Swamp Dweller presents ten scary and true stories about state parks. You might want to think twice before the next time you go camping with the family.
According to a certain dipsh*t, a dishonest quack (aka a “pioneering plastic surgeon”) used his “expert” knowledge to declare that Patty actually had a butt crack.
But the same certain dipsh*t claims that a butt crack is “clearly visible” in the PGF film — so why in the flying f*ck was an expert opinion ever needed at all? I guess it doesn’t matter when you’re pulling crap out of your ass!
Shut your noise Pedo stu Savile ! it does have a butt crack but you need to watch the high def version of the film to see it. The version that is widely shown is so degraded from numerous transfers that it's hard to see . Does that answer your question wanker ? Carry on tosser, you have a think for butt cracks and you can't keep your nose out of them cheers
Because Pedo Stu, if you’d bothered to actually read it (which would prevent you looking like a f’n tool 99.% of the time you rehash dead points for the sake of the attention you don’t get at home)... you’d know that Guinn does a lot more on top of something that every bar you can see anyway.
Go back and read it Pedo Stu... when you’ve finished talking to yourself, of course.
You’re on a Bigfoot blog 24/7 publishing the same illogical and embarrassing comments that got destroyed days prior... and everyone else is looking for attention?
You just want someone to talk to, don’t you PS? If you’re that lonely, try treating people with respect and communicate your ideas logically and civilised... and you never know, you might get some respect back.
But your depression is a bit too severe for that. Isn’t it?
So if you need an expert to tell you what’s “clearly visible” in a film, then I honestly wonder what else you need an expert’s help to do. Feed you your Cocoa Puffs in the morning because you’re too lazy to pick up a spoon? Wipe your ass because you’re too obese to reach around your own fat body?
Pedo Stu... You have this habit of repeating yourself when you’re really happy with one of your own comments, not realising it got taken apart not only days ago, but once already on this thread of comments. And then you answer your own comment.
What’s clearly visible is a butt crack. But accompanied with a list of other biological traits pointed out by a plastic surgeon... It basically blows you out of the water ten times over for the sake of one stupid comment.
Well dipsh*t, as you know, anytime anyone has mentioned the absence of Patty’s butt crack over the past few years, you’ve reflexively copied and pasted from that unknown quack’s collection of worthless nonsense to supposedly “prove” the presence of said butt crack.
Based on that pattern of idiocy, I assumed that the butt crack wasn’t clearly visible to you. But now you’ve suddenly changed your mind and declared that a butt crack is “clearly visible.”
Naturally, I’m now wondering why the strip mall quack’s opinion was ever necessary to “prove” the presence of a butt crack? Either you need an “expert” to point out to you what’s “clearly visible” or you never bothered to read the quack’s babbling nonsense in the first place.
Pedo Stu... Can you reference one other instance where someone has claimed Patty doesn’t have a butt crack?
Nobody has ever claimed there is no butt crack, and I’ve never been asked to substantiate the presence of a butt crack. Patty has a butt crack, has always had a butt crack, and not only that, but also has corroborating biological detail that a pioneering plastic surgeon has pointed out. Again... It basically blows you out of the water ten times over for the sake of one stupid comment.
Dr. Guinn is board certified as a Plastic Surgeon by the American Board of Plastic Surgery. He is also a published author in both medical texts and journals, including articles on breast reduction techniques that he personally designed.
Medical School Tufts University - School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts General Surgery Fit*simons Army Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado University of Massachusetts, Worcester, Massachusetts Hand Surgery University of Connecticut, Hartford, Connecticut Plastic Surgery University of Missouri, Kansas City, Missouri Certifications American Board of Plastic Surgery Fellow American College of Surgeons
Someone did just a couple of days ago after others did so about a thousand times previously dipsh*t.
AnonymousSunday, August 19, 2018 at 5:49:00 PM PDT
Why does "Patty" not have a butt crack? That makes it seem fake.
Don’t worry, I won’t rub your face in it any further. You’ve suffered enough for one day. Now get some sleep so you’re rested up for your next beat down tomorrow!
No Pedo Stu... Is this where you beat off to me stating the obvious about having that exchange with you a couple of days ago? You’re a mess boyo. And for all these alleged “thousand times”, you can’t reference one. What an abject failure you are. Maybe you can make up other scenarios to help with your Bigfoot 100 Hoaxing Club?
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from...
Rumors abound on whether or not Finding Bigfoot will continue, but hopeful news is on the horizon. Snake Oil Productions, the production company responsible for Finding Bigfoot, is seeking a permit for filming in the Monterey, Virginia area. Monterey lies between the Monongahela and George Washington National Forests. Definitely a good place to look for bigfoot. We can only speculate if this means Finding Bigfoot has been signed on for additional seasons, or if perhaps a new bigfoot show is in the works. We'll keep you updated on any further announcements for sure.
Editor's Note: This is a guest post by Suzie M., a sasquatch enthusiast. Crypto-linguists believe that the species known Bigfoot/Sasquatch/Yeti/Yowie ect speak and understand a complex language, which by all accounts seems to stem from Asia. When one listens to it there is definitely a sense of it being Chinese or Japanese. It is a very odd mix of sounds, clicks and what could be actual words. This is the reason some experts are looking into the Asian dialect theory, some have said it could be a lost dialect, which was carried from Asia by the Bigfoot species that colonised America.
why doesn’t patty have a butt crack?
