Watch: Turner Bigfoot vs Patty.. Let's get it on!
Bill Brock from Team Rogue looks at the Turner Bigfoot footage and puts the footage up to the PG film. Are they the same kind of creature? You decide!
Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from...
Spicy hot turd jambalaya
ReplyDeleteBlokes in a suit. Both of 'em.
ReplyDeleteWhat's a bloke ?
Deletetoo fuzzy for me, but who know's. I'm not sure I could pick a real BF out of a line up. Tri-county
ReplyDeleteTC didn't you have a sighting yourself? I thought I read that you confess to seeing a bf when you were younger, in the Smoky mountain park?
ReplyDeleteBill Brock- You've got to give this a rest. It was a HOAX!!! Accept it and move on. You're looking like a fool.
ReplyDelete. . . .and having a lot of respect for ThinkerThunker doesn't help his case.
Deleteanon 7:19, I saw something in 96 on walnut Mtn. It could have been a bear, but it was really big and in an odd place. I only saw it from behind and for a split second.. I've always wondered. Tri-county
ReplyDeleteWell, since you sound pretty sane and a bear is easy to distinguish...let's just call it a squatch.
DeleteWhat makes you think sasquatch instead of bear TC?
ReplyDeleteI'm truly not sure what it was, it came across from the opposite side of the mtn. I was digging Ginseng and I heard something to my left and turned in time to catch a very large dark animal make a lunge and jump or run down the mtn. It was either in the top of a very small dogwood tree, or it was more than seven feet tall. It jumped out of the tree or ran over it. These questions are the reason I'm not sure about what I saw. The sun was shinning in on the mtn top at a low angle at that time of day, so I only saw from about four or five feet off the ground. I saw a large bear in the top of a very small tree, or a BF from the waist up. I don't know.. Tri-county.
ReplyDeleteTC as a person from the wilderness, do you believe the small tree could support the size bear you describe? Not trying to pin you down, just interested.
DeleteI'm not sure, anon9:14, Dogwoods are hard wood trees. The tree reacted, snapped back like something ran over or through it, or like something really heavy jumped out of it. You see the problem? I 've just never seen a bear climb that small a tree, only about the size of my wrist. But I'm not a bear expert. Whatever it was, it was very large across the back. Tri-county
DeleteYou sure it wasn't wild Bill, or one of those inbreds from that part of the country, running around looking for his sis?
DeleteIt's obviously a squatch! Dark, blurry, obscured and impossible to positively identify - confirms on all points!
ReplyDeleteStill duped by a fourteen year old child are we Ohio Bill?
ReplyDeleteUnless you can prove that this isn't a bigfoot, this is a bigfoot. Got monkey suit?
ReplyDeleteJoe Iktomi
The Turner footage was taken with a video camera that has a limited battery life. It is impossible to place a video camera anywhere, point it exactly at the only location that a real Bigfoot would happen to walk, and then have a Bigfoot walk in front of the camera during the limited time that it is on. And the hoaxers camera showed that the subject walked into view within 2 minutes of the camera being activated. 2 MINUTES! Furthermore, Bigfoot can hear video cameras while they are on, from 75 yards away and at a full gallop. And they avoid them like the plague. The Turner footage subject has no taper below the knee, therefore the subject is wearing pants. The Turner footage subject does not curl up his toes, as in the PG film. Given the weight of these arguments, any similarities with the PG film are irrelevant.
ReplyDelete