Watch: Todd Standing Bigfoot video as seen in Survivorman Bigfoot show with Les Stroud
Here's the Todd Standing footage from Sylvanic that was featured on Les Stroud's Survivorman Bigfoot episode 1. On the show, Les didn't sound all too convince the footage is the real deal.
Firsty! DK, uk!
ReplyDeleteSecond for the UK!
DeleteTop o' the morning to ya Joe
DeleteHave a good day people. Till later on fucko's
DeleteHave a good day my friend!
DeleteIf Les thinks Standing is Legit I am onboard too!
ReplyDeleteMaybe Mr. Kulls is wrong. If Todd filmed a muppet where is the proof of this claim Steve Kulls makes?
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteMy pants have been removed by the author.
DeleteAnd I like it!
Deletejoe why did you take your comment off?
ReplyDeleteYou think maybe Kulls is wrong too?
or are you doing a cut/paste for me?
Delete... I will commit to publicly stating my feelings on the matter soon.
DeleteI think I've been very clear that I support what Todd is doing.
Peace.
The trees in that video look more like flesh and blood than that pathetic puppet. If you can't see that then there truly is no hope for you Joe.
DeleteHere, I'll use a history of Joe's actions and patterns to predict his position:
DeleteSince most people believe it's a hoax and that is generally the accepted view, Joe will do his usual buck the trend cliche move and claim with some asterisk that the footage is real.
Don't be fooled, although initially there may be an asterisk on the legitimacy of the creatures in the film after a short period of time, he will belligerently start yelling about how it's absolutely not a hoax, seemingly evolving his position on it.
Of course, this prediction may force his hand, not wanting to fall into his typical patterns, he may declare it a hoax...
But a noble hoax. It was done to raise awareness and protect the forest people's and their homes.
Therefore the noble hoaxer will get a pass from Joe.
Joe you magnificent bastard. I read your book!
DeleteGot magic muppet suit?
Delete4:13... Trees look fine to me?
Delete4:52... You have no doubt taken a tongue in cheek article written by myself and Mike, and ran with it. The truth is there is no hoax that helps the wider community, but in a weird way COULD be used for the greater good. I by no means condone hoaxing (I in fact hate it) but there enough weird circumstances within this field that we should not exclude much.
My opinion on this footage is that the footage could indeed be legitimate. People who know me will confirm my stance on this, but I think it sensible that before I totally comit to that opinion publicly, that I ascertain all the facts; something I'm in the process of trying to accomplish.
Any footage or photograph of an alleged Sasquatch is going to be attacked... ANY! Yet Todd has total transparency with anyone able to go with him providing they can keep up, and all of a sudden he has someone like Les on board?
5:20... ; )
"Joe" is just a jrefer having a bit of fun playing the role of a deluded footer
DeleteJoe, what makes you think anyone in the "public" gives a rat's arse what you think about anything? No one could care less what you commit to publicly.
DeleteFor God's sake, get over yourself already.
If what I thought wasn't so important, then you wouldn't harass me or get all so butthurt when I come get you... Would you?
DeleteNo wonder my ego is so big, eh?
If by "come get me you" mean paste some meaningless fringe theory nonsense, then oh yes, I be soooo scared.
DeleteYou are such an idiot.
I garentee you there is no "joe" from wales with an interest in bigfoot. Its a character from one of the jrefers or bffers who have been in this game for years.
DeleteIn my best Christopher Walken voice,
DeleteWow,you are delusional.
^^ You are correct. The Joe account, and all the other ones he holds here, is run by someone in the USA. The Joe account holder is here only for troll bait and to influence blog traffic.
DeleteHa ha ha!! Walken voice... You make me smile.
DeleteAnd it truly is pathetic that the poster using the Joe account actually thinks that anyone cares about what he thinks.
DeleteHere is what is happening guys. The Joe accounts has existed and currently exists only to influence blog traffic as Joe plays the role of the pathetic dope. But here lies a good opportunity for SHAWN!!
Just like Shawn has done with the other goons, hoaxers, and losers, i sense that Shawn is getting ready to start commentary with "Joe". This is why the Joe account holder has started this nonsense about what he will "commit to publicly". Shawn is getting ready to start promoting the Joe account holder.
Dont be fooled people. Joe is not from Wales, he lives in the USA and is only here to influence blog traffic. He acts like a dope on purpose to lure in trolls for blog hits
Glad that it makes you smile Joe.This troll is really delusional. Don't let these pecker heads get to you. He answers his own post.So essentially, he knows he lonely. Actually I feel sad for the little fella.It has to be a sad life trolling on site about something that he doesn't know about.
