Got monkey suit ? didn't think so You're just an old wet fart staining your knickers badly . Don't even know why you visit this blog ? must be because you are bored out of your mind. Not to fret boyo, that's what blow up dolls were made for cheers
^ can't handle bigfoot being real, can't produce the magic monkey suit, can't reproduce the PGF , can't think of saying anthing else than "gug, gug" Schooled once again boyo ! cheers
Do not let it spoil your sexual life as we have prepared something brand new for you. Revolutionary drug that already helped more than 98% of men all across the globe!
Get advantage of our special sale and use your personal discount coupon: c8wghlzp to save up to 50% on your next purchase. Get more information about the drug and our sale on our web-site.
'Gug', only have lame Patterson film,'Gug'. Everyone has HD phone cameras and no Bigfoot, 'Gug', so sad, weep weepy weep, 'Gug', solace in 'footers','Gug', so good Cheers Joe
I can't believe i'm even thinking of debating with nutters who can only say "gug, gug " and some idiot selling viagra ! Sod off the lot of you ! cheers
But humans do, so do animals, as well as natural depressions and outright hoaxers all which can be mistaken for actual Bigfoot tracks. If Meldrum is your main source for scientific expertise than you are in real trouble. Here's a word for you ..... DNA, come talk to me when you actually have some of a Sasquatch.
Hey PS, you do realise that most people reading this would have the b*lls to actually open the links I’ve provided, and be able to read that all your excuses are utterly debunked?
Spoiler alert... hoaxers would literally require a time machine to know about mid-tarsal breaks before the scientific community did.
I think it’s slightly rich that you can suggest my source lacks integrity when you haven’t even got the guts or intelligence to read it. Oh and the DNA was done ages ago; it’s human... sorry you didn’t get anything for the time you wasted looking in the woods for a bipedal gorilla. But that’s your shortcoming, so man up and take responsibility for that.
Why on earth would I open those links again when you have used them over and over trying to prove your case? Of course that was printed in the completely biased Journal of Scientific Exploration which is only endorsed by the few fellow believers. Mid-tarsal breaks can simply be an artifact of the casting process open to interpretation interpretation so that's not an open and shut case. So you say the DNA is human. Well, I agree with you......all too human. I guess we are all Sasquatches eh?
You’ve never opened those links because you’re a fraud. You like to spout off around here like you know what you’re talking but truth is you’re just lonely. If you had read the papers then you’ll know the complex nature of which trackways have been left are way to complicated to hoax. For example, several footprints and even a trackway Meldrum studied in the Walla Walla in 1996, clearly exhibited evidence of midfoot flexibility, producing distinct pressure ridges. You simply cannot hoax a trackway with mid-tarsal foot flexing and planter pressure, and there’s too much data like that. Do you think biologists, trackers and anthropologists are just hippies with no field expertise? You are utterly clueless, these people not only have academic backgrounds but they have respectable studies published. Have you ever actually stopped to google and read the publications Meldrum has under his belt and the scientists he’s bunched with for studying things like the Terra Amata footprint, for example? This is a guy top of his field. You? Someone who got duped running around the woods with Biscardi, so please... save the statements based in nothing but faith because you’re up against data you neither understand nor have the b*lls to read.
So how’s this, show me proof that mid-tarsal breaks are an artefact of the casting process. Because if that’s the case, the scientists who cast the tracks to known hominid sites (details provided in the links above) have got it all wrong too... and then it’s simply you with no facts, no data, not even a scientist to reference against a whole field of anthropology that’s studied hominid footprints for the past 50 years.
NO footprint is impossible to hoax. Furthermore what is seen in the footprint is open to interpretation. Now having the actual leg and foot of whatever left that footprint is irrefutable and that is what you are going to need to prove the existence of Bigfoot.
If no footprint evidence is impossible to hoax... Show me. The burden lies with anyone who makes the claim. You have the data presented up top, debunk it. Your mere faith and ignorant assertions are not an equivalent to repeatable science.
If I was to claim that Bigfoot flew, I would be expected to provide data and substance. What I’ve done is claim Bigfoot exists, and to provide substance to that I’ve shown you the work of an anthropologist to back that up. Forget the leg, we have the impression of an archaic foot not known to exist in modern populations of modern humans. That foot is linked to actual footage of a subject that is widely reported to be “Bigfoot”.
