Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from...
Wow - Meldrum has hit the big time presenting in the basement of a church. Seems appropriate though since Bigfoot believers rely on faith.
ReplyDeleteCue nuttytomi standard reply in 3...2...1...
Erm...no, 60 years of cross dressing, wife swapping queer reviewed cultural misappropriations proves snatchsquatch is real.
DeleteI would have throught that would have appealed to you since you’re such a devout Christian, Stuey? Advocates don’t have room for mere faith, since they have repeatable scientific evidence to be convinced by via the scientific method being applied to the trace evidence for these hominins.
DeleteStating evidence is debunked because it’s debunked is circular reasoning; a logical fallacy. Calling something pseudoscientific without debunking it’s core data, is pseudoscientific. Not attending your burden of debunking the evidence and simply offering insults... is ad hominem. And referring to something that had repeatable scientific evidence as faith-based, with nothing but a conspiracy theory; is perversely hypocritical.
Bigfoot does exist, in the minds of those who choose to believe. Some believe based on faith and some choose to believe the evidence presented. Bigfoot isn't actual, however. Bigfoot believers will never produce a living version of one of the 10,000 monsters they believe in.
DeleteIf “Bigfoot doesn’t exist”, then there is a creature running around with the exact same anatomy; large morphologically archaic feet twice the size of average human feet. There is no way to dispute the evidence for this coincidence, since the chain of custody as well as repeatable data within is impossible to hoax. What are the chances of that, huh?
Delete“Now here is the remarkable aspect to all this. Although the Titmus cast was gotten in 1967, to my knowledge only a single screened black and white photo of it, depicted among a number of other casts in Titmus’ growing collection, was ever published, and that initially in 1973 (Green 1973:32). The first replica and analysis of that cast was published by me in 1999, after Titmus’ death. A photo of the footprint itself, depicted in Figure 4, taken by Lyle Laverty, was published in 1978 (Green 1978:122), but no previous investigator had identified or drawn attention to the midfoot pressure ridge, let alone interpreted or discussed its significance for sasquatch foot function. Mr. Yuan had discovered and cast his footprint pair in 1995, with no knowledge of the North American sasquatch phenomenon, let alone details of alleged footprints. The Mill Creek cast was documented in 1991. To these could be added the tracks I cast near Walla Walla in February 1996 (Meldrum 2004a). How could these independent examples, separated by nearly three decades and half-a-world apart coincidently share these sound and significant subtleties of anatomy and functional morphology? Simply a convergent happenstance of unrelated hoaxed footprints? I think not.”
- Jeff Meldrum
A body would be the fruits of using the readily available physical evidence in a consorted and appropriately funded professional study. And that hasn’t happened yet. And the years that apparently roll by without “proof”, but ten times the evidence the Bili Ape had does, it simply means there’s no body YET. To draw conclusion that Bigfoot does not exist, would be to ignore a plethora of credible data, that’s impossible to be the result of anything other than a real biological entity leaving it. And just like a good little fundie, you’ll proceed to follow your faith over basic scientific principles.
* ”coincidence”
DeleteI get the narrative, ikdummÿ. I get the evidence presented. A living version will never be produced. It would be more believable if the bigfoot narrative were confined to the Pacific northwest. 49 states is severely pushing it. Washington and Vancouver Canada would be enough but the lynch pin was in California so you have to include Oregon. The narrative locales are way too sprawling. Nevada, Arizona, New mexico, Utah, it gets silly.
Delete9:24 is a bloke who goes to sleep every night and rubs the head of the bust of James Randi he keeps by his night table wishing that everything he refuses to believe in will magically stay untrue for just one more day
DeleteMeldrum has a degree BTW, what do you bloody have ?
go back to the ISF !
Pleasant dreams chum
cheers
Joe
Wow "Joe" you really are British. Bloke bloody chum cheers to you.
