Pages

Friday, May 8, 2015

Does Anyone Know What Is Attacking This Game Camera?


Some of you may have seen this before. A looped video of a game camera being attacked by... something, was posted the other day on YouTube. There's some strange sstuff going on in this video, and we aren't sure what is attacking it. Do you know what it is?


137 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. "This is the willful maintenance of a fringe myth that can be easily discarded based on what is sitting right there in front of you. The desire for the "smoking gun" is so strong that not even the most obvious evidence to the contrary can dampen it - when you've made yourself immune to the evidence, you've inoculated yourself to the "truth" you claim to be uncovering. So silly. "

      Delete
    2. ^^ Turd seems to have been meddled with as it`s countersunk.

      Delete
    3. You're just jealous that bigfoot is attacking a game camera.

      Delete
    4. 12:18.

      You`ve deduced this from ?

      Repeating a 3 second clip of a video that shows nothing at all is your evidence ? I can see how you`d equate that it must be as it`s evidence of a similar kind to ALL the other bigfoot "evidence".

      Delete
    5. The racist Joeholi's ludicrous Loveluck giant skull idea has been torn to tatters:

      http://www.andywhiteanthropology.com/blog/lovelock-cave-and-the-illusion-of-a-jawbone-that-slips-over-that-of-a-large-man#comments

      Hopefully, the racist Joeholi (along with Bend Over Butt Cheeks) will amend his racist theory that European red haired Giants built the monumental burial mounds and other cultural wonders in North America and bring himself to give credit to actual Native Americans for accomplishing those impressive feats.

      However, I fear that we will instead be subjected to an endless series of unreadable comments filled with words like "darling" and " old boy."

      Delete
    6. It's really hilarious how Joeholi constantly b*tches and moans about the trolls not discussing the "subject matter." I decided to humor the babbling bird brain and, after literally five minutes of research regarding the subject of his giant Lovelock skull delusion, I was able to utterly shatter an absurd theory that Joeholi has been incessantly chirping about for years!

      Delete
    7. Actually!! The jaw comparison ins't even Andy White's work... He ripped it all off of Jason Colavito; old news., sorry! What Andy fails to do, is quash the legend-physical evidence avenue, which is what I will demonstrate now.

      The double rows of teeth thing that Andy first started looking into was actually rather interesting and something I was aware of and congratulated Andy on personally (if you check the comments on his blog). Unfortunately, what could have been a great site is actually an avenue for Andy to plug his only breakthrough for his efforts; double rows of teeth, which is in eeeeeeeeeeevery blog page. What his analysis of the article on Dover's work doesn't achieve, is to avoid everything else regarding the Humbolt skull's morphology and ratios, which is what I would have expected an honest, impartial anthropologist to do... And as a result is not being intellectually honest.

      Are "Bigfoot" researchers taking giant research? Well that depends if you have the "fairy tail monkey" idea at the helm, or if you realise that in line with relict hominids, which is what the skull in Dover's article highlights, we have a skull that matches the widely reported morphological details of a Sasquatch, found precisely where Native legends have stated they have been for many thousands of years.

      http://sasquatchresearchers.org/forums/index.php?/topic/621-anthropologists-paper-on-the-lovelock-skull/

      ... The skull has an occipital bun, reminiscent of Paleo peoples, and Neanderthals. A feature of the Lovelock skull is the large protrusions of the nuchel crest which is for the attachment of large neck muscles. Sasquatch are widely accepted to have no necks. Oh, and the measurements of that skull leave the subject when living in the region of 6.6 to 7 feet tall. We have archeological discoveries of giant human skeletal remains in burial mounds and other long referenced areas in line with some native cultures who have legends of sharing such or having violent encounters with Sasquatch, who they agknowledged to be giant human tribes. Back up evidence? We have a hominid skull paper with the exact morphology that would adhere to Sasquatch traits (brow ridge, receding forehead, large jaw, higher nose bridge, extra bone in neck for more neck & shoulder muscles), from a place where the nearby native peoples have always stated that giant cannibalistic tribes resided. This in turn exactly the same as nearly every native tribe in North America that have the same legends intertwined in their understanding of Sasquatch. Oh, and in the paper up top in the link I sourced, you'll also notice it was made by actual anthropologists, but who actually addressed the skull. Ok... And on we go...

