True stories like “role-players” who don’t appear to have a single bit of coherency in their alleged methods... who have impossibly low numbers to achieve all the activity and evidence around the US, who are in cahoots with PhD’s, who nobody reports seeing, and who dodge loaded weapons all year round. These role-players are even more elusive than the Sasquatch.
lktomi is right! These are TRUE stories that happen in the middle of nowhere. Swamp Dweller would not be clowning around - he only deals with TRUE stories. He is keeping it REAL!
- a pathetic old fool with nothing to live for aside from a defence of a fantasy and a blog site filled with fantasy accounts of his own creation... a laughably and demonstrably sad and lonely old man
Like a “tole-playing empire” who don’t appear to have a single bit of coherency in their alleged methods... who have impossibly low numbers to achieve all the activity and evidence around the US, who are in cahoots with PhD’s, who nobody reports seeing, and who dodge loaded weapons all year round. These role-players are even more elusive than the Sasquatch.
... fantasy. This blog, or rather its comment sections are indeed full of it.
... You’ll notice there’s nothing ambiguous about the three casts that demonstrate consistent morphology. And since there is sufficient evidence for the existence of such a creature, one could empathise rather easily with the someone seeing one.
Sure, I can see how, in your LARP fantasy these footprints back up your belief but in reality they do not fall within the category of scientifically valid evidence.
lktomi likes to tout his "peer reviewed journal" at every opportunity because he thinks it gives Bigfoot some measure of credibility. Here..take a closer look at this "esteemed" journal and judge for yourself:
... And for all your ad hominem, you still couldn’t debunk the paper in question. A journal’s a journal, and an editorial board with PhD’s is an editorial board with PhD’s. The journal Meldrum’s work was published in simply doesn’t prejudice against topics that need to be scientifically scrutinised... much of which it debunks and you should actually be referencing for your little self l-esteem exercise. And since we’re rehashing old dances, here’s what a Nobel Winner has to say about more mainstream journals... "Leading academic journals are distorting the scientific process and represent a "tyranny" that must be broken, according to a Nobel prize winner who has declared a boycott on the publications. Randy Schekman, a US biologist who won the Nobel prize in physiology or medicine this year and receives his prize in Stockholm on Tuesday, said his lab would no longer send research papers to the top-tier journals, Nature, Cell and Science. Schekman said pressure to publish in "luxury" journals encouraged researchers to cut corners and pursue trendy fields of science instead of doing more important work. The problem was exacerbated, he said, by editors who were not active scientists but professionals who favoured studies that were likely to make a splash." https://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/dec/09/nobel-winner-boycott-science-journals
Doesn’t sound very scientific, does it? And then let’s look at this... "Journal Accepts Paper Reading “Get Me Off Your F*****g Mailing List”; https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2014/nov/25/journal-accepts-paper-requesting-removal-from-mailing-list
10:20, when ikdummy first began citing that "journal," I thought that he was either (1) Playing a strange joke on us, (2) Trying to prove that bigfoot does NOT exist, or (3) Attempting some combination of both (1) and (2).
But now it appears that the boob is serious. He might as well cite Mad Magazine as a reputable scientific journal!!! Ha ha ha!
Just let him keep citing it, he's doing our job for us!
Another hilarious fun fact about the "journal" is that it awards something called the Dinsdale Prize every year which is named after a buffoon whose claim to fame is researching ----- wait for it ----- THE LOCH NESS MONSTER!!! Ha ha ha! You go ikdummy!
When you’ve quite finished talking to yourself... You could simply hurry up and debunk it.
Personally, I find the Loch Ness monster a matter worthy of scientific scrutinisation. Even if you don’t believe in it, how are the self-esteem needy like you gonna build any, if questions aren’t asked and things not put to bed?
But like I said... you could just address what’s in the journal, because it’s not like I’m gonna stop rubbing your face in to.
I'm sorry ikdummy, I was just reading an article in the "journal" about ghosts and ectoplasm. I think that the "peer reviewers" were Bill Murray and Dan Akroyd!!!! Who you gonna call??? Ha ha ha ha!!!! Thanks for the laugh!
Oh, and let’s look at one of your sources... “Andrea Ballatore of University of California, Santa Barbara described RationalWiki as a debunking website, finding it to be the most visible debunking website of conspiracy theories in terms of Google and Bing search results, slightly more visible than rense.com and less visible than YouTube or Wikipedia.” ... Ouch! I wonder what they would have to say about your thousands year old, culture hopping conspiracy theory? And since I haven’t actually seen it debunk anything I’m referencing yet, I can’t teslly attest to it’s job all that well either?
“There are several common criticisms of RationalWiki (RW) as a source; It's a wiki - The obvious cautions that apply to using Wikipedia as a source apply to using RationalWiki as a source. Anyone can edit it, check the references, and so on. It's got terrible tone - See the main article on this topic: Tone argument True, RationalWiki has a "snarky" point of view, and sometimes it perhaps it goes a bit overboard. It's biased - “”Basically the material presented is what a slightly left of centre atheist needs to win an internet debate.” — Konkvistador “Good on debunking theism and woo. Horrible on politics. Heavily biased.” — /u/jdkeith
Oh dear... Did you happen to pick up “slightly left of centre atheist“ as well? Doesn’t seem to be your bag Stuey, since you’re a right/alt-right Christian?
Your own anonymous sources state that rational wiki is good for debunking theism and woo — thanks for the further endorsement pal! The only alt-right Christian wacko types I’ve seen here are your buddies Zabo and the flat earther Leon whom you’ve referred to as “brother.”
It does yes... now apply theism and woo to the paper I’ve referenced. And even if I was, I’d be endorsing a source that hasn’t debunked anything to do with Bigfoot, and that has nothing to do with you. In fact, a source that threatens your most widely used as hoc fantasy.
AnonymousThursday, March 31, 2016 at 1:02:00 AM PDT Im a proud racist, thank you very much http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2016/03/bigfoot-eyewitness-reports-from.html?m=0
AnonymousSunday, January 11, 2015 at 6:50:00 PM PST DS, I'm a christian as well, and i respect all people and their opinions. http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2015/01/report-of-day-arkansas-man-witnessed.html?m=0
That’s all I read was two wiki links... from someone who doesn’t understand the peer review process, and who only has a conspiracy theory against scientific data.
Yeah, we all know how anonymous comments that are exactly tailored to support your stupid arguments conveniently pop up for you to copy and paste.
And I might add that while you were kissing the asses of admitted racists like Zabo and Leon, I was beating the crap out of them and their racist ideas. Thanks to me, neither of those ugly hate mongers are here anymore. You’re welcome! Ha ha ha!
I’ve categorically proven, time and time and time again, with even more comments I could publish in the very next comment if I wished... that you have published everything I’ve sourced.
There is not evidence either of those two were racist, and you’re probably the biggest and most proud racist I’ve ever come across on my entire time on the entire internet.
Hey Harriet did you see the reports of blacks looting homes, and strong arm robbery in Houston yesterday? Oh no that's not good for you anti racists(code word for anti-White)propaganda machine! My,my how the mighty have fallen! Just like those old confederacy statues?
