Sasquatch Summit: Controversial Skookum Cast makes its appearance

By -
Fast-Forward 1:00 to see the Skookum Cast.


Believe to be cast of a partial Bigfoot body print found 9/22/2000 during a BFRO expedition in southern Washington state. The cast is referred to as the "Skookum Cast" because it was found in the Skookum Meadows area of the Gifford Pinchot National Forest. 

Skeptics like Dr. Anton Wroblewski, who claimed to have analyzed the Skookum cast said it is nothing  more than an elk.

See BFRO: How the Skookum Cast was Obtained


Found in a remote area of the Cascade Mountains known as Skookum Meadows, the BFRO team cast the imprint using more than 200 pounds of plaster. Named the "Skookum Cast," this monumental piece of Bigfoot evidence is shipped to a laboratory in Seattle for forensic analysis.

Comments

  1. AnonymousThursday, April 14, 2011 at 8:14:00 PM PDT

    Wroblewski is unqualified to make any scientific determination about the cast.

    The list of people (living and deceased) who say (said) it is not an elk, and were are qualified to make that determination:

    Dr. Jeff Meldrum
    Dr. Grover Krantz
    Dr. John Bindernagle
    Dr. Esteban Sarmiento
    Dr. Daris Swindler

    Wroblewski is a geologist.

    ReplyDelete
  2. spouseFriday, April 13, 2012 at 3:44:00 PM PDT

    The camera person needs a lesson on movement and zoom.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnonymousTuesday, May 7, 2013 at 7:12:00 PM PDT

      yea I like the virtual tour idea but his execution is shit

      Delete
  3. AnonymousWednesday, April 25, 2012 at 9:30:00 AM PDT

    I am surprised the cast image was not blurry as is the norm in almost all bigfoot evidence imagery.

    At least most of these researchers have various scientific qualifications, other than the lawyer. I am surprised there were so few hairs found considering the fur was in contact with the ground and made imprint marks.

    new anony

    ReplyDelete
  4. AnonymousWednesday, July 30, 2014 at 10:47:00 AM PDT

    How did the sasquatch exit the laying position without leaving evidence of footprints?

    ReplyDelete
  5. AnonymousMonday, November 3, 2014 at 2:50:00 PM PST

    I have elk hunted this area several years, I cannot say what caused the impression in the mud, however 2 years ago my two friends were hunting up there on Big Creek and found 2 prints in the mud of the creek bank, they were stunned, amazed and terrified at what they saw. They were not prepared to take photos but when they returned home they Googled orangutan prints, and they were an exact duplicate as to what they saw in the mud. Just saying....

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?

By -
Image
Editor's Note: This is a guest post by Suzie M., a sasquatch enthusiast. Crypto-linguists believe that the species known Bigfoot/Sasquatch/Yeti/Yowie ect speak and understand a complex language, which by all accounts seems to stem from Asia. When one listens to it there is definitely a sense of it being Chinese or Japanese. It is a very odd mix of sounds, clicks and what could be actual words. This is the reason some experts are looking into the Asian dialect theory, some have said it could be a lost dialect, which was carried from Asia by the Bigfoot species that colonised America.
Read more

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

By -
Image
Rumors abound on whether or not Finding Bigfoot will continue, but hopeful news is on the horizon. Snake Oil Productions, the production company responsible for Finding Bigfoot, is seeking a permit for filming in the Monterey, Virginia area. Monterey lies between the Monongahela and George Washington National Forests. Definitely a good place to look for bigfoot. We can only speculate if this means Finding Bigfoot has been signed on for additional seasons, or if perhaps a new bigfoot show is in the works. We'll keep you updated on any further announcements for sure. 
Read more

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story

By -
Image
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from
Read more