This Is Les Stroud's Secret Weapon To Find Bigfoot
So far traditional camera systems have failed when it comes to capturing bigfoot. That's why Les Stroud and Survivorman:Bigfoot tech director Doug Haijcek have turned to camera systems designed for underwater use.
Having worked with Aqua-Vu Underwater Viewing Systems on numerous past projects, Doug Hajicek, wildlife researcher, television producer and Tech Director for Survivorman: Bigfoot, immediately consulted with the popular marine optics company. Ultimately, Hajicek secured and equipped eight Micro 5 underwater camera systems for filming of the new hit Discovery Channel series.
"All previous trials with traditional trail cameras have failed," noted Hajicek, President of Whitewolf Entertainment, who has produced over 200 TV features since 1987.
"It's known that many animals in the wild possess acute hearing and vision capable of detecting or sensing light in the UV and even infrared spectrum. The Aqua-Vu Micro cam has proven ideal for capturing potential Bigfoot footage because it is so stealthy, totally silent and compact enough to allow us to conceal the acorn-sized optics within natural objects."
To read more and see how they are using these camera systems, click here.
Oh turds!!
ReplyDeleteGreat, we are now looking for bigfoot underwater.
DeleteFirst Patty.
Then Lovelock skulls.
Then it went from gigantopithicus to homo sapien
Then Blue Bags
Now the ultimate indignity--Underwater Bigfoot Cams.
Thank Les Stroud!
....Stroud will be looking for quite awhile: I believe Hajicek was the producer of the successful Monsterquest...The ratings were still high when it was canceled..This new show will run for a few seasons...
DeleteNow we're on to something!!!
ReplyDeletewould that be blue bags?
DeleteQuit trying to make me look foolish. Haven't my videos done enough of that?
Delete^^ Demon!
Delete^ he de`mon `Mon` says the Scotsman.
Deletebecoming engulfed into a quest for fame and notoriety somewhat of a "lust" for this myth..is not healthy. and can lead to other misgivings
DeleteMyths don't leave tracks; your daily reminder.
DeleteMyths don't leave tracks, hoaxers do.
DeleteBlue bag markers make bigfoot research easier.
DeleteTrue or false?
speaking of blue bags well this must be the greatest find in history! could this be the gathering spot of all the clans? http://s238.photobucket.com/user/madcapster/media/India/0003%20Dec%2007%20Lucknow%20to%20Bhopal%20Train%20Journey/andeverpresentdirtandstagnantwater.jpg.html
DeleteHoaxers don't design the exact same dermal ridge patterns, decades apart and States apart.
DeleteSays who? People can hoax decades apart in different states with similar prints. You are making an assumption you can not prove.
DeleteIktomijoeabholi, your only achievement is irritating people on a Bigfoot blog. In fact, for all your pompous posturing, absolutely nobody aside from a few blogs is aware of you at all. You are an obnoxious self important blowhard, and nothing more.
DeleteNARGHHHHH!!!! The same bigfoot (who was human by the way) walked across the country and left identical prints in every state! As seen in some cartoon pictures I linked to earlier, the human bigfoot is in fact 15 feet tall and can walk quite quickly!!!!!
Delete^ Yes, but he usually gets the last word, draws others into debate about total nonsense, and has total confidence that he is right. He wins in a sense.
DeleteHe win the battle but loses the war. Meaning he kind of wins on Bigfoot Evidence but loses in life,
They would have to have a knowledge of primate dermals (that not many do, have a lottery win's chance of faking the same biological idea, and then fool multiple forensic experts. The things that are and given to you as scientific facts are done by the same level of impartial, consistent scientists that shows that the dermals are genuine. Crying circular logic doesn't begin to counter it.
DeleteWow, isn't it rather cringey & sad how some of these trolls get so upset and personal? I don't hate anyone... By the way.
Peace.
Interesting, one question though:
DeleteIn your comment, where does the parenthetical statement end?
Up your ass.
DeleteWhy get so upset and personal? After all, you don't hate anyone!
DeleteThat doesn't exclude having a sense of humour.
