A Terrifying Scream Just Frighten This Deer
If you were in the woods alone, and you heard this sound -- would you run like hell? This deer sure did.
BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia
Rumors abound on whether or not Finding Bigfoot will continue, but hopeful news is on the horizon. Snake Oil Productions, the production company responsible for Finding Bigfoot, is seeking a permit for filming in the Monterey, Virginia area. Monterey lies between the Monongahela and George Washington National Forests. Definitely a good place to look for bigfoot. We can only speculate if this means Finding Bigfoot has been signed on for additional seasons, or if perhaps a new bigfoot show is in the works. We'll keep you updated on any further announcements for sure.
Joe!
ReplyDeleteMike b IS NOT A HOAXER!! He his a known bullsh*ter though. Joe needs to wake up or come to the states and do his own research!
DeleteThanks Uno!!!!
Delete^gullible idiot
DeleteZZZZZZZZZ
DeleteSleepy joe? Still waiting on the proof that bigfoots exists from Mike b. We'll keep waiting..............
DeleteZZZZZZZ
Delete(Fart)
ZZZZZZZ
I can see a intelligent conversation is taking place,lol.
DeleteJoe said yesterday that Mike b had proof of bigfoot, where is it joe?
DeleteYou know joe is beat when he starts that ZZZZZ crap.
Quote sweetheart, don't joke me.
DeleteOh, and the (fart) comment just shows you how mature he is.
DeleteAre you aware of your comments?
Delete(Wow?)
See how quick he is to respond? Show us the proof joe. What's your next response? Let me guess "ZZZZZ fart ZZZZZ" right?
DeletePatience, you'll have audio evidence to slate soon enough.
DeleteYou said yesterday that Mike b had proof of bigfoot, period. Put up or shut up joe.
DeleteZZZZZ ZZZZZ fart ZZZZZ right joe?
He just said "audio evidence'
Delete1:45... Quote me.
DeleteThought so... Just a joker.
DeleteBack to sleep...
DeleteZZZZZZZZ
^told ya! Hahahahaha!!!!!!!!!
DeleteWhen asked about the evidence that Mike b has that's proof bigfoots exists, joe says "ZZZZZZZZZZ"
DeleteYou bragged about it yesterday, show us joey!
ZZZZZZZZZZ huh joe?
Delete... ZZZZZZ
Delete(Snort, splutter)
Huh? Patience, I've got to put it together and upload it to Mike's channel... You'll have to wait for your next hate campaign a little longer I'm afraid... Now, you're boring... Back to sleep...
ZZZZZZZ
Mike isn't capable of uploading it to his own channel? Is everybody listening to this?!
DeletePlus you said that yesterday, how long does it take an idiot to upload something these days? I can't wait! Joe and Mike boogerson have proof that bigfoot is real!! It might take them a while to "upload" it, but they'll show us!
DeleteIt takes a fake Texan and a Welshman 3 days to upload a hoax. Wow!
DeleteStill waiting joe!! Prove us wrong dumbass!!!!
DeleteI'm going to fly to the states to see this! Mike and joe have proof!
DeleteAnd again you leave all these hopeful delusional footers disappointed. Shame on you!
DeleteA delusion is a belief held with strong conviction despite superior evidence to the contrary... Like thousands of years of both contemporary & cultural references that spand uncooperative ethnicities, that transition into modern day mediums that account for every single source of evidence short of modern type specimen. As a pathology, it is distinct from a belief based on false or incomplete information, confabulation, dogma, illusion, or other effects of perception.
DeleteDelusions typically occur in the context of neurological or mental illness, although they are not tied to any particular disease and have been found to occur in the context of many pathological states (both physical and mental). However, they are of particular diagnostic importance in psychotic disorders including schizophrenia, paraphrenia, manic episodes of bipolar disorder, and psychotic depression. In a survey conducted by the group of psychologists, people who partake in so-called trolling online showed signs of sadism, psychopathy, and were Machiavellian in their manipulation of others and their disregard for morality. The researchers defined online trolling as “the practice of behaving in a deceptive, destructive, or disruptive manner in a social setting on the Internet” for no purpose other than their pleasure.
(Yawn)
Delete... Back to sleep...
ZZZZZZZZZ
Just as long as you don't think this guy is getting paid to disrupt Bigfoot discussions.