      Delete
    8. ^

      Shock...you mean the Red Giants aren`t really real ?

      Gosh !

      Footers will be upset at finding this news.

      Delete
    9. The tradition among the Paiute Indians, being that some very tall, reddish haired tribe, occasionally cannibalistic, once dwelt in the area. This being consistent with every other tribe in North America that have cannibalistic Giants intertwined in there Sasquatch legends. This matches the reports of the red headed male mummy (described as both 6 ft 6 and 7 ft, supporting evidence being the skull in the anthropological paper up top) pulled out of the central portion of the cave in 1911 by James Hart, David Pugh, and Lawrence W. Crehore. The Paiutes have many traditions of the “Pahi-zoho” tall, hairy giants who would grab children in baskets, and eat them. The “Pahi Zoho” also has the name “Tso ‘apittse”, an ogre of the same class in Paiute folk lore, described as a monster who hunts down women, cuts them up, and eats them. Princess Sarah Winnemucca, daughter of the chief of the Paiutes in 1883 described the tradition among her people, that these red headed people were both cannibals and lived in caves. She called them “barbarians” and they would set traps for women, and children, and carry them off. These Otamid, Paleo types sort of do resemble a cross between Cro-Magnon and Neanderthal man. Below is a report from the Paiute elders, that the tribe was also called “Numa Ticutta” People eaters... And they had red hair “all over their bodies”;

      https://thedavisreport.files.wordpress.com/2014/11/red-haired-giants.jpg source 2: http://www.lovelockpaiutetribe.com/History.html

      Eric Johns offered an example from 1911, where researchers named Pugh and Hart had found the remains of large, red haired humans at Sunset Cave close to Lovelock, Nevada. The remains found there were over seven feet tall, and some of the remains were shipped to the Smithsonian Institute by L.L. Loud, an archaeologist with the University of California, one year later.”These notes are still on digital file at the Hearst Museum of Anthropology,” Johns shared, “listed under reference number 544, An Anthropological Expedition of 1913.

      "A hair sample from Spirit Cave Man was analyzed by Craig Lahren, then of the Office of the Hamilton County Medical Examiner’s Office. In his report Lahren (1997:2) states, “… density and distribution of the pigment granules in your sample (2064) is typical of a Caucasian individual” and that the “… pigment granules in your sample (2064) are brown.” The report also states that the hair “… has a moderate shaft diameter with minimal variation, and an oval cross-sectional shape. All of these observations are consistent with hair derived from the head or more specifically the scalp of a Caucasian individual.”

      A hair sample was also analyzed by Joseph DiZinno of the Federal Bureau of Investigation Laboratories, who observed “…numerous dark reddish-brown, Asian origin head hairs with broken roots, broken tips and much surface debris” (DiZinno 1997:1).

      Goodman and Martin note (1999:4) “we now judge the hair to be medium to dark brown and straight. In other words, the hair is exactly the color and form [sic that] is most common in Northern Asian or a Native American.” The hair studies performed to date do not allow the assignment of Spirit Cave Man to an affiliation with a particular tribe."

      Hope that hurts... I mean, helps!

      : )

      Delete
    10. The only thing I took from that non-responsive blather is that you have nothing to rebut Andy White's analysis. And I did notice a certain Joe F leaving comments on Andy's blog, but no one named Iktomi. Are you proclaiming yourself as Joe F?

      Delete
    11. Who's Joe?

