Mountain Beast Mysteries presents a piece of footage taken near Mount St Helens. The footage shows what could be an actual sasquatch. Check it out and see what you think.
Or - you`re as much a cocksucker as Joe if you can`t handle the fact that people disagree - particularly when there is not ANY VERIFIABLE EVIDENCE in 60 years.
Jeez. You’re back to believing everyone is Joe, eh Stuey? Are you having another relapse akin to the magic airforce base that everyone here (who were somehow allegedly the same person all at the same time), was attacking you via a psy-ops experiment? The tablets don’t define you Stuey, keep taking them for heaven’s sake. And what are you doing to convince anyone that 60 years of footprints are unverifiable Stuey? Remember I’m collecting a dossier on you, I would have noticed if you had some substance for once in 8 years.
Kittalia A. sent us the following questions about Patty, the Bigfoot in the Patterson-Gimlin film. They are all very good questions that we we wish we knew the answers to. We're no "Henry May" and it's times like this that we wish we had his number. Since we don't have Henry around whenever we need him, here are some easy questions for all you Patterson-Gimlin believers to try and answer:
Thanks to Matt Moneymaker for sharing this story with us from a guy named Thomas S. who was camping with some friends near the French Meadows Reservoir in August 2012. This remote, forested basin is located on the American River approximately 58 miles east of Auburn in the Sierra Nevada's. Before his encounter, the man thought Bigfoot "was just for entertainment purposes", but he changed his tune when he ended up with messy drawers that night. "That will teach to goof on our show," says Matt.
Uh Oh. Here we go again, folks. M.K. Davis originally brought up this theory called the "Bluff Creek massacre" theory back in 2008 at a conference. The controversial theory was immediately rejected by the Bigfoot community and Davis was shunned from ever speaking about it again. According to Davis, based on his expert film analysis and color enhancements of frame 352 of the PG film, he theorizes that the Patterson party had been to the Bluff Creek site at least once before returning to capture their famous Bigfoot video. His theory also suggests that the party probably murdered a family of Bigfoots and buried their bodies. Davis points to an enhanced anomaly resembling a bloody dog print and a pool of blood as proof of his theory.
Short arms, the trailing leg is straight, not bent in the compliant gait. Its human.
ReplyDeleteYep.
Delete^ here`s a hint - they all are.
DeleteGot monkey suit?
DeleteAppears to be folds on the outside of the right pant leg as hes walking away. Looks like some dude in a hoodie.
ReplyDeleteOMGoodness! Soooooo obviously fake bigfoot BS.
ReplyDeleteWhats funny is the dickheads in here say its a hoax!
ReplyDelete^ Joe`s new account ?
DeleteOr - you`re as much a cocksucker as Joe if you can`t handle the fact that people disagree - particularly when there is not ANY VERIFIABLE EVIDENCE in 60 years.
Jeez. You’re back to believing everyone is Joe, eh Stuey? Are you having another relapse akin to the magic airforce base that everyone here (who were somehow allegedly the same person all at the same time), was attacking you via a psy-ops experiment? The tablets don’t define you Stuey, keep taking them for heaven’s sake. And what are you doing to convince anyone that 60 years of footprints are unverifiable Stuey? Remember I’m collecting a dossier on you, I would have noticed if you had some substance for once in 8 years.
DeleteYou still have zilch.