We've already heard Jay Cooney's opinion on the Virginia photograph, and he thinks it could be a bear. Here's what Phil Poling of ParaBreakdown thinks of it:
You know who's opinion I want on this photo. Well, who has shot a lot of bear? And who has also shot a bigfoot? Large and small. I want to get his opinion. Probably one of the only qualified persons to say?
I don't know what this is. What appears to be long hair on the head(?) is kinda screwing with me. Also, I don't see EARS where they should be very visible if this were a bear? It also looks pretty well covered in hair, so I don't know about a claim for mange?
The back legs look too short for a B-Foot, but tha fronts look to long for a bear. The belly looks more bear like on this photo. More so than the Jacobs photo.
As far as the fingers, Maybe GoD (PHIL) has better equipment and a lager screen, but I see what looks like an up-turned hand on the right. Looks like fingers to me??? What does the Gallery say?
As a Platinum Level Cryptozoologist Special to Bigfoot Evidence my opinion is that this is indeed a bear. Or a dogman. I don't think it's a chupacabra.
Yes, third bear-taterhole Bigfoot. This one, the Jacobs one, and that ridiculous lounging Bigfoot from Alberta. Bears are nothing if not exhibitionists.
So does Phil Poling believe bigfoots are real? Is there any breakdown videos where he concludes its real or is unsure? Or does he just stick to the videos/photos hes sure he can prove fake?
Just a couple off the top of my head. Yes there are some very compelling videos out there but face it, the majority of them are crap. And NO I am not Phil.
Bart did a hell of a job on that video. The sad thing is that he HAS to be commended for his efforts. That type of follow up investigation should be the standard. If the Cutino Standard Investigation is not done to a video why should anyone believe it?
Bear... you can see the head for Christ's sake. The front right leg - the one everyone says is an arm - look just above/ behind it. you can see the forehead and snout. It's head is hanging low so it can sniff for grubs.
Adam Davies visits Dr. Johnson at the SOHA base camp, and tries a new experiment to test the relationship Dr. Johnson has with his bigfoot friends. But how did it turn out?
This photograph was first shown at a Bigfoot conference in Washington over the weekend where witnesses were blown away. While we're currently seeking permission to post the screengrab here, we'll provide the link to the image on Facebook for now. The image is just a snapshot of a 5 minute-long footage of a Bigfoot caught on thermal. Washington Bigfoot researcher Derek Randles explains the image:
Here's the latest update from Stacy Brown Jr. from the mine shafts in Hellen Georgia: Stacy Brown Sr. and Jr. stumble upon a very odd spot in the woods behind the cabin.
NOT FIRST
ReplyDeleteWow. Slowest first in the west.
DeleteHey Shaun -------
DeleteYou know who's opinion I want on this photo. Well, who has shot a lot of bear? And who has also shot a bigfoot? Large and small. I want to get his opinion. Probably one of the only qualified persons to say?
So what does SMEJA say?
I don't know what this is. What appears to be long hair on the head(?) is kinda screwing with me. Also, I don't see EARS where they should be very visible if this were a bear? It also looks pretty well covered in hair, so I don't know about a claim for mange?
DeleteThe back legs look too short for a B-Foot, but tha fronts look to long for a bear. The belly looks more bear like on this photo. More so than the Jacobs photo.
As far as the fingers, Maybe GoD (PHIL) has better equipment and a lager screen, but I see what looks like an up-turned hand on the right. Looks like fingers to me??? What does the Gallery say?
You know what??????
DeleteThats what they did!!! It was a Bear photo and they used CGI. They removed the right arm and layed over a Right side gorilla hand, arm and shoulder.
Thoughts?
A false false first. I bow down to you your majesty
ReplyDeleteAs a Platinum Level Cryptozoologist Special to Bigfoot Evidence my opinion is that this is indeed a bear. Or a dogman. I don't think it's a chupacabra.
ReplyDeleteWhen do I get my own post saying this is a bear? We can't have enough of them, you know.
ReplyDeleteMaybe when you pay up like the rest of us and get your degree from that bigfoot tracking website?
DeleteHave you seen the "new" site, LOL? How many different ways can a train wreck?
DeleteFor the amount of money they charged me they can afford several new trains.
DeleteWait......a bigfoot site charges money and people willing pay?
DeleteI need to get in on this.
It is a bear. If you look at a zoomed picture you can see the forehead and snout just above/ in front of the front right leg.
DeleteHey Fozzie, you look a little like a Bigfoot too. Why don't you bend over so I can...get a picture?
ReplyDeleteYes, third bear-taterhole Bigfoot. This one, the Jacobs one, and that ridiculous lounging Bigfoot from Alberta. Bears are nothing if not exhibitionists.
DeleteI had Taco Bell last night and my allergies are acting up giving me the sneezes so that picture might be a little blurry. :(
DeleteThe blurrier the better, my furry friend. But it will be quite a sight...everyone knows Muppet taterholes are big enough to reach right up into...
Deletethe 70's were an hell of a decade!
DeleteSo does Phil Poling believe bigfoots are real? Is there any breakdown videos where he concludes its real or is unsure? Or does he just stick to the videos/photos hes sure he can prove fake?
ReplyDeleteGT
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-xAuHHdaYU
Deletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-6xkYBbmf8
Just a couple off the top of my head. Yes there are some very compelling videos out there but face it, the majority of them are crap. And NO I am not Phil.
Thanks for the links Fozzie. I agree most videos are crap. Phil said at the end of the first video, he is a skeptic.
DeleteGT
There is a big difference between a skeptic and a skeptard.
Deletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGh3wASXkVY
I think this is Phil's brother or cousin or something.
Bart did a hell of a job on that video. The sad thing is that he HAS to be commended for his efforts. That type of follow up investigation should be the standard. If the Cutino Standard Investigation is not done to a video why should anyone believe it?
Delete"This video contains content from Channel 4, who has blocked it in your country on copyright grounds." :(
DeleteI did see some guys definition on skeptics and skeptards etc. Means i'm a skeptic then. Really hope the big guys out there though!
GT
2013 will be the year of bigfoot- you just wait til Miley Cyrus twerks with one !
ReplyDeleteYou've been warned !
Buckle up? Yawn
Delete2014 will be THE Year of the Squatch!!!!!
DeleteThis could get exciting!! Melba?
DeleteYup, just like Chicago Cubs Fans, 2014… wait till next year. 2015… wait till next year. 2016…...
ReplyDeleteAh, the Billy Goat Curse...One of my favorite sports stories...
DeleteNot a bear. The front arms are way to long for a bear. This is either a juvenile bigfoot or somebody's lost monkey!
ReplyDeleteGood lord, you must have had an extra helping of stupid for lunch today. You nincompoop, just wow.....
Deletelol
DeleteTurkey. What looks like long hair is actually feathers.
DeleteBear... you can see the head for Christ's sake. The front right leg - the one everyone says is an arm - look just above/ behind it. you can see the forehead and snout. It's head is hanging low so it can sniff for grubs.
Delete