Watch this: How not to BASE jump
Check out this incredible point-of-view footage of a failed bike base jump from the Bolivian Death Road. Injuries suffered included fractures in his forearm and cut tendons in his knee. Ouch!
Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from...
AN OPEN LETTER TO ANYONE WHO KNOWS THE ANSWERS TO THESE 22 QUESTIONS!
ReplyDeletePlease spread this around if you want to help get to the bottom of this sleazy hoax!
Rhettman Mullis has revealed that he was fed unreleased stories early last year about Dyer's claims. The stories would then be "verified" or "corroborated," whereupon Dyer would release the same story publicly!
He also revealed that Jack Barnes of Facebook/Find Bigfoot and someone named "Maximus," who was an admin on that site, were both part of this "Bigfootology" group that Mullis headed.
That begs some very compelling questions that have not been pursued and are screaming for further explanation:
1. What kinds of stories were these that they were being fed?
2. Who received the stories, and from whom?
3. Were they being fed to Bigfootology by Barnes and Maximus?
4. How did they go about finding "corroborators"?
5. Why would Mullis and his group be "60/40 hoax" now if they had such convincing verification? They must suspect they were played, no?
6. Did Mullis and others on his team receive direct corroboration, or was it only reported to them by Barnes and Maximus?
7. Is it a little fishy that just as Mullis was asking Barnes to get hair samples for Sykes that Barnes and Dyer had their falling out?
8. What is the Bigfootology group's opinion today of Barnes and Maximus?
9. Why did Mullis wait so long to release a statement on all of this, well after Dyer was ridiculed because he wasn't pursued by Sykes for his documentary?
10. Was Mullis embarrassed because he knew he had been "had" from within? If not then is he willing to clarify his statement so it doesn't appear that he is?
Is it not obvious that many answers can be traced backwards to the origin of these stories? Is there not much to be read between the lines in his statement??
What's more, Barnes and Maximus are AWOL now..."Maximus" said on Facebook in November he was going underground to work on a "secret project." That begs more questions:
1. Who is Maximus? Is it Musky? Jeff Andersen?
2. Was Maximus on the trip to watch the premiere in Toronto?
3. Where did they get the "pirated film"?
4. Why did they get it just as they were leaving (after Noel had already left), after their angry review of a film that didn't do anything to propel the story into the limelight? Was it a damage-control ruse to get the story back on track?
5. Why would they show it only to Musky and not one of the real researchers they were working with, if it was better than PGF as Musky said?
6. Why would they destroy it without showing it even privately to anyone else? (Please don't say they were afraid of a lawsuit.)
7. Did Barnes use his wealth to infiltrate Bigfoot groups by buying them expensive equipment, all the while planning to prop up Musky and Dyer in their game to embarrass the Bigfoot community?
8. If Barnes is not "in on it," then Dyer and Allen are doing this alone? They are master-minding all this false leaking and corroboration?
9. If they are, then why is Barnes not the most anxious to answer these questions?
10. Is that the "secret project" Maximus is on? Uncovering who made a fool of them?
11. Have they tracked the stories back to their origins and figured out who fed them false information? Or are they working behind the scenes to pull Dyer's strings?
12. Why would they disappear now that their vindication is supposedly at hand? Do they still believe? (Noel is supporting Dyer very conspicuously).
There is a path to the truth here, and it has nothing to do with locating the right mask. Can these questions be satisfactorily answered? Why is no one asking them? Let's pick up the clues and move toward uncovering the whole sordid story.
So..?
Deletethis is the biggest "too much reading" ever
DeleteThanks this is great for my psychology study into american sub cultures, looking particularly at the religious groups and the science and logic deniers. This bigfoot community is impressive with its complex hierarchies, conspiracies and back stabbing and all the while trying to avoid the actual issue in hand ie. the impossible task of proving a non existent entity is real.
DeleteFascinating reading Thanks.
Take it to the psycho's on racer x's blog. Nobody cares about it here.
DeleteDid anyone ACTUALLY read this? We can wait a couple of hours for you to get through it, we know its long. If you get stuck and can't find your way out, send up some flares and we will send a rescue squad in for you.
Delete**Give us an update if it says someone found bigfoot, proved it with dna, or Smeja comes clean.
Yay! 20 questions?
DeleteIs it..bigger than a breadbox???
Rhettman Mullis is the most compelling taterhole explorer in the Bigfoot community.
DeleteTaterholes... The final frontier...
DeleteThese are the voyages of Rhettman Mullis.
I'm smelling a CODE RED here. The paid scoftics are apparently scared to death of Rhettman Mullis and his Bigfootology. Therefore, they resorted to spending some extra time in fabricating fiction events in order to sew seeds of doubt. Hey, I have an idea. Why doesn't Anonymous 2:50PM, GET A REAL JOB!
DeleteAnybody else notice that this anonymous 2:50 clown and Daniel Campbell, are never seen at the same place and at the same time? Spooky I know!
DeleteBTW, Who knows the connection between Daniel Campbell and Georgio A. Tsoukalos, who is the guy pictured alongside Campbell's name, until he deleted the picture recently?
Not sure if 9:17 is serious...
DeleteObviously not well versed in memes, pop culture, humor, or satire.
PS - Nobody has seen Daniel Campbell in weeks.
Try again butthurt footer.
A study in american subcultures would be for a sociology class, not psychology. If you're going to try to talk down to people at least try to get it right.
DeleteShawn - please dump the "piss in your face" moron...that is getting old - and I won't come here to read that everyday.
ReplyDeleteI second that.
DeleteLooking into this. Thanks!
DeleteI will come back if you do.!
Delete<B-)
I think it's great.
