BigfootWeekend September Expedition

Monday, June 27, 2011

Erickson Project: Two Dead Bigfoot Bodies Being Used For DNA Test, Whereabouts Caused Matt Moneymaker to be "hopping mad"


Update: Click here to read Erickson Project: Clarification on the Two Dead Bigfoot Bodies, Friend of Shooter Responds
Update: Click here to read Erickson-Lindsay Project DNA Update: Bigfoot is a man, an ancient man, a blast from our ancient past, a subhuman, a human ancestor
Update: Erickson Project: Leader of Bigfoot DNA research group responds to "leaked" results

Special Update: Click here to listen to radio interview with Robert Lindsay and Richard Stubstad

Breakings news from Robert Lindsay's blog about the Erickson Project, two dead Bigfoots, Matt Moneymaker, DNA samples, National Geographic, and many more.

We don't know how Robert gets people to spill the beans about the Erickson Project, but I bet you it's either money or drugs. First the Richard Stubstat Erickson Project Bigfoot DNA leak, and now this. How do you do it Robert? Did you slip a pill into their drinks without them noticing? Whatever you do, keep it up, because we all deserve to know!

Here's the article taken from Robert's blog:
New Erickson Project News: Bigfoot DNA Project Using Two Dead Bigfoot Bodies for Samples

Note: Long, runs to 24 pages.

I was recently put into touch with a hunter from Western North America who is quite well known in his field. You might even say that he is famous. He and others were the subject of a recent book, and he often gives talks at various forums. He was formerly employed at America’s foremost science museum but is no longer working there.

He is considered to be at the top of his field, which I will not reveal here. He is also a hunter and travels around North America hunting. He especially likes to hunt bears. This puts him in touch with many other hunters. He is also active on taxidermy boards. He has deep ties to the Erickson Project and the Olympic Project.

He will be known anonymously as Bear Hunter in this article, as he only talked to me on the grounds that his identity was kept secret.

Robert Lindsay: Hi, what made you decide to get in touch with me?

Bear Hunter: Well, I read your article where you interviewed Richard Stubstad, and I thought, “Wow! This guy is hot on the trial! He’s really close. He’s closing in. So I decided to fill in some blanks for you.”

RL: Is there a reason why you decided to spill the beans on this hot news to me just now?

BH: Yes, I am getting very impatient with the pace of this project. You know, it’s always coming out this year, then next year, then this year again, then next year again, then this spring. I’m getting tired of it. I want to jumpstart this project and tell them to get going and finish it up.

RL: You say you have some blockbuster news regarding the Erickson Project Bigfoot DNA study, right?

BH: Yes I do. This all started from a thread on Taxidermy.net, a website where I hang out. There are sometimes threads on Bigfoots, and in this one thread, in November 2010, a guy said that he had just shot two Bigfoots! The guy is a trapper, a taxidermist and a hunter. This was huge news of course, and pretty soon there were lots of followup posts. Somehow the guy’s name and number got out, and there were reports of people bothering him and harassing him. He asked the webmaster, George Ruff, to shut down the thread. George shut it down.

Well, afterward, I got in touch with the guy and talked to him for a while. Adrian Erickson, Matt Moneymaker and Tyler Huggins all got involved. Moneymaker and Huggins are with the BFRO (Bigfoot Field Research Organization). Erickson had heard of Bigfoots getting shot; actually, he has lots a number of stories from Canada where they get shot pretty regularly. But, as he put it, “I’ve never been two weeks behind a shooting before.” Everybody was scrambling after this guy!

RL: How was it that the Bigfoots came to be shot, and were they killed?

BH: In November 2010, [name withheld] was hunting on the border between Nevada and California, inside California, near a game refuge. (RL: Based on my investigation, it took place in or near the Dixie Mountain Game Refuge west of Frenchman Lake on the Plumas National Forest in Plumas County. It borders Washoe County in Nevada. See a map here).

On one side of the game refuge, there was this single road in a canyon leading into and out of the refuge. Bigfoots were apparently using the game refuge, since they are safe from hunters there.

The guy was on this road when he came upon a large dirty-white (RL: supposedly female) Bigfoot standing in the road. Since the narrow road was the only route in and out of the place, the Bigfoots were forced to use this road whether they wanted to or not. The Bigfoot was standing there waving her arms at him. I thought maybe she was telling the hunter to back up so the Bigfoot could move through, since the Bigfoot was stuck on the road, no?