ReplyDeleteAccording to a certain dipsh*t, a dishonest quack (aka a “pioneering plastic surgeon”) used his “expert” knowledge to declare that Patty actually had a butt crack.
DeleteBut the same certain dipsh*t claims that a butt crack is “clearly visible” in the PGF film — so why in the flying f*ck was an expert opinion ever needed at all? I guess it doesn’t matter when you’re pulling crap out of your ass!
Ha ha ha!
Shut your noise Pedo stu Savile !
Deleteit does have a butt crack but you need to watch the high def version of the film to see it. The version that is widely shown is so degraded from numerous transfers that it's hard to see . Does that answer your question wanker ?
Carry on tosser, you have a think for butt cracks and you can't keep your nose out of them
cheers
Joe
Because Pedo Stu, if you’d bothered to actually read it (which would prevent you looking like a f’n tool 99.% of the time you rehash dead points for the sake of the attention you don’t get at home)... you’d know that Guinn does a lot more on top of something that every bar you can see anyway.
DeleteGo back and read it Pedo Stu... when you’ve finished talking to yourself, of course.
Keep shunning the skunks, see how they run for attention?
DeleteYou’re on a Bigfoot blog 24/7 publishing the same illogical and embarrassing comments that got destroyed days prior... and everyone else is looking for attention?
DeleteYou just want someone to talk to, don’t you PS? If you’re that lonely, try treating people with respect and communicate your ideas logically and civilised... and you never know, you might get some respect back.
But your depression is a bit too severe for that. Isn’t it?
So if you need an expert to tell you what’s “clearly visible” in a film, then I honestly wonder what else you need an expert’s help to do. Feed you your Cocoa Puffs in the morning because you’re too lazy to pick up a spoon? Wipe your ass because you’re too obese to reach around your own fat body?
DeleteHa ha ha! Woo hoo!
Ha Stu, ignore the skunk, his desperation is great, he thinks he actually knows anything, sad really
DeletePedo Stu... You have this habit of repeating yourself when you’re really happy with one of your own comments, not realising it got taken apart not only days ago, but once already on this thread of comments. And then you answer your own comment.
DeleteWhat’s clearly visible is a butt crack. But accompanied with a list of other biological traits pointed out by a plastic surgeon... It basically blows you out of the water ten times over for the sake of one stupid comment.
Maybe the penny will drop this time. Silly Pedo.
....
DeleteWell dipsh*t, as you know, anytime anyone has mentioned the absence of Patty’s butt crack over the past few years, you’ve reflexively copied and pasted from that unknown quack’s collection of worthless nonsense to supposedly “prove” the presence of said butt crack.
DeleteBased on that pattern of idiocy, I assumed that the butt crack wasn’t clearly visible to you. But now you’ve suddenly changed your mind and declared that a butt crack is “clearly visible.”
Naturally, I’m now wondering why the strip mall quack’s opinion was ever necessary to “prove” the presence of a butt crack? Either you need an “expert” to point out to you what’s “clearly visible” or you never bothered to read the quack’s babbling nonsense in the first place.
Which is it dipsh*t?
Ha ha ha!
Pedo Stu... Can you reference one other instance where someone has claimed Patty doesn’t have a butt crack?
DeleteNobody has ever claimed there is no butt crack, and I’ve never been asked to substantiate the presence of a butt crack. Patty has a butt crack, has always had a butt crack, and not only that, but also has corroborating biological detail that a pioneering plastic surgeon has pointed out. Again... It basically blows you out of the water ten times over for the sake of one stupid comment.
Dr. Guinn is board certified as a Plastic Surgeon by the American Board of Plastic Surgery. He is also a published author in both medical texts and journals, including articles on breast reduction techniques that he personally designed.
Medical School
Tufts University - School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
General Surgery
Fit*simons Army Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado
University of Massachusetts, Worcester, Massachusetts
Hand Surgery
University of Connecticut, Hartford, Connecticut
Plastic Surgery
University of Missouri, Kansas City, Missouri
Certifications
American Board of Plastic Surgery
Fellow American College of Surgeons
Unlucky, Pedo Stu.
Someone did just a couple of days ago after others did so about a thousand times previously dipsh*t.
DeleteAnonymousSunday, August 19, 2018 at 5:49:00 PM PDT
Why does "Patty" not have a butt crack? That makes it seem fake.
Don’t worry, I won’t rub your face in it any further. You’ve suffered enough for one day. Now get some sleep so you’re rested up for your next beat down tomorrow!
Ha ha ha!
No Pedo Stu... Is this where you beat off to me stating the obvious about having that exchange with you a couple of days ago? You’re a mess boyo. And for all these alleged “thousand times”, you can’t reference one. What an abject failure you are. Maybe you can make up other scenarios to help with your Bigfoot 100 Hoaxing Club?
DeleteShun the skunks ^
DeleteBeat the pedos
Delete