Deleteif you come here to read joe, you can come here reading of piss in your face
DeleteThanks Shawn
DeleteMMC
Can we still say PLOP! and taterhole?
DeleteYep, he needs to GO
DeleteMy bet is he's proxied. I hope he is at least.
DeletePerson who asked for this was Joe
DeleteSo let me get this straight. You regular morons, including Joe, Chick, and the endless other parade of foul mouths cum on this site and every post you make has to do with genitalia, cussing, taterholes, buttholes, sexual acts, and everything else under the sun, and you little babies cry about some guy hassling Joe with comments about pee in the face???
DeleteShawn if you delete the pee in the face guy, then you should delete probably 90 percent of the other commentors, including the regulars, b/c the stuff they talk about is far worse. Joe typically refrains from bad language, but everyone else is a habitual offender on a level far above anything about piss in the face.
I cant believe Joe got so smoked by this guy that he had to come on here and beg for Shawn to remove him in the same fashion that Steven Streufert and Phil Poling made shawn remove all the negative comments about them, or they threatend to quit the site. Joe, are you that much of a baby. That your gonna cry to Shawn about some guy making comments about taking a piss. Do you also complain about the endless commentors who insult you, talk about your sexuality, your mating habbits etc????? No so stop being a little pansy.
Lets be fair about this. If your gonna selectively sensor people who techincally have not violated anyr ules of this blog then you might as well be robert lindsay. Yet all of your regulars cuss up one side of the comments and down the other, and every other word is a sexual comment. If anyone needs to go, its you
I would like to state here and now, that I have not complained about anything regarding the 'urinating in the face guy'; I would like to say however, that this clown is driving people away, easy as that. It hasn't got anything to do with what words he's using, it's just the simple fact that nobody wants to read that.
DeleteTypically that will make you cry, because anything that comes my way... Regardless of it having nothing to do with the subject matter that he failed miserably in debating me in, it will no doubt get chumps like you all happy because you are of course like minded people. Your directed paranoia at me is also quite expected as well... Oh, and it's 'censor', not 'sensor' by the way.
Peace.
Piss in the face guy is driving people away????????LOLOLOL What a joke!!! First Joe, you were banned at least once from this site for your language, so you cant say anything about anyone being driven away.
DeleteSecondly, the only people who would be driven away from the piss in the face comments is either yourself, or....., yea pretty much just you.
your argument fails on many points. Lets discuss them in your typical fashion. So a guy who comes on and posts about peeing in your face every one or 2 blogs is somehow scaring others off????? Yeah that makes sense, if and only if, this was a serious comment section on a serious blog....but guess what, its not Joe.
Take a look at the comments, And you are just as guilty at this as others. Every comment made by every member will be followed by something taterhole, some comment about gays, some comment about nicknames, etc. Realistically 90 percent of the comments section is ripping the 10 percent regulars. Thats all. So how is the pee in the face comments, that come up once every other blog, suddenly translate to scaring people off. When on every single blog, and after basically every comment there is someone making obsense, rude comments. Cussing, or just talking about sex.
So explain that to me Joe. Suddenly pee in the face guy is scaring people away?? LOL what a joke. What scares people away are the 90 percent of the comment section and the jokes that are posted as blog entries.
Maybe if Shawn screened his comments beforehand that would be a solution. But if your gonna ban the piss in the face guy, then you certainly have to band the taterhole guy, the sparklecake guys, the butthurt guys, and so on. B/c they do a million times more damage then some guy, who is only after you Joe, who makes a comment every couple of blogs.
It makes zero sense. I can almost bet money, that the people above who said they wanted him gone, are the same anon over and over, and its probalby you Joe. No one really cares but you.
So if you can look on this blog and if you then think that the pee in the face comments are whats scaring people away, when most of the comments are smut, then you are indeed retarded. So i guess we should tell Shawn to ban 90 percent of the commentors. That way, you and the 6 or so other guys that post here all the time can talk among yourself. B/c thats all it would be. The only thing that keeps this site going is the comments section and the controversy it causes. Shawn knows what will happen if he takes it away or starts banning people.
Now you are schooled Mr. Wales
Taterholed. ^
DeleteIm first you GUZZERS !
ReplyDeleteFAIL!
DeleteHelp! I'm stuck on the toilet with a log halfway out but it won't come out. My husband won't get home from work for three hours. All I have is my laptop to communicate. I'm too embarrased to call 911. Stuck in Denver.
ReplyDeleteReminds me of back in the old country, when Mama Fasano would let little Timmy perform his 'a running a with a hees eyes a close ed". And the gore would drip like Mama F's homemade Italian pesghetti sauce sauce.
ReplyDeleteEarly settlers' diaries spoke of how not to base jump.
ReplyDeleteEarly settlers' diaries spoke of a rotund man with delusions of grandeur...his initials R.M.
DeleteTater?
ReplyDeleteRegards, Lord Lickertwat
Hamster?
ReplyDeleteBaron Von Gerbilwonker
Hey, this is kind of fun. Think of someone you really despise and then imagine that person is riding the bike in the base jumping video. Ooh! Ow! Argh!
ReplyDeleteI could never do this guys. I am scared to death of heights. I used to build some tree houses for the neighborhood kids and i fell out once. Never been the same since.
ReplyDeleteMMC
personally i think joe fitz should do one. cleary a prick who gets something from comig on here
ReplyDeleteban this guy,for what?
shawn ,please get real
this site is full of pricks. get joe out first
im tired of taterholes,sexual inuedos etc...from all the in crowd aholes on here. all the decent posters have long since gone
sort it out shawn or your board will defo be full of these pricks who contribute nothing but school yard comments
zzzzzzzzzzzz