      Actually, like I said... I would have expected an anthropologist to actually address skull morphology, that didn't happen, like proving that there were no giant hominids living in the Lovelock/Humbolt area. Ooops! I only went and did it again!

      : (

      PS. You noticed Joe ripping Andy a new one then?

      Delete
    12. Still no species?


      Have a nice say.

      Delete
    13. ... Ask Sykes. And thank you, I will.

      Delete
    14. Iktomi..caucasian playing indian looking for bigfoot.

      Abholi Fala..caucasian playing indian looking for bigfoot.


      See a trend?

      Delete
    15. Yes, yes, yes... Notice I obliterated your Andy White stuff?

      Good.

      Delete
    16. Wrong guy.

      Iktomi..caucasian playing indian looking for bigfoot.

      Abholi Fala..caucasian playing indian looking for bigfoot.


      See a trend?

      Delete
    17. Yeah... I'm not actively looking for "Bigfoot", I'm just a guy who posts on a blog, so well it seems that I attract the occasional butthurt troll.

      Delete
    18. You're a "guy" playing Native American bigfoot researcher.

      Delete
    19. Yes "Iktomi". You didn't choose your own name? Idiot.

      Delete
    20. And a girly boy to boot.

      Delete
    21. I discussed this subject with Andy White elsewhere. I realized the error about double rows of teeth after discussing the issue with Micah Ewers several months ago but just got around to correcting that one area.

      Andy White calls himself a scientist but I'm not impressed with the way he goes off on stuff, making bad assumptions/rants.

      Delete
    22. Iktomi, you're right about he doesn't touch on the bulk of the evidence concerning that skull, but takes a stance and doesn't explore other areas that might challenge that stance. Science shouldn't seek to only support biases.

      Delete
    23. Debating a mythical creature....

      Delete
    24. Myths don't leave physical sign... Your intelligence is the rel myth.

      Delete
    25. Hoaxers leave fake physical signs. Myths and hoaxes won't get you a species. Hope this helps.

      Delete
    26. Hoaxers cannot, by any leap of FAITH, defy forensics to have the same species traits, decades apart and Sates apart. It's basically an impossibility.

      Forensics gets you a species, if you don't like it, go do something about it. Circulars don't even begin to help you.

      Delete
    27. The Humboldt skull is thoroughly human. You have presented no hard evidence that suggests otherwise: http://www.andywhiteanthropology.com/blog/bigfoot-researchers-still-insist-native-american-skull-is-not-human

      Delete
    28. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    29. Hello Andy... That's because I've always maintained Sasquatch are human. For reference, go and check out some Harvey Pratt forensic sketches. Also... Are you aware of the latest DNA study on Zana, to which a very famous geneticist is claiming that we share the same DNA as what people have commonly referred to as Yeti? I will proceed to use your article to support my stance in due course.

      Delete
  2. It was probably a hobo. He was wandering the woods, high from eating mushrooms, and was hungry. He thought the camera was a can of beans.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That, or it was a 10 foot tall hairy ape-man that has eluded humans and 20th/21st century technology for the past 60 years.

      Delete
    2. That's possible, but I like my hungry hobo theory. Maybe it was both? The hobo got scared off by a Squatch who grabbed the camera and "examined" it to see what the hobo was so interested in. :)

      Delete
    3. 12:20... The thing is, "10 foot hairy ape-men" haven't evaded technology as well as you would like. We have footage, trail cams, thermals, audio, even the application of DNA analysis and forensics; all have contributed to a level of evidence that stops short of a modern type specimen, all of which would not be possible if we didn't have technology doing it's best.

      No, no... The pleasure's all mine.

      : )

      Delete
    4. You have nothing and you know it. A whole lot of nothing doesn't make a species. Hope this helps.

      Delete
    5. Actually... I have footage, trail cams, thermals, audio, even the application of DNA analysis and forensics; all have contributed to a level of evidence that stops short of a modern type specimen, all of which would not be possible if we didn't have technology doing it's best.

