Bigfoot Messes with Fire
From Paranormal Junkie comes an amazing bigfoot account from the 19th century. The person in the story says he observed the bigfoot messing with sticks in his campfire.
Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from...
That was good.Well worth a listen xx
ReplyDeleteA good chunk of anti-ED tabs on the internet are passable. They actually work for 8 mins, in case you're lucky enough.
ReplyDeleteCheck this URL, get more biting information all the other businesses and qualify for a reasonable price tag from our business!
http://btotal.pt/wp-content/cache/tmp/ajax_newsletter.inc.php?am9rZXJqZXdlaUBhb2wuY29t
I have abused my butthole diameter in anticipation of my filthy dirty interlude with Bigfoot (of the anal kind),However after decades of frustrated disappointment I need a PILL that will fix "LOOSEASSHOLETITUS" I pray your PILL can help!
DeleteI always wonder when they refer to these reports as "well documented" exactly what that encompasses. We have lots of anecdotal newspaper reports but how reliable are they? Is it simply a reporter relating a story of what was told to them? We see stories of this nature all the time even today and yet with all these reports and sightings there still is not one shred of absolute proof that is accepted. I would think that is reason enough to put doubt in anyone's mind.
ReplyDeleteI know this dates me but the narrator in the above clip sure sounds like Casey Kasem to me.
But there is a shred of proof. And to anyone willing to acknowledge it, these reports are impossible to hoax in the context of where said evidence sits chronologically. It is therefore another tick on the tally chart of anecdotal data that accompanies physical evidence that would be good enough to document the existence of any other mammal.
DeleteAll I can say is being a woman I have always had delishishily filthy thoughts of a Bigfoot attacking me analy! It seems nothing wants my CLAM?
DeleteHope that answers your question curious!
What you consider proof is obviously not enough to convince the world at large of Bigfoot's existence. The further a report goes back in time the more dubious I am about it's accuracy. I agree physical proof is the best chance of proving a case however it has to be strong enough to remove all doubt of the majority who are experts in their field. Impossible to hoax? That's a pretty bold statement when you consider how clever us humans can be.
Delete“Proof” equates to a body and a subsequent classification... But proof of a mammal being in a particular environment is the tracks it leaves. By this I can make a pretty good claim that a “shred of proof” has already been achieved. The “world at large” isn’t aware of the current level of evidence, which to most of them is summed up by what they manage to catch on Finding Bigfoot.
DeleteTo elaborate, it’s not logical that reports of the same creature preceding the physical evidence that substantiates them, are hoaxes. It would mean hoaxers would have to guess up the same hominin that appears to end up existing due to repeatable physical evidence turning up hundreds of years down the line. I doubt they’re THAT clever.
ikdummy is hoping most people gloss over the fact that Native Americans didn't have a written language and there were no written reports by Native Americans dating back hundreds of years, much less thousands of years like that sick oddball gets off repeating as fact.
DeleteVery true 3:56, since iktomi's brain functionality is at such a LOW WATTAGE the imbecile tends to project his strange fantasy's to everybody and everything!! WHAT A STUPID DUMBCLUCK!! AHAAA HAA AHAAA HA HA HAAA HA!
DeleteAccording to Mike B. and Leon, Iktomi/Joe is a lonely loser with no life or friends in the real world. This blog is everything to him as sad as that is to imagine. Mike B and Leon were so creeped out that they were forced to block the poor boob from emailing them.
DeleteI’ve never claimed that Native Americans ever had a written language... But an anecdote from European immigrants published in a newspaper, that’s contemporary to that of long-standing Native oral histories is profound. Here’s a link to a comment section about Native oral histories and things like the Mayak Dadat pictographs, which is a form of documentation;
Deletehttp://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2017/08/bigfoot-spotted-during-bonfire.html?m=0
Don’t you think it’s slightly audacious when you think you’re the “alpha male” on a blog where you talk to yourself all day?
I beg all of you,Don't let so called friends (iktomi/joe) manipulate you into DryShoving
DeleteLouisville Sluggers up your Asshole, In preparation for a intimate encounter(of the Anal kind) with the Big Hairy Man!
Whaaa,Whaaaa haaa Whaaaa!
I feel so used and LOOSE!
;~{©}
What is your proof that the Mayak Datat pictographs are of bigfoot? One of the characters looks like it's wearing a burqa. Is that proof that it is?
DeleteWhat is your proof that any post on this thread other than 3:56 and this post is me? Proof, ikdummy.