That’s EXACTLY your point of view on the matter. If Zabo would have taken the total opposite of that stance, you would have jumped all over it just to try and drive him away. You’re a racist hypocrite. And Zabo has never published outright ethnic slurs or that he’s a proud racist. You have.
ZaboSunday, August 27, 2017 at 3:22:00 AM PDT And let's go back to your racist claim. You are right (almost) I'm a race REALIST! And for that I will never apologize for. Besides my views are correct as the way I see em! So too bad your little racist word just doesn't make a difference to me. Boo-Hoo you're a meanie racist whaha,whaha, whaaa. Go tell Mommy.
Instead of arguing with me, you should be down on your hands and knees, thanking me for being the only one here with the moral courage to confront Zabo’s racist garbage!
You remember, when I was kicking an avowed racist’s ass, you supported the racist because having an ally in your bigfoot fantasy was more important to you than basic human decency.
AnonymousTuesday, September 5, 2017 at 2:57:00 PM PDT >>That could be the very reason your such a bltch MMC HAHA yeah ok. What is your name and where do you live again tough guy? How is your * * * * * * grandchild your racetraitor daughter spewed forth? You are degenerate filth that will be removed soon. http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2017/09/something-keeps-triggering-bigfoot-alarm.html?m=0
Proof you use the same “>>” as quotations - http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2017/11/the-glagg-saga.html
... I could tell you that you might actually be the most severe example of antisocial personally disorder I’ve ever come across on the internet. Encompassing perverse narcissistic tendencies that is typical of someone with borderline personality disorder (the most antisocial kind)... But again, you’d only get off on that, wouldn’t you? You’re a “proud racist”, which translates to a coward behind anonymity. Zabo denies he’s a racist but has controversial views. Views I have never even suggested I agree with, and quite frankly, don’t give a ****. But please... tell me all about how moral you are.
So now “race realism” constitutes merely a controversial view? I suppose Adolph Hitler had “controversial views” as well, right? Your disgusting apologia has no limits so long as it supports your deranged bigfoot idiocy.
And to answer your question from yesterday, no I will not be creating an account with an avatar. That’s something done by pathetic people who feel the need to create fake online personas because they have nothing happening in their real lives. My real life is quite satisfactory.
Blah, blah, blah... Concentrate on your little conspiracy theory... that’s where your efforts should be. And you won’t be using an avatar, because that would be too much of inconvenience switching between anon sockpuppets, and you’re a coward of course. Your life is here, 24/7... imitating British slang because and thinking of ways of playing embarrassing mind games with me and others. You dirty old racist.
I thought you had to “dash” 45 minutes ago? And yes, I’ll continue to use the word “nutty” since it clearly gets under your skin. Ever heard of an American movie called “The Nutty Professor”? That’s such a British slang term! Learn to read before you try to play with the big boys. Ha ha ha!
Only one of us has genuine psychologists writing articles on our behaviour... whilst listing off the obvious reasons behind such behaviour. Obsessing over me and this blog isn’t gonna make that go away.
You “don’t have a burden”, if you’re trying to forget about how much you’ve failed in 8 years of obsessing about the people of this blog. But in reality... you’re just too dense even begin to address it
Incidentally, I wouldn't have the faintest idea of how to switch between accounts, but given your comment above, you are an expert at it with long experience! Thanks for admitting to sock puppeting dipsh*t! Ha ha ha!
Oh Stuey... you know how to get around being banned, Shawn told me so. Switching between anon accounts is nothing for the likes of crazy nerds like you.
You just admitted to being so butt hurt that I ruined your bigfoot fantasy that you called Shawn to get me banned — and you’re calling me a crazy nerd? Oh man, please stop it! Ha ha ha!
Ever notice how lktomi imagines every comment to be from the same person? Ever notice how he refers to the same examples over and over like they will suddenly sink in and convince everyone? I remember when lktomi was sucking up to Troll Killer and Khat Hansen - two of the most batshit crazies that was every on this site. But hey - everyone else is delusional for not believing in Bigfoot hahahaha!
Nuttytomi will never accept there's more than one. In his fantasy world he thinks they are all from a made-up entity called "Stuey". He goes on about an emotional investment yet he responds to each and every post.
How do you say it — “Christ on a bike”? You’re actually judging other people’s emotional investment when you just admitted that you care so deeply that you call Shawn over this crap?
We post for fun and amusement 3:19 but nuttytomi is so fanatical that he has to respond to EACH AND EVERY post desperately trying to defend his faith. It's really quite sad really that his life is so empty.
Carry on Stuey! Please keep responding to it... if you weren’t a sockpuppeting like a loon you’d simply not bite to it. It’s not like I’m gonna let it go.
I had reason before to speak with Shawn, I haven’t spoke to him in over two years, maybe three. But I know for a fact he would ban you, sometimes daily, and you’d simply get around it in no time. And that’s just it... Your comments were so insignificant and void of any intellectual worth, that you had to drive people away for you comments to stand out only as long as they’re among very few in number.
Signs of manipulative psychopatic personality at public forums: 1) Name calling and labelling the others aggressively with no reason given 2) Accusing the other posters from nonexisting or even psychopat's own activity 3) Using of the plural pronouns like "we", "our" ("pluralis majestatis") when presenting private and subjective opinions 4) Labelling the various concepts as a "true", "real", "actual" - although no such intersubjectively accepted definition exists 5) Mass downvoting of other posters, often with using sockpuppet accounts 6) Subscribing each post with poster's name, although its author is obvious already.. 7) Mindless spamming with copy&paste and repetitive posts https://medicalxpress.com/news/2011-12-psychopathy-misunderstood-personality-disorder.html
Not only are you on record boasting of using a laptop and a smart phone at the same time, but I for example could simply have two tabs up on my smart phone and publish two different comments within seconds of each other. This is obviously achievable with multiple comment sections too.
You’re irate... A month of tantrums because of one simple question would do that to you.
^ Ikky is obviously suffering mental strain under the huge burden he carries - I am a DIFFERENT poster to the OTHER PEOPLE who post here - there are AT LEAST 3 people who know Ikky is an unbalanced moron who is full of bitterness and internal strife...for crying out loud IkJoeboy (or whoever you are mainly posting under today) GROW UP.
You didn’t go far... just five minutes it took for you to publish another comment?
You’re not distancing yourself from your most embarrassing contradictions... for the 50 comments an hour you’re frantically thrashing out, it takes just a minute for me to cut & paste your face plants.
IkJoeboy is suffering insomnia as he is usually tucked up in his grotty space on the floor by now - it is the huge burden he is laden with - staggering and stuttering beneath the impossible task of proving a dream (nightmare for him) is real - but it isn`t real and the nightmare continues for him - hence the wakeful hours of his horror.
Hey, yo, greetings all. I got ikdummy to admit he was wrong (again... 2nd time) on http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.com/2018/03/a-bigfoot-in-derbyshire-england.html
I had been calling him out for dismissing UK bigfoot role-play while fully engaged in US bigfoot role-play. Then I reminded ikdummy that the 450 UK sightings that ikdummy dismissed, PARTIALLY because "the numbers were so low", were actually proportionate to the US numbers given that USA is 30 times bigger.
