That looks like something to me. Possible upright figure pretty much just as described by the analyst. Not enough detail to get past "possible" though.
I've been thinking about this schema of analysts reviewing video captured by a field researcher and decided to try something different.
Better, I think, to find BF in random tourist/camper/trekker videos that are unrelated to BF and have no BF related comments. It eliminates the whole hoax argument, mostly, and you don't have to deal with diva BF field researchers.
Here is a "probable" I found in a tourist video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IeHkjDXQ_kQ
It was done using logic, premiere pro and my armchair. Commence hissy fit in three... two... one... boom.
Why release it here? Well this is obviously the least reputable bigfoot website on the entire internet, so perfect place right?
It is more than likely a hoax but to say that no hoaxer would think someone would analyze it is ridiculous. Any hoaxer knows that there are dozens of people who scrutinize this stuff.
Adam Davies visits Dr. Johnson at the SOHA base camp, and tries a new experiment to test the relationship Dr. Johnson has with his bigfoot friends. But how did it turn out?
This photograph was first shown at a Bigfoot conference in Washington over the weekend where witnesses were blown away. While we're currently seeking permission to post the screengrab here, we'll provide the link to the image on Facebook for now. The image is just a snapshot of a 5 minute-long footage of a Bigfoot caught on thermal. Washington Bigfoot researcher Derek Randles explains the image:
Here's the latest update from Stacy Brown Jr. from the mine shafts in Hellen Georgia: Stacy Brown Sr. and Jr. stumble upon a very odd spot in the woods behind the cabin.
Hey yo!
ReplyDeleteWould any of you blokes fancy taking a closer look at my "baby bigfoot"?
DeleteThat looks like something to me. Possible upright figure pretty much just as described by the analyst. Not enough detail to get past "possible" though.
ReplyDeleteI've been thinking about this schema of analysts reviewing video captured by a field researcher and decided to try something different.
Better, I think, to find BF in random tourist/camper/trekker videos that are unrelated to BF and have no BF related comments. It eliminates the whole hoax argument, mostly, and you don't have to deal with diva BF field researchers.
Here is a "probable" I found in a tourist video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IeHkjDXQ_kQ
It was done using logic, premiere pro and my armchair. Commence hissy fit in three... two... one... boom.
Why release it here? Well this is obviously the least reputable bigfoot website on the entire internet, so perfect place right?
in Massachusetts - they be them Pukwudgies
ReplyDeleteDo the Massachusetts bigfoot not pronounce the letter R in words?
ReplyDeleteMassachusetts bigfoot: I ran across the yaaad not to faaa from the caaa.
It is more than likely a hoax but to say that no hoaxer would think someone would analyze it is ridiculous. Any hoaxer knows that there are dozens of people who scrutinize this stuff.
ReplyDeleteHow is this a hoax?
DeleteI think it's genuine...Great catch!