DeleteYou have a friend in me, sir.
DeleteSo here's some logic. Numb nuts above thinks Joe is a super troll (delusional) who logs in with other accounts as well in order to create blog traffic, and yet all the obsessed crazy troll above does is post about Joe, constantly, adding significantly to the blog traffic himself. Irrational, illogical, not very intelligent and most likely, highly insane. What a tool. Doesn't get any dumber than this, folks.
DeleteHey Ernie!
DeleteMan... This troll ain't Einstein!! Hope you're well buddy, drop me am email.
Peace.
4:52 here. Da Fuq you talking about with 6:05? Tongue and cheek Mike B. article? Wtf?
DeleteAnd on another note, look at Ernie go, making one bigfoot related comment in the past month. Must have strained his brain and sent him back to chasing a bunch of anons around instead.
Ernie came for bigfoot but stayed for white knighting. How many maidens have you saved this year, Ern?
"No wonder my ego is so big,eh?"
DeleteGigantic Dueche alert!
Is that why you don't post on BFF? Afraid you would look like an impish child?
You took the Bigfoot Evidence post me and Mike wrote and ran with it, can you not read?
DeleteMy ego is here off the back of numbskulls like you, I'm at least honest about that... Look no further than your comments for credence to that.
I didn't "run with it," as a matter of fact I wasn't even aware of it. Last thing I saw about Mike B. on a post was some wolf picture from a state that in fact had wolves listed on their wildlife commission website.
DeleteI used the pattern of the past year of your posts and actions to determine my post at 4:52.
Big ol' scaredy cat, you are.
BS... And you know it.
DeleteYou took my tongue in cheek written piece that a hoax could benefit the greater good regarding Todd Standing, exactly whilst we are discussing Todd Standing, I can post you the exact comment to make you look silly if you like?
I seriously wasn't even aware of it until you pointed it out and I still haven't read it, nor will I.
DeleteMaybe you are extremely predictable and follow patterns?
There has been talks of noble hoaxing for a while, it's nothing new. If you posted with us at BFF maybe you'd be versed in it.
Sorry!
Your "commentary" isn't even on the front page.
DeleteBesides, I won't click it just so the traffic on that post is minuscule just like the comments.
Go read my Bigfoot evidence post with Mike B regarding Timbergiant.
DeleteI can't be bothered to play this game with you, you bore me.
Nah, I'd rather not. Nothing you could ever add will be considered a break through, revolutionary, insightful, meaningful, or honest.
DeleteDoesn't keep you from trying to be the "one-upper," and desiring the last word.
As long as I get to people like you, my work here is done.
DeleteI think your attacks would suggest a high accumilation of getting 'one up'.
Folks, take note of how many accounts Joe used to back himself up above when he was called out for being a troll only here to influence blog traffic. He posted under Joe, anonymous, and Ernie. Notice how Joe hates these comments about him being a troll here to influence blog traffic. He is desperate to make it seem like its not true, and the reason for that is because people are seeing it and realizing that Joe is here for blog hits only.
DeleteBut i just wonder Joe, once i track the IP of your AOL account, where will that address show up as?? Wanna place a bet that its located in the USA. Your about to be made a fool of Joe
Ha ha ha!!
DeleteYou're a total loon.
12:32, you're a complete idiot. Let me repeat:
DeleteSo here's some logic. Numb nuts above thinks Joe is a super troll (delusional) who logs in with other accounts as well in order to create blog traffic, and yet all the obsessed crazy troll above does is post about Joe, constantly, adding significantly to the blog traffic himself. Irrational, illogical, not very intelligent and most likely, highly insane. What a tool. Doesn't get any dumber than this, folks.
Read em and weep.
10:35, you've been through this hoop before. You say chasing around anons, like they are pointless and irrelevant. Solid point. At least, you admit you're irrelevancy is in full swing. Let's face it you're a nobody, no one knows who you are. Your posts are just a blur smeared in with the feces with the rest of anon trolls on here. How does it taste?
DeleteGood morning ladies! Who do I have to fuk around here to stop getting hoaxer updates? Love Les but sorry I agree it may not be a muppet but it's fake as hell. If you look at the whole series of pics you can see. standing was trying to avoid a direct photo. Shooting a leaf in front of the subject he knew damn well was fake. A good fake obviously if some people still think it's real. But fake nonetheless.
ReplyDeleteHey Harry, how was it to be punked by the hoaxer Tim Fasano?
