags

    ReplyDelete
  46. Watch my video break down of this sighting, the baby moves! how did they pull this off?? Please explain.. http://youtu.be/g1Mv8c-e09U

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story