The guy stopped his truck and jumped out. He knew it was a Bigfoot, but he thought she was threatening him. The Bigfoot knew his intentions by now, and she started to run away. He shot her with a 25.06. He shot her through the side of her chest, piercing her lungs. The Bigfoot took off into the brush, but he heard her crash down soon afterward.

Next thing he knew, he heard barking sounds coming from the side of the road. There were two young Bigfoots there that popped up out of nowhere. They were brown-colored. The hunter shot one of the young Bigfoots dead! He’s an idiot, right?

It died in his arms. 4 feet tall, 80 pounds. He said it had a huge head, and then I knew it was a young Bigfoot, because the young ones have gigantic heads while they are still young. The head is more normal sized as they get older. Remember that “Pancake Video” from the Kentucky Project, where the young Bigfoot has a huge head that everyone was saying was a human with some birth defect? Well, that is what they look like when they are young.

Have you seen the Jacobs footage that they say is a mangy bear? The shooter told me the juvenile he shot looked just like the Jacobs creature.

RL: Yes, what is it? A bear?

BH: No way. It’s a juvenile Bigfoot. You can tell by the hips. And the neck. The thing has no neck. I know bears. I love bears. No way is that a bear.

RL: Why did he shoot the adult Bigfoot? He says he thought it was a bear.

BH: No. He knew what it was. Because of the color. Bears don’t come in off-white. Anyone knows that. He shot it because he thought it was threatening him.

RL: Why did he shoot the juvenile Bigfoot? He says it got up on an outcrop and was threatening him.

BH: No, that’s not true. Why did he shoot it? He’s that kind of guy. I know a lot of hunters. Most are good people, but some are not. There are a lot of guys like him out there hunting. People shoot things just because they can, just to kill them. That’s why he did it. He did it because that’s what kind of person he is.

RL: What did he do with the Bigfoots?

BH: He told us that he left them lying there. There was snow on the ground, so we figured that there might still be enough time to go in and get the bodies. Pretty soon, we decided that the guy was probably lying. We thought he probably took the bodies, because taxidermists are hoarders – they never leave anything they shoot in the field.

RL: The Olympic Project says they went back to the site over two weeks later and found a bit of flesh on the ground, left over from the shooting. They used this bit of flesh to slice up and submit to the DNA project.

BH: No, they told me they never went back there.

RL: What happened to the dead Bigfoots?

BH: Well, we put the hunter in contact with the Olympic Project that is working on Bigfoots in Washington State. We didn’t hear much for a while, only that the OP folks kept saying, “We are just trying to keep [name withheld] out of jail.” The hunter was convinced that if California figured out he shot these two Bigfoots, he was going to jail. He was really afraid of going to jail.

RL: Ok, then?

BH: Moneymaker and the BFRO were in on this too. It was a mad rush for those bodies!

We didn’t hear much more for a while until the Olympic Project starting sending samples to Melba Ketchum for her DNA project as part of the Erickson Project. Some of the samples that the EP was getting were of tissue, and they looked like they were carved off a dead body!

(RL: One sample appeared to be carved off of the thigh of a human or hominid cadaver. Dr. Ketchum was so freaked out by the sample that she called people up asking them to hold it for her in case the police came to her lab, because she was afraid of going to jail.)

The samples had two different colors of hair. Obviously, the Olympic Project was sending Ketchum samples carved from the bodies of the two dead Bigfoots? Isn’t that incredible?

RL: Who has the Bigfoots, the hunter or the Olympic Project?

BH: I think that the hunter still has the bodies or he has parts of the bodies. Maybe he cut parts off them before he left. If he has the bodies, he has probably cut them up, cut off the heads and has them on ice. They can last a long time like that. I don’t think the Olympic Project has the bodies.

We did a lot more digging, and we found that now the hunter is associated deeply with the OP. He’s part of their project. The OP is not admitting to anything. They deny it all, they say they have no dead Bigfoots, and they don’t have access to any.

RL: Incredible news!

BH: Yes, there’s more too. Notice how the Olympic Project is all over the Internet boards talking about how they have enough Bigfoot samples to last for years? Guess why they say that? Probably because they have access to two dead Bigfoot bodies! Think about it.

RL: Too much…Do you know about any leaks from the Erickson Project DNA study?

BH: Yes, I do. They are very close to humans. Say if chimpanzees are 2 clicks away from humans, these things are maybe 3/4 of a click away.

RL: Ok, and they are in the Homo line?

