Monday, May 14, 2012

The Beast of Seven Chutes: What the Heck Is It?


Editor’s Note: This is a post by Bigfoot Evidence contributor Vicki W.

In June of 1995 a man sightseeing in Quebec snapped 76 photos and made 4 videos of an area known as Parc des 7 Chutes, or Seven Chutes Park, near Saint-Georges de Beauce, Quebec. As he browsed through the pictures, something odd caught his eye in photo number 32. There appeared to be something strange standing amid the trees. When the photo was enlarged, a tall brown figure with a baboon like snout becomes clearer. Not only that, it seems to be clutching a white dog, and appears to be staring towards the photographer. He had not seen it when he took the pictures.

The photographer (who wishes to remain anonymous) went back to the area and had photos taken with a man standing in the same spot for comparison, as well as to see if there could be another explanation. Some skeptics have suggested it is a rock formation but the subsequent area photos do not support this theory. Others claim it's simply a case of pareidolia, the phenomena of seeing faces or other distinct images in objects such as clouds, tree formations, or even a cinnamon roll. Remember the famous cinnamon roll that had the uncanny likeness to Mother Theresa of Calcutta? There seems to be more than that to this particular image, however.

So what is the thing, and why is it holding a small dog? If it's a bigfoot, it doesn't match up with most descriptions by bigfoot eyewitnesses. This animal has a snout like a dog or wolf, leading some to call it a "dogman" or a werewolf. There have been reports of an animal meeting this description in a few other places. One of the most well known are the sightings of the "Michigan dogman", and another string of sightings in Wisconsin of a similar animal.

Here are some examples of 'dogmen' or werewolf type creatures described by witnesses:

MANWOLF SPOTTED ON BRAY ROAD IN 2004

Witness Description: It was dark in color but tipped silvery gray...its eyes were glittery and dark, they had no sclera or whites like a human eye in a mask would have. It's head was big, almost too big for its body. It had an elongated snout, but pointy, not rounded like a Lab's. "It stood there, and then it hunched over into an aggressive stance. It's arms were bent at the elbow and forward. I couldn't see the hands. Its ears were pointed, shaped like a German shepherd's, but laid back. It was looking right at me. I felt it was aggressive and would defend itself viciously.

MICHIGAN DOGMAN SIGHTING BY 4 PEOPLE

Witness Description: Yellow eyes, kind of slanted in a way. It didn¹t have a long snout like a dog, but the snout was narrow. It wasn¹t human and wasn¹t dog. It wasn¹t flatfaced like human, all I saw was hair underneath what I presumed to be a jaw. Like a cape or mane. From what I saw, it was kind of slender in stature, not beefy, I would guess 210-220 pounds. The head reminded me of a canine shape, the kind of triangle-looking head. It was looking completely straight on at us. It could have had ears but was too dark to see them.

WISCONSIN WOLFMAN

Remember the Wisconsin "bigfoot" that pulled the deer from the back of a pickup? Well Steve Krueger, the guy who reported it says "It wasn't a bigfoot. it's head was more like a wolf!"... read what he says it was below! Witness Description: Steven Krueger the contractor who says a creature pulled a deer out of his pickup describes the creature like this, "It had pointy ears, triangular shaped," he said, "and they looked like big wolf ears standing up on end. That was the main feature that made me realize it was not a bear. It had a longer muzzle than a black bear, and its head was more like a wolf than a bear. It almost looked like a very large black bear standing on its feet, if you took a wolf's head and enlarged it and set it on the bear's body." "I know it wasn't a bigfoot."

Another perplexing case regarding a mysterious beast from history which has sometimes been labeled a werewolf is the 18th century French case known as the "Beast of Gevaudan". Historians continue to scratch their head about exactly what the beast was, but there's no doubt that the ferocious creature was responsible for the grisly killings of over 100 people, some of which it partially devoured. The victims were all women and children, and curiously the beast did not attack livestock such as sheep or cattle. Many victims were tending sheep when the animal viciously attacked. It was thought to be a wolf, and many wolves were killed but the attacks continued.

