Bigfoot Bounty Judges Make Statement on Rick Dyer Hoax
The $10 Million Dollar Bigfoot Bounty airs this Friday on SpikeTV. When asked about Rick Dyer's latest claim, Dr. Todd Disotell and Natalia Reagan, the judges on the show had this to say about Dyer's fake Bigfoot body:
"The second profit pops into science, science goes squiggly," concluded Disotell. "It's strange that he chose to have it taxidermied rather than have better-preserved live samples sent for testing," said Natalia Reagan, a primatologist who co-judges "Bounty" with Disotell and actor Dean Cain.
Their statements were published on Tuesday via Yahoo News. You can read the full article here: tv.yahoo.com
1st for Snow Walker
ReplyDeleteSorry he's playin on a tv show no time to do his have my wife film me doin shit videos besides go to YouTube not talk about it here
DeleteLike joe rogan says go get a jockstrap we're all out of support
I checked it out & re subscribed
DeleteHe has the best shot at the 10 million
I like all these dudes for the most part
Joe Rogan vs Smeja
DeleteSmack down for Truth
Make him confess
MMC
E PLURIBUS UNUM
ReplyDeleteE Taterus Holum
DeleteAhh fuck off my game today
ReplyDeleteIt's because of your McComa, Harry. Grab a couple jars. You'll get back on top soon enough.
Deleteyou'll gett'em next time, harry!
DeleteBB
bb has a man crush on harry
DeleteAwwwww,he does bless him,unfortunately Harry is forbidden fruit and Ball Boys heart may be forever aching although they do say every body has a double so maybe BB will find Harrys double and live happily ever after xx
DeleteWear am that dang skunk ape??
ReplyDeleteIf he was all up in that taterhole you'd know where he be.
DeleteJust the tip.
DeleteConsider this, Hank is equal to any other bigfoot evidence ever presented. All of them carry the same validity. Which is 0%.
ReplyDeleteConsider this, that comment ^ has 0% validity.
DeleteIs it true that Daniel Campbell's leg has a negative effect on children?
ReplyDeleteDepends on which day of the week it is.
Delete^Just his third one.
DeleteWe seen Rick dyers Bigfoot body at the lab and taxidermy it's real 100% will never forget the smell and everyone will eat there words soon!
ReplyDeleteWe SEEN it? Or we SAW it.
DeleteIgnorant.
Grammar Nazi alert.
Delete^Flat joke Nazi alert
DeleteWe seen Rick dyers Bigfoot body at the lab and taxidermy it's real 100% will never forget the smell and everyone will eat there words soon!
ReplyDeletedamn you're stupid but I guess that's par for the course
DeleteHow dare you! I boast a 3 candle power I.Q.
Delete^^^Holy smokes! Your mastery of the English language won me over.
DeleteTodd standing just released the best all time fotage of Bigfoot
ReplyDeleteBullshit^
DeleteSTOP GIVING THAT DYER DUDE ANY PUBLICITY,MAYE HE WILL GO AWAY!
ReplyDeletethat will never happen there is money to be made off this.there will be 25 more dyer posts on this blog in the next few days..the traffic it gathers is a advertising goldmine dont think for a minute that this bullshit dont go both ways..money for all
DeleteLOL. It's ALL a hoax. Bigfoot doesn't exist.
ReplyDeleteLoL. Your a Hoax.You don't exist.
DeleteJim tow here ! We just had r first Bigfoot incounter last night at 5.00. Pm wow was it big, 8 feet tall and a huge scar under left eye so of course we called him scar face !! It screamed at us and we all ran for our lives it lasted a whole 15 seconds and one minute of running which almost killed us cause were out of shape!
ReplyDeletesounds legit
DeleteNo tease Wood King.
DeleteFor Jim to,Don't tell your stories here, even if true, and i am not doubting you. You'll never be believed on this site! To many assholed,taterholed skeptics on this site. you'll be ridiculed to death here!
DeleteRick has the real deal. I saw it and touched it and it smells.
ReplyDeleteThat's what SHE said.
Deletein ricks case it's that's what HE said
DeleteGerbils can talk?
DeleteGoing to ricks house right now!!
ReplyDeleteDwa (although calling himself a skeptic) will simply not even consider that bigfoot is the result of hoaxers, liars and misidentification. He simply will not even give that possibility a seconds thought.
ReplyDelete"Simply denying mainstream science based on flimsy, invalid and too-often agenda-driven critiques of science is not skepticism at all. It is contrarianism ... or denial," Mann told LiveScience.
DeleteInstead, true skeptics are open to scientific evidence and are willing to evenly assess it.
"All scientists should be skeptics. True skepticism is, as [Carl] Sagan described it, the 'self-correcting machinery' of science," Mann said.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=just-a-theory-7-misused-science-words&page=2
... 7:25... I think you need to understand how proper skepticism works before suggesting anyone else is wrong.
Peace.
If you are a true skeptic you know bigfoot dont exist. Period.
