This Type Of Technology Could Prove Bigfoot Is Out There
As more and more researchers start using FLIR cameras in the field, and using thermal imaging to search for bigfoot, the chances of proving they exist get closer every day.
Questions of the day: Something's not right about Patty, why are the soles of her feet white?
Kittalia A. sent us the following questions about Patty, the Bigfoot in the Patterson-Gimlin film. They are all very good questions that we we wish we knew the answers to. We're no "Henry May" and it's times like this that we wish we had his number. Since we don't have Henry around whenever we need him, here are some easy questions for all you Patterson-Gimlin believers to try and answer:
The problem is that these types of images can be faked much more easily than regular footage.
ReplyDeleteThis will never prove anything!
Get a specimen, living or dead. That's it! End of story!
BS!! You can't fake a subject in the height range of 8.5 feet tall;
Deletehttp://cliffbarackman.com/research/field-investigations/the-brown-footage/
And until mainstream science investigates, you have repeatable scientific evidence in track impressions to sweat over.
Not to mention Iktomi, a ancient modern homo sapien sapien 8-10ft that will sprint off at 40 mph in - 40 below zero weather buck naked and then disappear without a trace!
DeletePS the most ancient hss are the pygmies of(central africa) and Khoisan of (south west africa) genetic mutations (mito) give a approx racial age of 180,000 ybp!!
I dont expect you "Joe" to understand!! as your LOW IQ is self evident!
IT'S OBVIOUS YOUR BARKING UP THE WRONG TREE!
your teacher,,,AC(indeed) collins. :-P
All addressed here;
Deletehttps://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2016/11/sasquatch-kingdom-at-13000-feet.html
Your turn to rebute it all.
Real bigfoot researchers use FLIR rifle scopes, not FLIR cameras.
ReplyDeleteAgreed. At this point, anything short of collecting a specimen is a waste of time.
DeleteAnything short of fully investigating three times the amount of physical evidence that the Bili Ape enjoyed at this stage of research, is a travesty. Stop crying about it and explain away the evidence. Rhetorically demanding proof when the creature you're crying about is already shown to exist in the physical evidence it leaves, is futile.
DeleteThere is no more irrefutable proof for the existence of bigfoot than there was 50 years ago.
DeleteActually, there is three times the amount of evidence the Bili Ape had at this stage of research. There was no forensic evidence 50 years ago, no hair samples that have uniform morphology over 12 samples, no thermal, no audio and none of the world beating conservationists and primatologists optimistic about their existence.
DeleteTry again, try-hard.