Dr Squatch, Me and Joe F are Brits! That being fact!! we know more about sasquatch then you Yank Tossers,,,even thou we already know the answers! I want to ask you bloody yank a simple question? Whilest Me and Jo jo F were in the midst of haveing homosexual Arse sex! a thought came to mind!!! WHERE DOES THE STENCH that eminates from a sasquatch come from (as in orifice's)?? me and Joe F are curious to know the Yank thoughts on this subject matter.
I like these gentlemen. They go to great spots. They look, they listen, they film with a steady hand.
But something is wrong in the process from that point. They aren't seeing in analysis what is visible in their videos. Possibly they are looking for ape-like creatures. Just go frame-by-frame and look for cavemen. Look for pasty white dudes in black wetsuits. There are other archetypes but that is what most look like.
If these yahoos knew that the branch breaking Bigfoot were actually invisible, they would quit Bigfooting cold turkey, and take up knitting as a hobby instead.
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from...
Tonight on Coast To Coast AM, Bigfootology's Rhettman Mullis will talk about Bigfoot sightings, and give us an update on the Oxford Bigfoot DNA project.
This photograph was first shown at a Bigfoot conference in Washington over the weekend where witnesses were blown away. While we're currently seeking permission to post the screengrab here, we'll provide the link to the image on Facebook for now. The image is just a snapshot of a 5 minute-long footage of a Bigfoot caught on thermal. Washington Bigfoot researcher Derek Randles explains the image:
Yawn.
ReplyDeleteDr Squatch, Me and Joe F are Brits! That being fact!! we know more about sasquatch then you Yank Tossers,,,even thou we already know the answers! I want to ask you bloody yank a simple question?
DeleteWhilest Me and Jo jo F were in the midst of haveing homosexual Arse sex! a thought came to mind!!!
WHERE DOES THE STENCH that eminates from a sasquatch come from (as in orifice's)??
me and Joe F are curious to know the Yank thoughts on this subject matter.
Joe
“Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.”
DeleteThese guys really have themselves convinced - too bad they're the only ones.
ReplyDeletemore like ,,Thank the man upstairs.
DeleteI like these gentlemen. They go to great spots. They look, they listen, they film with a steady hand.
ReplyDeleteBut something is wrong in the process from that point. They aren't seeing in analysis what is visible in their videos. Possibly they are looking for ape-like creatures. Just go frame-by-frame and look for cavemen. Look for pasty white dudes in black wetsuits. There are other archetypes but that is what most look like.
I'm getting the feeling its all about them on camera, and not Bigfoot research!
DeleteIf these yahoos knew that the branch breaking Bigfoot were actually invisible, they would quit Bigfooting cold turkey, and take up knitting as a hobby instead.
ReplyDeleteSurrounded by nothing but fuctardery!
ReplyDelete