Did Les Stroud capture a bigfoot on video? Some say that in this video is a bigfoot watching Stroud from the tree tops. Here's Bigfoot Tony with a breakdown.
Good gawd - every shadow, every depression, every sound, every broken twig is a bigfoot or evidence of bigfoot. Researchers? No, more like morons of the highest order.
bigfoot tony is as crazy as the fb/bf guys. Kots in trees,leaves paradoila are all possible bigfoot creatures in his eyes. At least he said it could be a bear! Why a bear would be that far up a sparce tree with nothing on it,isnt something he feels he needs to ask himself. this iis knot in tree/leaf movement letting people see what they want to see if he thinks that "face/elbow" feature is a bigfoot,i can see 5 bigfoots case closed
Uh Oh. Here we go again, folks. M.K. Davis originally brought up this theory called the "Bluff Creek massacre" theory back in 2008 at a conference. The controversial theory was immediately rejected by the Bigfoot community and Davis was shunned from ever speaking about it again. According to Davis, based on his expert film analysis and color enhancements of frame 352 of the PG film, he theorizes that the Patterson party had been to the Bluff Creek site at least once before returning to capture their famous Bigfoot video. His theory also suggests that the party probably murdered a family of Bigfoots and buried their bodies. Davis points to an enhanced anomaly resembling a bloody dog print and a pool of blood as proof of his theory.
Thanks to Matt Moneymaker for sharing this story with us from a guy named Thomas S. who was camping with some friends near the French Meadows Reservoir in August 2012. This remote, forested basin is located on the American River approximately 58 miles east of Auburn in the Sierra Nevada's. Before his encounter, the man thought Bigfoot "was just for entertainment purposes", but he changed his tune when he ended up with messy drawers that night. "That will teach to goof on our show," says Matt.
Tonight on Coast To Coast AM, Bigfootology's Rhettman Mullis will talk about Bigfoot sightings, and give us an update on the Oxford Bigfoot DNA project.
Good gawd - every shadow, every depression, every sound, every broken twig is a bigfoot or evidence of bigfoot. Researchers? No, more like morons of the highest order.
ReplyDeletePlaster is still our best hope. It's all we have now.
ReplyDeletePlaster grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change; courage to change the things I can; and wisdom to know the difference.
it could very well be a bear but also a bigfoot, def something up that tree because it does not look like it's part of the tree
ReplyDeleteJoe
^ very dim boy
Deleteget to specsavers Joe and get your feckin eyes sorted out
^ don`t worry about specsavers Joe - get your sorry ass to Florida pronto
Deleteall you sorry sods have had your brain replaced by plaster um ?
DeleteJoe
bigfoot tony is as crazy as the fb/bf guys. Kots in trees,leaves paradoila are all possible bigfoot creatures in his eyes. At least he said it could be a bear! Why a bear would be that far up a sparce tree with nothing on it,isnt something he feels he needs to ask himself.
ReplyDeletethis iis knot in tree/leaf movement letting people see what they want to see
if he thinks that "face/elbow" feature is a bigfoot,i can see 5 bigfoots
case closed