Now, ikdummy is consistent and receptive to UK role-play. Yes, ikdummy is broadening his delusion but at least he now plays in his own country and is not as snobbish when it comes to bigfoot role-play in his own backyard.
Thanks, 2nd time within a month. ikdummÿ's sore spots are that he hates being recognized as a bigfoot role player and deep down he understands his whole premise of 10000 10 foot tall 1000 lb apemen hiding in 49 US states is way, way beyond preposterous. But he's invested so much time in a fantasy that he feels it's too late to turn back.
By the way, it was discovered earlier that it drives him crazy to be called “nutty” so a third person who was here earlier began to call him “nuttytomi” — perfect!
Yes, nutdummÿ/nuttytomi is acutely aware that he is off psychologically which is amplified whenever he projects his issues on to others. After all, believing in hide n seek hairy men, by itself, is certifiable.
IktomiThursday, March 15, 2018 at 1:08:00 AM PDT Me on the UK - • There are mythologies, there are however no oral histories of Natives in the UK. • I have spoken to some eyewitnesses, they are not misidentifying. • When physical evidence turns up, those eyewitnesses are validated. • That means some portion of the 450 are genuine sightings, once that occurs.
Me on the US - • There are thousands of years oral histories in the US from Natives. • There are more eyewitnesses in the US in two years than have ever been in the UK. • There is no needs for physical evidence to turn up, as there is 60 years of it. Some of which is now peer reviewed. • This means regardless of the likelihood of some portion of the inummerable US sightings being hoaxed and misidentificaton... It is impossible for them all to be.
You on both - • It’s all role-play.
You’re flogging a dead horse. The key here is evidence... That’s fundamental. There is none for one country (to which I’m STILL not dismissing and maintaining an open mind), but there is for another. But let’s pretend you’re correct... Let’s say the words you’re trying to put in my mouth to try and distance yourself from answering one simple question was right, and I’m claiming all 450 UK sightings are misidentification. How does this help your need to provide an estimated figure for your role-players? How does this sidestep scientific data? Again... You backtrack after referring to the subject as role-play numerous times just in the last three days, and claim that it’s mostly missidentification. But if all the reports are down to missidentification, where is the room to hoax & role-play evidence? There is none. Where is the room for all the hoaxing? Where is the room for your role-play. You’ve debunked yourself.
IktomiThursday, March 15, 2018 at 1:45:00 AM PDT Here’s more perspective as to how pointless your latest deflection technique is... I BELIEVE THAT ALL BIGFOOT REPORTS IN THE UK ARE MISIDENTIFICATION. There, I played your game for a minute. Ok, so now let’s apply your “UK maths” to the US. Statistically I’d be grossly wrong, since the equivalent sightings per land mass in the US is yielding plenty of physical evidence that no theory of mass misidentification can explain away. Suddenly, just like me, you’re wrong and both comparisons cannot be simply attributed to misidentification. And that leaves your role-players and hoaxers confounded to impossible numbers.
IktomiTuesday, March 20, 2018 at 1:18:00 AM PDT I’d stated that Bigfoot was likely misidentification prior to taking the time to conversing with eyewitnesses. That’s where research leads you at times, to make you self-evaluate, reassess and evolve. But let’s say I still had that approach, and that was compared to the same frequency of misidentification in the US. Statistically I’d be wrong, since the equivalent sightings per land mass in the US have plenty of physical evidence that no theory of mass misidentification can explain away. Just like me you’d wrong and both comparisons cannot be simply attributed to misidentification. But then again, mass misidentification is only your stance when you chicken out of providing a moment’s worth of logic to your conspiracy theories.
IktomiTuesday, March 20, 2018 at 7:35:00 AM PDT I would be more concerned with getting your own ducks in order before audaciously pointing fingers. One minute it’s “all role-play”, the next it’s “all misidentification”... I really can’t keep up. Me “being on track” means that I’m happy to potentially add another continent to a body of geographical evidence that’s impossible to hoax. You “being on track” means there is no room for your minority of role-players to be able to hoax everything... and you inadvertently debunk your own drivel (not that it was hard). There is indeed role-play going on here, and it ain’t me.
... I know you’re desperate to partake in another fantasy (you do need to justify obsessing over me and this blog for the last few years after all), but I’ve never admitted to you that I’m wrong. And for 10,000 10 foot tall 1000lb apemen hiding in 49 US States, I have 60 years of physical evidence that yields average height and weight ratios, as well as Gaussian distribution. Some of which is now peer reviewed. If only someone could verify your role-playing empire, we’d be on par, eh?
You "Reassessed and evolved" based on information I provided you with, scatterbrain. Are you taking spin class?
I didn't read your whole crap. Did you copy and paste the part where you now "have more data about the UK and US proportionate sizes" after I enlightened your uncurious, zero grasp of the obvious, copy and paste, follower, zero original thoughts or conclusions brain?
What MUST you do for a living, you incompetent loon?
Sorry Stuart... I know reasons to justify your battering for the last month are not in abundance, but the “information” you provided was a backtracking deflection, which intimately debunked your own conspiracy. You see, as research develops, more information comes to light. If the information that comes to light adds more geographical data to evidence that’s already been peer reviewed...
D’you see how futile this is now?
And that’s just it. You don’t read any of my comments, but it’s unfortunate for you that others can. And talking of “spins”... we started off with 100 role-players that account for entire US and Canada, then it was ”an overwhelming majority” that were misidentifying, then it was all “a joke”, then we went around two more times with the aforementioned, then the role-players amounted to five (four of which were frequenters to this blog), THEN just three... THEN role-play was split into two camps (“producers and consumers”)... then we bounced back and forth from role-players to misidentification again about two more times... to where we are now with you relegating your US role-players to impossible hoaxing numbers after applying a deflection comparison tactic. ALL THE WHILE NEVER ONCE ADDRESSING THE EVIDENCE THAT’S PEER REVIEWED. All because you were asked the first question ever about your conspiracy theory. A month down the line and we’re still no closer to the first bit of coherency about these impossibly low in numbers, super-human evading, bullet dodging role-players that nobody EVER reports.
As you can see at 1:16am PDT, your role-playing & relative sizes jig doesn’t seem to be taking off too well. And if you ever need reminding if the evidence... just let me know.
Ironic how I ENABLED your UK bigfoot role play by explaining that 450 UK bigfoot were roughly proportionate to 12,000 US bigfoot given that the US is 30 times larger.
You’ve never once provided a single reason to believe the evidence I reference is bunk. Plus you’ve resorted this “role-play” to such insignificant numbers that any chance of that evidence being proven bunk is drastically reduced. This is your idea of how an adult debates Bigfoot out of existence... its embarrassing. There is nothing I can create that brings this hominin into existence... the data I reference however does manage that rather well. It’s why it’s now peer reviewed.
Nobody’s trying to convince you Stuey... just making you look silly about something that’s allegedly the equivalent to the tooth fairy. People generally don’t have so much struggles explaining away the tooth fairy.
When the evidence just falls short of what is required for true verification, every single time, then the dataset can only be interpretted as there being no such creature in existence.
By whose authority are you speaking of when you say “falls short”? Not having a body should have been to the detriment of every biological study to classify any number of new species from the beginning of wildlife biology, if that were the case.You have no clue as to how new species are tracked and classified, since you assert that a field research starts at its conclusion. Pretty embarrassing cart before the horse logic.