The few people who managed to escape the animal described it as a wolf like creature, but larger, as large as a horse or a cow. Rumors circulated that the animal must be some type of werewolf. Eventually, the beast was shot by Jean Chastel in 1767 with a silver bullet, or so he claims. (A silver bullet would be unstable as it is too heavy to get the spin necessary to make a bullet fire in an accurate straight line.) Human tissue was found in its stomach, and the killings finally stopped. Despite this, the identity of the beast of Gevaudan was never ascertained. It had differences from a common wolf, and we only know that it was buried in high secrecy somewhere in Versailles. Cryptozoologists speculate that it may have been a hyena (an escaped exotic specimen) or a wolf-dog hybrid. Accusations have also been tossed around that the beast had been a trained animal; trained to attack people by a beast of the human persuasion, perhaps Jean Chastel himself had blood on his hands. Circumstances surrounding his ability to get as close as he did when so many others failed fueled more than a few whispers and raised eyebrows. Still, he was honored as a hero for dispatching the beast and putting an end to its carnage. A large memorial marks his grave site, and the beast remains a mystery today.

Extreme Head Close-Up


Beast of & Chutes (original)


Recreation

For more information and photos regarding the 'Beast of 7 Chutes', see www.haveyouseenthiscreature.com

Watch the Australian produced "Animal X" episode about the Beast of Gevaudan if you would like to know more about the French legend.

130 comments:

  1. Armondo the Baker (of bread)Monday, May 14, 2012 at 11:28:00 PM PDT

    Suddenly far more fearful of camping...and Canada

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. its a fucking broken tree for the bf face, and part of a tree for the dog, the rest imagined shit. the sun reflecting off back of bf neck and dog is same, same color=treebark.

      Be scared of the people who post shit like this

      Delete
    2. rembr monsterquest pgf digitalTuesday, May 15, 2012 at 9:38:00 AM PDT

      Not a tree, looks babboon-ish. Did anyone see monsterquest where they digitalizes the PGF and it not only looked real, but had a face just like a big babboon, just like this?? Serious comment here, I think some sasquatch look like giant baboon, like this go watch that monsterquest with old man and fat british geek looking at PGF!!!

      Delete
    3. I was thinking broken tree originally, but that wouldn't really make sense because the tree would also be in the recreation photo. There is additional foliage in the recreation which could be hiding the tree, but the person in the recreation would have seen it there.

      Delete
    4. Armondo the Baker (of bread)Tuesday, May 15, 2012 at 12:39:00 PM PDT

      suddenly I find myself far more fearful of flora

      Delete
    5. Relax man, Bigfoot enjoys skateboarding. Nothing to be afraid of, check out his board brah!

      Delete
    6. This is the only photograph of a FACE EATER OR THE LOST ONES . GOOGLE IT AND LEARN MORE.

      Delete
  2. Those Things are Satan's Demons,either banished or just set free to roam free on earth and cause havoc.

    ReplyDelete
  3. How the hell does that have a snout? you can make out a brow ridge and conical head. The face is too blurry to make out much else.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes way too hasty to call that a snout, and the photographer didn't notice it being there at all so zooming in doesn't really reveal that much. Light also plays many tricks. I think it's just the bare part of the face if it's real at all of course, strange it is nevertheless and there's only two possibilities anyway it's either fake or it's real.

      Delete
    2. But why holding a dog?

      Delete
    3. Don't know, doesn't look like a dog to me so it could be anything. That's probably where they mix things up and where snout comes from.

      Delete
    4. I'm with you on this one, brother. Clearly an apelike animal. Big cone, heavy brow, round powerful bulk muscle.

      Delete
    5. Way to hasty to call this anything other than nothing.

      Delete
    6. For blind trolls maybe.

      Delete
    7. Oh I'm sorry koolaid troll..did I upset you?

      Delete
  4. Looks apelike:

    http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-1XG1Yq9MXIQ/TqJJDzURkYI/AAAAAAAABtY/XZGRjK4kfyY/s1600/gorila.jpg

    ReplyDelete
  5. Agree with most of the above- most probably a rather unusual looking sasquatch. Tim, U.K.