BH: Yes, I am sure of that. Recall that say 50,000 YBP, there were maybe five different hominids on the planet. Homo sapiens sapiens, Homo erectus, Homo Floresiensis, Denisova, Homo heidelbergensis and Neandertal Man. All of these other hominids are gone. What happened to them?

RL: We killed them all.

BH: Yes, we killed them all. So the only thing that could survive was something that was huge, very stealthy and wary, hated humans, favored the most remote areas, had the use of bad smell to ward off enemies, used an intense EMF field to paralyze and disorient enemies, was very strong and had a very thick skin that was hard to penetrate. They’re the ultimate survivors of our genocidal wars.

RL: Do you think they are humans or apes?

BH: I don’t know. You know Bindernagel wrote that book, America’s Great Ape, but then after he saw the Bigfoots in Kentucky, he changed his mind. Now he thinks that they are hominids. But I know one fellow who saw one face to face on a trail. He said it’s ape-like; it’s an ape-man. So who knows?

RL: Do you have any info on the Kentucky Project?

BH: I do. Erickson bought that place, and he got a lot of great video out of there. He installed Dennis Pfohl and Leila Hadj-Chikh there, and they shot quite a bit of Bigfoot video. Erickson said he had so much good Bigfoot video that he was getting tired of taking pictures of them. At one point, he brought Bindernagel down there to see the Bigfoots. Bindernagel was able to see them. He also wanted to bring John Green down there, but he was very sick with prostate cancer and could not make it.

A friend of mine saw the famous video of the young female Bigfoot walking in the forest. She walks towards the camera, then sees the camerawoman, growls and turns away. He said there is no way that this could be a costume. They also shot video of a huge male at that site, but everyone is keeping very quiet about that.

RL: Do you believe that Erickson is in it for the money?

BH: I get tired of hearing this. Erickson has sunk $3 million of his own money into this thing. $3 million! He hasn’t made one nickel back.

RL: Do you have any information about Erickson’s movie about Bigfoot?

BH: Yes, it’s finished! 100% completed. They are just waiting for the DNA study to finish up, and I have no word on that yet.

RL: Do you know if Dr. Ketchum has any TV or film interests in the works?

BH: Yes, she is involved with National Geographic. They want to do a special on Bigfoot, and she is involved in that.

RL: What’s the relationship between Bigfoots and trappers?

BH: Bigfoots hang out along traplines and raid them. I heard of one case where a Bigfoot got caught in a trap. The Bigfoot got himself out of the trap by bending the solid steel! Unbelievable!

RL: You say you hear a lot of stories of Bigfoots getting killed?

BH: Yes, I get a story about every 2 months. They range from recent to pretty far back in time. There are many stories coming out of Canada too. Erickson also has many stories. It’s the same story every time. People kill it, and it looks so much like a human being that they leave it in the field because they are afraid they are going to be prosecuted for murder.

RL: I say that if you believe in Bigfoot, you must also believe in a few things. 1) People are shooting at and killing these things fairly regularly. 2) There must be a government coverup. 3) We are photographing and videotaping Bigfoots on a fairly regular basis.

BH: I agree. As far as a government coverup, of course the government must know about these things. And I know that the timber industry knows about them. And people shoot them all the time.

There was a recent case in Alberta where the Fish and Wildlife people were poisoning wolves. They are supposed to tell trappers about this, but they didn’t in this case. A trapper found a dead wolf partly eaten and huge tracks leading away from it. The tracks were of a Bigfoot that had been poisoned by eating the wolf. The guy tracked it for a while but then lost the trail.

He reported it to the Game people, but they paid him $20,000 to shut him up. They kept saying, “So, you lost 5 cougar dogs tracking that thing. That’s worth about $20,000.” He hadn’t lost any cougar dogs. He finally figured out they were offering him money to shut him up, so he took the money.

RL: What’s the motivation for the coverup?

BH: In Canada, they are worried about resource lockup. They are afraid it will shut down logging. I know that up there, as soon as there is a Bigfoot sighting, the timber people get word of it and come in and clearcut the area. They do that to drive the Bigfoot off, because they don’t want the Bigfoot on their logging land. They’re afraid it will keep them from logging the land.

RL: Do you think Bigfoots are getting habituated to humans in any way?

BH: Yes, a friend of mine in Alberta told me about a Bigfoot that was living on the outskirts of the Nordegg dump, living off the garbage, foraging food out of the trash. People tracked the thing way back into a remote area and found its nest. All sorts of stuff from the dump had been hung in trees 8-10 feet up, bicycles, chairs, you name it. The Bigfoot was decorating its home with that stuff.