Tbe “dataset” suggests there is 60 years of evidence which is found repeatable across different continents.
Um... no it doesn’t. That wasn’t the case for another man sized primate that was classified in recent times... and it certainly didn’t mean the evidence for it previous to that classification wasn’t important. Evidence I might add, that is dwarfed in comparison to this subject at this stage of research.
"When the evidence just falls short of what is required for true verification, every single time, then the dataset can only be interpretted as there being no such creature in existence. ===== PATTERSON FAKE CREATURE!!
... in the form of perverse special pleading, they sure do. And let’s not toetemd like you know any genuine sceptics, or have the intelligence to understand how to think like one. You’d self-reflect on the holes in your conspiracy and probably drink for weeks knowing how much you’ve embarrassed yourself.
I love it when nuttytomi accuses others of special pleading. This is the same guy who empowers Bigfoot with all sorts of special abilities...hearing...eyesight...strength...intelligence - ALL WITHOUT HAVING A SINGLE BODY TO CONCLUDE THIS!
... all of which are basic attributes of recognised primates. And there are databases of reports on behaviour that are substantiated by 60 years of evidence.
You see, bigfoot must have those abilities otherwise bigfoot would be found and the fact that bigfoot has not been found proves that bigfoot has those abilities. Circular logic really comes in handy for role players.
Anyway nuttyomi (I can’t take credit for coining your new name, but I love it!), I have to dash, have fun running around on your hamster wheel all night!
Plenty found, just none classified or in a zoo... And a primate having obvious abilities doesn’t mean much unless there’s an actual effort to classify it. A certain man sized primate classified in recent years, the “lion killer”, attests to that. A primate with obvious physical attributes that just needed to be tracked.
Rumors abound on whether or not Finding Bigfoot will continue, but hopeful news is on the horizon. Snake Oil Productions, the production company responsible for Finding Bigfoot, is seeking a permit for filming in the Monterey, Virginia area. Monterey lies between the Monongahela and George Washington National Forests. Definitely a good place to look for bigfoot. We can only speculate if this means Finding Bigfoot has been signed on for additional seasons, or if perhaps a new bigfoot show is in the works. We'll keep you updated on any further announcements for sure.
Editor's Note: This is a guest post by Suzie M., a sasquatch enthusiast. Crypto-linguists believe that the species known Bigfoot/Sasquatch/Yeti/Yowie ect speak and understand a complex language, which by all accounts seems to stem from Asia. When one listens to it there is definitely a sense of it being Chinese or Japanese. It is a very odd mix of sounds, clicks and what could be actual words. This is the reason some experts are looking into the Asian dialect theory, some have said it could be a lost dialect, which was carried from Asia by the Bigfoot species that colonised America.
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from
True scary Nofoot stories yo. Keepz it real homies. Dont be clownin dogz. Know what I'm sayin?
ReplyDeleteDingo
True stories like “role-players” who don’t appear to have a single bit of coherency in their alleged methods... who have impossibly low numbers to achieve all the activity and evidence around the US, who are in cahoots with PhD’s, who nobody reports seeing, and who dodge loaded weapons all year round. These role-players are even more elusive than the Sasquatch.
DeleteTrue stories.
Dam dogg, you need a feed bag round yo neck to catch all the t_erds comin out yo mouth. You crazy loco G. Know what I'm sayin?
DeleteDingo
True stories.
Deletelktomi is right! These are TRUE stories that happen in the middle of nowhere. Swamp Dweller would not be clowning around - he only deals with TRUE stories. He is keeping it REAL!
DeleteThere don’t appear to be any true stories associated with your conspiracy theory though.
Delete: (
^ IktomiJoe
Delete- a pathetic old fool with nothing to live for aside from a defence of a fantasy and a blog site filled with fantasy accounts of his own creation... a laughably and demonstrably sad and lonely old man
Yes... “fantasy”.
DeleteLike a “tole-playing empire” who don’t appear to have a single bit of coherency in their alleged methods... who have impossibly low numbers to achieve all the activity and evidence around the US, who are in cahoots with PhD’s, who nobody reports seeing, and who dodge loaded weapons all year round. These role-players are even more elusive than the Sasquatch.
... fantasy. This blog, or rather its comment sections are indeed full of it.
Like the fantasy of Bigfoot existing
DeleteFantasy doesn’t manifest in peer reviewed physical evidence. If only there were an equivalent for your hoaxing CP.
DeleteYes but your peer reviewed journal is bullshit so it's worthless
DeleteIt’s BS to one biased debunking wiki link... that hasn’t debunked anything in it.
Delete: p
Refrencing a nonexistent creature totally debunks it
DeleteNonexistent creatures don’t leave physical data that’s worthy of peer review.
DeleteNonexistent role-playing millionaire conspirators; can’t say the same I’m afraid.
^ glory hole competitor
DeleteI fear the small insects that have invaded my pubes. They scurry around my scrotum whilst I set at my desk. AAAAAAAGGGGGGHHHHHHH!
ReplyDelete^ IkkyJo has `em round his bottom
DeleteGreat LARPing. "Scary" is a key component of a bigfoot LARP. No unambiguous evidence is another vital ingredient. Anyone else seeing the pattern here?
ReplyDeleteI don’t... Only ambiguous conspiracy theories.
DeletePage 368;
http://www2.isu.edu/rhi/pdf/JSE-303-Meldrum.pdf
... You’ll notice there’s nothing ambiguous about the three casts that demonstrate consistent morphology. And since there is sufficient evidence for the existence of such a creature, one could empathise rather easily with the someone seeing one.
Sure, I can see how, in your LARP fantasy these footprints back up your belief but in reality they do not fall within the category of scientifically valid evidence.
DeleteThat’s a link to a peer reviewed journal. If only you had a shred of evidence for your role-playing empire, eh?
DeleteTut, tut.
lktomi likes to tout his "peer reviewed journal" at every opportunity because he thinks it gives Bigfoot some measure of credibility. Here..take a closer look at this "esteemed" journal and judge for yourself:
Deletehttps://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Journal_of_Scientific_Exploration
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Society_for_Scientific_Exploration
Don't overlook reading about Henry H. Bauer (it's editor) and his views:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_H._Bauer
Yeah - something to be real proud of lktomi.
Yes Stuey. We did this dance here...
Deletehttp://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2018/03/frightening-stories-from-hiking.html?m=0
http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2017/05/the-squatch-detective-steve-kulls-talks.html?m=0
http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2017/05/bigfoot-stalks-man-during-day-hike-at.html?m=0
http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2017/08/surrounded-by-bigfoot-noises.html?m=0
http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2018/02/encounters-with-real-cryptids.html?m=0
... And for all your ad hominem, you still couldn’t debunk the paper in question. A journal’s a journal, and an editorial board with PhD’s is an editorial board with PhD’s. The journal Meldrum’s work was published in simply doesn’t prejudice against topics that need to be scientifically scrutinised... much of which it debunks and you should actually be referencing for your little self l-esteem exercise. And since we’re rehashing old dances, here’s what a Nobel Winner has to say about more mainstream journals...
