The Pennsylvania White Bigfoot
Why are there so many sightings of white bigfoot in Pennsylvania? Check out the history of sightings of the Pennsylvania White Bigfoot.
M.K. Davis Discusses The Bloody Dog Print at Bluff Creek [Massacre]
Uh Oh. Here we go again, folks. M.K. Davis originally brought up this theory called the "Bluff Creek massacre" theory back in 2008 at a conference. The controversial theory was immediately rejected by the Bigfoot community and Davis was shunned from ever speaking about it again. According to Davis, based on his expert film analysis and color enhancements of frame 352 of the PG film, he theorizes that the Patterson party had been to the Bluff Creek site at least once before returning to capture their famous Bigfoot video. His theory also suggests that the party probably murdered a family of Bigfoots and buried their bodies. Davis points to an enhanced anomaly resembling a bloody dog print and a pool of blood as proof of his theory.
Rehashing old videos is an important part of live action role playing as a bigfoot believer.
ReplyDeleteAnonymousSaturday, March 3, 2018 at 5:48:00 AM PST
DeleteNo one even role plays anymore because everyone knows it's bullshit
http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2018/03/todd-standing-gets-laughed-at-by.html?m=0
But I thought there were no role-players anymore? So are there 100 role-players or none at all now? Gimme some coherency here.
AnonymousMonday, March 3, 2014 at 4:23:00 AM PST
Of course you don't. The only thing you care about are conspiracies, things you can never seem to prove, and open ended questions.
I bet your a*ds ridden mother is real proud.
AnonymousMonday, March 3, 2014 at 3:34:00 AM PST
Lol^
Bigfoot follows the exact path of all the classic woo topics to the letter.
Got link to peer reviewed paper?
Well, well. Would you look at that. And I’ve got a nice little archive of that stuff. One of us can in fact point to peer review on tracks impressions made by the PGF subject. The other has conjecture and impossible hoaxing conspiracy theories. The irony here if course, is that for years you’ve demanded peer review and claimed that others have had nothing but conspiracy theories. Now you’re stuck in your own flip sided bubble of pseudoscience.
See ya tomorrow sweetheart.
Got monkey?
DeleteYeah... in the 60 years of evidence...
Delete