RL: Wow!

BH: Yes, I have so many stories. When I go to give my talks, I always say if you have any Bigfoot stories, come up and talk to me afterward. Every time, people come up to talk to me. All sorts of people. They haven’t told many others about their sightings, and every case, they have not reported it to any private or public agency.

One guy told me how he was hunting in a swamp in the Southeast US, and he passed out from the swamp gas. The stuff can overwhelm you and make you pass out.

He woke up, and he was next to a spring. There was a huge 8-foot Bigfoot crouched down next to him, offering a cup of water from the spring. The cup had been hanging from the spring. People sometimes hang metal cups from springs. He took a drink, passed out again, and then woke up again later on. The Bigfoot was still there, and it offered him another drink. He drank it and passed out again. He woke up the third time, and the Bigfoot was gone.

RL: Do you think that tracking dogs are good for tracking Bigfoots, say in order to capture one? Jeff Meldrum has been talking about that a lot lately.

BH: I think dogs are useless when it comes to tracking these things. You know, I am a hunter, and I use tracking dogs all the time. We take people out on guided hunts, and I hunt myself all the time using guides. Dogs will track anything, but they won’t track these things. The meanest dog on Earth will be left pissing, shivering and whimpering by his master’s legs.

I knew one guy who sent six dogs after a Bigfoot. Only five of them came back; the sixth was torn up. The other five dogs were so traumatized that they were useless as trackers. They would never track another animal again. And these were good tracking dogs.

RL: What do you think of Bigfoots’ use of infrasound?

BH: I am not sure that they use infrasound. You see, all animals have an EMF field that they give off, and these things do too. One of my theories is that these things have a very strong EMF field that they give off, and they may be able to manipulate it. One thing you notice is that when these things are around, everything goes quiet, and most of the animals around take off. That’s because of the strong EMF field that the Bigfoots give off. It scares the crap out of other animals.

I know that they use this field to disorient people. Erickson said he was being chased out of the forest in Canada by one once, and he was so disoriented and delirious that he had to keep looking at the moss on the trees, because you know, moss only grows on the north? That’s because the Bigfoot was disorienting him so much that he kept getting lost.

I am going to test this theory out by buying an outfit that they sell for $100. It neutralizes your own EMF field. Supposedly, you can wear it and walk right up to animals and touch them.

RL: Were you always a Bigfoot believer?

BH: Not at all. I was a skeptic until five years ago. Then I started looking into this thing, and all of these people started coming forward, including people I had known for years and trusted completely. I started getting swamped with these stories, even people I had known a long time had stories, but they had never told me! I dove into it, started doing a lot of research, and soon it became completely obvious that these things exist. People can ridicule me all they want to, and they do, believe me. But I don’t care; I know they are real.

RL: Have you met any skeptics who saw one?

BH: Many times. And a lot of them were hardcore skeptics. But then they saw a Bigfoot, and they all changed over to believers. They said that their lives were changed completely.

Related:

38 comments:

  1. This is nutty, as an electrical and electronic expert I can say with some authority that neither animals nor humans give off a detectable electro-magnetic field. And that part about the BF offering the disoriented man drinks. That is obviously a bunch of bunk.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are completely wrong, we do give an electro-magnetic field. The hart gives off emf 5000 times stronger then the brain does.

      Delete
  2. Also, not everyone would be afraid of being prosecuted for murder for shooting one. With only a little thought by only a marginally intelligent person, it's easy to realize that one would only have to tell authorities that it attacked or threatened to attack them and therefore it would be self-defense, which would not be prosecuted in most parts of the US or Canada. Besides, by law either they are human or not. And it would be easy for a court defense attorney to convince a jury that these things ( if they exist ) are NOT human. Scientific expert testimony from an expert could easily make the case for something like this being non-human. Even in Skamania county Washington, where they have a law forbidding the slaying of a BF, you could get off by a claim of self-defense. Even a cheap court appointed lawyer could get you off the hook.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "a little though by only a marginally intelligent person"...
      sounds like a "researcher" or bigfoot blogger.

      Delete
    2. If this guy killed two bigfoots, he is an idiot

      Delete
  3. I just listened to the radio interview and it's one of the best Bigfoot interviews I've ever heard. Robert Lindsay seems convince of the Bear Hunter story. For me, I don't know what to think. I've heard of these sorts of lies before, but I'm going to let my guard down a little and giving them the benefit of the doubt.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Coyotes, wolves, cougars, bears, hawks/owls/eagles, and all other known predators must have a switch they use to turn off their "EMF" so they can catch their prey by surprise. Otherwise they'd scare off their prey, right?? After all creatures can detect this EMF, the article says that so it must be true. Predators switch it all off temporarily. Now we all are educated with the truth.