      Glad I could help son.

      Delete
    6. Mainstream science doesn't allow hoaxed evidence.

      Hope this helps.

      Delete
    7. "The evidence is not there because scientists who have not studied it say it isn't."
      - Pseudo-Science troll

      Mainstream science digests what a select few of highly qualified people tell them is solid science. Stop contradicting yourself kid, it's getting painful...

      Delete
    8. Iktomi..caucasian playing indian looking for bigfoot.

      Abholi Fala..caucasian playing indian looking for bigfoot.


      See a trend?

      Delete
    9. Here is your "morphology study":

      "David Hatcher Childress, actually holding the normal-sized [Lovelock] skull in his hands, says 'these are really the skulls of giant people.' I just don't get it."

      A much more interesting and fruitful endeavor would be a "morphology study" on Joeholi's skull to determine how such a racist, conspiracy crazed dingbat came to exist in society.

      Even when his argument is thoroughly debunked, he cavorts around, using multiple exclamation points and chanting furiously to himself that he's vindicated. I'm almost beginning to feel sorry for the poor boob. Perhaps I should stop before something tragic occurs.

      Delete
    10. Forget Childress, who cares? Nobody's ever pushed Childress on anyone around here. Learn to read sweetheart, in my comment up top I left this;

      http://sasquatchresearchers.org/forums/index.php?/topic/621-anthropologists-paper-on-the-lovelock-skull/

      ... An anthroplogical study that your Andy White avoided like explaining like the plague. The skull ratio of that skull means that when living, the subject was between 6.6 to 7 feet tall, whilst you are aware of the innumerable reports of Sasquatch having seemingly far smaller heads to their body ratios, right? (What was I thinking?) You also missed the part of my comment where the hair fibres taken from skeletons from the cave were proven to be Caucasian.

      Don't feel sorry for me kid, I at least read your comment fully, and it appears you still need to address the facts thrown down the basement at you.

      : (

      Delete
    11. You follow all these BS bigfoot studies that occupy your pea brain. There is no bigfoot.

      Delete
    12. Actually... The anthropologists who studied that skull didn't have anything remotely "Bigfoot" on the brain, they just studied what was in front of them, old boy.

      Circular reasoning... What's the matter kid, getting angwy?

      Delete
    13. No one's buying it. Fool.

      Delete
    14. "Nobody" meaning you and your below average intelligence, it was never meant to be sold to anyone who couldn't understand it.

      Delete
    15. 60 years. No one is buying it.

      Delete
    16. Iktomi, you don't have the evidence. Sorry kid. You're having a meltdown. Glad I could help. You are not intelligent. Sorry kid.

      Delete
    17. 60 years and Sykes, Goodall, Napier, Mitterneier, Sarmiento, Schaller and many, many, many more have bought it. Sorry you're too stupid, and too agenda driven to understand the evidence.

      I have the evidence in bulk, you've flapped at it for the past 48 hours, and it's because of brain dead numpties such as yourself that your theory group is no closer to explaining it away.

      Delete
    18. Still no bigfoot. All the "evidence" leads to imaginary creature. Can't declare a myth a species.

      Delete
    19. You can declare ten thousand years of cultural & contemporary acknowledgement of relict hominids that transition into physical evidence a legitimate enough question to get people like the pioneering geneticists in the world involved... You need to a DNA classification to ascertain the species, dumb-dumbz.

      Delete
    20. Myths aren't real. Science doesn't agree with you.

      Delete
    21. Actually, science is the very thing that agrees with me. Don't like? Use science to prove me wrong;

      http://woodape.org/index.php/about-bigfoot/articles/90-anatomy-and-dermatoglyphics-of-three-sasquatch-footprints

      ... You've got "science", right?

      Delete
  3. How on earth is anybody supposed to even attempt a guess at this...it is a nonsense to suggest it is a bigfoot.