"Leading academic journals are distorting the scientific process and represent a "tyranny" that must be broken, according to a Nobel prize winner who has declared a boycott on the publications. Randy Schekman, a US biologist who won the Nobel prize in physiology or medicine this year and receives his prize in Stockholm on Tuesday, said his lab would no longer send research papers to the top-tier journals, Nature, Cell and Science. Schekman said pressure to publish in "luxury" journals encouraged researchers to cut corners and pursue trendy fields of science instead of doing more important work. The problem was exacerbated, he said, by editors who were not active scientists but professionals who favoured studies that were likely to make a splash."
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/dec/09/nobel-winner-boycott-science-journals
Doesn’t sound very scientific, does it? And then let’s look at this...
"Journal Accepts Paper Reading “Get Me Off Your F*****g Mailing List”;
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2014/nov/25/journal-accepts-paper-requesting-removal-from-mailing-list
^ IktomiJo = delusional fool
Delete10:20, when ikdummy first began citing that "journal," I thought that he was either (1) Playing a strange joke on us, (2) Trying to prove that bigfoot does NOT exist, or (3) Attempting some combination of both (1) and (2).
DeleteBut now it appears that the boob is serious. He might as well cite Mad Magazine as a reputable scientific journal!!! Ha ha ha!
Just let him keep citing it, he's doing our job for us!
Another hilarious fun fact about the "journal" is that it awards something called the Dinsdale Prize every year which is named after a buffoon whose claim to fame is researching ----- wait for it ----- THE LOCH NESS MONSTER!!! Ha ha ha! You go ikdummy!
When you’ve quite finished talking to yourself... You could simply hurry up and debunk it.
DeletePersonally, I find the Loch Ness monster a matter worthy of scientific scrutinisation. Even if you don’t believe in it, how are the self-esteem needy like you gonna build any, if questions aren’t asked and things not put to bed?
But like I said... you could just address what’s in the journal, because it’s not like I’m gonna stop rubbing your face in to.
: p
I'm sorry ikdummy, I was just reading an article in the "journal" about ghosts and ectoplasm. I think that the "peer reviewers" were Bill Murray and Dan Akroyd!!!! Who you gonna call??? Ha ha ha ha!!!! Thanks for the laugh!
DeleteI apologise Stuart... But I couldn’t seem to find anything ok be internet about that topic. Care to link it? I’d love to read the conclusions drawn.
DeleteYes, I’m sure you’re laughing all the way to the conspiracy theory bank. I wonder if they have a paper on that??
Nargh!
Ho ho ho ho ho ho!!
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteOh, and let’s look at one of your sources...
Delete“Andrea Ballatore of University of California, Santa Barbara described RationalWiki as a debunking website, finding it to be the most visible debunking website of conspiracy theories in terms of Google and Bing search results, slightly more visible than rense.com and less visible than YouTube or Wikipedia.”
... Ouch! I wonder what they would have to say about your thousands year old, culture hopping conspiracy theory? And since I haven’t actually seen it debunk anything I’m referencing yet, I can’t teslly attest to it’s job all that well either?
“There are several common criticisms of RationalWiki (RW) as a source;
It's a wiki -
The obvious cautions that apply to using Wikipedia as a source apply to using RationalWiki as a source. Anyone can edit it, check the references, and so on.
It's got terrible tone -
See the main article on this topic: Tone argument
True, RationalWiki has a "snarky" point of view, and sometimes it perhaps it goes a bit overboard.
It's biased -
“”Basically the material presented is what a slightly left of centre atheist needs to win an internet debate.”
— Konkvistador
“Good on debunking theism and woo. Horrible on politics. Heavily biased.”
— /u/jdkeith
Oh dear... Did you happen to pick up “slightly left of centre atheist“ as well? Doesn’t seem to be your bag Stuey, since you’re a right/alt-right Christian?
Your own anonymous sources state that rational wiki is good for debunking theism and woo — thanks for the further endorsement pal! The only alt-right Christian wacko types I’ve seen here are your buddies Zabo and the flat earther Leon whom you’ve referred to as “brother.”
DeleteIktomi sure got butt hurt when his journal was exposed as garbage , look at him seethe
DeleteIt does yes... now apply theism and woo to the paper I’ve referenced. And even if I was, I’d be endorsing a source that hasn’t debunked anything to do with Bigfoot, and that has nothing to do with you. In fact, a source that threatens your most widely used as hoc fantasy.
DeleteAnonymousThursday, March 31, 2016 at 1:02:00 AM PDT
Im a proud racist, thank you very much
http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2016/03/bigfoot-eyewitness-reports-from.html?m=0
AnonymousSunday, January 11, 2015 at 6:50:00 PM PST
DS, I'm a christian as well, and i respect all people and their opinions.
http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2015/01/report-of-day-arkansas-man-witnessed.html?m=0
That’s all I read was two wiki links... from someone who doesn’t understand the peer review process, and who only has a conspiracy theory against scientific data.
DeleteBrrrrrr! Terrified.
Whee, he's a hurtin'
DeleteThere is no "evidence" ,it is that simple,
Deletea lot like simpleTomi
There’s your burden...
DeleteChop, chop.
Yeah, we all know how anonymous comments that are exactly tailored to support your stupid arguments conveniently pop up for you to copy and paste.
DeleteAnd I might add that while you were kissing the asses of admitted racists like Zabo and Leon, I was beating the crap out of them and their racist ideas. Thanks to me, neither of those ugly hate mongers are here anymore. You’re welcome! Ha ha ha!
I’ve categorically proven, time and time and time again, with even more comments I could publish in the very next comment if I wished... that you have published everything I’ve sourced.
DeleteThere is not evidence either of those two were racist, and you’re probably the biggest and most proud racist I’ve ever come across on my entire time on the entire internet.
Keep kissing their asses:
DeleteZaboWednesday, August 30, 2017 at 4:11:00 AM PDT
Hey Harriet did you see the reports of blacks looting homes, and strong arm robbery in Houston yesterday? Oh no that's not good for you anti racists(code word for anti-White)propaganda machine! My,my how the mighty have fallen! Just like those old confederacy statues?
http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.com/2017/08/bigfoot-sighting-in-yosemite.html?m=1
That’s EXACTLY your point of view on the matter. If Zabo would have taken the total opposite of that stance, you would have jumped all over it just to try and drive him away. You’re a racist hypocrite. And Zabo has never published outright ethnic slurs or that he’s a proud racist. You have.
DeleteMore from your “brother”:
DeleteZaboSunday, August 27, 2017 at 3:22:00 AM PDT
And let's go back to your racist claim. You are right (almost) I'm a race REALIST! And for that I will never apologize for. Besides my views are correct as the way I see em! So too bad your little racist word just doesn't make a difference to me. Boo-Hoo you're a meanie racist whaha,whaha, whaaa. Go tell Mommy.
http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.com/2017/08/the-best-dogman-encounter-stories.html?m=1
Instead of arguing with me, you should be down on your hands and knees, thanking me for being the only one here with the moral courage to confront Zabo’s racist garbage!
DeleteI would normally proceed in publishing your most hideous ethnic slurs... but I’ve gotta dash.
DeleteRemember... you’re only someone when I’m around to smack you around.