You have the links... show me how it’s open to interpretation. I’ll pop back tomorrow, Einstein.
And stopping short of a classification, the footprint evidence for an unclassified hominid is recognised to the people who aware of this level evidence, and to those who aren’t prohibited to do so. That’s why it’s now peer reviewed. If you don’t like it... Prove the evidence is bunk. You did tell me I was in “real trouble” after all.
Easy. Because the physical evidence is irrefutable, it’s illogical to assume some other biological entity is leaving hominid footprints twice the size of civilised humans around the North America, besides what’s been reported for thousands of years.
Your turn, fraud. Your unqualified opinion doesn’t count.
Feck me, you’re dense. I published two links to two papers yesterday. I didn’t prove the evidence is impossible to hoax; Meldrum did. So guess I’m not in real trouble? You don’t know what the feck you’re talking about, never have, never will.
Please give me another one of those long essays, crying about how this place used to be so much fun and precious to you, ha ha ha!!! I took that away when I finished off the trolls, and destroyed all your best arguments in the process. Your PGF religion = destroyed.
And only one of us in this thread is actually providing substance.
Is that why you ran away like a little bitch and snuck back later to comment, you keep posting the same bullshit and actually call it substance? Ha, well rotted manure is substance I guess.
Poor stuey, battered and torn like a flag of a defeated army. Still he tries to argue his totally invalid point way long after Iktomi soundly trashed him to shreds ! The lad just does not quit . Give it up PS, you have lost so many times over it's becoming a running joke like your well rotted manure quip cheers
Well I came back and you’ve got (drum roll)... nothing. Imagine my shock? Like I said, your unqualified, uneducated opinion doesn’t count. You have no integrity to trump scientific data based on your opinion and religious-like faith alone. After destroying your heroes and driving away many trolls, I don’t even have the ego to expect that my opinion alone to wash. That’s why I reference things.
Nothing is what you get when nothing is proven and whether you like it or not you have proven nothing. Scientific data ,not. Nothing but stories and opinion..a big nothing.
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from...
Rumors abound on whether or not Finding Bigfoot will continue, but hopeful news is on the horizon. Snake Oil Productions, the production company responsible for Finding Bigfoot, is seeking a permit for filming in the Monterey, Virginia area. Monterey lies between the Monongahela and George Washington National Forests. Definitely a good place to look for bigfoot. We can only speculate if this means Finding Bigfoot has been signed on for additional seasons, or if perhaps a new bigfoot show is in the works. We'll keep you updated on any further announcements for sure.
The only thing paranormal about bigfoot is Iktomi's "magical thinking" regarding the subject.
ReplyDeleteGot monkey suit ? didn't think so
DeleteYou're just an old wet fart staining your knickers badly . Don't even know why you visit this blog ? must be because you are bored out of your mind. Not to fret boyo, that's what blow up dolls were made for
cheers
Joe
'Gug', knickers, 'Gug', boyos, 'Gug' ,so good
DeleteCheers
'Gug', big turds too,'Gug', so good
Joe
Joe = gug gug gug ooops I slipped on my monkey suit gug gug
Delete^ can't handle bigfoot being real, can't produce the magic monkey suit, can't reproduce the PGF , can't think of saying anthing else than "gug, gug"
DeleteSchooled once again boyo !
cheers
Joe
ED is a trouble that can be treated and you need it friend.
Deletehttp://karvadisu.website/wp-includes/sodium_compat/src/Core/Curve25519/t_deviable_collembolan.html
Do not let it spoil your sexual life as we have prepared something brand new for you. Revolutionary drug that already helped more than 98% of men all across the globe!
Get advantage of our special sale and use your personal discount coupon: c8wghlzp to save up to 50% on your next purchase. Get more information about the drug and our sale on our web-site.
'Gug', ' footers' are real, 'Gug', so good
DeleteCheers
Joe
'Gug', only have lame Patterson film,'Gug'. Everyone has HD phone cameras and no Bigfoot, 'Gug', so sad, weep weepy weep, 'Gug', solace in 'footers','Gug', so good
DeleteCheers
Joe
I can't believe i'm even thinking of debating with nutters who can only say "gug, gug " and some idiot selling viagra !