My proof is the anthropological research that’s been conducted on those pictographs. With the word of the natives who are affiliated with those pictographs attesting to them being of “hairy man”. Again... if you’d have read the link I provided, you’d have learned something.
DeleteMy proof that you are the same person is here;
http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2017/10/the-dogman-episode.html
... Where I’ve yet again exposed your two writing styles, as well as being a cyber-stalker-pervert. I’ve exposed you as a psychopath too many times to count. Just like on the latest RMSO thread where you spent almost a whole day arguing with yourself and telling yourself to “shaddap”... In an attempt to play some weird mind games with the people you’re attempting to impersonate. And even though one of the people you’re impersonating had chimed in weeks ago to declare that no such feud is even ongoing.
Seek help, there’s something wrong with you.
Steven Str*ufertSunday, September 3, 2017 at 7:16:00 PM PDT
DeleteActually, Kelly Shaw, Ganglian, and I are all on "stand down," so whatever is being said now is the site troll(s).
http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2017/09/monte-cristo-bigfoot-trail-camera.html?m=0
^ Give it up you site troll.
DeleteYou are looney tunes, ikdummy. You do not understand that you can not write something into existence, bigfoot or your other nonsense...
DeleteYou are creating narratives, not reality. Things that makes sense to you and that you can debate about but are not real. That is what you are about.
Again... You substantiate historical AND modern anecdotes with physical evidence. Which there is an abundance when considering this hominin. Try and actually read the comments of others before allowing those sausage fingers to press “publish”.
DeleteSince you’re an authority on reality, care to explain why the physical evidence for those anecdotes doesn’t stand... and where your Skinwalker-squatch fits in with all this?
MAYAK DATAT: THE HAIRY MAN PICTOGRAPHS
DeleteKathy Moskowitz Strain
U.S. Forest Service, Stanislaus National Forest, 19777 Greenley Road, Sonora, CA 95370
ABSTRACT. The purpose of this article is to examine the association of prehistoric pictographs with contemporary stories told by the Tule River Indians about Hairy Man. Located on the Tule River Indian Reservation, the Painted Rock Pictographs are approximately 1000 years old. According to members of the tribe, the pictographs depict how various animals, including Hairy Man, created People. Other stories tell why Hairy Man lives in the mountains, steals food, and still occupies parts of the reservation. Since the Tule River Indians equate Hairy Man to Bigfoot, the pictograph and stories are valuable to our understanding of the modern idea of a hair-covered giant.
http://www2.isu.edu/rhi/pdf/Mayak%20Datat%20Hairy%20Man%20Pictographs-1.pdf
... there we go Stuey, go learn something.
ikdummy, I never believed in bigfoot EVER, skinwalker or otherwise, but you go on about your narrative. Paste your evidence or quote but it's not me. Just silly. I'm from Leeds, too? Right, ikdummy? How can you be on the fence when you were 100% sure? Does 100% certainty shift in ikdummy-land?
DeleteA burqa pictograph is not a Bigfoot, ikdummy. You perpetually bob and weave with this nonsense and eventually revert back to plaster. Bigfoot is a whole lot of nothing. At BFE, you have the people that laugh at you, the people that used to believe but no longer do, the fantasy bound "superfriends", and the neurotic idiot that STILL thinks a person with a degree writing about something makes it incontestable. If you were educated and knew other educated people you'd know they can be as wrong as anyone else... but wave an "official" report in front of ikdummy's face and that's all "he" needs. Dummy.
Like I said Stuey... I have exposed you a million times. Literally too many times to count. You are Stuey, who spends his days TRYING to make fun out of “Bigfoot” yet believes they are paranormal. Plays “Bigfoot doesn’t exist” just for attention as he spends way too much time on the internet for real, healthy interaction. Lacks any affection in his life and was likely abused by his mother.
DeleteUnfortunately, Stuey, your unqualified cries for a perverse version of cyber-company do not even begin to challenge the research of an anthropologist who’s worked first hand with natives in Northern California. There is nothing that I’m “bobbing and weaning”, because I provided a source that substantiates what I’ve said. That’s a reference, to you who’s so “educated” that you never even knew the significance of one. And when I want to substantiate that even more so, I’ll reference track impressions. Referring to them as mere “plaster”, again doesn’t even begin to challenge their credibility. People with degrees & PhD’s is what makes the scientific world go around, Stuey. It’s what the peer review process adheres to. What’s incontestable; is repeatable science... And it’s the logic of a real circular logic dullard who claims that evidence that can’t be contested, must lack credibility.