    ReplyDelete
  5. No Fish and Wildlife agency in any state or province poisons carcasses to kill wolves. At least not in the last 50 years. This could and would kill many other non-targeted species. That's not game or wildlife management, at least not modern, government sanctioned management.

    Also, if governments of nations like Canada and the US are covering anything up, it would not be for the sake of lumber companies. This would not be necessary, the "Bigfeet" don't harm or kill logging crews and they really could no nothing to stop lumber operations. A more valid explanation as to why a government would cover up this type of phenomenon would be because it would scare the holy bejeesus out of hikers, camper, hunters, bird watchers and all other types of nature lovers. This would cause a significant economic loss to all sorts of outdoor industries and park service fee revenues. Nobody would want to venture out very far from civilization of such things really existed and it was well known. Even fishermen would be scared to go afield out in the middle of nowhere. That would be plausible, but that being said, I still don't believe in this stuff.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The timber industry would lose out because any land that was proven to have Sasquatches inhabiting it would become protected conservation land. Therefore it could not be logged. I think that is what this guy was getting at!

      Delete
    2. Well said! in the scheme of things, what lengths would an individual(s)take to ensure continued monetary gain?

      Delete
  6. Supposedly this guy was going to the location to shoot bear. But why would someone use the 25-06 Remington cartridge for bear? Seems an odd caliber for use on black bear. A very high velocity round because it was developed from the famous 30-06 cartridge, it was just necked down to accept a smaller and lighter .25 caliber bullet. But the smaller bullet, although faster, does not have a lot of energy or knock down power. I'd use at least a .270 Winchester or something in the .30 caliber range. Maybe a 30-06 itself or .308 Winchester.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anon 3:25, not all outdoorsmen are aware of caliber differences, energy dispersal and the like. Remember, dangerous game such as the Africa Big 5 were sought with "Medium" bore weapons at one time. Those that practiced this believed in bullet placement rather than impact efficiency. Either way, I do agree with your assessment. Kudos

      Delete
    2. yes, but he claims he was a regular hunter and taxidermist, so he should have been aware of this. Like all of lindsays blogs, this one is about 99% made up. i'm surprised anyone takes him at face value.

      Delete
  7. if your photographing them "on a regular basis"... and theres "so much proof"... where the heck is it??

    all i hear is talk.

    ReplyDelete
  8. DR. Kethchum is a creep she takes peoples money and then steals anything that has to do with bigfoot stuff..I am a witnecess to that TOM BURNETTE author natures secret agents....

    ReplyDelete
  9. Interesting.
    I've delivered to the Nordegg area twice and thought it would be an ideal location for Bigfoot.
    Lots of water,lots of game and plenty of cover for living.The trees are very dense up that way.
    I was 100 kms. in the bush doing a delivery when I came to any area that smelled terrible. I had my window open because the morning was warm.
    I was traveling on a dirt road with trees on one side and a clearing on the other with trees farther back.
    The smell reminded me of a cattle feed lot.The strong smell of urine,dung and dirty animals.
    It never occurred to me until after and I thought "hey,there are no cattle or horse ranches here,it's oil field."
    I never saw anything but the smell was unforgettable.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I find it funny that person thinks the government would cover up bigfoot to support the already failed and mostly failing parks departments which cost taxpayers to opperate rather than cover them up as a preventative measure taken by the government grant funded multi-trillion dollar logging industry,

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey Anonymous, there's a reason why you have NO likes! It seems ur an expert on everything, except sasquatch!!! Find another site!

      Delete
    2. hey anonymous, how many likes do YOU have? oh, none...

      Delete
  11. I agree, the government has other things to worry about than wether a birdwatcher gets nightmares or if uncle jimmy goes fishing this summer. And if anything it would boost park tickets, tourism, and stores like R.E.I. would bennifit greatley. I believe that it is inevitable that in time it will be a scientific certanty they exist and a sudden boom in ecconomic growth both on tv, in the media and small bussiness as well as large, people are going to make billions and it may even grow quickley into an ecconomic staple industry. If i was wall street or big government i would want to get all my big bussiness affairs in order before i started the trend, you know, monopolise the whole industry and then press the start button.