    ReplyDelete
  6. If amazes me when these items are so cheap that most Bigfooters are unaware of them, or use them.

    come on guys....BUY a Tricorder cover to help identify what's being photographed.

    http://www.ebay.com/itm/Star-Trek-Tricorder-iPHONE-4-4S-4G-HARD-COVER-CASE-/290659734604?pt=UK_MobilePhones_MobilePhonesCasesPouches&hash=item43acab944c

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. RTFA... photos taken in 1995. Not likely a cellphone. Take yer spam elsewhere.

      Delete
  7. Good Morning all:

    I just got off the phone with Jack Bindernagel and we discussed this photo. I have to say Jack had not seen it before and it made him very upset. I emailed him the link and he just stopped cold when he opened it. The exchange went like this "I will tell you I think Ketchum is full of it" then dead silence- I said Jack, Jack are you ok?. He remained silent and then said "Cuddles" I said "what do you mean Cuddles" and his response was as follows: "Cuddles was the name of our dog, the dog in this picture, that damn Sasquatch kidnapped my dog!!!" "my wife was sick for a month over it and we never knew what became of him".

    He then said "I must go call me later- I have to call Justin Smeja, payback is going to be a real bitch, or Sally, whichever term you prefer".

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Don't you get tired of setting around in your bloomers all day typing about things and no one cares about what you say or likes your comments? Go away. You are no longer funny.

      Delete
    2. Everyone is tired of you- including your wife and kids. People wait for my comments while people only wait for you to leave.

      Delete
    3. ^ you mean people wait for my comments you plagiarist! don't take credit for things you didn't post

      Delete
    4. Hahaha! I live for Jack calls.

      Delete
    5. Now answering himself.

      Delete
  8. Since we are in Quebec this must be the Loup-Garou.
    How tall was this compared to the stand in comparison man. The white dog like figure is not necessarily a dog, but does fit description of Bigfoot holding large objects like a football. Another inconclusive photo but very interesting indeed.

    Chuck

    ReplyDelete
  9. Since we are talking of a Dogman that seems to come from the Manistee National Forest region of Michigan and Monster Quest did a show about this, I heard an interesting story (I think on a Coast to Coast interview of David Paulides book Missing 411, with host George Knapp) about 2 months ago. I think this happened in the late 1800s in the Manistee National Forest region when the area was being logged. A lumberman who lost his wife, would take his then young daughter with him everyday when he cut lumber, and she would play and ride logs downhill when the horse pulled them. She came up missing. The lumberman could not find her. A couple of hunters who were in the area helped search for the girl and finally found here after several days. When asked how she stayed alive she told them the Wolfman took care of her, fed her, and kept her warm at night.

    Chuck

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Manistee Michigan=cold as fuck 9 months a year btw.....frozen, icy snow beaches.

      Delete
  10. Why is the "original" of much lower quality than the "recreation" photo? Were they made with different cameras? Or there is a higher quality original, but it reveals it to be a case of pareidolia? Or am I missing something?

    ReplyDelete
  11. Interesting picture and link. It does not look faked but maybe a stretch saying it's holding a dog.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Another fine article, Vicki!

    ReplyDelete
  13. The analysis/recreation of this photo is exactly what should be done with all photo/videos of supposed evidence

    ReplyDelete
  14. Being so small in the picture this could be just about anything. A tree, rocks, what ever. Light does a lot of things.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Yo people look at the recreation photo very closely and you will see something in the exact same spot that looks similar but is more obscured by brush that has grown up since the original photo was taken. J.D.

    ReplyDelete
  16. its not a dog..its a white bunny...see the two rabbitt ears folding down...hes got em a big ole bugs bunny under the arm...mmmm rabbitt...squatches have good taste. Finally some good photos are coming to light. I agan reapeat:
    IT IS A WILD HARE A COMMON RABBITT NOT A DOG...TAKE A CLOSER LOOK!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A closer look...I put my face closer to the photo....still see to be honest what looks like a giant tampon.