Deletehas a hard on fer T-Fats^
Delete^ Harry still mad after being punked
DeleteLink or it didn't happen bitch
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteTrapper John Tice, just saying
Deletemanishsangal manish sangal google ebs inc
enterprise business solutions inc
xceltech inc
conceptsit
Concepts IT Inc
Manish Sangal work as an Vice President for Enterprise Business Solutions Inc at Burke, VA The company's webpage is http://www.ebs-us.com. For email, phone number and executive profiles for Vice President and other executives of Enterprise Business Solutions Inc at Burke, VA, check Enterprise Business Solutions Inc at Joesdata.com. Not the Manish Sangal you are looking for? Do a quick search in our website and find other people named Manish Sangal.
About Enterprise Business Solutions Inc:
Enterprise Business Solutions Inc is located at 5216 Lyngate Ct, Burke, VA 22015-1631. It has around 50 - 100 employees. Its revenue is within $2.5 - 5M.
Is there anyone in the Virginia area that can swing by Enterprise Business Solutions and punch Manish in the throat? Let us know how it went. Thanks in advance!
DeleteLol!
DeleteThanks. I'll be here all week! And don't forget to tip your waitress!
DeleteHey joe unless you can provide an exact replication of the mask then it is the real deal.... right? If you can not produce the mask then there is your bigfoot.
ReplyDeleteYes, this is how retarded your pgf arguments are.
Not really... The photographs up top would be down to my opinion and merely that, whereas the PGF has a long line of scientists and experts presenting a study that has yet to be tested.
DeleteHow do you test a case for organic tissue?
No, no... The pleasure was all mine.
A long line of scientists? You mean just the one then: meldrum.
DeleteA long line of experts? You mean just the one then: munns. (His expert status is questionable as he hasnt worked in the industry for decades since he was fired).
Now a long list of experts and scientists that say it's a hoax. Yep we got both of those and they are long long long lists.
Obliterated.
Blown out the water.
An anthropologist (Meldrum) a wildlife biologist (former advisor to the UN; Bindenagle) and a costume expert of 30 years (Munns; he's also been involved in and lecturing about digital special effects for the past 20 years). That's just referencing a couple.
DeleteHow do you test their study?
Got monkey suit?
No?
... Shut up and sit down.
(Side note... Meldrum and Bindenagle are both in support of Standing)
; )
Got muppet? No then there is your Todd standing bigfoot.
DeleteFish in a barrel.
Todd is the real deal.
DeleteTrolls in a barrel.
I like how when Joe was destroyed above and called out on his "long list of" statements, that he copped out once again. The anon destroyed Joe by calling his BS out and correctly stating that Joes long list of people was actually Meldrum, John B, and Munns. Thats 3 people. When Joe responded, he confirmed it by restating what the anon said, and then conveniantly saying that he would mention just those 3 guys for a reference. HAHAHA. Joe got called out for lying and put in his place and all he could do was make up excuses. This is how you know that Joe is a troll here to influence blog traffic. No one is that stupid and ignorant without being classified as retarded
DeleteJoe is taking a pretty harsh schooling above. I wonder when the comment deletion will begin. He is already boiling over after being humiliated by the anons above. How is the weather there in Wales Joe????? Oh wait......You live in the USA and are a troll here to influence blog traffic.
DeleteDidn't Joe get banned once upon a time?
DeleteIf he is a "troll here to influence blog traffic..."
Why would he get banned?
Good one anon 8:14.Blew the trolls theory right out of the water.
DeleteAt 8:14, yes he did get banned. And about an hour later he was suddenly back. With the excuse that he apologized to the mods. Funny, thats the only person that this has ever happened with. Was he banned? absolutely not. All part of the act
DeleteSo you are saying Joe is...um...a hoaxer. ?
DeleteInteresting.
Joe, could you point to what sources you are using for your claim that Meldrum and Bindernagel support Todd Standing?
Delete7:11... If Todd's pictures had the same significance to this subject, and was subject to the same scientific backing that has not been presented with suficient testing, then your argument would apply. Nobody's trying to convince anyone of the photographs (I don't care what people think), but what I will do is present everyone with the wider facts once I attain them...
DeleteI'd get suit making if I were you.
8:11... Your comment makes absolutely no sense at all, bro... I fail to see where I've 'copped out' and fail to see where I have lied. For more advocates of the PGF, you merely have to watch Legend Meets Science for such names. The names I have listed are but a couple but warrant the same fair treatment of testing suitable of proper scientific scrutiny. Put the meth down and go to sleep.
Oh... Didn't you say you'd go away after I answered your three questions?
"Coo-coo!"
8:14... "Coo-coo!"