DeleteOh yes, a sense of humor that you vividly demonstrated when you linked to those cartoon pictures of bigfoot!
DeleteThat's humor, Welshman.
DeleteJOE is too Stupid to know that homo sapien sapien are PRIMATES !!
DeleteHA Haaaa Haaaaaaaa Ha Haaa !!
WHAT A DOPE !!
; )
https://www.harveypratt.com/resume.php
DeleteKnock, knock...
Why do you guys mind what Iktomi concludes for himself?
DeleteYou say there is no proof of bigfoot; Iktomi says there is no proof of bigfoot.
You agree.
So what is the argument day in and day out about?
"Up your ass", really Iktomi?
DeleteIf he is Welsh, wouldn't he have used "arse"?
DeleteJOE is Expressing Need !!!!! Not Humor !!!
DeleteHaaaa Haaaaa Haa Haaa Haaa
; )
You guys are funny.
DeleteIts cool Iktomi join in ,after all
DeleteWho's Joe ??
; )
iktomi is an arsehole in need of a fat penis.
DeleteWho's Iktomi?
DeleteOh no. Joe had another melt down. Your daily reminder. Your welcome. Glad I could help, kiddo.
DeleteStrange person... Quite creepy in fact.
DeleteThis camera is a IR. The big guy might be able to see that. Also the post yesterday of the possible BF's in the trees could have only been clearly captured with a proper telephoto type manual focus zoom lenz camera. Something that most people don't have or carry with them.
ReplyDeleteMMC
shut up
Delete^ make me
Deletejoe's towel boy^^^
DeleteIt's creepy how much you jref/isf footers are obsessed with Joe. It's like how rabid footer "Drew/Drewbot". who pretends to be a skeptic does his "Hovey" imitation on Brian Brown.
DeleteNarghhhh!
DeleteYeah, Drew is just another lying footer who's embarrassed about his own sighting. From what I've read sightings run in his family but he keeps that a secret among the other pretend skeptics on the isf.
Delete1:17
DeleteYeeeeeerrrSSS !
The great Les Stroud is on our side. Checkmate jref footers.
ReplyDeleteWe`re playing Draughts you idiot
Delete^
Deletebutt hurt jref footer.
troll^
DeleteWhy do you always say checkmate instead of just check? Why do you always leap over check straight to checkmate? Isn't "check" good enough in these circumstances? In the rules of chess, there are usually checks before checkmate.
DeleteYou're asking a lot. Most bigfooters are befuddled by Rock, Paper, Scissors.
DeleteBigfooters are bufuddled by check, but not by checkmate?
DeleteThey're intelligent enough to see blue bags as "markers".
Delete"They're", you're stereotyping. Most people are just interested in the topic I think, and aren't "bigfooters" and probably dismiss alot stuff such as blue bags.
DeletePerhaps, but then again there are a fair amount who believe in cloaking and portals
DeleteAnd where does "Dogman" fit into the scheme of belief for the footers ?
DeleteThere is as much data such as footprints and even video of dogmen...so just where do the footers stand in belief terms ?
For whatever reason dogman does not seem to be as cool as bigfoot. The momentum is with bigfoot. If dogman were more popular then every fuzzy picture and shadow would be attributed to dogman. Most of the photos and videos people post are so indiscernable that they could be either bigfoot, dogman or practically anything. If the momentum and popularity were on dogman's side then people would be attributing every shadow, noise, print... to dogman.
Delete729, if someone had hoaxed dogman like they did with the PGF, we'd be chatting on Dogman Evidence.
DeleteMaybe, but bigfoots origin can be better explained. Bigfoot is something along the evolutionary line between human and ape. Something which has already happened. Apes evolved into humans. Bigfoot would be a lost branch that has stayed hidden.
DeleteBut what would be dogman's origin? Half man/half dog? Is that possible? Man didn't evolve from dogs. As far fetched as bigfoot is it still seems more plausible.
But dogman could be a cool character, just not one that as many people think is real.
Finally, we're going to get the evidence we need. I'll be back in a couple of months to check on the progress. Don't let me down!
ReplyDelete