      Delete
  17. where do they come up with this dogman wolf face crap...it clearly has a simian face...looks like a baboon exactly...and its carrying bugs bunny

    ReplyDelete
  18. I wonder if Bigfoots have pets? Maybe mr. Rabbit was his bud, not lunch.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bigfoots don't have pets. they're do hungry.They will on occasion adopt a person if they are unlucky enough and have good dope conections. You will then be mind linked with your bigfoot buddy for life

      Delete
  19. If a snouted animal roams around there, then I vote for it being a baboon escaped or released from captivity.

    I believe the 'Beast of Gevaudan' was also thought to be an escaped menagerie or circus animal, most likely a hyena, but possibly a baboon. And the guy who shot it was likely the psychopath who directed the darn animal to attack all along.
    C

    ReplyDelete
  20. great pic don't see a dog though

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Looking closer now I actually see what could be a dog, the tail over the Sasquatch's arm clutcing it and the head sticking out underneath. See the eyes? Just wonder how on earth the Sasquatch caught it, I know they're supposed to be fast but I'd imagine a small dog could easily escape and be fearful of approaching a huge Sasquatch anyway unless the rumored hunting technique of rock throwing was used to stun the prey. It does look real the whole thing, and quite disturbing. The thing looks enormous and the whole nonhuman build looks correct enough, also think the face is realistic. The snout suggestion is wrong though, except on that poor dog of course if that's what it is.

      Delete
  21. What do you mean a bunny it looks like a pit bull in all honesty look how long it's front leg and there are no bunny ears and when is the last time you saw a wild rabbit white with black spots I know it sounds kinda crazy but look at the facial structure if the white creature it screams dog and if it is a dog and a pit bull then think how big the bf is that's holding it at least 8.5-9 feet tall I also do not see a snout on the face it looks like a baboon... Honestly in order for me it goes 1. Paterson film 2. This picture... Honestly the best still photo I have ever seen and if you disagree with me plz site the picture you think is Bette cuz I must not have seen it...

    ReplyDelete
  22. I don't think that it is a baboon. If the animal it is holding is a small dog, rabbit, whatever; The size comparison alone would put this creature well beyond the size paramaters of a baboon. A large baboon is about the size of an average 13-14 year old kid. This thing looks much, much larger. To me, the face looks very similar to a gorilla or one of the creatures depicted on the original 'Planet of the Apes' movies.

    Whatever it is, I would love to hear more about the encounter and any past encounters from the area.

    I dread having to read through all of the crap posted by the "critics" who will claim this is some guy wearing coveralls holding a trashbag etc. Just to try to find some serioes intel. on the subject.

    Archer1

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. But if it's actually a bf then it could be a large dog even in the comparison photo you can tell this thing is way over 6 ft tall... I am positive that's a pit bull it's holding...

      Delete
    2. I agree with you Archer 1. Something about this photo screams very large to me, and whatever it is holding appears to be at least two feet long as it is longer than the length of the creatures finger tips to elbow which on me at 6 foot is 18 inches. Maybe I'm nuts, but I am seeing something here and a lot of others are also.

      Thanks again Vicki for coming up with some great stuff. I salute you.

      Chuck

      Delete
    3. If you are nuts, I'm in the nut house with you.

      Archer1

      Delete
  23. It could be a large broken tree... More of a gorilla looking face I think. Cool picture, whatever it is.

    ReplyDelete
  24. It's obviously a bear wearing a little red beret and holding a baguette... It is Quebec after all...

    ReplyDelete
  25. Looks like a tree stump, the brown patch at the top looks like a branch has snapped off. The face is made up of 3 dark spots (eyes and mouth) which could be shadows a la the NASA mars face. We are seeing what we want to see.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree, you are definitely seeing what you want to see. As for me, I'm seeing what is obviously a large bipedal creature.

      Delete
    2. Exactly. Arms, legs, everything. There's only two thing it's can be it's either fake or it's not.

      Delete
  26. This would be easy enough to verify if the person would release the other comparison photos of a man taken later.

