This Is Why Todd Standing Lost His Bigfoot Case
Bigfoot showman Todd Standing tried to get a court in Canada to legally recognize bigfoot. As we know it failed miserably, but not why you might be thinking.
First, Standing argued that the province’s failure to give Bigfoot protected status violated his right to free expression (Standing’s, not Bigfoot’s), because he is “unable to fully impart information and ideas as to specific locations where sasquatch sightings occur” for fear that someone will go kill one. The court found, however, that keeping this secret would be Standing’s decision, not something mandated by the government.
Second, Standing argued that BC’s inaction on the matter was somehow subjecting him to “cruel and unusual punishment,” though it isn’t clear from the opinion what he was talking about. In any event, the court found that since BC wasn’t doing anything to Standing at all, it certainly wasn’t “punishing” him, much less in a cruel or unusual manner.
Third, Standing raised an argument also made in the California case, namely that ignoring his Bigfoot pleas was discrimination on the basis of “political or other belief.” Again, the court held this failed because Standing hadn’t alleged that BC was doing anything to him, much less discriminating in some way between “those who believe in the sasquatch [and] those who do not.”
For the full article, click here.
Hey old man !
ReplyDeleteIf Todd had just enjoyed Delicious chewy sphincter like me he'd be a winner, mmmmm sphincter
ReplyDeleteWasn't Standing supposed to present evidence beyond a doubt about the existence of bigfoot, dna evidence if I remember. I don't think a court would accept a Netflix movie as evidence. I also am apalled at Iktomi and his sphincter eating antics, Shawn should ban him for that
ReplyDeleteIktomi will school you all because of his taste for sphincter, he will show you how to eat fresh sphincter
ReplyDeleteSo? Dumb article. Everyone knows you dont prove a new species by suing a government entity. This was a media stunt to draw attention to him self as he always does.
ReplyDeleteThe court wouldn't let him provide evidence of chewy Delicious sphincter
DeleteYou can't toss the salads of underage lads in a court of law
DeleteJoe
A court of law has joined science in rejecting the existence of bigfoot, this is a dark place for me, here by the sphincter I so love to eat, fresh sphincter saw. I come here and talk a lot of crap and no one believes me because my breath smells like Delicious fresh sphincter so people assume I'm full of shit. Joe and I live in another country and the arabs make us eat their fresh sphincter, we don't have a life beyond trolling for underage lads on American bigfoot sites and chewing on fresh Delicious sphincter. So what if bigfoot is make believe, I need the escapism of fantastical animals to blur my wretched reality, Joe is just actually a sick old pedo so that's his only reason, that and he admits to trolling for underage lads. Throw us a bone America, we'll gladly chew it, 'Gug',weep weepy weep 'Gug',weep
ReplyDeleteSorry Pedo Stu! I know your understanding of the legal system is as poor as it is with science, but nothing got as far as confirming Standing’s alleged evidence.
DeleteHey everyone, wanna make Pedo Stu lose his **** and start ranting for two days on end? Ask him the first bit of substance about his ideas on “science rejecting evidence” or, “make believe and escapism”. You get comment sections, sorry... I mean... coping mechanisms like this ^
Ha ha ha ha ha!!!
So what you're saying is that science rejects your evidence?
DeleteScience doesn’t think. It’s a tool, and used to test evidence to which stands up. Don’t like it... do summin about it
DeleteSo what you're saying is that since science doesn't recognize bigfoot exists it is safe to say that the evidence tested doesn't stand up so what can you do about that except cry?
DeleteI’m still waiting on at least one mainstream scientist from you, with respect to the peer reviewed evidence.
DeleteDon’t you get bored looking the idiot, PS?
So what you're saying is since you're so smart you're going to show everyone the scientifically recognized bigfoot? Are you sure that's something you can pull out of your ass?
DeleteSo what you're saying is that you're going to show everyone that you're not full of shit and try to deflect with bullshit, that you're going to show scientifically recognized bigfoot, is that what you're saying?
DeleteSo what you're saying is that since what you say is true you should have no problem providing that and that the onus is on you?
DeleteYep!