    Why...because they are not real.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The demented will beg to differ.

      Delete
    2. 12:22...

      Circular reasoning (Latin: circulus in probando, "circle in proving"; also known as circular logic) is a logical fallacy in which the reasoner begins with what they are trying to end with.[1] The components of a circular argument are often logically valid because if the premises are true, the conclusion must be true. Circular reasoning is not a formal logical fallacy but a pragmatic defect in an argument whereby the premises are just as much in need of proof or evidence as the conclusion, and as a consequence the argument fails to persuade. Other ways to express this are that there is no reason to accept the premises unless one already believes the conclusion, or that the premises provide no independent ground or evidence for the conclusion.[2] Begging the question is closely related to circular reasoning, and in modern usage the two generally refer to the same thing.[3]

      Circular reasoning is often of the form: "A is true because B is true; B is true because A is true." Circularity can be difficult to detect if it involves a longer chain of propositions. Academic Douglas Walton used the following example of a fallacious circular argument:

      Wellington is in New Zealand.
      Therefore, Wellington is in New Zealand.[4]
      He notes that, although the argument is deductively valid, it cannot prove that Wellington is in New Zealand because it contains no evidence that is distinct from the conclusion. The context – that of an argument – means that the proposition does not meet the requirement of proving the statement; thus, it is a fallacy. He proposes that the context of a dialogue determines whether a circular argument is fallacious: if it forms part of an argument, then it is.[4] Citing Cederblom and Paulsen 1986:109, Hugh G. Gauch observes that non-logical facts can be difficult to capture formally:

      "Whatever is less dense than water will float, because whatever is less dense than water will float" sounds stupid, but "Whatever is less dense than water will float, because such objects won't sink in water" might pass.[5]

      Delete
    3. all this "evidence" bigfoot should be declared a species any day now.. LOL

      Delete
    4. Iktomi..caucasian playing indian looking for bigfoot.

      Abholi Fala..caucasian playing indian looking for bigfoot.


      See a trend?

      Delete
    5. A white guy playing Indian. A non-researcher playing researcher. A loon looking for tall ape men.

      Delete
    6. ... A troll requiring an argument, circulars don't help him in logical thinking.

      Delete
    7. Iktomi, ocaams razor. Sorry kid. You're having a meltdown. I win. Sorry kid. Glad I could help. Sorry kid.

      Delete
    8. Yes, Occam's razor indeed. When you have two sources that point to the same phenomena (and we have four) you use this principle to help conclude; in this case a large bipedal primate.

      Bro, you have to be like 16 or something. Moma needs to lock the computer room at night.

      Delete
    9. Mythical creature. Wake up. It's 2015.

      Delete
    10. Sykes woke up... He's telling you to stop living in 1966.

      Delete
    11. No species. Bigfoot doesn't exist.

      Delete
    12. I would rest on the opinion of the best geneticist in the world, over someone who used circular logic as his "science".

      (Pffft!)

      Delete
  4. Well, the wankers on this blog will say bigfoot.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. yep anytime now bowl killer will show up with his hahahaha routine and of course his version of ebonics leonism's so to speak.

      Delete
    2. 1:05... Will they? Or are yo just baiting because you are hateful and need a fix?

      Delete
    3. what a silly little "man" you are with your fake indian name pretending that there are 10 foot tall hairy men in other men's country..

      Delete
    4. I don't have to pretend, I have the evidence to be convinced by... That gets substantiated by you failing so amusingly to explain away eeeeeeevery day.

      But don't worry, you at least have your "Bigfoot doesn't exists" statement to cling to, what a clever boy you are, eh?

      Delete
    5. You sure do have to pretend, little "man".

      Delete
    6. The only "pretending" occurs around you having the ***** to keep up in an adult's exchange, forget a debate.

      It's ok... I'm happy to baby sit.

      Delete
    7. ^ He`s a little "man" with an even smaller "little chap"...

      lmao.

