Bigfoot Eats Lead!
From World Bigfoot Radio comes a story not suitable for children. A couple of night fisherman were jumped by an angry bigfoot, but they weren't going out as victims.
Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from...
If'n you don't kill bigfoot he's a gonna kill you
ReplyDeletehttps://www.phantomsandmonsters.com/2018/12/texas-hill-country-bigfoot.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed:+PhantomsAndMonstersAPersonalJourney+(Phantoms+and+Monsters)
ReplyDeletexx
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/in-pictures-46646350
Deletexx
I live in the Hill Country PIB. Thanks for the posts, really enjoyed reading them!
DeleteMike Brookreson’s ranch was in the Texas Hillcountry. And David Claerr (author of Sasquatch Tool Use) did research on Mike’s ranch too... And some of those photos are very similar to what Mike got???
DeleteVery interesting...
I’m gonna try and contact him and see if he knows anything.
Hi Chick Chick.Glad you liked them.Is that far from Mike Brookreson? xx
DeleteHi Iktomi..you must have been reading my mind lol xx
DeleteGreetings all, I’ve decided to declare a moratorium on making any further comments that humiliate you freaks during this long Christmas weekend. Heck, even you morons deserve a few days of enjoyment during the holiday!
DeleteAnyway, I’ll be busy volunteering at the local homesless shelter and soup kitchen to help poor transients who need food and shelter. Perhaps I’ll see some of you bums there waiting in line to get in? Ha ha ha!
Merry Christmas!
Someone warn the homeless they don't deserve it.
DeleteHAAA!!!
DeleteDoes anyone remember the last time contradictions, logical fallacies and pretending to not believe in Bigfoot humiliated anyone?
THOSE ARE MIKE’S PICS AND RESEARCH SITE!!!!!!!!!!!
DeleteSomeone’s not asked for his permission to use them!!
DeleteI wondered if it was Mikes place.Does he know?He's got some good photos xx
DeleteWell I’ve contacted him and he got straight back to me, doesn’t seem happy. He’s got the link so I’m hoping he chases it up. What type of cheeky bugger would do that?
Delete... actually, we know by this blog’s comment sections that there’s plenty of obsessed nutters out there.
DeleteWhat kind of disbarred meth addicted “cheeky bugger” would destroy the life of an innocent teenage girl and not lose any sleep over it? Call me crazy, but that seems like a more important question.
DeleteWow, I thought it was an article on his area because I recognized the pic with that big black one straight off!
DeletePIB, I don't know where he lives but I'm guessing a couple hours away from me.
What's sad and tragic is that you sickos throw around the word "pedo" like it's some funny way to jab people in your little role playing fantasy -- when one of your best friends is a documented child abuser and you choose to ignore it.
DeleteMakes you wonder who's really behind the sock puppet rape comments, doesn't it?
=-(
Not really, we know its you12:29. And we'll never let you forget it.
DeleteMaybe Danny can step in now and give input as to the reasons why Stus pedo rape comments were innocent and appropriate!
DeleteThe scary thing is that at least Brookreson was man enough to put his real name on here. Anyone with half a brain (which excludes most of you) can do a five minute Google search on him and easily find out what a detestable human being he is.
DeleteJust imagine what kind of disgusting and criminal behavior the rest of you social degenerates are hiding behind your fantasy role playing identities.
I shudder to think!
Nice try at defelction Pedo Danny stu. Fact is you've been busted by Iktomi and now you are pulling out all the stops to try and convince everyone you are someone else. Poor pathetic Fullham supporter you are Danny stu, gig is up bro
DeleteJoe
Didn’t take Danny long to come back after his “Merry Xmas”, did it? Ha ha ha!! Just bring up any researcher, or anyone that appears to have not been duped by Biscardi... and look at the RAGE in him man!
DeleteDaniel CampbellThursday, February 19, 2015 at 3:18:00 AM PST
Joe, do you dress up in women's clothes and role play in the mirror at home too?
Danny-PS, don’t you think it’s a little rich you calling anyone else a role player when you’ve been proven, only in the last 24 hours, to have anything up to ten different sockpuppets pretending to not believe in Bigfoot? And two of those sockpuppets you’ve claimed Bigfoot are extraterrestrial.
I remember when Danny threatened to take Mike’s young boy into the woods. Mike went ape and threatened to drive to meet him. Like a little desktop tough guy; Danny crapped it.
What you will find online is NOUT but libel about Mike, nothing that has ever resulted in Mike have charged against him, just allegations and hearsay, probably from some angry person who lost a court case or didn’t get what they want. Losing out on money tends to make people do some pretty horrible things.
