If it hasn't happened by now (convincing evidence) with all the advanced technology and a good camera available to almost everyone then it's pretty probable it never will. Factor in the best video footage was taken back in 1967 the odds of no one getting anything better are almost nil.
That swamp footage is about the best you'll ever see and will stand up in any court as evidence .you can call in every expert you want til you turn blue and you wont find one that wont say it's a living creature. you are just a dense wank nugget if you think bigfoot is just going to waltz out in the pen and pose for a bunch of close up photos- are you really that daft ????????? Full stop, Case closed ! CREASED !!!!! cheers
PS, each time you’re given a new piece of footage to cry about you end up having a month long meltdown, threatening strangers online with rape and publishing racism. Stick to trying to debunk the PGF mate, should be easy with all the SFX advances by now, eh?
How funny... it is that PS’ most used argument is actually the most damning example of how incompetent he is.
Uh Oh. Here we go again, folks. M.K. Davis originally brought up this theory called the "Bluff Creek massacre" theory back in 2008 at a conference. The controversial theory was immediately rejected by the Bigfoot community and Davis was shunned from ever speaking about it again. According to Davis, based on his expert film analysis and color enhancements of frame 352 of the PG film, he theorizes that the Patterson party had been to the Bluff Creek site at least once before returning to capture their famous Bigfoot video. His theory also suggests that the party probably murdered a family of Bigfoots and buried their bodies. Davis points to an enhanced anomaly resembling a bloody dog print and a pool of blood as proof of his theory.
Thanks to Matt Moneymaker for sharing this story with us from a guy named Thomas S. who was camping with some friends near the French Meadows Reservoir in August 2012. This remote, forested basin is located on the American River approximately 58 miles east of Auburn in the Sierra Nevada's. Before his encounter, the man thought Bigfoot "was just for entertainment purposes", but he changed his tune when he ended up with messy drawers that night. "That will teach to goof on our show," says Matt.
Tonight on Coast To Coast AM, Bigfootology's Rhettman Mullis will talk about Bigfoot sightings, and give us an update on the Oxford Bigfoot DNA project.
It hasn't happened
ReplyDelete“It hasn’t happened... it hasn’t happened... it... it hasn’t happened.”
Delete(Sweating, hands down his shorts, stuffing chips into his fat face)
It hasn't happened
DeleteIt never will happen - NOT EVER.
DeleteShut up ,I'm still stuffing chips in my fat face
DeleteIf it hasn't happened by now (convincing evidence) with all the advanced technology and a good camera available to almost everyone then it's pretty probable it never will. Factor in the best video footage was taken back in 1967 the odds of no one getting anything better are almost nil.
DeleteThat swamp footage is about the best you'll ever see and will stand up in any court as evidence .you can call in every expert you want til you turn blue and you wont find one that wont say it's a living creature. you are just a dense wank nugget if you think bigfoot is just going to waltz out in the pen and pose for a bunch of close up photos- are you really that daft ?????????
DeleteFull stop, Case closed !
CREASED !!!!!
cheers
Joe
Peer reviewed physical evidence;
Deletehttps://www.scientificexploration.org/docs/18/jse_18_1_meldrum.pdf
https://www.scientificexploration.org/docs/30/jse_30_3_Meldrum.pdf
Footage;
http://cdn0.wideopenspaces.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/bigfoot.png
Hair;
http://www.texlaresearch.com/okhair4.jpg
http://www.texlaresearch.com/okhairroot.jpg
http://www.texlaresearch.com/unknown-chimp-bear.jpg
Bones;
http://sasquatchresearchers.org/forums/index.php?/topic/621-anthropologists-paper-on-the-lovelock-skull/
Forensic physical evidence;
http://woodape.org/index.php/about-bigfoot/articles/90-anatomy-and-dermatoglyphics-of-three-sasquatch-footprints
Audio;
http://www.sasquatchcanada.com/uploads/9/4/5/1/945132/kts_p182-186.pdf
PS, each time you’re given a new piece of footage to cry about you end up having a month long meltdown, threatening strangers online with rape and publishing racism. Stick to trying to debunk the PGF mate, should be easy with all the SFX advances by now, eh?
How funny... it is that PS’ most used argument is actually the most damning example of how incompetent he is.
^ said while buffing his stinky helmet with his sleeve
Deletegug gug gug