8:27... I think you'll find Danny Boy got banned the same time as me, and he had to apologise as well... So sit back down, you know nothing, obviously.
Dan Dan Dan.Why are you so infatuated with Joe?
DeleteDo you think he has bigger nuts than you and you're just jealous?
It's really not that big of a deal.
Just take a hammer to your peanuts and walla!!!
You'll have huge walnuts.
So Meldrum and Bindernagel support Todd Standing? Again, do you have something to substantiate this?
Deletethx
Sup dork.
DeleteI used to date a girl named Sup Dork. She was a cutie but she had that whole Pol Pot/Killing Field thing hanging on her. Totally turned me off mass murderers. Oh well....
DeleteDon... I don't answer to trolls, but I'll find you that source and I'll enjoy your excuses all the same.
DeleteWatch this space.
Wasn't trolling Joe. I am just curious. I don't recall any sort of endorsement by either Meldrum or Bindernagel for Standing, so I'm curious to see where you got that from.
DeleteIf Uncle Bob says Meldrum and Bindernagel support Todd, you take that to the bank as 100% ironclad TRUTH!
Delete"Meldrum is more circumspect about the matter, as the skeptical scientist that he is. If asked, he simply says, “Well, let’s put it this way. I saw something.” The sighting occurred at the Alberta Habitation Site in the foothills of the Rocky Mountains east of Jasper National Park. This is one of the hottest sites in North America."
Delete"As I noted earlier, Meldrum and Bindernagel were taken there by Todd Standing as part of a documentary Todd was filming which incidentally has been sold to TV."
"Meldrum lifted his night vision binoculars to his eyes and peered through them. A bipedal figure resembling a man then “glided,” in Meldrum’s words, across a clearing or road."
http://cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/meldrum-sees-a-squatch/
http://robertlindsay.wordpress.com/2014/01/08/bigfoot-news-january-8-2014/
DeleteRemember, Uncle Bob broke this story FIRST!
From Robert Lindsay:
DeleteDr. Jeff Meldrum Class A Sasquatch encounter in Alberta, Canada! I told you previously that Meldrum had at least a Class B encounter up there, but now I am finally able to tell you more. The way I see is that Meldrum saw a Sasquatch up there, and that is the take everyone else has on the incident. If so, it would be the first time that Meldrum has actually seen Sasquatch en vivo.
Meldrum is more circumspect about the matter, as the skeptical scientist that he is. If asked, he simply says, “Well, let’s put it this way. I saw something.” The sighting occurred at the Alberta Habitation Site in the foothills of the Rocky Mountains east of Jasper National Park. This is one of the hottest sites in North America. A trapper runs traplines there, and this man says that there are seven different Sasquatches living in that area. Just about any trip to the area typically results in encounters of one sort or another, and people are often tracked, shadowed and followed as soon as they venture into the area. In other words, the Sasquatches act like they own the place.
http://cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/meldrum-sees-a-squatch/
Do not forget, there is no way Todd or is psychic buddy could have possibly had someone out there to fool the good Doctor since Todd's reputation for honesty is as ironclad as Uncle Bob's sources.
DeleteJoe, do you have any comments directly made by Meldrum or Bindernagel to reference, or are we to take Fraud Standing's word for it?
DeleteYou have a long standing written piece that if, should Meldrum and Bindenagle have any issue with it... They would have stated so. Like the reference stated, this occurance is for a TV show also.
DeleteSo, no then? It is their absence of comment that leads you to conclude that they both support Standing?
Delete"I had a pleasant and cordial conversation with Robert. I would simply point out that Robert has a tendency to apply quotation marks, when he is merely paraphrasing what i said in conversation. The basic message is generally there, but some inflection and innuendo are a bit misplaced. Let me qualify, I would not call this a class A encounter."
Delete- Jeff Meldrum
^^ Interesting. Thanks. Hardly a ringing endorsement. I'm curious, has either Meldrum or Bindernagel ever commented on the muppet video?
DeleteDon... No, it's the opportunity to contradict that source that hasn't happened and the TV cameras involved that leads me to conclude that.
Delete10:14... Focus on; "... The basic message is generally there, but some inflection and innuendo are a bit misplaced. Let me qualify, I would not call this a class A encounter."
The article stated that it agreed that Meldrum had a class B encounter.
"Well, let’s put it this way. I saw something.”
- Meldrum
The photographs certainly aren't getting in the way of such people taking Todd up on his open transparent opportunity, and having experiences too.
DeleteEh, Don?
I find that with Meldrum and Bindernagel they tend to be hesitant to publicly denounce suspected hoaxers. With perhaps Dyer being the exception and then only when asked about it directly.