DeleteSee how he tried to tie in delusional with trolling? Notice how he did it by not seperating the paragraphs? Didnt actually show any similarities between the two just made one statement then another and just stand back while his fan club does their golf clap and cheer how he just owned us, because they arent smart enough to see this is how he does things. Its like Meldrum once used a bear expert to make the statement that theres no way people could be mistaking bears for Sasquatch. Compelling evidence for dunderheads. However a bear expert is only an expert on bears, not on what people can misinterpret seeing. Using big words and fancy sentences that dont make sense added up to confuse the easily persuaded, thats your Bigfoot experts for you.
DeleteIs this going to be audio evidence thats out of the range of human vocals like the Sierra sounds? If so then sorry that cant be a Sasquatch, because they are human according to you. Lets move along, nothing to see here.
Delete4:09... Not this guy, he's not clever enough.
Delete4:13... Delusions have links to psychopathy, so does trolling. I know you're not clever enough to ascertain such obvious information, but I'm always here to baby sit of course. Using a bear expert to explain the very obvious anatomical differences and behaviour that is in contrast to a Sasquatch, and when your very best claim is that people are reporting bears, would be a last resort towards people experiencing such episodes of delusions, it's not a means to convince those who recognize such, more of a means to show how silly others are.
Using inaccuricies, versions and sheer anger for lack of fancy sentences, that only make sense to delusionists, added up to reassure the intellectually inferior; that's the modern day 'skeptic' for you!
: p
I thought the Sierra sounds was looked on as a hoax now. It was kind of interesting when L. Nimoy had it on "In Search Of".
Delete4:21... A human with very exceptional and animalsitic attributes far exceeding ours.
DeleteScience and psuedoscience are two very different topics, First of all, “pseudo” literally means fake or pretending in Greek, meaning that psuedoscience is science claiming to be real and scientific. It lacks the evidence to prove that it is true. Science, on the other hand, contains real evidence and can be proven by observations and experiments. Science and psuedoscience are two very different ideas.
DeleteBigfoot, also known as Sasquatch, is an ape-like creature living in forests and in the mountains. There have been many reports of sightings all around the world. Bigfoot got its name by leaving huge footprints that have been measured at least two feet long and more than half a foot wide. Bigfoot is described in sightings as being a mix between a human and an ape. Its height has been described as being 6-10 feet tall and having a very foul odor. It has also been described to weigh at least 500 pounds with the features of a gorilla.
There are many beliefs that Bigfoot really does exist. These beliefs are based on sightings, footprints, and a film captured in 1967 of the ape-man walking in the forest. There have been many sightings all over the world including China that say they have seen Bigfoot. Also, many footprints have been found in the forests. From this evidence, scientists and many people believe that Bigfoot is a science and that it really exists.
On the contrary, many people believe Bigfoot is fake and that it is a pseudoscience. These beliefs are made because of many reasons. These reasons include that a carcass has never been found, footprints and sightings are lies, and that the film from 1967 was a hoax. Scientists truly believe Bigfoot doesn’t exist because a carcass has never been found over hundreds of years. Also, they have proven many sightings and footprints to be manmade and hoaxes. Also, the film of 1967 was fake and a man was paid to walk in the forest in a gorilla suit. These are the beliefs of how Bigfoot is a pseudoscience. Finally, there has been no feastie remains found by Bigfoot.
I believe Bigfoot is fake and that it is a pseudoscience. There is more evidence to show that he doesn’t exist. First, most of the sightings and footprints of Bigfoot have been proven to be false. Next, over hundreds of years, not a single carcass was found of Bigfoot. Also, the film of 1967 was proven to be a hoax as a man was paid to walk around the forest in a Bigfoot costume. These are my beliefs based on the evidence I have gathered.
My beliefs have changed from the start of my investigation. In the beginning, I believed that Bigfoot really did exist. Now, I believe Bigfoot is fake and is just a big hoax. After gathering enough information, I truly believe Bigfoot is a pseudoscience. There is not enough information to truly tell if Bigfoot is real or not, however, there is more evidence that I have found to support the fact that Bigfoot is a pseudoscience.
A “pseudoscience” is defined as a claim, belief or practice which is presented as scientific, but does not adhere to a valid, scientific method. You can spot a pseudoscience by its lack of openness to testing by other experts (as with the Ketchum paper), an absence of progress (still no body?) and, as seen in the examples here, an over-reliance on confirmation rather than refutation. “He knows that’s our food” and other similar, bonkers assertions show that folks who follow the ‘Foot are not looking to find out *IF* it exists, but are out to prove *THAT* it exists. Real science fits the theory to the evidence, not the other way around.