    Chuck

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They did. Click on the link under the "recreation" photo. Lots of extensive investigation done after the object was found in the photo

      Delete
  27. MK Davis enhanced the photo and told me it clearly shows a white bigfoot wearing a fur over coat pinching off a loaf in the bushes. The white thing in its hand is Melbas paper. Evidently this squatch was one of the peer reviewers and ran off with the earth shattering paper.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Squatch saw the paper for what it was and was going to use it to wipe his ass.

      Delete
    2. You trolls are getting less amusing by the hour and it's strange you even bother still. Who in his right mind would be so interested in commenting on a believed nonexisting species and socalled blobsquatches every day, unless they know there's actually something there worth staying informed on knowing how much bigfooters care enough to. I think it's very obvious why trolls can't quit and leave their closet.

      Delete
    3. Yeah in other photos the white thing appears to have brown smears on it

      Delete
    4. Here's what I think happened:
      A Sasquatch walks up to a rabbit it the woods and says, " Hey, man. Maybe you can help me out... do you have a problem with s**t sticking to your fur?" The rabbit says, "No, not really." So the Sasquatch picks him up and wipes his a** with him.
      David from the PAC/NW

      Delete
  28. I have always liked this pic, except for the 'snout' description. I see a fairly obvious eyes/nose/mouth setup on a flat face. The cone-head is a little outrageous vs other pics out there but that and the wide-open-looking mouth could be sun artifacts at a distance. I like the bunny theory, except if taking the size comparison into account (if reliable), we should also be scouring the woods for a giant species of 100lb rabbit! ...maybe the size comparison is off.
    Too bad this comes from an Anon photographer. Although, I feel like I've seen his name somewhere before...
    David from the PAC/NW

    ReplyDelete
  29. I don't agree with the people who call everybody a troll just because they write a humorous comment. I enjoy a lot of the funny things people write on here. If you people want to read a bunch of serious stuff from know it all scientist wannabees, go to the Cryptomundo site. JMO.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. But Bigfoot is serious business dammit.

      Delete
    2. 100% agree! Laughter is good for you!

      Delete
    3. I love the humorous comments on here as long as they are tasteful and not degrading I really like the jack bindernagel stories

      Delete
    4. Trolls only laugh because they're retarded and don't know any better.

      Delete
  30. Arla here - What you are seeing is an image that's never been captured. This is an adult male Bigfoot. He is in middle phase of the shapeshifting process. 30 seconds after this picture was taken, he had already completely transformed into a gopher. Many people do not know this, but the gopher is their primary life form. Bigfoot is a secondary life form that gophers created to intimidate humans and scare them from their sacred sanctuaries.

    ReplyDelete
  31. On a forum somewhere in the past this was said to be a fake because one of the better pictures had been magnified and you could see a man's face under the snout of the beast. They thought it was a mountain man with a wolf head and skin wrapped over him.

    Don't blast the messenger I'm just saying what was said. I did magnify the screen and thought I could make out the face at one time but just not certain.

    It was thought the guy who took the picture had no idea it was fake just the way this mountain man happened to be there at that time.

    But if it's real it's pretty scary. I've corresponded with some people before who were investigating the Michigan Dogmen sightings and they told me they felt it had more to do with a local Army base? I can't remember for sure but they inferred that it was possibly experiments going on with animals for the super soldiers. He told me if that was the case he was sure their investigation would be stopped shortly. Never did hear from him again, so I don't know, This was about 6 yrs ago.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No offence, but I think bigfoot is more beleivable than the super soldier theory. Lol.

      Delete
    2. Shoulders seem a bit too high if it was a mountain man w/wolf headdress. Exellent idea though..

      Delete
  32. Great job, Ms. W! Never seen this picture before, which is odd because it is a very good one. Keep up the quality content!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The subject of Bigfoot is like a revolving door.
      I can pull a pic out of my ass from ten years ago that's been debunked over and over. There's still a boatload of new gullible fools that will fall for it though. How do you people make it through life and not get taken for everything you've got? Guess you gotta have something first.