Delete“Narrative’s” don’t shift your burden, Stuart. For a mere story you should be able to to find one scientifically sound reason not to consider said evidence. Maybe you’re too stupid to fathom the significance of repeatable evidence? You did need a secondary school textbook example on the scientific method after all... And let me get something very clear. I don’t publish these comments in an effort to convince you, I publish them because anyone with a brain is able to read them and deduce on their own the significance of such evidence, you’re important as far as a convenient fool I bounce such information off.
DeleteAnd for 49 States that have documented this hominin, there is three databases of reports that have 60 years of physical evidence to substantiate such.
You are a victim of the evidence. It's just so overwhelming. It's not like you want to believe, the evidence compels you. Mr. Science LOL
DeleteDid you used to live in Ireland?
Will Fraud Standing be there?
ReplyDeleteEven Ikcomments knows that Standing is a charlatan.
"And for 49 States that have documented this hominin, there is three databases of reports that have 60 years of physical evidence to substantiate such."
ReplyDeleteTHIS IS A BOLD FACED LIE! STORIES AREN'T
DONCUMENTATION IKDUMMY!
"I don’t publish these comments in an effort to convince you, I publish them because anyone with a brain is able to read them and deduce on their own the significance of such evidence?"
KING OF STUPIDITY! IKDUMMY, WHAT YOU THINK YOU PUBLISH ARE ALL LIES! YOU DON'T HAVE A CLUE WHAT'S IN THE WOODS, AND YOU ADMIT YOU DON'T RESEARCH, SO WHATEVER DRIVEL YOU PUSH/POST, IS UTTER GARBAGE, LIES!
AND THE DOUCHEBAG MELDRUM HASN'T HAD ANY NEW EVIDENCE, NONE, ZERO, ZILCH, NADA, NOTHING, EVER...HE'S PRESENTING THE SAME SPEECH, WHICH IS TOTAL BS, AND HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THESE CREATURES, NOTHING! HE'S A MAJOR WASTE OF PEIPLE TIME, AND TAKING THE TRUTH IN THE WRONG DIRECTIOM, JUST LIKE YOU IKDUMMY. AND GUESS WHAT YOU BOTH HAVE IN COMMON.....YOU DON'T FIELD RESEARCH! AND THAT'S WHY YOU FALL FOR HOAXES LIKE PATTY, AND STANDING'S FAKE MUPPETS.
DON'T BOTHER RESPONDING, I DON'T READ YOUR UNEDUCATED, TROLL RESPONSES.
IN MAY, NEXT MONTH IKDUMMY, IT WILL BE "ONE YEAR" SINCE I PUT THE CHALLENGE TO YOU TO SHOW ME "JUST ONE: PIC THAT MATCHES ANY OF MY EVIDENCE.....AN I PREDICTED YOU WOULDN'T/COULDN'T DO IT, AND GUESS WHAT.
YOU LOOK SO STUPID!
“DON'T BOTHER RESPONDING, I DON'T READ YOUR UNEDUCATED, TROLL RESPONSES.”
Delete... Really? Because it appears you took the time to read my comments here. Apart from calling everything “lies”, not providing a scrap of substance and not reading my comments properly... I’m not entirely sure if I need to respond with anything much. If they’re lies, prove it. Simple as that.
“STORIES AREN’T DOCUMENTATION...” No, but reports are, as well as the physical evidence. And reality check; whilst you’re struggling to get any content on this blog, Meldrum is having his work published in journals.
Oh, and you can’t replicate pareidolia. You even agreed by not taking up the same challenge.
Got monkey suit?
Hahaha, Ds gets roasted once again. i thought he was retiring ? i will venture to guess there are thousands of lionmen and leopard tree babies yet to be discovered in the local footpath
Deletecheers
Joe
If he moves his research indoors, he will find proof of beings like the bearded wizard in the vinyl flooring. Possibly the large chested nymph in the cupboard door wood grain. Your eyes can really get carried away when you're sitting on the pot. And no doubt he will share his photos of everything.
Delete^ Has jrefs troll disease.
Delete