DeletePsuedoscience is in fact maintaining that there is nothing worthy of analysis until such a process of conclusive research is reached, such as type specimen. Psuedoscience is also ignoring data based on subjective assumptions and inaccurate data, reclining to preconceived preferences that cannot be supported, and is in fact heuristics (what the scientific method was designed against)... Some of your very regularly expressed fallacies... Like providing a means to test the sources presented sufficiently and show that your position is not one hypocritically based on lies that you point to others making.
DeleteThere are more and more impartial researchers coming across 150 years worth of printed media up and down the country, that describe giant skeletons being uncovered in a time when populations were seperated geographically. Archeological and anthropological studies documented by some serious big hitters such as the Smithsonian and the Scientific American. Many think that these people are 'dumb apes'; but burial mounds suggest a much higher intelligence capable of culture with highly social evasion capabilities and would also explain why there are hundreds of accounts of disturbing such in libraries up and down your country and would articulate further why we don't come across the remains of these people, especially when 70% of the country is covered in wilderness, to which it turn suggests how hard it would be to locate such burial areas, especially once the old native regions of New England for example, were churned up and taken over during the industrial revolution and then covered up as quickly as possible to suit the economic boom. These places were the last burial areas where the Natives shared with the giant tribes, from a time before these people returned to the wilderness areas.
Tracks that yield species traits that exceed States and devades, found 50 miles into wilderness areas, verified by a long line of wildlife biologists, anthropologists and forensic experts, are not hoaxes and have never been proven to be hoaxes.
The theories regarding the evidence for this subject are based on consistent scrientific methods that have propelled fields of science to be as reliable as they have become, that have in turn transitioned into this field, therefore, it is a contradiction to celebrate science like a free thinking entity, when it's been applied in its purest form impartially & successfully to this field of study.
"A conscious entity practicing science can only draw on its subjective experiences to form beliefs. This means that no matter how objective science appears to be, there are generally two assumptions which must be taken entirely on faith."
There is no requirement of mere belief, because we are in fact convinced by the data and evidence. Psuedoskepticism is a fundemental, quasi-religion.
Congrats you two children, ruining the first decent thread of the day. I hope both of you are just peachy with your sociopathic selves.
DeleteJoe, here's a tip: you're equally as guilty of everything you spew as this/these anons. Until you learn self control and rise above the fray, you are as weak and pathetic as the same person you play patty cake with every day.
Sick n tired of it.
Cry me a river, I've got a subject to defend and if you don't like it, go complain to the admins.
DeleteI don't see you contributing to any discussion, so shut up and sit down.
: )
Lol, you aren't saving the planet. He's getting a reaction out of you which is what he wants.
DeleteToo much reading
DeleteSo you really find yourself some noble bigfoot defender here on this blog? I wasn't aware the 8 foot wood ape needed your defending, seeing as a single specimen has never been located, I'd say they can take care of themselves.
Delete"In the back of my Cadillac, a wicked lady sitting by my side saying where are we, stopped at third and forty three, exit to the night, it's gonna be ecstasy, this place was made for me,ooooooo, ooooeoooooo, here I am, in the city, with a fistful of dollars and baby, ya better believe, I'm Back, Back in the New York Groove!"
DeleteNow listen up, when I get to the Sasquatch Summit, I don't care if it's Don Meldrum, or Don Monroe, Terry Funk or Dory Funk Jr., or even Mother Funk, if you know what I mean, you tell em Joe, you tell all those ham n eggers at the Sasquatch Summit that the Nature Boy is comin..,..WOOOOOOooooooo, so DSA, whether you like it or not, learn to love it........!
DeleteAs Last Call Scott Hall once said when doing his best Tony Montana impersonation as Razor Ramon, "Say Hello to the Bad Guy!"
DeleteListen up DSA, you Ham N Egger, do you think I've got time to sit around and play with my Utube channel? Shawn knows, my main man Bigdad knows, Ace Frehley knows and you better believe that all your little ham n egg buddies know, that when it comes to being an Original Outlaw Footer, that I'm the Booger with the Sugar! So let's stop all these little glib insults and bask in the sweet sunshine this weekend. Life is passing you by one minute at a time my darling. And you'll never get out of it alive.