      Delete
    8. Oh dear... Are you like, 16 or something?

      Delete
    9. ^ Oh dear...You`ve been found out.

      lmao.

      Delete
    10. "Iktomi" busted. Is your name really Joerg?

      Delete
    11. It's apparently a million things, can we have the entire list? And the details of the magic Air Force base??

      Delete
    12. It appears that Joeholi deleted his youtube channel of G E R A L D F I T Z G E R A L D. But us trolls were able to get some of his info about his google account through some caches. Thanks to the troll giving out Joes email address, we have also come up with some very interesting things. Would it surprise anyone to learn that Joe is in his early 30s? We also have a real name now and are working on an address.

      Delete
    13. Post it chump, what you waiting for?

      Delete
  5. Replies
    1. It doesn't matter. Bigfoot doesn't exist. "Adult" boys and girls on here play Indian and Bigfoot like "Iktomi", a caucasian from England and AbholFala a white woman playing Indian.

      White frauds looking for fake ape man.

      Delete
    2. ^ doesn't this guy sound like he needs to convince himself a little? Even a little sweaty at times?

      So sad.

      Delete
    3. Iktomi..caucasian playing indian looking for bigfoot.

      Abholi Fala..caucasian playing indian looking for bigfoot.


      See a trend?

      Delete
    4. Fair enough, never said it was BF.
      Probably Bear or Moose.
      BoneHead shaking camera...
      We don't know and never will.
      Who's Iktomi
      Don't know if it real and doesn't look like I ever will be proven as to what but my friend was a tree planter and a guy he worked with saw a Bigfoot and shat his pants. I know my friend don't lie and says its credible.
      I started to look at Patterson Film and figure there is something to this.
      I'm not here to say its real but to think its all been a lie is hard to believe.

      Delete
    5. "Ijtomi" is a white guy from Europe who pretends to be Indian and names "him" self after a character from Lakota Indian mythology, "Iktomi".

      Delete
    6. Iktomi is one of many accounts from a 24/7 poster who's gone by joerg,joe f ,abholi fala,Alexander and who knows what else....cut and paste champion of the Bigfoot world

      Delete
    7. Please, can we have the entire list of everyone who's Joe, and the details of the magic Air Force base that they all attack you from?

      Delete
    8. "We" meaning me and the sane people who frequent this blog.

      Delete
    9. ^ You had better count yourself out of the "we" then.

      Delete
    10. Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot Sasquatch Bigfoot

      Delete
    11. I've never claimed to be sane... I just included myself in those numbers screaming in laughter at your delusions.

      Delete
    12. It appears that Joeholi deleted his youtube channel of G E R A L D F I T Z G E R A L D. But us trolls were able to get some of his info about his google account through some caches. Thanks to the troll giving out Joes email address, we have also come up with some very interesting things. Would it surprise anyone to learn that Joe is in his early 30s? We also have a real name now and are working on an address.

      Delete
    13. everyone knows your not sane Joeholi. Only an insane fool would make up dozens of accounts and respond to himself all day. Including numerous female accounts that you made and posted under, including Merry May and the now infamous Abholi accounts. And don't forget you telling yourself you looked hot and had nice hair. How utterly disgusting and pathetic. Not to mention you went on and on a few days ago about how interesting certain gorilla breasts are. Your disgusting filth

      Delete
    14. Prove it donkey, you're a cyber nazi with so many issues its unreal.

      Prove it or cry, cry, cry.

      Delete
    15. "Issues" ? ... make`s not one iota of difference to the central point...which is,as well you know,the reality of bigfoot...an endeavour of creative thinking.

      Delete
    16. 3:29

      So it`s not something you can back up then ?

      Or even prove that "they",meaning your "we",are actually real...or anywhere,aside from in your desperately seeking a point scorer head.

      No...I didn`t think so

      Much like the sasquatch argument.