DeleteIf you're a true skeptic, you'd look at the evidence impartially and not deny it's there.
DeleteNo offense.
8:53 another one who thinks he's God.
DeleteThere is no scientific evidence for Bigfoot. Before you respond Joe, bear in mind that scientific evidence has to be falsifiable and repeatable. So anecdotes and footprints need not apply.
ReplyDeleteThere it is folks. The ultimate schooling.
DeleteWildlife biology is a science and tracks are apart of that... That's just one example.
DeleteI shouldn't have to point that out to you Don, oh dear?
Footprints and hair do apply.
DeleteHee-hee. Don said 'bear' in mind.
DeleteJoe, can you please list for us all of the animals that have been classified on their track evidence alone?
ReplyDeleteTrack evidence for Bigfoot is especially problematic since so much of it has been proven to be fabricated.
But it still remains that tracks are not repeatable or falsifiable and therefore cannot be considered as proof of existence of anything.
^^^Living in a phantasy
DeleteAnd awesome use of the Reply button, dmaker.
DeleteAnna Nikaris has been quoted as saying that there is a developing branch of wildlife biology that identifies new species by their tracks, but that's irrelevant, you were taking about sources of scientific evidence... Not confirming a new species, there are many elememts to accomplishing this, again, this should to be something I shouldn't have to point out to you.
ReplyDeleteIt is not scientifically impartial to deny a source of evidence purely because something has been shown to be falsifiable. Science asks questions, attempts all hurdles and get's to the very bottom of any issue, to attain the facts.
Thousands of tracks that yield dermals consistent with species traits from opposite sides of the country decades apart; are evidence. When you also have one of the best ex-forensic artists in the country (who doubles up as a primate prints expert), amongst many other examples of wildlife biologists and anthropologists; then you have a considerable unit of scientific opinion which is a piece of work trying to explain such elememts of information that is very regularly avoided being countered.
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteSo, scientific evidence that can be used to prove the existence of Bigfoot is.... ?
Deletethe removed comments were double posts only. my droid phone is behaving oddly today
DeleteThe accumulation of which that consists of hair samples, multiple person eyewitness accounts, tracks, DNA, footage and recorded language.
DeleteI would like to add that if there was an acknowledgment of all these sources together, then science may have got to the bottom of it all way before now.
You were welcome.
Joe, I asked for scientific evidence. Evidence that can be falsified and repeated. So there goes your eyewitness account and tracks and footage and recorded language. Scientific evidence cannot be ambiguous. So DNA is left. DNA has always come back as some known entity or contaminated and unidentifiable as a result. There is no such thing as unknown primate result. Footers throw that out there, but then fail miserably at pointing to anything conclusive that lists unknown primate as a result.
DeleteSo we are left...that's right....nothing.
I think you'll find Don... I provided you an example of scientific evidence in tracks, and you also did exactly what I noted you would; side step and avoid it completely. Multiple eyewitness testimony is pretty good in a court of law too and there has been unknown primate DNA sequenced.
DeleteYour version of science does exactly what it has always done; ignore answering questions it can't. If answers aren't attainable, there's nothing to answer.
I suggestion read my comments up top... Properly.
"The Hoofnagle brothers, a lawyer and a physiologist from the United States, who have done much to develop the concept of denialism, have defined it as the employment of rhetorical arguments to give the appearance of legitimate debate where there is none, an approach that has the ultimate goal of rejecting a proposition on which a scientific consensus exists."
DeleteJoe fitz! Hey Dmaker is wrong there has been many DNA results for bf but it has just came back unknown primate of some sort bla bla ! With no sourse to compare to soon it will be solved!! For Shure I promise !! Canadian guy!!
DeleteHey TTL!
DeleteHow the devil are you sir?!
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteFYI - ALEX MUNOZ IS A HOAXER!!! PROVEN...
ReplyDelete"ALEX & ARLA, are "GOD'S" , among you acorn rooting pig's...
DeleteThese two scientist did not say one way or another that Dyer is hoaxing. Another topic not being discussed is the challenge that Dyer made.
ReplyDeleteifn bigfoots outs in tham woods takes U a shotgun fer U safety
ReplyDeleteRick Dyer true or not that taxidermy monster he got made would have cost some serious money and the hair or fur looks pretty good on it from me being the average hunter?? Who nows?? What if it is true??
ReplyDeleteWho knows? I know. You'll get nothing and like it.
DeleteCHUTAK!!!!!!!!!!!!
ReplyDeleteI think Spike TV should take their experts, doctors, and checkbook and call Rick Dyers bluff, tell him to put up or shut up!!!!
ReplyDeleteI saw Ricks Stuffed Animal in L.A. What a weirdo. Hes got a body, all stuffed with fluff. Runnin around snapping "selfies" and acting like a goof. He jumped in some guys limo video taping himself, and then got out. Just tryin to make it look like hes livin large. Charged me $20.00 bux. I wanted to smack him. But then I smacked myself for paying it. JB L.A
ReplyDelete