DeleteOne more thing DSA.....just so we are absolutely clear on these issues....A Terrifying Scream Just Frightened This Deer.....and it sounded like this......"Wooooooo!"
DeleteHa ha ha ha ha ha!! You feeling better Mike?
Delete5:40... An 8 foot wild human doesn't require saving, but the evidence that points to every source short of that type specimen does against those who tremble at the thought. I'm not a knight in shining armour I'm the nasty doctor on the ward that rips the hemorrhoid pillow from under you and administers a nice dose of reality.
And that deer had no desire to stick around to see what it was. Hope this deer headed in the right direction and not the one that the ambush was set up for. I Gotta pull for the deer on this one.
DeleteChuck
According to Joe bigfoots built the Colosseum in Rome.
ReplyDeleteDon't forget the pyramids. Oh, and the great wall of china. Bigfoots are awesome!!
DeleteStonehenge was probably their biggest accomplishment. Gotta love them bigfoots. Joe says they're from Mars.
DeleteAncient aliens or Bigfoot? I am confused now.
DeleteNeither, it's called baiting.
DeleteThis vocalization sounds human to me.
ReplyDeleteAnd nothing like the loud vocalization I heard once hunting.
I wouldn't describe this vocalization as "terrifying".
DeleteI agree it sounds human. I have no idea who would be doing it though- unless they were trying to sound like Bigfoot.
DeleteThere is just so much hoaxing going on now it's sad because it 'waters down' the legitimate sightings, vocalizations and experiences.
DeleteAn aside:
Anyone else getting the "show us your not a computer" flags for each post? That must be super annoying for Joe with his extensive posts ?!
I got them for a little while a week or so ago- not now.
DeleteOh that's why some one kept saying(i'm not a computer) last week lol xx
DeleteInteresting. Have not been flagged as yet.
DeleteChuck
Thousands of people around the world believe in the existence of a large primate that roams the mountain forests. It is known by many names, such as Bigfoot, Yeti and Sasquatch. Many of these enthusiasts even claim to have genuine biological samples from these creatures. Skeptics have so far remain unconvinced. No authentic photographs or video material has been produced and no bodies have been found. Meanwhile, cryptozoologists complain that scientist are not taking them seriously.
ReplyDeleteTo remedy this problem, Sykes et. al. (2014) requested samples from all over the world, subject them to rigorous decontamination protocols, amplified the DNA and then sequence them in order to find out their identity. Guess what they found?
How was the analysis carried out?
The researchers contributed to a press release requesting samples from alleged “anomalous primates”. They got almost 60 samples from all over the world, from the United States to Sumatra. After excluding samples that were obviously not animal hairs, such as plant material and glass fiber, they selected 37 samples based on their geographical origin and historic notoriety. A thorough decontamination procedure was used to avoid mistaken attribution of a sample to human x mammal hybrids that previous Bigfoot enthusiasts had done. After that, they ran a lot of PCRs on the mitochondrial 12S gene and sequenced the resulting product. Finally, they compared the DNA sequences to publicly available sequences at NCBI.
What did they find?
Out of the 30 sequences from which DNA could be extracted, only one matched human. This means that their decontamination procedure was highly effective. Out of the remaining 29 samples, 27 matched living mammals, such as brown bear, racoon, porcupine and cow. The last two samples was particularly interesting as they matched an extinct Pleistocene polar bear, but not their closest living relatives. However, the researchers conclude that the sequences probably belong to a previously uncharacterized polar bear species or a polar bear / brown bear hybrid.
What does this all mean?
In other words, all sequences that yielded DNA (apart from the ones matching the extinct polar bear) could be matched to currently living mammalian species. While this does not conclusively disprove the existence of a Bigfoot-like creature, it effectively refutes several dozen samples that Bigfoot enthusiasts claim come from this mysterious creature. Interestingly, Harry Marshall and Icons Films (both big producers of Bigfoot related media) contributed to the funding of this study. Looks like the results were not quite what they expected. At any rate, the cryptozoologists can no longer claim that real scientists do not take them seriously, but they will probably find ways to rationalize away this counter-evidence.
