Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from...
First
ReplyDeleteWhat have you done with the real Mayor? It's obvious you're an imposter who took his identity but couldn't use his full name. Come clean McCheese!
DeleteCongrats! You'll always be my Mayor! :)
DeleteNot quite sure who the bigger morons are, the people who hoax this stuff or the people who take them seriously.
ReplyDeleteis there any real film?
ReplyDeleteI swear, Howto101 is a KNOWN HOAXER AND LIAR who Phil has already debunked, numerous times. Whats the point in beating off a dead horse?
ReplyDeleteWho runs Barter town?
ReplyDeleteBlack Russian Bigfoot? Is that a drink? Pour vodka and milk into a bigfoots taterhole, tell it to jiggle its ass and then it farts the drink into your glass. Black Russian bigfoot.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteWe need to send out teams of Ninja Assassins to go out and eliminate those who make hoax videos and put them on the web trying to pass it off.
ReplyDeleteNot talking about Documentaries or recreations for shows. I'm talking about the dumbasses who are setting legit research and inquiries back.
Please let me know if you're looking for a article writer for your weblog. You have some really good posts and I think I would be a good asset. If you ever want to take some of the load off, I'd absolutely love
ReplyDeleteto write some content for your blog in exchange for a link back to
mine. Please drop me an email if interested.
Thank you!
Here is my web-site Toenail Fungus
Do you mind if I quote a couple of your posts as long as I provide credit and
ReplyDeletesources back to your website?
My blog is in the exact same niche as yours and my users would really benefit from
a lot of the information you provide here. Please let me know if
this is ok with you.
Thank you!
Also visit my web-site; iphone mileage
Good day,
ReplyDeleteThis is my first visit to your blog! We are a group of volunteers and starting a new project in a
community in the same niche. Your blog provided us valuable
information to work on. You have done a wonderful job!
my site shooting games
Hi there, I read your blog occasionally and I own a similar one and
ReplyDeleteI was just wondering if you get a lot of spam remarks?
If so how do you prevent it, any plugin or anything you can suggest?
I get so much lately it's driving me insane so any assistance is very much appreciated.
Stop by my weblog; sleep
Doh! I was domain shopping at namecheap.com and went to type in the domain name: http:
ReplyDelete//www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2925104810508047182&postID=80715203953554306 and guess
who already acquired it? You did! Awesome blog!
Here is my web site :: Beginners Golf
Also see my site :: Beginners Golf Putting
Many people who know little to nothing about the field of sasquatch research tend to claim that all videos are hoaxes or misidentifications. And considering the vast majority of videos are obviously not misidentifications, they either depict a genuine sasquatch or they are hoaxes. And these people who always claim hoaxes are actually doing the same thing they claim the bigfoot researchers are doing...which is presenting claims without anything to back them up.
ReplyDeleteOf course this video is a hoax. But I am not saying that based on just looking at this video. I am basing this claim on looking at the characteristics exhibited by the subject in the video, and comparing them with the hundreds upon hundreds of reports that agree in what they describe. I also have the luxury of comparing what I am seeing with the sasquatch that I witnessed, which not everyone is able to do.
I understand that it is quite likely that sasquatch comprise only one species, as this makes the most logical sense, although I don't have the space to get into a thorough explanation. Just know that the majority of comments I make have some sort of weight behind them, and I don't take any claim lightly.
But like humans, the variety exhibited throughout all of the individuals within the sasquatch population is large. Therefore it would be foolish to base an analysis of a purported sasquatch video on appearance alone. So instead of doing that, I personally also look at other physical characteristics, as well as behavioral characteristics. Although it is easy for a hoaxer to create a bigfoot suit to fool someone who doesn't know what they are looking for, it is extremely difficult to hoax someone who has spent the amount of time myself and other researchers have analyzing all aspects of sasquatch.
And on top of that, it is extremely easy to fool someone who knows nothing of sasquatch behavior, but very difficult to do so with a seasoned investigator or theorist. I consider myself more of a theorist, although I do investigations and research in the field at times. My goal is to develop, with the help of the community, a complete picture of sasquatch behavior and physical characteristics. This field is far more advanced than many would be willing to believe, as the information is out there for the most part. There is still much to discover and glean from eyewitness testimony, which is to be compared with other eyewitness testimonies, but for the most part many of the hypotheses have been put forth regarding the most basic aspects of sasquatch.
Out of the over one hundred sasquatch videos I have analyzed, I place them all into various categories. The main categories are obvious hoaxes, probable hoaxes, impossible to distinguish, and authentic sasquatch. And I have only placed a handful of all these videos into the latter category. Some of the videos in the "impossible to tell" category very well may be authentic, but as I always say, it is better to throw it out than make a mistake. So every single one of the videos I deem to be authentic pass the test on every single aspect of behavior and physical characteristics.
And some of the videos in the impossible category look extremely good. The subject I mean looks real. But some of these videos lack the behavioral aspects, among other things, and therefore they cannot be deemed authentic, simply because they do not provide enough information. So to sum it all up, this video in question is definitely a hoax, as it does not pass muster by my personal criteria, which I believe any good researcher would basically agree with.