"Cryptozoologist" Phil's Opinion on The Virginia Trail Cam Photograph

By -

We've already heard Jay Cooney's opinion on the Virginia photograph, and he thinks it could be a bear. Here's what Phil Poling of ParaBreakdown thinks of it:



Comments

  1. UnknownWednesday, August 28, 2013 at 9:01:00 AM PDT

    NOT FIRST

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. UnknownWednesday, August 28, 2013 at 9:01:00 AM PDT

      Wow. Slowest first in the west.

      Delete
    2. The Bigfoot PatriotWednesday, August 28, 2013 at 5:58:00 PM PDT

      Hey Shaun -------

      You know who's opinion I want on this photo. Well, who has shot a lot of bear? And who has also shot a bigfoot? Large and small. I want to get his opinion. Probably one of the only qualified persons to say?

      So what does SMEJA say?

      Delete
    3. The Bigfoot PatriotWednesday, August 28, 2013 at 6:08:00 PM PDT

      I don't know what this is. What appears to be long hair on the head(?) is kinda screwing with me. Also, I don't see EARS where they should be very visible if this were a bear? It also looks pretty well covered in hair, so I don't know about a claim for mange?

      The back legs look too short for a B-Foot, but tha fronts look to long for a bear. The belly looks more bear like on this photo. More so than the Jacobs photo.

      As far as the fingers, Maybe GoD (PHIL) has better equipment and a lager screen, but I see what looks like an up-turned hand on the right. Looks like fingers to me??? What does the Gallery say?

      Delete
    4. The Bigfoot PatriotWednesday, August 28, 2013 at 6:13:00 PM PDT

      You know what??????

      Thats what they did!!! It was a Bear photo and they used CGI. They removed the right arm and layed over a Right side gorilla hand, arm and shoulder.

      Thoughts?

      Delete
  2. Fozzie Wednesday, August 28, 2013 at 9:30:00 AM PDT

    A false false first. I bow down to you your majesty

    ReplyDelete
  3. Fozzie Wednesday, August 28, 2013 at 9:36:00 AM PDT

    As a Platinum Level Cryptozoologist Special to Bigfoot Evidence my opinion is that this is indeed a bear. Or a dogman. I don't think it's a chupacabra.

    ReplyDelete
  4. AnonymousWednesday, August 28, 2013 at 9:41:00 AM PDT

    When do I get my own post saying this is a bear? We can't have enough of them, you know.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Fozzie Wednesday, August 28, 2013 at 9:47:00 AM PDT

      Maybe when you pay up like the rest of us and get your degree from that bigfoot tracking website?

      Delete
    2. AnonymousWednesday, August 28, 2013 at 9:50:00 AM PDT

      Have you seen the "new" site, LOL? How many different ways can a train wreck?

      Delete
    3. Fozzie Wednesday, August 28, 2013 at 9:54:00 AM PDT

      For the amount of money they charged me they can afford several new trains.

      Delete
    4. AnonymousWednesday, August 28, 2013 at 12:33:00 PM PDT

      Wait......a bigfoot site charges money and people willing pay?

      I need to get in on this.

      Delete
    5. AnonymousWednesday, January 1, 2014 at 1:46:00 PM PST

      It is a bear. If you look at a zoomed picture you can see the forehead and snout just above/ in front of the front right leg.

      Delete
  5. AnonymousWednesday, August 28, 2013 at 9:43:00 AM PDT

    Hey Fozzie, you look a little like a Bigfoot too. Why don't you bend over so I can...get a picture?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnonymousWednesday, August 28, 2013 at 9:46:00 AM PDT

      Yes, third bear-taterhole Bigfoot. This one, the Jacobs one, and that ridiculous lounging Bigfoot from Alberta. Bears are nothing if not exhibitionists.

      Delete
    2. Fozzie Wednesday, August 28, 2013 at 9:49:00 AM PDT

      I had Taco Bell last night and my allergies are acting up giving me the sneezes so that picture might be a little blurry. :(

      Delete
    3. AnonymousWednesday, August 28, 2013 at 9:51:00 AM PDT

      The blurrier the better, my furry friend. But it will be quite a sight...everyone knows Muppet taterholes are big enough to reach right up into...

      Delete
    4. Fozzie Wednesday, August 28, 2013 at 9:53:00 AM PDT

      the 70's were an hell of a decade!