Many of these enthusiasts claim to have genuine biological samples from these creatures such as hair. These hair are have been collected right up and down the US, that have consistent uniform morphology, but just as consistently lack medulla to sequence sufficient DNA for clasification. 'Skeptics' have so far remained in gross denial about these facts can, even should they be shown such samples;
Deletehttp://www.texlaresearch.com/okhair4.jpg
http://www.texlaresearch.com/okhairroot.jpg
http://www.texlaresearch.com/unknown-chimp-bear.jpg
'Skeptics' also maintain that no authentic photographs or video material when one source has defied any conclusive means to warrant proper scientific reasoning for such for the past 46 years, whilst they maintain there has been no bodies when there are in fact 150 years worth documented by some of the pillars of their faith. Cryptozoologists highlight that there are some of the very best scientists endorsing the evidence for an unknown primate residing in the U.S. but this is largely ignored, partly due to a restriction of mainstream science investing interest and a dogmatic approach towards pioneering scientists that account for a minority.
"Headlines such as "DNA Debunks Bigfoot Myth" and "Genetic Testing Shows That Bigfoot Is Not Real" are completely false and misleading. The only thing the DNA tests proved were that none of the hair samples used came from an unknown primate such as a bigfoot or a yeti. Does that mean they do not exist? If the study had been about dogs living in the wild, but none of the test results matched a domesticated canine, would that mean no dogs live in the wild? It simply means the test samples did not come from the sources they were believed to have possibly come from. Mark Evans and Justin Smeja during BBC Documentary
Another misleading matter in this whole thing is just about that. Where the test samples came from. I've read various articles that claim a little less than half of the samples came directly from bigfoot sightings. Really? How so? Because someone reported a sighting in a general area, and the hairs were found in that same general area? Did someone pluck the hair directly from a bigfoot creature, or see a clump fall out as it ran away? I'm fairly certain you could find all kinds of hairs in my front yard, that doesn't mean they came from the rabbit I saw out there. This is exactly what happened during the documentary about the Sykes study where Justin Smeja was interviewed about his claim to have shot and killed at least one bigfoot. It was well known within the community that Justin submitted a tissue sample to Sykes that was believed to be that of a bear. This was known information before hand. Yet when the documentary was released, it was edited to make it sound like Smeja claimed to have acquired the tissue sample directly from the bigfoot itself. This was not only misleading, it was an outright lie. Regardless of how you feel about Smeja, or what your opinion is on his claim, he was in fact misrepresented and lied about during this documentary. That is a fact."
- Matt K
The only known researchers that I can find who submitted samples were Dan Shirley, Marcel Cagey, Justin Smeja and Derek Randles. The BFRO did not provide any of the North American samples.
Fits "find ways to rationalize away this counter-evidence" to a T.
DeleteOh, and regarding the one sample that came back human;
Delete"Bob Daigle, a friend of Mary Green’s, sent a hair sample collected from the Tennessee site to a DNA geneticist (named only as Dan), who found nothing but human results, the sample sequence being an exact match. He sequenced some 300 nucleotides from a mitochondrial gene called cytochrome b, and amplified a 1100 base pair fragment, then ran the results through GeneBank.
The GeneBank is an open access annotated collection of nucleotide sequences and their protein translations. It lists some 100,000 distinct organisms and having in 2006 some 65 billion nucleotide bases and 61 million sequences.
Control tests were run that were deliberately contaminated with dog and cat DNA despite which still the Fox hair turned out to be human.
The rest of the scientific community and senior Bigfoot researcher’s deniability is reaching the point of being ridiculous. At some point some very public agency or noted personage is going to declare that the creatures are actually human beings, just different from modern man though a subtle shift in the genetic code. Perhaps just a few genes are involved though important ones and they might add up to huge differences and need to be identified. It might be what actually makes us human and them sub-human! This might be what made the jump between Homo erectus and Homo sapiens some 200 thousand years ago in Africa – we became intelligent beings almost overnight."
- Ray Crowe
Yain't got no bigfoot evidence the cuncluesavly pruves ths a xistance of sascwotch.
DeleteNo... But we've got everything short of type specimen;
DeleteOccam's Razor.
Did shick come out with a new shaver called occams razor?
DeleteWelcome to the Shave Club.
DeleteNo DNA on record, no legitimate bone in possession, you have evidence that can be hoaxed and misinterpreted. You have audio that at best cannot be identified. The best footage on record cannot be 100% ruled out as a hoax.
DeleteYou have a lot of hoaxable and easily misidentified/misinterpreted data. One single piece of biological evidence rules over ten thousand eyewitness accounts/stories.
Todd Disotell recently told Jim & Bill Viera this on Search for Lost Giants.
Sorry!