Losing out on life makes people do even more terrible things... isn’t that right, Danny-PS?
“Poor pathetic Fullham supporter you are Danny stu, gig is up bro”
DeleteHAAAAAA!!!!!
And for the record... I’m down with anything extraterrestrial.
DeletePeace.
As 12:50 wrote "Just imagine what kind of disgusting and criminal behavior the rest of you social degenerates are hiding behind your fantasy role playing identities.
DeleteI shudder to think!"
YES, we ALL wonder the same about you!!! But, your role-playing and writings on this blog tell us all we need to know about you, hypocrite!
BIOTCH SLAP!!!!!!!!!
Delete:) xx
Delete;-)
DeleteA biotch slap seems appropriate for the prison biotch.
“THWACK!!!”
Delete... Like only Uno can!
;-)
DeletePlease tell Mike we miss him around here, Iktomi.
Merry Christmas all, even the troll(s?)!
Hearsay huh? As your spending entire days poring through old comment sections, why don't you find the one where the piece of sh*t Brookreson came on here himself after the poor girl died because of her drug addiction? He admitted to corrupting her as a minor and cried some fake tears to try to get some sympathy after she died. Pathetic. No wonder he doesn't show his meth pock marked face here anymore!
DeleteWow! Seething jealousy. Not surprising. ^
DeleteBlah, blah, blah, blah, blah... Poor Stuey Pedo is jealous Mike’s work. That’s what happens when you’re dull enough to get duped by the biggest coco the clowns from Florida.
DeleteYeah, I'm jealous of a disbarred child abusing meth addict with pock marks on his face who's essentially unemployable and who lives on his sister's ranch rent free where he pretends to "research" bigfoot. That's sure a lot to be jealous of!
DeleteI suppose one could be jealous of a total loser who was spoiled rotten by his rich family his entire life -- including a father who spent thousands setting him up in his own law office -- only to squander it all on his meth addiction and abuse of teenage girls.
Wow this Danny Campbell and Mike Brookreson sound like some eh ... interesting fellows. Sorry I missed it. I take it they don't post here anymore (at least not under their real names)?
DeleteLook at him RAGE!!! Ha ha ha ha!!! A
DeleteMike is ten of you, PS-Danny boy! Maybe if you were brought up different and did something with your cruddy existence... you’d be less bitter eh?
You couldn’t even get a crappy crypto blog up and running!
Ha ha ha ha!!!
AND YES... I WOULD LIKE TO CLARIFY THAT THE PHOTOGRAPHS IN PUSS’ LINK ABOVE ARE INDEED OWENED BY MIKE BROOKRESON, TAKEN FROM HIS FACEBOOK, OF TEXAS HILLCOUNTRY CRYPTOZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY... AND YOU CAN SEE ALL THAT AND MORE RESEARCH ON THE YOUTUBE CHANNEL WITH THE SAME NAME!!!
DeleteThis is a ridiculous story. He states that he shot the animal 6 times starting from the growin and working up. Completely unrealistic and likely impossible to anyone who has ever hunted. First you would never shoot at the groin as a first defensive shot. Namely because their is little to hit their to cause stopping power. Their are a few arteries but it would be the most impracticle place to shoot the animal to start with. Secondly, their is absolutely no way an animal would stay still long enough for a hunter to fire 5 more rounds working their way up on the body. Any hunter will tell you the same. Their simply is not the reaction time to do that. The shooter would be extremely luck to have fired the first shot, and got on the creature in time for a 2nd shot.
ReplyDeleteNext anyone who talks about how ineffective 22 LR is on big game animals is ignorant. On a many, what any law enforcement officer will tell you is that 22LR often does more damage in the human body than a larger pistol caliber. The reason being that the bullet enters the body and bounces around inside. The same applies to large game. A 22LR will kill any animal walking north america with the proper shot placement. Shoot a grizzly behind the front shoulder with a 22 making sure you miss the shoulder bone, and you will have a dead grizzly.
Next, you have the "foamy" blood he claims he saw. Foamy blood is often indicative of a lung shot, but not always, and any deer hunter will tell you, that an animal can easily live with just one lung. Seeing foamy blood does not mean the animal will die. It is suggestive of a lung shot but that is all.
Then you have his claims that he emptied shot after shot into the head area of this creature. Again, if bigfoot is flesh and blood, then this is hogwash. Buckshot will kill any animal walking north america. From grizzly, to elk, to moose, to bison, etc. Doesn't matter if the hide is thick or if the bone is thick, i can assure you bigfoot do not have muscles, hides, and bones any thicker than a moose or a bison. And even if they did, the buckshot would still penetrate.
