Possible Sasquatch Tracks In Snow Filmed In Utah


Youtuber Utah Sasquatch posted this video of a possible bigfoot track find in the show in Utah. Finding trackways like this are rare, and in the snow is next to impossible. If these are tracks of a bigfoot, this is a major find.


Comments

  1. Replies
    1. most likely tracks of a Lycandroid...

      Delete
    2. Thinkin' a bounding bobcat would make tracks something like that. Perhaps a coyote.

      Delete
    3. Why is it that any time a person comes across tracks in the wilds it is "bigfoot" ?

      Just because they haven`t seen anybody isn`t grounds for calling it bigfoot...when will these idiots leaarn ? ..maybe the whole of the rural US is becoming simpleton due to the ridiculous shows like (not)Finding Bigfoot...you`d think they`d be smarter.

      Delete
    4. Everything is bigfoot. Just look at the blue bag theory that Joe was supporting. Any time you see trash in trees, its bigfoot. Anytime you see leaves on trees, its bigfoot. When you see leaves on the ground, its bigfoot. When you see feces in joes face, its bigfoot.

      Delete
    5. 8:21... If everyone truly thought way, there would be far more claims put forward.

      8:37... Quote me, don't joke me.

      Delete
    6. Yes, but there are obviously way too many false claims as it is.

      So were you just being nice in not shooting DS down regarding his "blue bag" theory of Bigfoot?

      Delete
    7. They should get that one guy (who apparently doesn't work) to go over to this site...stand there and talk about these prints for 10 minutes on a video we can watch?

      (That guy that says "sauce-squatch) - he's from Utah yes?

      Delete
    8. KEKKY SHAW IS QUITE THE "JOE" .

      Delete
    9. If you want to see one or hear them go out on Trash night in your neighborhood late at night. I have a high vantage point over the neighborhood down to the next level of homes with woods in between. They will post lookers while one gets in the garbage.

      Delete
    10. Trust me on this..Garbage night, especially if you live in the outer areas of a town in the Suburbs that go to the wooded areas. I hear them from my deck and Eyeshine from the watchers as one will raid trash left out.

      Delete
    11. Jeff tech GURU from the Mountain Monsters AIMS team using the latest night vision technology to track down them BIGFOOTS

      Delete
  2. those tracks were made by Baba booey..thank you ..Howard stern

    ReplyDelete
  3. Certainly looks like they could be!

    ReplyDelete
  4. "A sucker is born every minute" - R Patterson

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Any man is liable to err, only a fool persists in error."
      - Marcus Tullius Cicero

      Delete
    2. ^ Took him 3 hours to search on the web for a suitable response.

      Ironic in that he`s literally living the quote.

      Delete
    3. Joe is having an epic meltdown today. He is getting pounded from all sides, and he is posting under his multiple personalities and various accounts like its going out of style. Joe must be sore from the deep thrusting he has taken the last few days. I mean dag on. Bigfoot is a field full of Joes, aka "suckers".

      AHHHHH HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

      Delete
    4. 8:17... And you were anxiously awaiting all that time for a bit of cyber attention, eh? Someone must be crying out to be noticed in real life. A picture can be so easily painted. I was working... It takes two seconds to quash your vomit piles once noticed.

      8:35... Dance! Dance! Dance! (Clap! Clap! Clap!)

      Delete
  5. Another day, another tally of zero bigfoots, another nail in the coffin of footery.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. sometimes GRAYS on the hunt for DNA and when they do leave tracks - sometimes they look like bigfoots tracks - so you thinking these are bigfoot tracks but they are tracks of a GRAY alien hunting for DNA

      Delete
    2. PFFT, Yeah those crappy examples must be the real thing.

      Delete
    3. Joe is having an epic meltdown today. He is getting pounded from all sides, and he is posting under his multiple personalities and various accounts like its going out of style. Joe must be sore from the deep thrusting he has taken the last few days. I mean dag on. Bigfoot is a field full of Joes, aka "suckers".

      AHHHHH HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

      Delete
    4. I'm sure Joe donated to that Bigfoot blimp project. It must have really bugged him when his buddy Mike B got stranded going to work for the "ground crew". It was money down the drain.

      Delete
    5. Dance! Dance! Dance! (Clap! Clap! Clap!)

      Delete
    6. Iktomi, if you want to donate some money to Bigfoot research I can provide a PO Box for you to send it to.

      Delete
  6. The bluff creek trail camera project has confirmed there are no bigfoots in the area. There never was any. They dont exist.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ^ Who needs a monkey suit when it is cgi ?

      Delete
    2. But you can tell "scientifically" by looking at it that it has to be real!!!

      Delete
    3. P/G Hoax has been debunked. The Mark Anders Texas Bigfoot has replaced Patty.

      They even found Bigfoot in Mexico!!!!

      Mexico's Bigfoot:
      https://youtu.be/4qwdtUHPea8

      Delete
    4. No monkey suit then?

      Dance! Dance! Dance!

      Delete
  7. When the state of research is an out of work costume designer filming the movement of middle aged womens breasts to compare them to a set of false breasts sewn on to an ape costume for a grainy 60s film then its probably time to take a deep breath and reconsider your belief in such lunacy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ... That's one expert in SFX actually. And to accompany him, he has an anthropologist, a wildlife biologist, a primatologist and a pioneering plastic surgeon supporting his ideas.

