That looks like something to me. Possible upright figure pretty much just as described by the analyst. Not enough detail to get past "possible" though.
I've been thinking about this schema of analysts reviewing video captured by a field researcher and decided to try something different.
Better, I think, to find BF in random tourist/camper/trekker videos that are unrelated to BF and have no BF related comments. It eliminates the whole hoax argument, mostly, and you don't have to deal with diva BF field researchers.
Here is a "probable" I found in a tourist video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IeHkjDXQ_kQ
It was done using logic, premiere pro and my armchair. Commence hissy fit in three... two... one... boom.
Why release it here? Well this is obviously the least reputable bigfoot website on the entire internet, so perfect place right?
It is more than likely a hoax but to say that no hoaxer would think someone would analyze it is ridiculous. Any hoaxer knows that there are dozens of people who scrutinize this stuff.
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from...
Rumors abound on whether or not Finding Bigfoot will continue, but hopeful news is on the horizon. Snake Oil Productions, the production company responsible for Finding Bigfoot, is seeking a permit for filming in the Monterey, Virginia area. Monterey lies between the Monongahela and George Washington National Forests. Definitely a good place to look for bigfoot. We can only speculate if this means Finding Bigfoot has been signed on for additional seasons, or if perhaps a new bigfoot show is in the works. We'll keep you updated on any further announcements for sure.
Editor's Note: This is a guest post by Suzie M., a sasquatch enthusiast. Crypto-linguists believe that the species known Bigfoot/Sasquatch/Yeti/Yowie ect speak and understand a complex language, which by all accounts seems to stem from Asia. When one listens to it there is definitely a sense of it being Chinese or Japanese. It is a very odd mix of sounds, clicks and what could be actual words. This is the reason some experts are looking into the Asian dialect theory, some have said it could be a lost dialect, which was carried from Asia by the Bigfoot species that colonised America.
Hey yo!
ReplyDeleteWould any of you blokes fancy taking a closer look at my "baby bigfoot"?
DeleteThat looks like something to me. Possible upright figure pretty much just as described by the analyst. Not enough detail to get past "possible" though.
ReplyDeleteI've been thinking about this schema of analysts reviewing video captured by a field researcher and decided to try something different.
Better, I think, to find BF in random tourist/camper/trekker videos that are unrelated to BF and have no BF related comments. It eliminates the whole hoax argument, mostly, and you don't have to deal with diva BF field researchers.
Here is a "probable" I found in a tourist video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IeHkjDXQ_kQ
It was done using logic, premiere pro and my armchair. Commence hissy fit in three... two... one... boom.
Why release it here? Well this is obviously the least reputable bigfoot website on the entire internet, so perfect place right?
in Massachusetts - they be them Pukwudgies
ReplyDeleteDo the Massachusetts bigfoot not pronounce the letter R in words?
ReplyDeleteMassachusetts bigfoot: I ran across the yaaad not to faaa from the caaa.
It is more than likely a hoax but to say that no hoaxer would think someone would analyze it is ridiculous. Any hoaxer knows that there are dozens of people who scrutinize this stuff.
ReplyDeleteHow is this a hoax?
DeleteI think it's genuine...Great catch!