Wow they can't concentrate on a topic without thinking Sasquatch is just over there? Seriously guys coming across as nutters isn't helping the Sasquatch cause! Geez Louise!
I'm starting to see those researchers who film themselves constantly, and don't have any evidence, are nothing more than dis-information agents! This ABC thing is going to be joke! Think about it, i'm the only one with EVIDENCE, and if ABC was interested in EVIDENCE, i would get the call....They chose these 2 because they don't have any proof.
Possibly the problem is that your evidence is literally the worst crap in the entire bigfoot research world Dr. Squatch. Why on Earth would they call you?
Uh Oh. Here we go again, folks. M.K. Davis originally brought up this theory called the "Bluff Creek massacre" theory back in 2008 at a conference. The controversial theory was immediately rejected by the Bigfoot community and Davis was shunned from ever speaking about it again. According to Davis, based on his expert film analysis and color enhancements of frame 352 of the PG film, he theorizes that the Patterson party had been to the Bluff Creek site at least once before returning to capture their famous Bigfoot video. His theory also suggests that the party probably murdered a family of Bigfoots and buried their bodies. Davis points to an enhanced anomaly resembling a bloody dog print and a pool of blood as proof of his theory.
Thanks to Matt Moneymaker for sharing this story with us from a guy named Thomas S. who was camping with some friends near the French Meadows Reservoir in August 2012. This remote, forested basin is located on the American River approximately 58 miles east of Auburn in the Sierra Nevada's. Before his encounter, the man thought Bigfoot "was just for entertainment purposes", but he changed his tune when he ended up with messy drawers that night. "That will teach to goof on our show," says Matt.
Tonight on Coast To Coast AM, Bigfootology's Rhettman Mullis will talk about Bigfoot sightings, and give us an update on the Oxford Bigfoot DNA project.
They're getting married! How sweet!
ReplyDeleteLOL!!! ^
DeleteHopefully the little feller got a bikini wax,,,, we wouldn't want curly hairs on the GARTER BELT as it gets tossed to the next bride to be ,,,
DeleteJoe
Joe, they want you for best man. And bridesmaid.
DeleteCongratulations. Now everyone who watches ABC's Nightline will know how crazy you guys are as well.
ReplyDeleteI'm sure they have EVIDENCE RIGHT??? You guys aren't going to make BIGFOOT RESEARCHERS LOOK BAD RIGHT!
DeleteThey better!
The only face pics i've seen, are of THEM!
Deletei'd love to see that ! i hope they post the video of it soon because i can't get ABC here
ReplyDeleteJoe
The big announcement was..... the guy in that black t-shirt "gone squatchin" actually washed it for the 1st. time!
ReplyDeleteWow they can't concentrate on a topic without thinking Sasquatch is just over there? Seriously guys coming across as nutters isn't helping the Sasquatch cause! Geez Louise!
ReplyDeleteI'm starting to see those researchers who film themselves constantly, and don't have any evidence, are nothing more than dis-information agents! This ABC thing is going to be joke! Think about it, i'm the only one with EVIDENCE, and if ABC was interested in EVIDENCE, i would get the call....They chose these 2 because they don't have any proof.
DeletePossibly the problem is that your evidence is literally the worst crap in the entire bigfoot research world Dr. Squatch. Why on Earth would they call you?
Deleteshow me who has better proof...IDIOT!
DeleteBigfoot is real ive seen them up close as in within arms reach so dont beleive?cool.move on with ur life.
ReplyDelete