Watch Bigfoot Photographed in Virginia Breakdown
So are the new bigfoot photos from Virginia everything they are supposed to be? ParaBreakdown's Phil Poling takes a look and gives his opinion. This one might have him stumped.
M.K. Davis Discusses The Bloody Dog Print at Bluff Creek [Massacre]
Uh Oh. Here we go again, folks. M.K. Davis originally brought up this theory called the "Bluff Creek massacre" theory back in 2008 at a conference. The controversial theory was immediately rejected by the Bigfoot community and Davis was shunned from ever speaking about it again. According to Davis, based on his expert film analysis and color enhancements of frame 352 of the PG film, he theorizes that the Patterson party had been to the Bluff Creek site at least once before returning to capture their famous Bigfoot video. His theory also suggests that the party probably murdered a family of Bigfoots and buried their bodies. Davis points to an enhanced anomaly resembling a bloody dog print and a pool of blood as proof of his theory.
Finally, I was sick of looking at that nasty manfox
ReplyDeleteI will have nightmares over that!
DeleteTEAM DICKWEED!
DeleteRush! Ha ha ha ha!!
DeleteThere is your proof doubters! Enjoy you meal of crow.
ReplyDeleteGot stump suit?
ReplyDeleteCase closed. On to Lochness
ReplyDeleteMeat deewkcid
ReplyDeleteFuck me
ReplyDeleteThis one might have him STUMPED? Get it? It's a stump, so it says this case might have him stumped.
ReplyDeleteYeah, I get it. Matt K thinks we're dumb as stumps.
DeleteI don't get it......
ReplyDeleteNo mattwr what, Clueless Joe "believes in the Church of Bigfoot".
ReplyDeleteah shit! I thought this was the one
ReplyDelete