The problem with these types of clips as evidence is that, to the skeptic, the entire recording can be readily hoaxed by anyone with a basic home recording studio. You then take your "bigfoot" recording and a sound system out in the woods. After walking a good distance away, you or someone else starts the playback. You then record it from a distance with your cell phone.
This type of evidence will NEVER convince a skeptic.
If you want to prove the existence of sasquatches, the only way that you will be able to do so is to provide a specimen, living or dead. There has simply been too much BS hoaxing over the decades for anything else to convince science and the world at large that these creatures exist.
If you are trying to gather evidence to prove the existence of bigfoot and are doing something other than attempting to capture or kill a specimen, YOU ARE WASTING YOUR TIME. Anything else will not provide proof. Anything else would only support the belief of those who already believe that sasquatches exist, and skeptics would remain unconvinced.
Editor's Note: This is a guest post by Suzie M., a sasquatch enthusiast. Crypto-linguists believe that the species known Bigfoot/Sasquatch/Yeti/Yowie ect speak and understand a complex language, which by all accounts seems to stem from Asia. When one listens to it there is definitely a sense of it being Chinese or Japanese. It is a very odd mix of sounds, clicks and what could be actual words. This is the reason some experts are looking into the Asian dialect theory, some have said it could be a lost dialect, which was carried from Asia by the Bigfoot species that colonised America.
Tonight on Coast To Coast AM, Bigfootology's Rhettman Mullis will talk about Bigfoot sightings, and give us an update on the Oxford Bigfoot DNA project.
Todd Standing and NvTV are the most credible voices in the Bigfoot community today.
ReplyDeleteA good rule of thumb to always keep in mind is, if it's from NvTv, it's complete bigfoot manure
ReplyDeleteThe problem with these types of clips as evidence is that, to the skeptic, the entire recording can be readily hoaxed by anyone with a basic home recording studio. You then take your "bigfoot" recording and a sound system out in the woods. After walking a good distance away, you or someone else starts the playback. You then record it from a distance with your cell phone.
ReplyDeleteThis type of evidence will NEVER convince a skeptic.
If you want to prove the existence of sasquatches, the only way that you will be able to do so is to provide a specimen, living or dead. There has simply been too much BS hoaxing over the decades for anything else to convince science and the world at large that these creatures exist.
If you are trying to gather evidence to prove the existence of bigfoot and are doing something other than attempting to capture or kill a specimen, YOU ARE WASTING YOUR TIME. Anything else will not provide proof. Anything else would only support the belief of those who already believe that sasquatches exist, and skeptics would remain unconvinced.
Kill all the bigfoots, no one will notice them gone
DeleteHa - tell that to lktomi. He claims they already have all the evidence they need to proclaim it real.
Delete