DeleteIn fact, Bindernagel has visited Ontario and spent time with both Timbergiantbigfoot and that other fool, Sasquatch Ontario. Both of those folks are blatant hoaxers in my opinion, but you can find photos of Bindernagel smiling while posing for pics with both of them. He has not denounced them in either of their "transparent opportunities" either.
Does this mean he supports and endorses them? It's sad if he does, but by your logic he does.
You threw your own argument out in your first sentence.
DeleteYou would also have to find a means of proving Sasquatch Ontario a hoax too.
Your logic here is not surprising since you constantly demonstrate a preference for negative evidence as support of something rather than positive evidence.
DeleteI can't seem to find anything where Bindernagel denounces any chucacabra photos or mothman. He must support both of those then.
Oh please. Common sense proves Sasquatch Ontario is hoaxing. Unless of course you deem dimension hopping and invisibility to be reasonable sasquatch traits?
DeleteI hardly threw my argument out in my first sentence. You are suggesting that in lack of a public denial that Meldrum and Bindernagel must therefore support Standing. I am saying they both seem hesitant to denounce what seem to be obvious hoaxers unless asked. So even if they were inclined, you are not likely to find anything as that does not seem to be their style. But then you take that absence and twist it into they must obviously support something. That was what I was pointing out.
Delete... Negative, positive? Rich from someone who muddles the two concepts in a suppression of evidence fallacy.
DeleteIt doesn't really have to be all that thought out... You have two of the biggest names in Footery, taking Todd up on his invitation and having experiences... And, reportedly with TV cameras around.
If you can't find anything where Bindernagel denounces chucacabra photos or mothman, it's because his field is in wildlife biology and Bigfoot?
(Duh)
What I will also say, is nobody as of yet has yet debunked Sasquatch Ontario and we have examples of the same vocals being recorded from Kazakhstan (Islam Recordings).
Oh... And you threw your own argument out, even went as close as contradicting yourself.
DeleteBindernagle hasn't expressed disgust nor denounced pedophilia, therefore he's a pederast Dude.
DeleteSup dork.
DeleteSup dork = Ernie.
DeleteSup dork has been 'dorkin' Don for ages.
DeleteBindernagle hasn't expressed disgust nor denounced pedophilia, therefore he's a pederast Dude.
DeleteDon smokes Joe every time he comments here.
DeleteI would read back your comment and in future refrain from using not only such misleading comments, but so easily imterpreted ones at that.
DeleteThat goes to 10:55 AND 11:00!
DeleteTry typing with your fingers instead of hitting the keys with your tongue.
Delete"What I will also say, is nobody as of yet has yet debunked Sasquatch Ontario and we have examples of the same vocals being recorded from Kazakhstan (Islam Recordings)."
DeleteDo you feel Sasquatch Ontario is legit? Do claims as ridiculous as dimension travel and invisibility cloaks really need to be debunked?
Bindernagle hasn't expressed disgust nor denounced pedophilia, therefore he's a pederast Dude.
DeleteJust Joe's line of thinking in action.
Shawn hasn't publicly denounced terrorism or the actions of Pakistan, therefore he's down with paki terrorists!
More joe logic.
"What I will also say, is nobody as of yet has yet debunked Sasquatch Ontario and we have examples of the same vocals being recorded from Kazakhstan (Islam Recordings)."
Delete... I think I was pretty clear there you know? I'm not entirely sure Sasquacth Ontario has made such claims of dimensional stuff, whereas tests have shown (notably by the US Army) that infrasound can put you in all states of mind.
11:18... Why would Bindenagle do that anyway? It's perverse and his interest is in Bigfoot and wildlife biology??
DeleteLike suggested by Don (so clumsily), why not denounce something so 'obviously a hoax'? Credibility isn't a commodity in this subject. The truth is, regardless of the photographs, they had an experience with Todd Standing that was filmed with cameras. You would have to be silly to denounce something that in the same reference highlights a means of later confirming such an occurance.
Deliberately posting filth is exactly what your logic aspires to.
"Credibility isn't a commodity in this subject. "
DeleteLOL. Now that is probably the first thing I would have to agree with said by Joe.
So, Joe are you saying that Meldrum or Bindernagel cannot denounce the muppet video because they need Standing to seem legit to support a TV show they did together?
DeleteSounds like awesome science! Yes, let's ignore your other obvious fake results because that work we did together must appear legit.
LOL
Don't be mad at me because Bindernagle has not publicly denounced pedophilia dude.
DeleteThat's just your logic in use.