      Delete
    2. You are a moron. What you are describing - new people seeing old information for the 1st time - is true for EVERY subject. This isn't the Matrix - we don't get to have all prior knowledge downloaded to our brains with the flick of a switch! Seriously... grow a brain.

      And if you aren't interested in the subject, sod off already!!

      Delete
    3. @Anon 10:08

      Substantiate your claim. Where is the debunking for this? I will gladly take back my above comments if you can back yours up.

      Delete
  33. Thanks Chuck and anons. This pic is a really weird one, isn't it? There have been a few people who suggested the thing it is clutching is a pig. It kind of looks like a poodle in a way to me. I've seen it suggested that there is blood on the white things head, but I can't see anything like that.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I have even seen it commented that it was a duck or goose turned backwards. It looks like a poodle to me too or a rabbit. Just not sure.

      Delete
    2. When you finally go through all the enhancements they did years ago it looks like a poodle, a big one at that.

      Chuck

      Delete
  34. Lon did an article on this too.

    http://naturalplane.blogspot.com/2011/08/what-was-beast-of-seven-chutes.html

    ReplyDelete
  35. Sometimes an ink blot is just an ink blot. But if I had to guess I'd say it's a gorilla-monkey holding a white French-Canadian chi-poo-poo.

    ReplyDelete
  36. the part about the silver bullet in not correct,
    silver is lighter than lead, witch would cause the bullet to be less accurate and not having the same penetration as a lead bullet, the guns did not have rifling in the barrel until the civil war.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Can anyone else see what looks like maybe another one, in the upper left corner?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. there's actually five more, you're not looking close enough

      Delete
  38. You're right, it is lighter. One website says it is harder than lead. I confess I watched a program where they tested silver vs. lead and explained why silver tends to be inaccurate, and so was stating that from memory. I didn't remember correctly. It also said that silver causes less damage to surrounding tissue than lead. But thanks for the correction as I am not mechanically minded, that's for sure. The riflings allow for the bullet to spin, I guess?
    And thank you Blondie and North American Great Ape. I really appreciate the encouragement.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Rifling in a barrel increases the range of the weapon and the accuracy. The commenter above is correct in that rifled barrels were not widespread until the American Civil War.

      @Ms. W,

      Giving credit where it is due.

      Delete
  39. To me it looks like he is bringing home the bacon.
    I say piggy.....ass-end up.
    mmmmm bacon

    ReplyDelete
  40. Looks like Bigfoot is sportin' a purse.

    ReplyDelete
  41. Come on guys, this is clearly Sasquatch getting ready to skate down the river. Check out his board bro's and hoes!

    ReplyDelete
  42. It was a werewolf and the bite hurt like Hell.

    ReplyDelete
  43. I think someone did some photoshop work to this photo. There are inconsistencies with the pixel ratio

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It wasn't said if the same camera was used for both (as it should have been, of course). Or are you seeing funky sections?

      Delete
  44. I agree Vicki I have been cooking to this sight consistently for six months and you're posts are some of the best I've read/seen your hard work and dedication is appreciated immensely by true believers...

    ReplyDelete
  45. So if this is a dogman does it rape women like bigfoot? If so is it possible the dogman and a women could get doglocked?

    ReplyDelete
  46. I agree that it looks like some type of gorilla type primate, but I don't see a snout and I don't see a dog.

    It looks like the thing is carrying the backpack of it's last victim.

    ReplyDelete
  47. There must be a viable breeding population of dogmen to support the species. If these dogmen do indeed exist there can't be more than 500 to 1000 of them total. As for the white dog i have no idea.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The lil white dog is for breeding purpose's to create a "dogman" you need a dog!

      Delete
  48. Inconsistencies on the right side of the (?'s) so called face. Left side of (nose?) looks as if someone used a cloning tool to produce color variance.

    ReplyDelete
  49. Unexpected photo (didn't see it until I was looking at the photos)and anonymous photographer are hallmarks of bigfoot BSery.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Do your homework Shaun: this was extensively studied several years ago, it's a rock formation, you can go there today and find the "Beast". Great combination of light and shadow, rocks and leaves.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Do you have a link for this? I'd love to read more.