      Delete
    17. 11:19... No, your issues are highly relevant, like your requirement to daily reinforce your religious like beliefs in the face of science that you haven't the slightest idea nor brain power to counter. Not once have you ever addressed the science put at you, this is because you are obviously out of your depth, but your main issue is the hate in you. I've got you thinking about me aaaaaaaaall the time sweetheart, and you've not once had the belly to agknowledge it.

      3:29... I receive about 15 emails a week from regular posters and people who don't even post but frequent, and I can assure you that the laugh's on you, it's why I keep on at this stuff, because I've got people enjoying the archetype idiot in you that I use as an example of collective numb-skullery.

      And what you gonna do about it?

      : )

      Delete
    18. So basically you don't have a life outside of BFE?

      Check. Gotcha.

      Delete
    19. Come on Daniel, that's all you do is p*ss and moan this days, what's the matter bro? Let's have a dance like the old days, eh?

      Delete
    20. And I thought that the jackass claimed that he was gone for the weekend. So much for his wonderful social life -- I guess this blog constitutes his social life.

      Delete
    21. I wished everyone a good weekend, what's the matter darling, you worried you can't pursue your hate campaign now?

      Delete
    22. I just thought that you were growing weary of receiving continuous brutal beat downs from trolls, but I suppose your addiction to this blog outweighs everything else -- including your own fragile ego it seems.

      Delete
    23. Beat downs? Darling, point me one out, and you have a start. Listing delusional amounts of people who I am allegedly masquerading as, and writing essays calling me all the names under the sun, doesn't even begin to achieve that. Hit me on the subject matter, that's the best way you can score a beat down... Something tells me you're a little too stupid though.

      : (

      Delete
    24. Iktomi, I am beginning to pity you -- did you notice that everyone here laughs at you and mocks you? You're like the crazy old man who walks around town muttering nonsense to himself and delusionally thinks people respect him for his great intelligence. He's too lost in his deranged haze to realize that half the people whom he encounters laugh in his face, while the other half feel tremendous sorrow for him.

      To this point, I have been solidly in the group savagely mocking you, but, because of my guilty conscience (or "conscious" as you call it), I am quickly moving to the side of feeling compassion for your situation.

      I am even considering becoming your supporter, so that the regular beat downs you experience will become less severe in the future. So don't be surprised if you have a new anonymous "friend" helping you out soon!

      Delete
    25. Yes, yes, yes, yes... Did you manage to get an argument yet? Did you manage to show how crazy I am with a point, an angle of countering information, a means of demonstrating anything at all I have presented as supporting information/evidence on the existence of relict hominids, as inaccurate? You see, this is what will help you, this is where you'll hurt me, not large paragraphs expressing how much I'm on your mind and how much I so obviously get to you on an intellectual level. You wouldn't be trying trivial stuff like grammar (cringe) if you didn't have your ego effected, and be trying to compete on another level to show how "clever" you are. Think about it, think as to the reasons why you're so angry at me.

      That's right... Now please write another essay on my alleged character and the spelling of the word "conscience", it really helps your theory group no end. Oh... And spell check on iPhone does not show up on any blog, Einstein.

      : )

      Delete
    26. Sorry, I'm too busy wondering how such an intellectual Goliath doesn't know the difference between "effected" and "affected."

      Delete
    27. Yes, yes, yes, yes.... Sorry old chap, you lose. Get an argument, anyone would think you're a little scared.

      : )

      Delete
    28. If you really owned an iPhone, you would know that the autocorrect function works just fine on this blog. And the primary problem isn't that you are misspelling words, it's that you are not educated enough to understand the correct words to use in the contexts that you intend. The unfortunate result is that you appear to be an illiterate high school drop out.

      So as part of my earlier declared effort to assist you, I will volunteer to proofread your comments before you post them. You can email me drafts of your proposed comments and I will rewrite them in a more lucid manner. I will then return the comments to you and you can post them.