You remember, when I was kicking an avowed racist’s ass, you supported the racist because having an ally in your bigfoot fantasy was more important to you than basic human decency.
DeleteAnonymousTuesday, September 5, 2017 at 2:57:00 PM PDT
Delete>>That could be the very reason your such a bltch
MMC
HAHA yeah ok.
What is your name and where do you live again tough guy?
How is your * * * * * * grandchild your racetraitor daughter spewed forth?
You are degenerate filth that will be removed soon.
http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2017/09/something-keeps-triggering-bigfoot-alarm.html?m=0
Proof you use the same “>>” as quotations -
http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2017/11/the-glagg-saga.html
... I could tell you that you might actually be the most severe example of antisocial personally disorder I’ve ever come across on the internet. Encompassing perverse narcissistic tendencies that is typical of someone with borderline personality disorder (the most antisocial kind)... But again, you’d only get off on that, wouldn’t you? You’re a “proud racist”, which translates to a coward behind anonymity. Zabo denies he’s a racist but has controversial views. Views I have never even suggested I agree with, and quite frankly, don’t give a ****. But please... tell me all about how moral you are.
So now “race realism” constitutes merely a controversial view? I suppose Adolph Hitler had “controversial views” as well, right? Your disgusting apologia has no limits so long as it supports your deranged bigfoot idiocy.
DeleteAnd to answer your question from yesterday, no I will not be creating an account with an avatar. That’s something done by pathetic people who feel the need to create fake online personas because they have nothing happening in their real lives. My real life is quite satisfactory.
Blah, blah, blah... Concentrate on your little conspiracy theory... that’s where your efforts should be. And you won’t be using an avatar, because that would be too much of inconvenience switching between anon sockpuppets, and you’re a coward of course. Your life is here, 24/7... imitating British slang because and thinking of ways of playing embarrassing mind games with me and others. You dirty old racist.
DeleteCiao!
^ Oh the irony...your self analysis is spot on...you are a creep of cosmic orders and a psychiatric dream.
DeleteI thought you had to “dash” 45 minutes ago? And yes, I’ll continue to use the word “nutty” since it clearly gets under your skin. Ever heard of an American movie called “The Nutty Professor”? That’s such a British slang term! Learn to read before you try to play with the big boys. Ha ha ha!
Delete1;01
DeleteI have no burden whatever - unlike you who lives within a self structured mental jail.
No wonder you`re such an anti-social fantasist.
Only one of us has genuine psychologists writing articles on our behaviour... whilst listing off the obvious reasons behind such behaviour. Obsessing over me and this blog isn’t gonna make that go away.
DeleteThe tablets don’t define you, remember that.
You “don’t have a burden”, if you’re trying to forget about how much you’ve failed in 8 years of obsessing about the people of this blog. But in reality... you’re just too dense even begin to address it
DeleteIncidentally, I wouldn't have the faintest idea of how to switch between accounts, but given your comment above, you are an expert at it with long experience! Thanks for admitting to sock puppeting dipsh*t! Ha ha ha!
DeleteOh Stuey... you know how to get around being banned, Shawn told me so. Switching between anon accounts is nothing for the likes of crazy nerds like you.
DeleteYou just admitted to being so butt hurt that I ruined your bigfoot fantasy that you called Shawn to get me banned — and you’re calling me a crazy nerd? Oh man, please stop it! Ha ha ha!
DeleteI’m sure Shawn really looks forward to your calls! Ha ha ha!
DeleteEver notice how lktomi imagines every comment to be from the same person? Ever notice how he refers to the same examples over and over like they will suddenly sink in and convince everyone? I remember when lktomi was sucking up to Troll Killer and Khat Hansen - two of the most batshit crazies that was every on this site. But hey - everyone else is delusional for not believing in Bigfoot hahahaha!
DeleteOh wait, wait — I have to dash — meaning that I’ll still be here for another two hours! Ha ha ha!
DeleteHahaha - I'm going to start calling him "nuttytomi" he enjoys it so and it fits him perfectly.
Delete2:57, 2:59, 3:00, 3:04... Christ, what am emotional investment. Was it the banning comment and Shawn that got your blood up?
Delete3:07!
DeleteCalm down Stu, you haven’t moved this much in years.
That's because there is more than ONE of us posting idiot.
DeleteYeah... You need that myth to stick because you struggle so much with adult debate. You’re clearly just that irate.
DeleteThere is one troll...
Nuttytomi will never accept there's more than one. In his fantasy world he thinks they are all from a made-up entity called "Stuey". He goes on about an emotional investment yet he responds to each and every post.
DeleteHow do you say it — “Christ on a bike”? You’re actually judging other people’s emotional investment when you just admitted that you care so deeply that you call Shawn over this crap?
DeleteWe post for fun and amusement 3:19 but nuttytomi is so fanatical that he has to respond to EACH AND EVERY post desperately trying to defend his faith. It's really quite sad really that his life is so empty.
DeleteCarry on Stuey! Please keep responding to it... if you weren’t a sockpuppeting like a loon you’d simply not bite to it. It’s not like I’m gonna let it go.
DeleteI had reason before to speak with Shawn, I haven’t spoke to him in over two years, maybe three. But I know for a fact he would ban you, sometimes daily, and you’d simply get around it in no time. And that’s just it... Your comments were so insignificant and void of any intellectual worth, that you had to drive people away for you comments to stand out only as long as they’re among very few in number.
Here we go! “We” is busting out now!
DeleteSigns of manipulative psychopatic personality at public forums:
1) Name calling and labelling the others aggressively with no reason given
2) Accusing the other posters from nonexisting or even psychopat's own activity
3) Using of the plural pronouns like "we", "our" ("pluralis majestatis") when presenting private and subjective opinions
4) Labelling the various concepts as a "true", "real", "actual" - although no such intersubjectively accepted definition exists
5) Mass downvoting of other posters, often with using sockpuppet accounts
6) Subscribing each post with poster's name, although its author is obvious already..
7) Mindless spamming with copy&paste and repetitive posts
https://medicalxpress.com/news/2011-12-psychopathy-misunderstood-personality-disorder.html
Boy "we" really got him going this time. Check out the posting times - two at the same exact time. Magic?
DeleteNot only are you on record boasting of using a laptop and a smart phone at the same time, but I for example could simply have two tabs up on my smart phone and publish two different comments within seconds of each other. This is obviously achievable with multiple comment sections too.
DeleteYou’re irate... A month of tantrums because of one simple question would do that to you.
Well nuttytomi - I have to dash. But unlike when you stated you had to dash way back at 1:42 I will keep my word. You can rant to the other poster.
Delete^ Ikky is obviously suffering mental strain under the huge burden he carries - I am a DIFFERENT poster to the OTHER PEOPLE who post here - there are AT LEAST 3 people who know Ikky is an unbalanced moron who is full of bitterness and internal strife...for crying out loud IkJoeboy (or whoever you are mainly posting under today) GROW UP.
DeleteYou didn’t go far... just five minutes it took for you to publish another comment?
DeleteYou’re not distancing yourself from your most embarrassing contradictions... for the 50 comments an hour you’re frantically thrashing out, it takes just a minute for me to cut & paste your face plants.