      Delete
    2. 4:53 , the only lunacy is when people like you refuse to see the truth when presented with facts. Yeah doubting Thomas , you will never believe that which you can never touch which means you don't believe in bigfoot but think grand theft auto is reality

      Joe

      Joe

      Delete
    3. Joe is having an epic meltdown today. He is getting pounded from all sides, and he is posting under his multiple personalities and various accounts like its going out of style. Joe must be sore from the deep thrusting he has taken the last few days. I mean dag on. Bigfoot is a field full of Joes, aka "suckers".

      AHHHHH HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

      Delete
    4. So Joe are you going to see a plastic surgeon about that sagging sack of yours?

      Delete
    5. ^^ Can't recreate a simple 40+ year old suit so they get all angry like needy children who were denied their pablum with ice cream
      Your diapers are what is getting quite soggy fellas. I'd get your nanny to clean you up

      Joe

      Delete
    6. ^ I'm shure you would , with Glee. Sicko !

      Delete
  8. Confucius he say man called Joe on bigfoot blog is utter wanker with tendency to suck lot of c@ck.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Confucius also say man who post anon on bigfoot blog have small penis syndrome
      Well he was wrong because both of you are huge dicks

      Joe

      Delete
    2. ^ It doesn`t take a Chinese mystic to know that you are a complete wanker.

      And you are posting anonymously so that just about suns you up...you total wanker boy...you`re not even a man.

      Delete
    3. To be honest, I thought 1:18's quip was Very Funny, Lol! :-))

      Delete
    4. 1:53- I didn't see a name after your post mate.
      Oh wait- your name is Hugh G Dick
      Fits perfectly !
      cheerio

      Joe

      Delete
  9. Jane Goodall "I'm a romantic so I always wanted them to exist."

    Jane Goodall, a Mark Anders Bigfoot supporter. More and more are denouncing the Patterson Hoax.


    Sexier rear end than Patty:


    https://youtu.be/4qwdtUHPea8

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Everyone expect Mark himself who accepts the PGF as a living, breathing creature.

      Delete
    2. If he does it was just said to get in with the Bigfoot crowd. His Bigfoot is the real deal.

      Delete
    3. Why do you think he always compares his Bigfoot to Patty? To prove his Bigfoot is real. Patty has set the bar for all Bigfoot.

      Delete
    4. Yep, we see all the other fakers copy it. Imitation is the best form of flattery, especially in cons.

      Delete
    5. Mark Anders Bigfoot walks like a human. Patty has a unique locomotion that can not be replicated by humans. Filmed in 1967 gives the film more weight than anything that is presented today including Mark's presentation.

      Delete
    6. The Patterson Hoax was demonstrated to be a 6'2" non-bigfoot male human walking.

      Joe/Iktomi, the foremost bigfooter, says Bigfoot was human, so why do you say the Patty Hoax locomotion cannot be replicated by humans if it is a human?

      Delete
    7. Joe/Iktomi says bigfoot is human so maybe it should walk like a human.

      Delete
    8. "The most telling problem is in subjects knee bend... there is this Lateral rotation at the knee where the foot is going outward which is called inversion. And that is something that is rather strange."

      Dr. Jurgen Konczak
      Associated Director of the Human Sensory Model Lab at the University of Minnesota.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ekcyPgbCRxs

      Delete
    9. Demonstrated solely by your imagination and wishful thinking 10:24.

      Delete
    10. 10:24... Schooled by 11:05.

      10:24... Recognised hominids in our lineage have many, many anatomical and morphological differences compared to us... They are still human, however.

      Delete
    11. The Patterson Bigfoot walks like a human. I wonder why?

      Delete
    12. @ 10:24 Your question is a very good one . The simple answer is

      Joetomi is a utter "JOE" !!!

      Sad but True!

      Delete
    13. 1:22... No, it moves like no human we've classified. Learn something you insufferably dense psycho.

      Delete
    14. Diktomi, if it doesn't look or walk human, and there has been no Bigfoot DNA discovered then how do you know it is human?

      Delete
    15. There is nothing in Patty's anatomy, or morphology (excluding the way that she walks, because we would have to see another hominid walk for comparison), that can't be attributed both modern and ancient humans, or primitive humans in our lineage.

      The amount of times hair fibres have been tested and come back as human is incredible, but you'd have to know something about the topic to be privy to this. And before you claim contamination, there are screening processes for this, the hairs have always got uniform morphology across many samples (12 in total that I know of), have all been found via sightings, tracks and other activity... And the well known case of Zana who's description is confirmed by her son's skull morphology, that in turn yielded ancient human DNA.

      Delete
    16. By ancient Dna you must mean pygmy and or Khoisan bushman (the most ancient HSS dna known)---- ??

      Right lktomi?

      AC c :-)

      Delete
    17. You have been explained this to, too many times to count. Stick to trolling, AC.

      Delete
  10. BREAKING. Where is Mike Rugg's unknown hominid molar? Max Planck can now use fossil teeth for DNA genomes. Where is Mike's tooth now? Dr. Bryan Sykes had it, but didn't test it. Where is it now?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I believe Rugg has the tooth. Unless I am mistaken, he has submitted pieces of the tooth to some people for testing, without results. As far as wether it is a Sasquatch tooth, I gather he is hopeful. He has not made the assertion that it a certainty. Having talked with Mike on at least ten occasions, I can tell you that he has expressed doubts to me about Bigfoot, although he is obviously a believer. He has a passion for the subject for sure.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?