DeleteSod off the lot of you !
cheers
Joe
I thought you were saying gug and eating turds and stuff. You are Joe?
DeleteParanormal is the last refuge for Bigfoot belief.
ReplyDeleteThe boogeyman doesn’t leave tracks.
Deletehttps://www.scientificexploration.org/docs/18/jse_18_1_meldrum.pdf
https://www.scientificexploration.org/docs/30/jse_30_3_Meldrum.pdf
Let me know if you need help with the big words.
"The boogeyman doesn’t leave tracks."
DeleteBut humans do, so do animals, as well as natural depressions and outright hoaxers all which can be mistaken for actual Bigfoot tracks. If Meldrum is your main source for scientific expertise than you are in real trouble. Here's a word for you ..... DNA, come talk to me when you actually have some of a Sasquatch.
'Gug'
DeleteHey PS, you do realise that most people reading this would have the b*lls to actually open the links I’ve provided, and be able to read that all your excuses are utterly debunked?
DeleteSpoiler alert... hoaxers would literally require a time machine to know about mid-tarsal breaks before the scientific community did.
I think it’s slightly rich that you can suggest my source lacks integrity when you haven’t even got the guts or intelligence to read it. Oh and the DNA was done ages ago; it’s human... sorry you didn’t get anything for the time you wasted looking in the woods for a bipedal gorilla. But that’s your shortcoming, so man up and take responsibility for that.
Why on earth would I open those links again when you have used them over and over trying to prove your case? Of course that was printed in the completely biased Journal of Scientific Exploration which is only endorsed by the few fellow believers. Mid-tarsal breaks can simply be an artifact of the casting process open to interpretation interpretation so that's not an open and shut case. So you say the DNA is human. Well, I agree with you......all too human. I guess we are all Sasquatches eh?
DeleteYou’ve never opened those links because you’re a fraud. You like to spout off around here like you know what you’re talking but truth is you’re just lonely. If you had read the papers then you’ll know the complex nature of which trackways have been left are way to complicated to hoax. For example, several footprints and even a trackway Meldrum studied in the Walla Walla in 1996, clearly exhibited evidence of midfoot flexibility, producing distinct pressure ridges. You simply cannot hoax a trackway with mid-tarsal foot flexing and planter pressure, and there’s too much data like that. Do you think biologists, trackers and anthropologists are just hippies with no field expertise? You are utterly clueless, these people not only have academic backgrounds but they have respectable studies published. Have you ever actually stopped to google and read the publications Meldrum has under his belt and the scientists he’s bunched with for studying things like the Terra Amata footprint, for example? This is a guy top of his field. You? Someone who got duped running around the woods with Biscardi, so please... save the statements based in nothing but faith because you’re up against data you neither understand nor have the b*lls to read.
DeleteSo how’s this, show me proof that mid-tarsal breaks are an artefact of the casting process. Because if that’s the case, the scientists who cast the tracks to known hominid sites (details provided in the links above) have got it all wrong too... and then it’s simply you with no facts, no data, not even a scientist to reference against a whole field of anthropology that’s studied hominid footprints for the past 50 years.
'Gug' all my links prove gay porn exists. Open them to see the b*lls,'Gug'
DeleteF’n schooled.
DeleteLaters lonely boy.
Here we go PS. Scans of the ten original casts made by Bob Titmus nine days after the filming at the Patterson-Gimlin film site in 1967;
Deletehttps://capeia-usercontent.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/2017/10/1508434029_39_3605f.jpg
And the footprints from the Laetoli site in Tanzania, dated to the Plio-Pleistocene and famous for its hominin footprints, excavated by 1978;
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/27/Laetoli_footprints.png/220px-Laetoli_footprints.png
'Gug', plaster casts of all the big johnsons, 'Gug'. All the mid arsehole breaks, 'Gug' proof,proof
DeleteStick to your pareidolia and Finding Bigfoot now, alci boy. That’s your level.
Delete(Creased)
'Gug', I'll stick to jousting at windmills and gay porn,'Gug'. Won't anyone listen to me, 'Gug'?