      Delete
  6. AnonymousWednesday, August 28, 2013 at 9:54:00 AM PDT

    So does Phil Poling believe bigfoots are real? Is there any breakdown videos where he concludes its real or is unsure? Or does he just stick to the videos/photos hes sure he can prove fake?

    GT

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Fozzie Wednesday, August 28, 2013 at 10:12:00 AM PDT

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-xAuHHdaYU

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-6xkYBbmf8

      Just a couple off the top of my head. Yes there are some very compelling videos out there but face it, the majority of them are crap. And NO I am not Phil.

      Delete
    2. AnonymousWednesday, August 28, 2013 at 10:39:00 AM PDT

      Thanks for the links Fozzie. I agree most videos are crap. Phil said at the end of the first video, he is a skeptic.

      GT

      Delete
    3. Fozzie Wednesday, August 28, 2013 at 11:01:00 AM PDT

      There is a big difference between a skeptic and a skeptard.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGh3wASXkVY

      I think this is Phil's brother or cousin or something.

      Delete
    4. Fozzie Wednesday, August 28, 2013 at 11:23:00 AM PDT

      Bart did a hell of a job on that video. The sad thing is that he HAS to be commended for his efforts. That type of follow up investigation should be the standard. If the Cutino Standard Investigation is not done to a video why should anyone believe it?

      Delete
    5. AnonymousWednesday, August 28, 2013 at 12:00:00 PM PDT

      "This video contains content from Channel 4, who has blocked it in your country on copyright grounds." :(

      I did see some guys definition on skeptics and skeptards etc. Means i'm a skeptic then. Really hope the big guys out there though!

      GT

      Delete
  7. AnonymousWednesday, August 28, 2013 at 10:04:00 AM PDT

    2013 will be the year of bigfoot- you just wait til Miley Cyrus twerks with one !
    You've been warned !

    ReplyDelete
  8. AnonymousWednesday, August 28, 2013 at 12:10:00 PM PDT

    Yup, just like Chicago Cubs Fans, 2014… wait till next year. 2015… wait till next year. 2016…...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnonymousWednesday, August 28, 2013 at 12:57:00 PM PDT

      Ah, the Billy Goat Curse...One of my favorite sports stories...

      Delete
  9. RMSOWednesday, August 28, 2013 at 7:38:00 PM PDT

    Not a bear. The front arms are way to long for a bear. This is either a juvenile bigfoot or somebody's lost monkey!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnonymousWednesday, August 28, 2013 at 8:23:00 PM PDT

      Good lord, you must have had an extra helping of stupid for lunch today. You nincompoop, just wow.....

      Delete
    2. AnonymousThursday, August 29, 2013 at 4:10:00 AM PDT

      lol

      Delete
    3. AnonymousThursday, August 29, 2013 at 4:16:00 AM PDT

      Turkey. What looks like long hair is actually feathers.

      Delete
    4. AnonymousWednesday, January 1, 2014 at 1:50:00 PM PST

      Bear... you can see the head for Christ's sake. The front right leg - the one everyone says is an arm - look just above/ behind it. you can see the forehead and snout. It's head is hanging low so it can sniff for grubs.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story

By -
Image
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from...
Read more

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

By -
Image
Rumors abound on whether or not Finding Bigfoot will continue, but hopeful news is on the horizon. Snake Oil Productions, the production company responsible for Finding Bigfoot, is seeking a permit for filming in the Monterey, Virginia area. Monterey lies between the Monongahela and George Washington National Forests. Definitely a good place to look for bigfoot. We can only speculate if this means Finding Bigfoot has been signed on for additional seasons, or if perhaps a new bigfoot show is in the works. We'll keep you updated on any further announcements for sure. 
Read more

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?

By -
Image
Editor's Note: This is a guest post by Suzie M., a sasquatch enthusiast. Crypto-linguists believe that the species known Bigfoot/Sasquatch/Yeti/Yowie ect speak and understand a complex language, which by all accounts seems to stem from Asia. When one listens to it there is definitely a sense of it being Chinese or Japanese. It is a very odd mix of sounds, clicks and what could be actual words. This is the reason some experts are looking into the Asian dialect theory, some have said it could be a lost dialect, which was carried from Asia by the Bigfoot species that colonised America.
Read more