    ReplyDelete
  12. UTTER GARBAGE!!! I'm mad I even wasted my time reading this mess. Individuals like this are the reason that this field of research is openly mocked and disregarded by society and science.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Moneymaker was never chasing after this supposed corpse in the Sierras. He said from the very beginning that Smeja's story was plainly a hoax, and that it didn't add up any other way. He called it out from the get go. So at least that part of Lindsay's article is totally bunk.

    ReplyDelete
  14. This story and Matt Moneymaker are both crocks of dookie. Its a shame that these tv shows and crazy stories are able to fool people in to thinking that its true.I believe that a BF type creature is possible but until they have real hands on evidence all these crazy tales are going to keep most sane people from even considering it.

    ReplyDelete
  15. The BH has to be Shockey, and if it is then it's all true! Nothing here is a stretch when you break it down. Just curious why he didn't want to be identified. As for Matt, my kids love his show, they told a friend to watch it and he did, then he said, I guess they'll never find it will they. They won't! Then the show would be over!

    Why the cover up? Logging? Better thought is our world isn't ready for the possibility that an ansesstor to us is out there and worse than that we are hunting it.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Surely the hold-up is because these beings in fact are human of some kind. I mean, the DNA's studied and if it's only ape/animal then that's a very big thing too naturally, only it would appear it's so much more than that, and it's just taking forever because of this newly discovered and proven fact apparently. I'm guessing foreign scientists are involded in this by now, so I predict some big scientific history changing news in the times ahead, when exactly who knows but it would appear to be coming for sure. What may actually be there in the 1000s probably and flesh and blood, can't remain undiscovered for all eternity.

    ReplyDelete
  17. all i can say is bullsh*t all this evidence but none released every video or picture nothing but a blurry out of focus shot and most of all moss does not only grow on the north side of trees anyonr who has spent any amount of time in the woods or forests would know this and not make such a stupid statement this guy is as likely to be truthful as biscardi is

    ReplyDelete
  18. id like to know when would be a good guess at when the dna resuslts should come back. so the erickson project will air

    ReplyDelete
  19. If this BH guy gives public talks where he asks for people to tell him Bigfoot stories, why is he afraid to give his name?

    ReplyDelete
  20. i thnk yor guys are right, this is nothing more than a large human retard man, and people realize this after they shoot these wild men. to drag a body out of the woods is like taking a human to the cops after you shot them.

    ReplyDelete
  21. I am in woods all the time. I believe there are "beings" and things unbelieveable all around. (not JUST in woods. Have seen many things. But this story is a bunch of crock a poo poo........

    ReplyDelete
  22. I'll tell you how Robert does it. He makes the stuff up.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. yes, yes he does. he's found an audience that he can manipulate and he panders to its baser nature. some of his blog "replies" are actually from him. (susieq one example.) he sees the bigfoot community as an opportunity to get blog hits, so he manipulates it. and he knows that most of the so called community is reactive , impulsive, emotional, territorial, and not skeptical enough to consider the source. all of the blog hits on his bigfoot posts are paving the way for his bizarre racist posts with their barely hidden xenophobic hatred.

      Delete
  23. Dennis Pfohl says "We filmed and recorded them on many different occasions"

    Dr Leila Hadi-Chikh says "Definitely we had some really great opportunities to collect quite compelling evidence"

    Are they working on the same project? Having filmed them on many different occasions sounds more than just "great opportunities to collect quite compelling evidence". He sounds like they have hit the mother lode, she sounds a bit more vague...which is it? Evidence or no evidence, which is what she is basically saying?

    If they truly have many films and recordings they should release immediately, they would make more money with actual foorage than they ever will with this hype about what is probably ambiguous at best, the usual blurry black blob...honesty people!

    ReplyDelete
  24. Robert is a child predator

    ReplyDelete
  25. You know there are some hobbits living in my green house. If you guys are interested I can get some DNA samples from the hair on their feet if you like. I will have to bait them with bacon and eggs though and collect the samples during daylight as the Orcs come out at night. Oh yeah the Orcs, forgot about them. You can get your own damn DNA samples from those guys.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Back in the 1980's as fur price rose very high, ($100 for a red fox pelt) Suddenly everybody became a trapper. All of a sudden, People were publishing 'How to books on Trapping"! Everybody was an expert on the subject. One author made alot of money from his 'how to booklets" to his trapping adventures. After he died, it was found out that he never trapped in his life! Just was an excellent writer, stole material and Photos from others. People believed in him. He was the "Modern day Daniel Boone' but never set a Trap! he as an acountant! Does this story sound familiar?

    ReplyDelete