Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from
I couldn't be first.
ReplyDeleteNothing to worry about.
DeleteIf woody would've gone straight to the police......
DeleteUmmm ok. Now what about Melba
ReplyDeleteYou know who else was first ??? "MY MOM" awhahahaha
ReplyDeleteLol Muscleman! GREATEST CARTOON EVER
DeleteWTF is Phil talking about? a Charles Manson looking dude staring at the camera grinning? I'm confused, I see a bear... is this breakdown actually for this picture? What the hell is the meaning of this?
ReplyDeleteThis guy Phil , I have seen most his videos, he is an arrogant, idiot that likes to chase M.k Davis aroud trying to debunk everything he says. I dont see a bent over man, I dont see a face with a grin, sorry, Im with you
DeleteHuman backs don't bend that way PHIL! Probably a bear.
ReplyDeletei see a mid-tarsal break in there somewhere.
DeleteThe 'bend' in the back is actually from the elbow of the left arm. Bear? Not even close. And with as many comments on here stating that it's a bear? Seriously? Do you people ever get out of your house and off your couches? Basic anatomy would tell you that it's not a bear. And its not a bigfoot, either. It's a hoax. A person.
Deletei agree.. don't see a man grinning but i do see what looks like a pair of shoes..
ReplyDeleteThat's fake
ReplyDeleteThat picture looks like the bigfoot is bent over preparing for a raging taterholing, is it a hookersquatch?
ReplyDeleteYep he's bracing himself for that hard cockpunch to the poor ol'taterhole, just charges $3.50
DeleteWTF......Phil is stoned!
ReplyDeleteJesus! Two of em!
ReplyDeleteIs that supposed to be a picture of a squatting squatch dropping some Tatertots?
ReplyDeleteLooks like a young and wet Black Bear
ReplyDeleteI can see his cack
ReplyDeleteleave the bears alone jeez
ReplyDeleteIt's a bear. Looks like it has been burned or is suffering from a horrible case of mange. The fur is sluffing off. What looks like shoes is actually the skin of the paw. The muzzle is below the "grin". The ears look like horns on the top of the "human face". It also is either starving or just woke from hibernation. The front legs are very thin. You can also see what looks like ribs standing out on the flank. Not bone, just too thin. PA needs to figure out what the hell is infecting their bears and treat it.
ReplyDeleteJim and Phil must have both smoked some bad, or depending on how you look at it really good shit.
DeleteThat is no bear, That is no Bigfoot.. It is a Dogman mid transformation.. That is why he is still waring shoes...
ReplyDeleteBut seriously.. A BEAR??? That is not a bear, Look how skinny it is. Even if it was a malnourished bear, then why are the rear thighs that thick? Furthermore, the rear knees would not be bent at a 45 degree angle with its front paws on the ground. The wired arch in the back confuses me though. Freak in a costume?
The thighs look thicker because they are over lapping each other some and more fur is on them. It is a bear, a very sick one. One very interesting thing here though. Take a look at this pic, then look at the naked bear video in Florida. Then add in the Jacob critter. The flatness of the front paw in this pic and Jacob pic are close. Then all three have the steep arched back. Someone do a comparision of them on here.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteI think Phil is looking at the pattern of the fur which does look like a face. If that were the case, what looks like a muzzle he thinks is long hair...
DeleteBut if that is a muzzle, it is more Dog like and if that is the case, so are the ears. I do not want to say "Dog-man" but... More Dog-man than Bigfoot. If this is a bear it is more than just sick, it is deformed.
This is one of those pics like the other that was two bears. Pic a spot and it looks like different things, so I am at a loss.
ReplyDeleteLooks like an emaciated bear to me too.
looks like a bear, the snout and ears might have something to do with it
ReplyDelete- roy
When has it ever been proven that Bigfoot do not wear shoes? You have to figure they atleast where them to church.
ReplyDeleteEven Bigfoot is going Ape over the twinkies bankruptcy.
ReplyDeletetwinkies bankruptcy?
DeleteCall Dwight Schrute!
ReplyDeleteI keep my poop in a jar.
DeleteAre you people serious? This IS a Sick bear with mange. I live in San Diego and I can see that by looking at the picture. .....and yes, I DO believe in Bigfoot.
ReplyDeleteAnd this is why "bigfootery" has no respect - any and every purported claims is evidence of Bigfoot when the vast majority are hoaxes or misidentification as in this case. "Bigfoot" experts have no idea of what they are looking at and see Bigfoot in shadows, rocks, trees, bears, ghillie suits, costume gorilla suits etc.
ReplyDeletehttp://maxcdn.nexternal.com/armynavy/images/black%20ops%20ghillie%20suit.JPG
No Bigfoot expert would look at this and call it a Sasquatch. Are you fucking serious? "Bigfootery" has no respect because of assholes like you, and fuckers who put stupid pictures out like this when they know its not a Sasquatch. They just do it to stir up the shit and give the skeptics fuel to say things exactly like you just said.
Deleteprokill why is there no evidence for a 9 foot ape that lives in north america?
DeleteProkill, deal with it...it is not because of people like me who point obvious crap evidence but because the whole area is rife with hoaxers. Respect is earned dipshit.
Deleteno they are not serious, and noone seriously believes in bigfoot, its kinda like that flat earth society, its just a bit of fun :)
ReplyDeleteIts a Owl!!
ReplyDeletewhere is this bloke gettin this from lol what he just described was total bollox
ReplyDelete