Take a Bigfoot Cruise
Bigfoot has become more and more popular in society, especially as a form of marketing. Now you can even take a bigfoot themed cruise.
Adventure-lovers all over the U.S. were intrigued when Portland Spirit Cruises announced the launch of the first ever Bigfoot Adventure Cruise in March this year. The Pacific Northwest has long had a reputation for Bigfoot sightings, and this experience offers locals and tourists a chance to explore the majestic Columbia River Gorge and go where so many Sasquatch seekers have gone before.
This full Bigfoot Adventure experience begins in downtown Portland and winds 70 miles upriver through countless landmarks and under 13 bridges to arrive in Cascade Locks. As passengers enjoy the magnificent natural scenery the region is just as famous for, from the deck of the 40-foot Explorer Jet Boat, they are regaled with wild tales of local sightings and Bigfoot history, through narration from Finding Bigfoot’s Cliff Barackman. Guests on the cruise are also treated to a one-hour scenic break before they begin the second leg of the journey back to Portland. At the conclusion of the cruise, each guest receives a personalized Cryptozoology Certificate.
This week, Portland Spirit Cruises announced they have now added a shorter, ‘bite-sized’ version of the Bigfoot experience.
For more, click here.
Well, there it is....another marketing gimmick by using Bigfoot as a draw. Of course most taking this cruise have no expectations of actually seeing a Sasquatch or even caring but it's just a side draw of what should be a scenic trip and that's what most are there for.
ReplyDeleteAnd why not? Keeping the Bigfoot legend alive is profitable to many and with no hope of ever fully proving it doesn't exist and plenty of gullible people ready to buy into it, they can keep this ruse going forever. Step right up ladies and gentlemen, there's profit to be made!
This comment has been removed by the author.
Delete
DeleteFalse Attribution (logical fallacy):
Description: Appealing to an irrelevant, unqualified, unidentified, biased, or fabricated source in support of an argument (modern usage). Historical use of this fallacy was in the attribution of "religious" or "spiritual" experiences to outside "higher" sources rather than internal, psychological processes (see fantasy projection).
Logical Form:
Claim X is made.
Source Y, a fake or unverifiable source, is used to verify claim X.
Therefore, claim X is true.
Example:
“But professor, I got all these facts from a program I saw on TV once... I don’t remember the name of it though.”
Explanation: Without a credible, verifiable source, the argument or claim being made is very weak.
Tip:
Don't falsify facts. If you get caught lying, you will almost certainly lose the argument, even if you are right.
If Bigfoot is a fraudulent money making scheme (X), then demonstrate how scientific evidence is hoaxed. If you can’t, then you’re at “Y” of the above logical fallacy. No proponent of Bigfoot would be taken seriously if they made a leap in logic regarding Bigfoot’s existence... if they were to claim ”X” (Bigfoot) is real because “Y” (no evidence). Stop being intellectually inferior and provide substance for at least one of your pretend hoax-cult pseudo-religious mantras for the ten years you’ve been here harassing people.
Easy peasy.
Footprints prove bigfoot
ReplyDeleteLOL - yep, that's all you need. Just an impression in the dirt! Undeniable!
Delete(Cough, cough)
DeleteThat’s how biologists conduct studies. That’s how they know populations of mammals are in a specific area of wilderness... with impressions in dirt.
You are so impossibly ignorant of the subject you’re obsessed with, it’s feckin hilarious.
(cough, cough)
DeleteHas no body of Bigfoot - never will.
When you have thousands of years of anthropological data, tens of thousands of modern eyewitness, published audio recordings, peer reviewed physical evidence, footage and thermal... a lack of body is easily attributed to a lack of understanding of how to track them. Primates are notoriously difficult to track. We already know that the most earliest of hominids had the most complex of burial customs.
DeleteTo harp on about a lack of type specimen in the face of that body of evidence is nothing short of special pleading. Another’s logical fallacy you embarrass yourself with.
When you claim to have thousands of years of anthropological data, tens of thousands of modern eyewitness, published audio recordings, peer reviewed physical evidence, footage and thermal...and still no physical evidence of an actual body - well, that speaks for itself. Talk about special pleading - LOL.
DeleteYou don’t even understand the meaning of “physical evidence”, you utter twonk, ha ha!!! You’ve been given two papers on physical evidence. Please stop, you’re embarrassing yourself.
DeletePS will never stop embarrassing himself , ever ! He will always refuse to accept any type of evidence because his mind will forever be closed to an logic whatsoever . So much evidence out there and yet he is so blind to the truth. utter twonk is an apt description of stuey
Deletecheers
Joe