IkJoeboy is suffering insomnia as he is usually tucked up in his grotty space on the floor by now - it is the huge burden he is laden with - staggering and stuttering beneath the impossible task of proving a dream (nightmare for him) is real - but it isn`t real and the nightmare continues for him - hence the wakeful hours of his horror.
DeleteUnder painfully cringey, pretentious rant...
DeleteOne of us has the scientific method... the other has conjecture, contradictions and conspiracy theories.
And there is one troll. There has only ever been one troll... and there will only ever be one troll.
And just like that... Stuey’s three alleged trolls are all gone with one person’s apparent exit.
Delete(Eyes rolling)
Funny that. See ya tomorrow!
The only thing “painfully cringey” around here is the dump nuttytomi will be taking after sitting at his computer for the past 16 hours.
DeleteHey, yo, greetings all. I got ikdummy to admit he was wrong (again... 2nd time) on http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.com/2018/03/a-bigfoot-in-derbyshire-england.html
DeleteI had been calling him out for dismissing UK bigfoot role-play while fully engaged in US bigfoot role-play. Then I reminded ikdummy that the 450 UK sightings that ikdummy dismissed, PARTIALLY because "the numbers were so low", were actually proportionate to the US numbers given that USA is 30 times bigger.
Now, ikdummy is consistent and receptive to UK role-play. Yes, ikdummy is broadening his delusion but at least he now plays in his own country and is not as snobbish when it comes to bigfoot role-play in his own backyard.
Wow, good job — I can’t bekieve he admitted to being wrong!
DeleteThanks, 2nd time within a month. ikdummÿ's sore spots are that he hates being recognized as a bigfoot role player and deep down he understands his whole premise of 10000 10 foot tall 1000 lb apemen hiding in 49 US states is way, way beyond preposterous. But he's invested so much time in a fantasy that he feels it's too late to turn back.
DeleteBy the way, it was discovered earlier that it drives him crazy to be called “nutty” so a third person who was here earlier began to call him “nuttytomi” — perfect!
DeleteYes, nutdummÿ/nuttytomi is acutely aware that he is off psychologically which is amplified whenever he projects his issues on to others. After all, believing in hide n seek hairy men, by itself, is certifiable.
DeleteIktomiThursday, March 15, 2018 at 1:08:00 AM PDT
DeleteMe on the UK -
• There are mythologies, there are however no oral histories of Natives in the UK.
• I have spoken to some eyewitnesses, they are not misidentifying.
• When physical evidence turns up, those eyewitnesses are validated.
• That means some portion of the 450 are genuine sightings, once that occurs.
Me on the US -
• There are thousands of years oral histories in the US from Natives.
• There are more eyewitnesses in the US in two years than have ever been in the UK.
• There is no needs for physical evidence to turn up, as there is 60 years of it. Some of which is now peer reviewed.
• This means regardless of the likelihood of some portion of the inummerable US sightings being hoaxed and misidentificaton... It is impossible for them all to be.
You on both -
• It’s all role-play.
You’re flogging a dead horse. The key here is evidence... That’s fundamental. There is none for one country (to which I’m STILL not dismissing and maintaining an open mind), but there is for another. But let’s pretend you’re correct... Let’s say the words you’re trying to put in my mouth to try and distance yourself from answering one simple question was right, and I’m claiming all 450 UK sightings are misidentification. How does this help your need to provide an estimated figure for your role-players? How does this sidestep scientific data? Again... You backtrack after referring to the subject as role-play numerous times just in the last three days, and claim that it’s mostly missidentification. But if all the reports are down to missidentification, where is the room to hoax & role-play evidence? There is none. Where is the room for all the hoaxing? Where is the room for your role-play. You’ve debunked yourself.
IktomiThursday, March 15, 2018 at 1:45:00 AM PDT
Here’s more perspective as to how pointless your latest deflection technique is...
I BELIEVE THAT ALL BIGFOOT REPORTS IN THE UK ARE MISIDENTIFICATION.
There, I played your game for a minute. Ok, so now let’s apply your “UK maths” to the US. Statistically I’d be grossly wrong, since the equivalent sightings per land mass in the US is yielding plenty of physical evidence that no theory of mass misidentification can explain away. Suddenly, just like me, you’re wrong and both comparisons cannot be simply attributed to misidentification. And that leaves your role-players and hoaxers confounded to impossible numbers.
IktomiTuesday, March 20, 2018 at 1:18:00 AM PDT
I’d stated that Bigfoot was likely misidentification prior to taking the time to conversing with eyewitnesses. That’s where research leads you at times, to make you self-evaluate, reassess and evolve. But let’s say I still had that approach, and that was compared to the same frequency of misidentification in the US. Statistically I’d be wrong, since the equivalent sightings per land mass in the US have plenty of physical evidence that no theory of mass misidentification can explain away. Just like me you’d wrong and both comparisons cannot be simply attributed to misidentification. But then again, mass misidentification is only your stance when you chicken out of providing a moment’s worth of logic to your conspiracy theories.
IktomiTuesday, March 20, 2018 at 7:35:00 AM PDT
DeleteI would be more concerned with getting your own ducks in order before audaciously pointing fingers. One minute it’s “all role-play”, the next it’s “all misidentification”... I really can’t keep up. Me “being on track” means that I’m happy to potentially add another continent to a body of geographical evidence that’s impossible to hoax. You “being on track” means there is no room for your minority of role-players to be able to hoax everything... and you inadvertently debunk your own drivel (not that it was hard). There is indeed role-play going on here, and it ain’t me.
... I know you’re desperate to partake in another fantasy (you do need to justify obsessing over me and this blog for the last few years after all), but I’ve never admitted to you that I’m wrong. And for 10,000 10 foot tall 1000lb apemen hiding in 49 US States, I have 60 years of physical evidence that yields average height and weight ratios, as well as Gaussian distribution. Some of which is now peer reviewed. If only someone could verify your role-playing empire, we’d be on par, eh?
And when you’ve quite finished talking to yourself...
DeleteYou "Reassessed and evolved" based on information I provided you with, scatterbrain. Are you taking spin class?
DeleteI didn't read your whole crap. Did you copy and paste the part where you now "have more data about the UK and US proportionate sizes" after I enlightened your uncurious, zero grasp of the obvious, copy and paste, follower, zero original thoughts or conclusions brain?
What MUST you do for a living, you incompetent loon?
Sorry Stuart... I know reasons to justify your battering for the last month are not in abundance, but the “information” you provided was a backtracking deflection, which intimately debunked your own conspiracy. You see, as research develops, more information comes to light. If the information that comes to light adds more geographical data to evidence that’s already been peer reviewed...
DeleteD’you see how futile this is now?
And that’s just it. You don’t read any of my comments, but it’s unfortunate for you that others can. And talking of “spins”... we started off with 100 role-players that account for entire US and Canada, then it was ”an overwhelming majority” that were misidentifying, then it was all “a joke”, then we went around two more times with the aforementioned, then the role-players amounted to five (four of which were frequenters to this blog), THEN just three... THEN role-play was split into two camps (“producers and consumers”)... then we bounced back and forth from role-players to misidentification again about two more times... to where we are now with you relegating your US role-players to impossible hoaxing numbers after applying a deflection comparison tactic. ALL THE WHILE NEVER ONCE ADDRESSING THE EVIDENCE THAT’S PEER REVIEWED. All because you were asked the first question ever about your conspiracy theory. A month down the line and we’re still no closer to the first bit of coherency about these impossibly low in numbers, super-human evading, bullet dodging role-players that nobody EVER reports.