DeleteIkotmi schools PS and all he can reply with is "gug, gug, gay porn"
DeleteMATT, please ban PS from this site ASAP ! He is a blight on this blog !
cheers
Joe
The well rotted manure brothers ha ha ha
DeleteJokeTomi always ends up with egg all over his face --- every time --- does he never learn anything?
Deletewhat a loser he is
haha haha hahahahaha
NO footprint is impossible to hoax. Furthermore what is seen in the footprint is open to interpretation. Now having the actual leg and foot of whatever left that footprint is irrefutable and that is what you are going to need to prove the existence of Bigfoot.
DeleteIf no footprint evidence is impossible to hoax... Show me. The burden lies with anyone who makes the claim. You have the data presented up top, debunk it. Your mere faith and ignorant assertions are not an equivalent to repeatable science.
DeleteIf I was to claim that Bigfoot flew, I would be expected to provide data and substance. What I’ve done is claim Bigfoot exists, and to provide substance to that I’ve shown you the work of an anthropologist to back that up. Forget the leg, we have the impression of an archaic foot not known to exist in modern populations of modern humans. That foot is linked to actual footage of a subject that is widely reported to be “Bigfoot”.
You have the links... show me how it’s open to interpretation. I’ll pop back tomorrow, Einstein.
Iktomi if there was undeniable proof bigfoot would be recognized.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteAnd stopping short of a classification, the footprint evidence for an unclassified hominid is recognised to the people who aware of this level evidence, and to those who aren’t prohibited to do so. That’s why it’s now peer reviewed. If you don’t like it... Prove the evidence is bunk. You did tell me I was in “real trouble” after all.
Delete(Creased)
Ok, it's bunk. Now you prove it's bigfoot. Go ahead
DeleteEasy. Because the physical evidence is irrefutable, it’s illogical to assume some other biological entity is leaving hominid footprints twice the size of civilised humans around the North America, besides what’s been reported for thousands of years.
DeleteYour turn, fraud. Your unqualified opinion doesn’t count.
Speaking of frauds and unqualified opinions, so it's because you say so? I win again loser, bye until you prove it.
DeleteJokeTomi always ends up with egg all over his face --- every time --- does he never learn anything?
Deletewhat a loser he is
haha haha hahahahaha
Feck me, you’re dense. I published two links to two papers yesterday. I didn’t prove the evidence is impossible to hoax; Meldrum did. So guess I’m not in real trouble? You don’t know what the feck you’re talking about, never have, never will.
DeleteLaters alci.
I know you've failed, laters loser
DeleteFailed?
DeletePlease give me another one of those long essays, crying about how this place used to be so much fun and precious to you, ha ha ha!!! I took that away when I finished off the trolls, and destroyed all your best arguments in the process. Your PGF religion = destroyed.
And only one of us in this thread is actually providing substance.
: )
See you tomorrow!
Is that why you ran away like a little bitch and snuck back later to comment, you keep posting the same bullshit and actually call it substance? Ha, well rotted manure is substance I guess.
DeletePoor stuey, battered and torn like a flag of a defeated army. Still he tries to argue his totally invalid point way long after Iktomi soundly trashed him to shreds ! The lad just does not quit . Give it up PS, you have lost so many times over it's becoming a running joke like your well rotted manure quip
Deletecheers
Joe
Well I came back and you’ve got (drum roll)... nothing. Imagine my shock? Like I said, your unqualified, uneducated opinion doesn’t count. You have no integrity to trump scientific data based on your opinion and religious-like faith alone. After destroying your heroes and driving away many trolls, I don’t even have the ego to expect that my opinion alone to wash. That’s why I reference things.
DeleteFat old alci loser.
Bye!
Poor stuey, gone down to defeat just like his team Villa does every weekend. Poor old pedo sot. Just another wanker in the wall
Deletecheers
Joe
Nothing is what you get when nothing is proven and whether you like it or not you have proven nothing. Scientific data ,not. Nothing but stories and opinion..a big nothing.
DeleteProve it alci!
DeleteOne person is referencing science... the other seems to be praying a lot.
I’ll check again tomorrow.
Wow! Still no substance! Not even a reference? This isn’t a good look pal! How many days on the bounce?
DeleteDoes Jerry Cline have opposable thumbs?
ReplyDeleteIf so he is likely a shaved hybrid. Unce Twit is his second cousin which makes Zana his mother.