So 2 possibilities here. One is that this story is total hogwash. Or 2, bigfoot is not flesh and blood and is impervious to bullets or physical wounds. Which sounds more likely?
This is more of what I would like to see here. Explaining why these bullshit stories just don't add up. I swear someone just sits around and makes these up. Presenting some concrete evidence is one thing but just relating a story (often one that has happened years ago) offers little that is convincing.
DeleteIt’s always extra cringing watching a grown man answering his own comments!
DeleteAnd let’s not pretend like you have the intelligence to understand concrete evidence, nor the integrity to to acknowledge it... You’re just a full time crypto-failure whose ideas about Bigfoot are far wackier (aliens) than anyone simply pointing out how repeatable, and therefore unhoaxable the existing state of physical evidence for Bigfoot is.
You just don't get it Mr. "everyone is Stu" do you? The only above comment I have made is above at 7:03 so your comment about a man answering his own comments is dead wrong (as are so many of your statements). I have no idea what your talking about with "crypto-failure"??? and aliens (which sounds as ridiculous as the other theories) but you've got the wrong guy.
DeleteSo you ridicule the post above at 10:12 which sounds perfectly reasonable and logical to me? So which possibility do you support? Remember there are only two.
Listen PS... You might have pretty low standards of what constitutes ridicule (based on your own efforts trying the same with others), or even be a little sensitive after the last couple of days, but I’ve hardly ridiculed the comment above. I in fact found it to be an ok read... You on the other hand need to grow a pair.
DeleteYou dig PS?
(sigh) I'm not this "Stu" guy Mr. "everyone is Stu" - oh well (rolls eyes) - you'll never get it.
DeleteYes it was a reasonable comment. So you didn't answer the question - which possibility do you support? The sane answer is the story is a hoax. Surely you can agree to at least that much. You dig?
I’ll agree it’s an interesting comment... I didn’t even listen to the topic of this article. And this is the thing... Where your level is obsessing about pop culture, I’m getting up to scratch with the science of this subject. It’s how I end up dishing out nice slices of sugary meltdown.
DeleteInteresting??? That's the best you will offer? Why is it so hard to admit just one of these stories we read here is total bullshit. The comment above absolutely proves it. There's no shame in saying some of the stories here don't hold water even if you are all in on Bigfoot.
DeleteI really don't care if you continue to call me "Stu" Mr. everyone is Stu" - it's actually now amusing to me but your obsession with this guy (and maybe him with you) is pretty strange. How can you even comment on a story if you haven't heard it? Most of these stories can be easily dismissed if you just use common sense. Your certainly not helping your cause if you continue to accept every story unconditionally.
Listen PS... You might have your hand down your shorts ready for someone to approve your comment at 10:12... but I don’t hunt, know very little about hunting, and there could be holes in that for all I know, however seemingly unlikely. Plus, I don’t dance for psychos.
DeleteAnd if you didn’t notice... I didn’t comment on the story, Einstein. I have no opinion of the story, I don’t care... maybe you should try and debate what I do endorse and what ultimately helps my “cause” far more than any pop cultures; the evidence.
Or is that a little above you, PS?
(Silly question)
Oh good God I didn't write that post. How many times do I have to tell you I'm not St......oh wait... you got me - I AM Stu. I keep forgetting that Mr. "everyone is Stu". You are a master sleuth! You cracked my cover.
DeleteIt's quite clear to me now you accept every story about Bigfoot as evidence...even if you don't even read the story. So you endorse evidence.... that the far majority of the world doesn't accept. Gee, I'm impressed.
Ha ha ha!!
DeleteYou keep at it, you super “sceptic” you... when you can’t for the life of you come to grips with the evidence, your safe space of putting words in people’s mouths about what stories they believe sure does work alright... ... ... if you’re among ten year olds!!
You see, any notion that the world’s scientific majority doesn’t accept the evidence for Bigfoot, is riddled with logical fallacies. You cannot even vouch for the amount of the world’s scientists are even aware of Meldrum’s peer reviewed work... And as far as I’m aware, the only scientists who have looked at it endorse it.
So let’s not pretend like you’re able to speak on behalf of the scientific majority, PS, you’re not remotely qualified... Nor do you have enough respect around here for your opinion to stick.
: p
Someone is coo coo for cocoa puffs^
Delete^Dirty little coward
DeleteThere are different types. There is a real physical bigfoot then there are the "others" that pose as nd, dm and aliens to name a few.
ReplyDeleteI meant bigfoot, dogman, aliens, etc.
ReplyDeletewe knew what you meant bud
Delete