Deletehttps://i.cbc.ca/1.4362553.1508441707!/fileImage/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/16x9_780/bigfoot-film-patterson-gimlin.jpg
Science doesn’t recognise things or chooses like a freethinking entity. It’s a tool that’s used to test evidence. And the physical evidence left behind by the subject in the link up top, cannot be faked. That’s without even studying the subject’s biological tissue, etc.
If you don’t like it? Hurry up and find one of your mainstream scientists to debunk it. You asked, I delivered... now that’s ya burden.
AnonymousWednesday, September 19, 2018 at 11:57:00 AM PDT
Delete@11:00. Who said anything about bigfoot not existing? I believe that there is something to the bigfoot mystery and that sasquatches may actually exist.
^ and based on what, Pedo Stu? If every person reporting Bigfoot is lying, and every piece of evidence is bunk... what are you basing your belief on?
DeleteI don’t think you know what the feck you’re talking about do you?
So what you're saying is you can't?
DeleteSo what you're saying is that at this point in the human existence we have no scientifically recognized bigfoot and really probably never will?
DeleteYou have scientifically recognised physical evidence, peer reviewed, of something that has the exact same anatomy, and the exact same description as what Bigfoot has been reported to be for hundreds of years.
DeleteNow find me that dammed mainstream scientist PS!!
So what you're saying is that you have scientifically recognized evidence of? What? What scientifically recognized species did you say it was?
Delete(Cringe)
DeleteYou requested evidence, Pedo Stu. You got it. If you want classification then you’ll have to wait until someone uses that evidence for a field study.
I’m still not reading any mainstream scientists. Could it be that none who have allegedly debunked this evidence exist? How ironic... you’re pushing a myth that Bigfoot doesn’t exist, by a scientific authority that doesn’t exist.
Silly little Pedo!
So what you're saying is that you don't even know what it's evidence of, you don't do you? You haven't seen what left that evidence have you? Are you just assuming that it's bigfoot? Who are you to call people silly, or pedo considering you pal around with Joe who was caught out here trolling for underage lads, when in fact you just assume evidence is from a giant Hairy monster? Perhaps a psychiatrist would have a field day with one so delusional or is it just plain foolish?
DeleteIf there’s footage of a Bigfoot, if there’s evidence left behind of that Bigfoot... and both the footage and the physical evidence match that which has been reported and documented for hundreds of years... it’s safe to say it’s a Bigfoot, Pedo Stu.
DeleteNobody has been caught out doing anything, other than you who was reported to the US authorities. You’re getting angrier Pedo Stu... maybe some more of, “so what you’re saying is” will help?
So what you're saying is that bigfoot is a scientifically recognized species, wouldn't it have to be by your logic?
DeleteSo what you're saying is that you're getting angrier because you can't prove bigfoot even though pictures and footprints and stories should be scientifically accepted?
DeleteThe physical evidence for something with the exact feet as “Bigfoot” is scientifically recognised. Now that might be an issue if someone could point to me what other primate, twice the size of us is leaving it’s sign everywhere. You don’t classify a species, unless you can take DNA from it. This is child’s level field biological... oops! Don’t get excited PS.
DeleteI don’t need any more proof than what’s available, PS. If something doesn’t exist, it doesn’t leave decades of documented physical evidence that gets peer reviewed. If the scientific stalemate is that mainstream scientists won’t, can’t use that evidence for a study... then I’m fine with that. Especially since I can rub your wrinkly old face in it.
We have to take a moment here to assure everyone that underage people do not come to this site, we're not even sure that actual people come to this site, we would like to apologize to everyone for being such massive pussies that we've let third world urchins like Iktomi and Joe run wild and delusional over what was actually once a profit turning site. A man like Standing actually seems to have character and integrity when you compare him to us.So sorry but be sure to come back and enjoy the shit show it's all we have left
ReplyDeleteOh please go sod off ! The whole lot of you can ! Filthy disgusting troll aka Pedo stu Savile , it's only him and his filth that has degraded this site and it's up to sensible bigfoot devotees like me and iktomi to take this type of dirty trash out !
Deletecheers
Joe
You just go troll underage lads and toss their salad you pedo freak
Delete