DeleteWe may have sequenced Sasquatch DNA already if they do indeed have share the same sequence like Cro-Magnon, and the reason we don't have bones in posession is because of a major cover up of 150 years worth of such... Documented by scientific big hitters. If bones have been found then more can. We have evidence that can be hoaxed and misinterpreted, but so can any source submittable in any judicial or scientific arena... And it is a bigger leap of faith to claim the mounds of evidence, all of which account for every sourve short of modern type specimen, in line with ten thousand years of agknowledgement, are merely hoaxes than to at least think there's something going on. We have audio that's been published and is a joke should you dimsiss the science you so seemingly appear to cling to, and the best footage is waiting to be tested, to which should you not, is documentation of a living breathing hominid.
We have biological evidence in the form of unknown primate hair that has uniform morphology. Tell Todd to catch up.
http://www.texlaresearch.com/unknown-chimp-bear.jpg
DeleteJoe is Henry Mays identical twin but at 600lb he can do one helluva spin kick especially when you're trying to get his last twinky
ReplyDeleteIf you fuckers don't believe in bigfoot then why the hell do you spend your time on a bigfoot evidence website??
ReplyDeleteI think they be trollin'
DeleteInterest does not require belief.
DeleteDisbelief requires we tutor the believers.
DeleteCement heads have nothing better to do!
DeleteThat feeling when you know Joe is wrong :)
ReplyDelete"Psuedoscience is in fact maintaining that there is nothing worthy of analysis until such a process of conclusive research is reached, such as type specimen. Psuedoscience is also ignoring data based on subjective assumptions and inaccurate data, reclining to preconceived preferences that cannot be supported, and is in fact heuristics"
ReplyDeleteThis is the Joe definition of it. Stated in a way that it looks like a real definition of it, so half of you simpletons will buy it. Look up the real definition and see how he tailor fitted his definition to try and make it look like the skeptics are the psuedo scientists. This is what Joe does. Takes real data and facts and inserts his own beliefs and agendas into them and presents them to you all in a way that looks believable. Look up the real definition of psuedo science and tell me Joe didnt alter that. And look Joes embarrassing attempt to try and make the link between delusional and trolling. Responded to in typical Joe fashion, insulting the intelligence of the person that pointed out the obvious shortcomings of his story. Doesnt take long to see the same patterns in Joe everday. Excuses, denial, and a just plain refusal to acknowledge information presented. Then proceeds to inform us how we all just too stupid to understand. Its getting pretty bad though, I mean todays sorry attempts at making psudeo-science define skeptics, and delusional define trolling are particularly comical attempts even for Joe. It should be more and more obvious we are dealing with a self absorbed ego maniac here who has a need to be validated by the gullible. So in fact Joe is a troll in his own way. He comes here and trolls the gullible.
pseu·do·sci·ence
Deleteˌso͞odōˈsīəns
noun
a collection of beliefs or practices mistakenly regarded as being based on scientific method.
The key word is MISTAKENLY
pseu·do·sci·ence
Deletenoun
sü-dō-ˈsī-ən(t)s
a system of theories, assumptions, and methods erroneously regarded as scientific
The key word in this definition is ERRONEOUSLY
erroneously
adverb
in a mistaken or inappropriate way
Derived from eroneous.
er·ro·ne·ous
adjective
i-ˈrō-nē-əs, e-
not correct
HEIL GRAMMAR!
Who made a claim at stating any definitions? Someone please explain to this Einstein what principles are...
Delete(Sigh)
You were told yesterday, it's a matter of time before I stop flattering you, you're running out of chances of me even responding to you... You want my attenion then you start challenging the subject matter like an adult, or someone who can offer the challenge and justify a response for that matter.
(Cringe)
ACHTUNG!
DeleteEINIGKEIT RECHT GRAMMATIK!
^ Funny yet terrifying!
DeleteUsing a bear expert to explain the very obvious anatomical differences and behaviour that is in contrast to a Sasquatch, and when your very best claim is that people are reporting bears, would be a last resort towards people experiencing such episodes of delusions.
ReplyDeleteBut still a Bear expert isnt an expert on the psychology of the human mind. I mean even a simpleton like you gets that right? Or do I have to walk you through this. A bear expert can note the distinctions between a bear and a giant moneky person. But isnt qualified to say that theres no way people can be mistaking them for animals. So basically because Meldrum calls a bear expert to say that people couldnt mistake them for Sasquatch you would have the people here believe that there has never been a bear mistaken for Sasquatch? Cant believe I have to hold the hand a intellectual powerhouse like yourself and explain this to you. Basic stuff, anyone would tell you so.