      Let me know whether you would like to take advantage of my generous offer.

      Delete
    29. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    30. Hey sweetheart, am I getting to you a little about how you struggle intellectually with me? I mean, surely you can develop one little argument against a highschool illiterate drop out, right? You, see... This is how I know that you're all greasy at a desktop, because there is no spell check function on an iPhone 5 that works on blogs, if you don't agree, post your idea in a present comment section where people can address it.

      You have such an inferiority complex that you been addressing things about grammar that aren't even academically correct. It's a rather embarrassing state of affairs that you think "beat downs" are simply one person following me around with spell check, and the other posting quite pitiful paragraphs about who I am allegedly. You know nothing of my education, and I've got you bi*ching like a little girl cause you can't better me on the subject matter.

      Not true? Give me a challenge, for crying out loud.

      Delete
    31. Bigfoot is not a species. It is a myth. Hoaxers perpetuate the myth. Enjoy bigfoot as a myth.

      Delete
    32. Myths don't leave tracks, certainly don't manifest into biological evidence;

      http://sasquatchresearchers.org/forums/index.php?/topic/621-anthropologists-paper-on-the-lovelock-skull/

      ... Man, you make this easy.

      Delete
  6. What a bunch of Sick'os,,,,,,,, sheesh !

    ReplyDelete
  7. The Natural And Aboriginal History of Tennessee,” by Dr. John Haywood, which was published in 1823 and commissioned by the government. Yeah, thats right you idiotic trolls. Gads, one troll does like 15 minutes worth of research half-assed research at that and all the rest of you trolls take that as a self-proclaimed truth ,GAD you're stupid. this blog is ridiculous you allow the truth to take over and spell lunacy and simple minded drivel and then have the audacity to call this a place of study evidentiary work on Bigfoot give me a break! This is nothing more than a highschool free for all the little tiny men that are just called boys hiding behind their screen spamming and insulting each other and obviously cannot hold a real intelligent conversation with others concerning the Bigfoot issue. Good grief a bunch of tiny teenagers have taken over this place and named it troll heaven, mind you teenagers that obviously failed debate or science or for that matter history- US history ! Sad to say they need to go back to school. Iktomi lives outside the country, but obviously has more histor and "book larnin'" than the trolls.
    I for one ,enjoy his intelligence and postings far more than the turd or poop posting that the trolls resort to.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Which of your high school classes taught you that bigfoot exists? None? So, shut your mouth.

      Delete
    2. Ahem- science, which you obviously failed.
      Divergent evolution is the accumulation of differences between groups which can lead to the formation of new species, usually a result of diffusion of the same species to different and isolated environments which blocks the gene flow among the distinct populations allowing differentiated fixation of characteristics ...
      Now begone troll.

      Delete
    3. Nice to see Joe posting anonymously telling himself he misses himself. LOL. What a freak Joeholi is

      FFS!

      Delete
    4. The anon above took you apart brother. And thank you to the anon for his kind words.

      You have a friend in me sir.

      Delete
    5. ^ Needs all the friends he can get.>>>"Desperado Joe".

      Delete
    6. Sweetheart, you may live your social life through the Internet, but friends aren't an issue for me.

      Surely someone as butter and as hateful as you is the one who needs friends, or some level of affection.

      Delete

  8. Its repeating over and over for the whole 8 minutes, and shows nothing..

    ReplyDelete

  9. Its repeating over and over for the whole 8 minutes, and shows nothing..

    ReplyDelete
  10. The evidence is:
    1. Hair, not closely cropped fur like a bear.
    2. Powerful paws or hands with opposable thumbs
    3. Bipedal footsteps
    4. Does not comb his or her hair.
    5. Heavy breathing

    By the process of elimination, assuming this is in the U.S., a Bigfoot or a mountain man who does not comb his hair, are the only two remaining choices.

    ReplyDelete