You klutz, ha ha ha ha ha!!!
I'm just glad you are bigfoot role playing on your home soil now, ikdummÿ.
DeleteIf you need me to explain relative sizes of any other countries I will oblige.
nobody reads your comments IkkyJoeboy - you have zero evidence to produce and nothing to say.
DeleteAs you can see at 1:16am PDT, your role-playing & relative sizes jig doesn’t seem to be taking off too well. And if you ever need reminding if the evidence... just let me know.
Deletehttp://www2.isu.edu/rhi/pdf/JSE-303-Meldrum.pdf
No one reads your meltdowns, ikdummÿ.
DeleteIronic how I ENABLED your UK bigfoot role play by explaining that 450 UK bigfoot were roughly proportionate to 12,000 US bigfoot given that the US is 30 times larger.
Don't bite the hand that teaches you.
D’you know at this point... you probably should my comments, and partake in at least one attempt at a rebuttal.
DeleteYou've presented no defense except backing up your new bigfoot UK acceptance.
DeleteWhich has not one shred of bearing on the physical evidence that substantiates thousands of years of anecdotes in the US.
DeleteYou have never presented valid evidence for bigfoot, crazy lady.
DeleteAnd there’s your burden. Show the evidence isn’t valid... that’s what an adult would attempt to do.
DeleteIdiot^. No, adults don't waste time role-playing magical monsters into existence, like yourself.
DeleteYou are no arbiter of adult behavior. LOL Nice try, though.
ikdummy names herself after a mythical mischief maker, uses a puppet avatar, and spends all day debating a fake monster into existence...
Delete....but then dictates what adult behavior should be. HAHHHAHAHA!!!
You’ve never once provided a single reason to believe the evidence I reference is bunk. Plus you’ve resorted this “role-play” to such insignificant numbers that any chance of that evidence being proven bunk is drastically reduced. This is your idea of how an adult debates Bigfoot out of existence... its embarrassing. There is nothing I can create that brings this hominin into existence... the data I reference however does manage that rather well. It’s why it’s now peer reviewed.
DeleteGee, I'm convinced now, ikdummy. There really ARE 10,000 hairy tall apey menz in US forests.
DeleteWeeeeeehhooooyyaaaaaa!!!!!!!
Nobody’s trying to convince you Stuey... just making you look silly about something that’s allegedly the equivalent to the tooth fairy. People generally don’t have so much struggles explaining away the tooth fairy.
DeleteWhat does that say about you?
People generally don’t have so much faith in the tooth fairy.....or bigfoot.
DeleteSorry, ikdummy. Too easy.
One nobosy see’s... the other is being peer reviewed.
DeleteJust a friendly reminder.
Drunk again, ikdummy? LOL
Delete9 foot ape men all over america avoiding every type of detection with a 100% success rate. Sorry, I dont buy it.
ReplyDelete9 foot tall apeman in America merely avoiding classification, since there is 60 years of physical evidence documenting their presence.
DeleteNobody’s selling anything, you’re just too stupid.
When the evidence just falls short of what is required for true verification, every single time, then the dataset can only be interpretted as there being no such creature in existence.
DeleteBy whose authority are you speaking of when you say “falls short”? Not having a body should have been to the detriment of every biological study to classify any number of new species from the beginning of wildlife biology, if that were the case.You have no clue as to how new species are tracked and classified, since you assert that a field research starts at its conclusion. Pretty embarrassing cart before the horse logic.
DeleteTbe “dataset” suggests there is 60 years of evidence which is found repeatable across different continents.
Bigfoot not being confirmed to exist does mean the evidence has fallen short 100% of the time.
DeleteUm... no it doesn’t. That wasn’t the case for another man sized primate that was classified in recent times... and it certainly didn’t mean the evidence for it previous to that classification wasn’t important. Evidence I might add, that is dwarfed in comparison to this subject at this stage of research.
DeleteGo back to school.
Hey mate, I’d fancy something “man sized” of yours !
DeleteJoe
Are you referring to his anal warts?
DeleteOh Joe - your incorrigible (tee hee hee hee)!
Delete"When the evidence just falls short of what is required for true verification, every single time, then the dataset can only be interpretted as there being no such creature in existence. ===== PATTERSON FAKE CREATURE!!
DeleteThe “world beating heavy hitters” (whatever the hell that means) of science say otherwise(?)
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
Delete^ monkey suit ? - there are rather too many clowns around this circus - and you are one of them.
Delete"the physical evidence left by Patty is not only peer reviewed, but repeatable across continents."
DeleteWHAT ?
You are beyond stupid ... !!!
Yes Stuey. Page 368;
Deletehttp://www2.isu.edu/rhi/pdf/JSE-303-Meldrum.pdf
Got monkey suit? You’ve invested too much of your cyber existence on finding one, surely you’ve got something to reference?
Actually it was posted on this site, remember how upset you got?
DeleteI must have missed it... it would have been the debunking of the century and I would have remembered it. Care to post it again?
DeleteNope, you know it already, you and Joe sure cried that day ho ho
DeleteAnother empty promise.
Delete8 years full of them.
: (
^ Just plain empty
DeleteSupposed "New" Bigfoot documentary ... not sure if it is ...
ReplyDeletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BbSgcIKBnnQ
These role-players make good actors.
DeleteAntisocial sockpuppets; not so much.
DeleteSkeptics lying and role-playing? Not so much.
Delete... in the form of perverse special pleading, they sure do. And let’s not toetemd like you know any genuine sceptics, or have the intelligence to understand how to think like one. You’d self-reflect on the holes in your conspiracy and probably drink for weeks knowing how much you’ve embarrassed yourself.
DeleteOkay, your logic is so persuasive that I’ve been forced to agree not to “toetemd”!
DeleteI love it when nuttytomi accuses others of special pleading. This is the same guy who empowers Bigfoot with all sorts of special abilities...hearing...eyesight...strength...intelligence - ALL WITHOUT HAVING A SINGLE BODY TO CONCLUDE THIS!
Delete... all of which are basic attributes of recognised primates. And there are databases of reports on behaviour that are substantiated by 60 years of evidence.
DeleteYou see, bigfoot must have those abilities otherwise bigfoot would be found and the fact that bigfoot has not been found proves that bigfoot has those abilities. Circular logic really comes in handy for role players.
DeleteAnyway nuttyomi (I can’t take credit for coining your new name, but I love it!), I have to dash, have fun running around on your hamster wheel all night!
DeletePlenty found, just none classified or in a zoo... And a primate having obvious abilities doesn’t mean much unless there’s an actual effort to classify it. A certain man sized primate classified in recent years, the “lion killer”, attests to that. A primate with obvious physical attributes that just needed to be tracked.
DeleteThanks for trying.
You’ll be here every hour for the next 12 trying to get some satisfaction. And I’ll be pointing it out in the morning.
Delete^ been here for the last 24
Delete