Last time I checked, you don't need a psychologist to offer guidance on wilderness situations, or the comparitive anatomy of large mammals in order for people conducting research on Sasquatch to learn from and make better judgements in such scenarios.
Delete(Pfffft)
Therefore... What you do achieve by consulting an expert on the specific animal of what people are suggesting is a Sasquatch, in this case a bear, is reinforcing the refute that bear anatomy can be mistaken for Sasquatch, in accordance with other key areas to highlight such as behaviour and seasonal traits and tracks.
(Sigh)
How about you link the instance where Meldrum's consulted such an expert? I think you'll find the reasons within that source.
(Cringe)
Sigh and cringe one more time, I'm about to cum!
DeleteDon't waver Joe...you are doing good work here.
ReplyDeleteI'm here to stay my friend! Ha ha!
DeleteThat's right, Joe! Stay the course! Ha!
DeleteLoved your piece that you linked me... Really got me thinking...
DeleteLet's imagine for a minute that Sasquatch have the perfect blend of both animalistic and human attributes to their evasion, then it would be an extremely difficult creature to spot, unless it makes the odd mistake or is partial to bouts of curiosity (both very much being the case). An experiment shows that chimpanzees have startling photographic memories; they easily beat humans. From the Primate Research Institute at Kyoto University.
Deletehttps://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Zz7ShiQqLQg
Both animals and humans leave sign of their passage in addition to tracks. These include chewed or bruised vegetation, droppings, scratches in tree bark, hairs snagged on branches or in bark, rubbings on trees, gnawed bones, feathers, opened nuts, dens, burrows, and nests. You may also find well-worn trails and runways through the grass that many animals use regularly. These signs may not be obvious at first, but with practice, you will see them. If Sasquatch somehow had Photographic memories as well as the level of sentience as humans, all this could be why they see sign of human interference and things like trail cams having been erected. Natives who are some of the very best trackers in the world refer to this creature as the "boss of the woods" or "master of the mountain".
Animals like chimps are not without fine motor skills. In fact a study found that a relatively new brain area, developed in humans and other primates, gives us all an advantage in this realm. More gray matter in humans means more motor neurons and having more motor neurons means more muscle control. Our surplus motor neurons allow us to engage smaller portions of our muscles at any given time. We can engage just a few muscle fibers for delicate tasks like threading a needle, and more for tasks that require more force. Since chimps have fewer motor neurons, each neuron triggers a higher number of muscle fibers and using a muscle becomes more of an all-or-nothing proposition. As a result, chimps often end up using more muscle than they need, but they can in theory lift about 16 people over their own head. Imagine what a primate three times the size of a chimp could achieve? If Sasquatch were to have the perfect blend of both human and wild animal attributes... They would have phenomenal strength and stealth abilities to be clear gone before we would even know they were there. All that, and they can also think like humans.
This was born out of reading an excellent piece written by Bigfoot Student here;
http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/if-gorillas-can-do-this-imagine-what.html?m=0
JOE. You are arguing with someone that is still in the stone age of bigfooting. Send him a free pass to Oswalds Bear Ranch in Newberry, MI. ( Heck I will pop for the $10 entrance fee ) for next summer where he can get a good look at about 30 bears in all sizes. Hint there is a lot of difference between a bear and a sasquatch and quite easily distinguishable even from a far distance let alone one 50 feet away.
DeleteChuck
Hey Chuck, I realize I'm stooping very, very low responding... Trust me.
Delete: )
Joe, Thanks for the shout out. I've loved reading all of your posts, and to have you commend my writing means a lot.
DeleteYes chuck, Joe is very experianced at stooping low. Especially when there is a line of men involved.
Delete^
DeleteJ Randi's husband ?
BS, thanks for the inspiration.
Deletesuck much dick lately....a ball licker to an orangemen.....
Delete11:30... why don't you go show your mother your post....I'm sure she would be real proud of you.
Deleteyour mother was real proud of me too , after i hit it in the ass....
Delete"Just frighten this deer"? Scratching head...
ReplyDeleteAnyway, V cool Bob Garrett! FLIR plus audio, really smart. Take some lessons, footers.
ReplyDeleteTAPPER + WILD BILL = 1 trapped BIGFOOT
Deleteasdfghj
ReplyDelete