      Delete
    2. A rock formation?! Dang it, every time we turn around somebody is throwing a bucket of cold water on our fantasies.

      Delete
    3. Don't worry Anon, many credible reports indicate that bigfoot has the ability to turn into as stone formation when he senses cameras in the area. So while this may be a rock formation, it's still evidence for bigfoot.

      Don't forgot the cardinal rule of squatching: whatever the facts are, they can always be distorted to fit the bigfoot narrative.

      Delete
    4. Phew! Thanks for that, cuz that is one squatchy-looking rock formation.

      Delete
  51. We will never really know for sure what it is.

    ReplyDelete
  52. The camera was a Canon A70. Here's a link for photos of the area a few weeks later.

    http://www.haveyouseenthiscreature.com/ExactArea/

    ReplyDelete
  53. They should take a picture without any one standing there in the same spot.

    ReplyDelete
  54. Why is it wearing fluffy ear muffs or perhaps they are headphones....hmm

    ReplyDelete
  55. Whatever it is, it looks creepy. And scary. I hope its just rocks or something cos if that thing is real....

    ReplyDelete
  56. the usual red flag present IE 1 picture that is blurry[convient that]
    it looks like a tree stump to me. the white bit[ the small doman baby!] is the head of 1 tre the brown mass is the tree stump with leaves overhanging.

    its as plausable as anything else.

    what are we saying there are breeding populations of 7ft dogman alongside populaions of 8-10ft bigfoot walking about North America with anybody capturing it, finding bones/bodies, decent film,dna etc etc..

    this is ridiculas and makes people look folish wrting that this is actualy a werewolf or something. vrazy Americans I can only imagine.
    ive seen timbergiant, fasano,rick dyes work . Is this where you place you beliefs on. there is nothing on youtube related to either subject that is emotely interesting or PROOF

    is this a secret society or something,as i have no idea why adult men wuld belief such ridiculas things?!

    ReplyDelete
  57. why the guy in his worded intro refers to the ' michigan dogman' as some kind of proof is crazy. there is a film on youtube of the guy who hoaxed it,that isnt proof ,that was a well known[and good]hoax! which shows how easyit is for hoaxers to do a few simple costumes, add a good story and credible witnesses and you have a mystery.

    wakey wakey people.there are no 20 bogfoot or werewolves out there in north america. seep well you crazy yanks

    ReplyDelete
  58. Hi there! I know this is kinda off topic but I was wondering which
    blog platform are you using for this website?

    I'm getting tired of Wordpress because I've had
    problems with hackers and I'm looking at options for another platform. I would be fantastic if you could point me in the direction of a good platform.

    Also visit my blog post: roasted coffee

    ReplyDelete
  59. I think the admin of this site is truly working hard in favor of his web page, for the reason that here every material is quality based stuff.


    My web page - http://www.hjcustomjewelry.com/investigating-rudimentary-details-for-modcloth-coupon-code/

    ReplyDelete
  60. Hi mates, fastidious piece of writing and good arguments commented at this place, I am really enjoying by
    these.

    Here is my homepage :: Soulforce-Records.Com

    ReplyDelete
  61. I see what looks like a dog like baboon holding not a white dog but a small creature that resembles a baby primate of some kind with a pinkish nose being somewhat cradled rather than held. There are cases of albino primates being born and this looks something like that to me. I wonder if this could be the offspring of this creature.

    ReplyDelete
  62. to all that have seen them they do exist. I have been watching them. most of the description is correct but some is not. i hope to write a book soon and photos. they can move very fast so it is hard to photograph them. wish me luck...

    ReplyDelete
  63. I believe they are real, and I believe this is not a picture of one. There's a photo available for comparison. In the comparison photo, there are leaves on the trees. The leaves hide the rocks/ground being mistaken for the Beast. Here is the original photo with the comparison photo overlay: https://closetlight.files.wordpress.com/2016/08/beast-compare-1.gif This is not proof that the beast doesn't exist. It is only a strong indication that the beast is not in the original photo.

    ReplyDelete