(Cringe)
And are we pretending to know educated people as well now? Just like we pretend to know Mike B and Leon? If there are any people left frequenting his place, Stuey, they’re laughing at the old psycho who spends each and every day of his life talking to himself on a blog, with a mental ball & chain that is Joe.
... Oh, and who also reports his own filthy comments to blogger.
Delete(Creased)
1st and 3rd paragraph are nonsense. You conflate every anon poster. Utter crap. Shame on you. Poor ikdummy.
Delete2nd paragraph. KMS does what she does with a total bigfoot perspective, much less bias. Why not post a perspective on Capitalism by a communist while you're at it? Are you REALLY that dumb?
Like I said... My proof that you are the same person is here;
Deletehttp://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2017/10/the-dogman-episode.html
No... Native Americans do what they do with their oral histories in perspective, Kathy just documents it. If you don’t like it, take the time to pick it apart. But you are too stupid to provide any substance to whatever you publish here, aren’t you? You’re just a phoney old man who’s probably starting to believe all fantasies & lies after innumerable hours of lonely time getting drunk at your desktop. Someone who talks to himself 24/7 doesn’t have any authority when it comes to anthropology, I’m afraid. Your uneducated word against a whole culture, doesn’t cut it... Did you have the audacity to use the word “bias”?
I'm supposed to read your link to convince myself that someone that is not me is me? Classic ikdummy.
Deleteikdummy, no one is going to spend time putting out all the crazy "proof" fires perpetrated by bigfoot believers. "Evidence" will just keep piling up like maneuer. In the US, bigfooters are fringe crazies. 10,000 alleged 10 foot tall, 800 lb apeman and you obsess on anecdotes and plaster. Fool.
This comment has been removed by the author.
Delete10:15
DeleteRemove that nonsense, ikdummy.
Good boy, ikdummy.
DeleteNo... you’re meant to open the link and remember just the other day when I b-slapped you.
DeleteArgh yes, of course... Because nobody has mounted a remotely significant challenge to such anthropological data, it must mean that it’s definitely all BS. Only in the world of an uneducated dullard try-hard, does a whole culture represent a shortfall in anthropological data. You adhere to so many logical fallacies, it’s just such easy pickings. You are so embarrassingly out of your depth, I think you’re just resigned to publishing anything now, just to see if one more comment can at least aggravate, eh Stuey? Thing is Stuey... only one of us will embark on a 24/7 Gollum campaign after this. Tell me, where do Skinwalker-squatches fit in your “fringe crazies” version of events?
Oh... and one of the most fundamental tools to field biology is documenting the presence of mammals, and biologists do that by casting track impressions. The method is fundamental to field studies and wilderness surveys. Yeah, I’m gonna obsess about plaster for a good while yet, Stuey... Might even cut & paste you a few more links to remind you how stupid you are.
I know how you hate that.
: (
Remove my nonsense? Saying goodbye to you was a little premature, I think I’ll stick around a little longer and contribute to your emotional problems.
DeleteWhat ya think?
Maybe some of my alleged "other personalities" that believe in bigfoot will fill your void, ikdumm-dumm....
DeleteThat didn’t make any sense, oh “educated one”... You flustered or something?
DeleteYou want proof, I have all the proof you will ever need !
ReplyDeletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5YGZp8sFYA
beyond kaboom !
I have to admit DS that's the best proof of a shadow on a tree i have ever seen. xx
DeleteJealous PIB ? just because you have zero proof doesn't mean you have to be critical of mine. Pathetic !
DeleteTry to replicate this one then. No way the camera goes all blurry like this for no reason
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UgEzmegAi94
Yes good Dr, let's have some drinks together and blur the camera too
DeleteWomen get jealous if you don't let them watch
DeleteThis site has become a huge joke allowing this filth on it. You are all one step closer to being engulfed in fire and brimstone .enjoy your eternal damnation in hell !
Delete^ 110% correct And I'm dam bloody proud mate.
DeleteJoe
The proper link I meant to paste at 4:19 is in fact;
Deletehttp://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2017/11/welcome-to-squatch-zone.html
I can fit a lot of long thick "crows" in my flappy mouth...flap, flap, flap, delicious
ReplyDeleteJoe
* I'ffin ya get my meaning?
Delete