Hell will freeze over the day that Joe answers a question with a yes or a no instead of answering with ambiguity or another question.
DeleteYou would no doubt agree with that, considering you constribute in some minuscule way to the censorship.
DeleteI'm not saying Meldrum or Bindenagle have anything to do with his photographs, what I'm saying is; they've had experiences in his recommended place to have those experiences. I would expect that Meldrum and Bindenagle would like to steer well clear from commenting on the photographs, but you have the most prime example possible in the very recent programme that the pictures appear to have no baring on people getting on board with Todd's transparent offer... Les, did the exact same thing as Meldrum and Bindenagle and has had experiences.
That's significant.
What's not science, is discounting what are always going to be scrutinised photographs, because the same advocate is providing Bigfoot experiences to credible people.
; )
Case in point ^
DeleteI think you'll find his efforts to slip out the back door as entertaining as Randy California slipping into Eva's back door.
...if you know what I mean!
And the fact that people get involved with someone like Todd Standing has no baring on your opinion as to their integrity or legitimacy? It does for me. I think Todd's muppet to be one of the more laughable fakes in footery. To turn a blind eye to that and follow his directions and have "experiences" casts a shadow on the person involved and on the alleged experiences.
DeleteIt's ridiculous when you think about it. Hey, I'm a known hoaxer but trust me and I'll take you to the woods where you can have ambiguous bigfoot encounters. It's like Dyer without the mannequin and trailer.
Sup dork.
DeleteIt really is getting old seeing Dmaker destroy Joe every single time. But hey, thats what the Joe account holder is here for. He plays the role of the dopey bigfoot enthusiast in order to garner blog traffic. Its nothing but troll bait. Joe posts his idiotic comments and assertions and then just waits for the trolls. When they comment, he just copy's and paste;s. Its a perfect way to encourage further trolling and reactions.
DeleteMake no mistake, whoever runs the Joe account, is part of the bigfootevidence crew. He is not an enthusiast, just a troll himself. I am in the process of tracking the IP of Joe's AOL email address he gave out. It will be interesting to see where that IP originates out of, and how "Joe" will try and squirm his way out of being exposed.
Whats your excuse gonna be "Joe", when i pull that IP address and it originates in the USA. Further more, im betting it comes back from a CA IP address. But we will see. Today when i get some time i will track it. Better start thinking of an excuse there Joe. And the whole, i used a proxy excuse isnt gonna fly "joe". You already have stated several times over the last year you dont do that. This should be interesting.
Dont even waste your time dmaker, "Joe" is just a troll account. He is here to influence blog traffic. Wanna bet how long it is before "Joe" shows up in the blog thread titles for commentary?? I bet its coming soon. Joe is just here to pull views for bigfootevidence. Dont waste you time with him
DeleteDon... No, it doesn't because of the credibility of those people... One in Stroud who's got a massive reputation to uphold.
DeleteThe photographs are quite a shock I must admit, and there are probably as much enthusiasts opposed to them as 'skeptics'. The truth is, that to me they look like they could indeed be real and the experiences are now having consistency into widely 'acceptable' sources. You would have to go a long way to prove that whatever Les experiences in the next episode, are merely 'ambiguous experiences'.
This, in turn lends credence to the experiences of both Meldrum and Bindenagle.
It has no baring on me because I have not discounted Standing on the basis that photographs (that can always and will be suits and muppets becuase of this subject), should discount credible people maintaining his transparency successfully AND having results.
It's funny... I haven't once read you discount Stroud?
; )
12:25, 12:27...
DeletePlease go ahead... We'll see how you get off with that.
Nut job.
I wouldn't have to go a long way at all to prove what Les experiences in the next episode are ambiguous experiences. I will guarantee you that they are nothing but ambiguous experiences. Do you really think definitive proof of bigfoot was obtained months ago and is just being revealed to the world via the Travel channel in Canada? Of course not, that is absurd. His experiences will be absolutely nothing but ambiguous. You can take that to the bank.
DeleteI was a big fan of Stroud. I posted on JREF and BFF as much when this was first announced. Yesterday I posted to Stroud's facebook page that I thought he was a sell out and the he has jumped the shark and I will never entertain a single thing he produces in the future based on the ridiculous bigfoot sell-out he is doing.
Well guys, it looks like Joe shut down his AOL account. Must have been from all the spam he had been getting. No worries, im working on getting his IP another way
DeleteAnd again you miss the point of positive claims. It's not up to anyone to prove that Les's experiences in the episode are ambiguous, it's up to him and Standing to prove the claimed source of the experience. The ambiguity of the experience, or evidence borne of that experience is simply an objective observation. Proving the source is up to the person making the claim. In this case, Standing and Stroud. Which is most likely why he will probably say something lame like , I don't know for sure what it was, but it sure isn't this..or that...blah blah.
DeleteSup dork.
DeleteWhat's the matter Don, you seem riled up?? Are you a little worried that people like Stroud are now publicly proclaiming semi-legitimacy to this subject???
DeleteYour actions in trying to convince people of that is telling and unfortunate for you, your just little old insignificant Don from Canada, can't see Stroud worrying too much on what you and the recycled junk you get from JREF have to say.
Is it selling out, or popular culture bringing you your worst nightmare??
; )
The default position in this case is very simple. Whatever evidence they display, be it tracks, vocalizations, etc is of a known animal until they prove otherwise. Hence removing the ambiguity. It does not work the other way around.
DeleteWTF is a DMaker anyway?
DeleteNot riled up at all Joe. You thought you were being clever and saying I had not discounted Stroud. I was simply responding to that to correct you. I am quite sure that Stroud does not care at all what I think. Why would he?
DeleteUnlike you, I do not have an over inflated opinion of my own importance.
A Dmaker is one who destroys a troll named "joe" whenever that account holder tries to create blog traffic. Consider yourself schooled
DeleteI know.He makes dildos!
Delete... Not when you have to present sources to prove those claims, it is the natural process of determining legitimacy to then test those claims in conjunction with consistency that transcends mediums and professions.
DeleteYou cannot prove or disprove the legitimacy of research without testing the said sources, and every field of study as a starting point. Evidence doesn't 'stop existing' because you have a preconceived default position, that's as anti-scientific as you can get, not true skepticism and in fact suppression of evidence (not to mention denial).
There are numerous hallmarks of when the troll account known as "Joe" is losing his temper and is getting schooled. Of course we all know about deleting comments and copy/paste, but another sure sign is insult throwing. Notice how "Joe" is now insulting dmaker because he has nothing else to go on, and is making himself look stupid. Even as a troll account, "Joe" fails miserably.
DeleteAnon 12:58 uses the dildos that dmaker makes.
Delete... I think you'll find I'm returning the 'compliment' that Don pays me and my opinions worth very regularly.
DeleteI also thought it embarrassing that he would think Stroud would give two sh*ts what he thinks.
No Don, you got riled up and then thought that Stroud would give to sh*ts what you thought...
DeleteI can just imagine his expression and thought process now; "what the heck is a Dmaker, and who's he to tell an outdoorsmen like me what I have and haven't seen!"
Sounds legit (no sarcasm).
Joe, I would appreciate if you would not pretend to think you know my thoughts. It's creepy. I am perfectly fine with Stroud not giving a sh*t about my comment. But Facebook is social media and encourages comments. So I offered one. I used to be a fan, and felt like I wanted to express my disappointment. Again, I highly doubt he cares.
DeleteBut above you are correct when you say claims must be tested. Of course. So how does this scenario go? Les and Stroud in the bush. A scary noise is heard off camera. Is there a scientific investigation into what made that noise? Do we cut to several weeks later where experts are analyzing the recorded sounds and offer their opinion? No. What happens in all these cases is the person immediately discounts all the known animals in the area and jumps right to bigfoot. And then people like you chime in and say it's bigfoot that made that sound until someone proves otherwise. While other roll their eyes and marvel at your facepalm.
Seriously, what does dmaker mean.
DeleteAn honest question.
... Must have been heart rentching to see one of your heroes turn to the dark side, eh Don?
DeleteTwo words... Wood knocks and whoops, sooooo many other animals do that don't they?? And what's significant, is that we have the survivor man, who would know way more than any scientist could tell you, confirming those instances.
So that's how you can test these claims; find an equivalent to Stroud that would contradict his conclusions, and Bob's your uncle!
Humans whoop and wood knock all the time. I suspect at an even higher rate when hoaxers are around. :)
Delete... And yes, I'm aware that it came out as three words, not my intention.
DeleteWow DMaker,all your people from Canada are hoaxers. Let us not forget,
DeleteMIIIKKKE FFLLOOWWERR BRUDERRR!!
LMAO.
Hard to really differentiate when eeeeeeeeeveryone's a hoaxer, and eeeeeeeeeeeeveryone's in the woods as some secret society scaring people who potentially have guns.
DeleteDMaker,what is in the water that makes all Canucks crazy?
DeleteOh,sorry you'll just give a crazy answer. Sorry to ask.
Joe, are you a paid troll sent here to influence blog traffic and if so, did you pay the Welsh actor, Timothy Dalton to call me all those times. And just exactly what did that cost you?
DeleteYes it is the real deal. Bigfoot has been a badly made puppet all the time. Who knew!
ReplyDeleteIf you is serious about his beliefs, he would reject Standings "work". It is obviously hoaxed.
I liked the bit where they are looking at that natural tree formation and pretending a mythical creature did it.
ReplyDeleteI hate the word "Sylvanic"!! Hoaxers should be hung from the gallows.....by their nads!
ReplyDeleteBut his heart is in the right place so he gets a pass.
DeleteKind of like Alec Baldwin.
DeleteAlec Baldwin is a American Drunk.
DeleteAs long as he's OUR drunk!! Just kidding. I'd trade him to the Taliban for a 7th round pick and a goat to be named later.
Deleteno blinks...animals blink humans blink...no blink from that expressionless mask
ReplyDeleteJoan Rivers hasn't blinked since the mid 80's.That should be a warning to anyone considering plastic surgery as a way to look less repulsive.
DeleteLet me say this slow so you can understand: IT WAS SLOWED DOOOOWWWNNNNNN.
DeleteWhyyyyyyyyyyyy?
Deletewhy slow it down if you want to show this as a legit animal. show the thing blinking dumb dumb
DeleteNancy Kerrigan in the house folks!! Give it up!!
DeleteHank looks better than this crap.
ReplyDeleteActually that isn't true. Hank like like utter garbage. I wouldn't use Hank for special effects in a B flick. These are passable at a distance for a B flick.
DeleteThe price of wood is going to go threw the roof soon !
ReplyDeleteGay male prostitutes on strike again? Selfish A-holes...
DeleteMy son made a paper mâché Bigfoot head for his Valentines box a few years ago that puts Standings to shame!
ReplyDeleteHoaxers should be hung from the gallows.....by their nads!!!
Another day, another muppet.
ReplyDeleteJust watched the vid. If that is in the episode, it's really bad. Les, what have you done? : o
DeleteHow DARE you!
DeleteTodd Lying is hoaxing for the good of squatchkind.
You rang?
DeleteJoe, when you post as Ernie, do you rang?
DeleteYes I do. All over your face.
DeleteWhat he said.
DeleteJoe, when you post as Ernie, do you like to say, what he said?
DeleteYah sure, sure do.
DeleteIt's a TV show. It's fake. That's all.
ReplyDeleteMountain Monsters (AMIS) be REAL, take it to the BANK $$$
DeleteMountain Monsters going after tham critters on the 4th of April...
Delete
ReplyDelete8'-3"
Has Joe ever scientifically validated anything he had ever claimed?
ReplyDeletelets do IT!
ReplyDeleteMountain Monsters (AIMS) with Trapper and the gang - will find bigfoot
ReplyDeletethankin sometimez bigfeets alookin lack bears, becawz ifn U seein tham, U thankin bear not bigfeets
ReplyDeleteyou so smart can i be your friend
Deletefriends be fer losers
Deletesorry i thought you was smart my bad
Deletekin be U only friend U needs....
DeleteImage should be on badtaxidermy.com
ReplyDeleteyou so smart can i be your friend
Deletedont have friends - thats a highschool thing! grown out of it years ago!
Deletesorry i thought you was smart my bad
Deletefriends are a liability only mediocre people have friends to make up for their shortfalls...
Deletedidn't know you was mediocre I just wanted to be friends
DeleteI dont have friends so I am not mediocre, U got friends I feel sorry for U, U still in High School. Time to put the big boy pants ON!
Deletei want friends i have no friends you so smart me want to be your only friend
Deletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r38aPVotm1o&list=UUjAgRTLiSiWvR8YzMu6ImFw
ReplyDeleteehi there's something that seems to observe them hidden in the grass at 4,30 min.
skullduggery going on here for sure!
ReplyDeleteanother stupid hoax - notice the well groomed mustache the "bigfoot" has ... Les teaming with Standing is like Meldrum teaming with Dyer
ReplyDeleteMountain Monsters (AIMS) got guns and technology to get them critters
DeleteAWWW COME ON MAN!
ReplyDeleteDAMMMMIT! THIS IS FOOLISH!
Sup dork.
ReplyDeleteGW :)
Delete;)
Delete;)
ReplyDeleteThe reason the T.V. producers are putting out these Big foot shows like: Finding Bigfoot, Mountain Monsters, 10 Mill bounty, Cyrid, and now Survivor man is because they know the American public is very, very, stupid! Are you?
ReplyDelete