Drivel it may be..but it is you who delegates this drivel to "creationists"..can we take it that were the tale told by a member of your own creed,an "evolutionist" that you would believe?
You`ve rather a hefty load to prove before accusing others of drivel.
Bend down and get ready to receive a long throbbing "truth".
This summer I will have been researching sasquatch for 27 years. Athough not my profession I have held a keen interest in biology especially ecosystems. I have spent countless hours out in the field, reading literature, even interviewing eyewitnesses and following any bigfoot related media I could find.
As the years fall behind me my enthusiasm for the subject has slowly faded with each and every disapointment, dead end, charlatan and wild claim.
Despite having an open mind in all my years I have never come across a single piece of evidence that has convinced me it could have come from such a species.
With my own shortcomings in the field I looked at what others were doing who could perhaps get into the more remote areas that I couldnt. But nothing has come from these people either. Blurry tree pictures? No thanks.
Each promised "evidence will be released soon" has turned out to be nothing. Biscardi, Dyer, Meldrum, BFRO, Standing, Ketchum, Sykes, Smeja, Brian Brown, Johnson the list goes on. No end in sight and ultimately no definitive bigfoot evidence.
I always held out hope that in this sea of madness technology would catch up and these elusive creatures would no longer be able to hide (how can a 9 foot hominid hide its heat signature from an aerial thermal survey for example). What we actually find is further excuses from proponants, of which I myself am guilty, of applying impossible attributes to try to explain away why we have no substantiated evidence. This which I have now realised is a one way road to insanity (see dr johnson).
With everything said and done I have made up my mind on the subject. There simply is no such species.
When you're trying to incorporate all your failed debates of the last few years into one long tedious role play... Just remember that people would rather you just stick to your "bigfoot don't exist" jig. It simply sums up your average intelligence, and articulates the logical fallacy you're left with after having all said arguments rammed down your throat 100 times already.
Hello Iktomi, I dont frequent the comments section here much so I believe you may be slightly mixed up. Not to worry happens to the best of us. You remind me of a younger me with much passion for the topic -nothing wrong with that. Anyway I will be happy to discuss any of my past experiences with you in a civil manner should you wish to do so.
RW, ikdummy is from Wales, never stepped foot in the US, and mentions alcohol in his posts frequently. He is also not formally educated but goes overboard compensating by trying to sound scientic, his overuse of terms like morphology can become annoying. In actuality, he looks at the existence of bigfoot as his "intellectual" exercise where he "proves" a fantasy creature as being real through "logic", plaster casts, and anecdotal evidence. It's a drunken, uneducated fool's way of getting back at the world.
I can sit in front of the TV 4,000 miles away, communicate with people who have spent 20, 30, even 50 years in the American wilderness that you're too scared to venture and ask their educated opinions about these "fantasy creatures". I can sit 4,000 miles away in the garden with a cold beer and research the plethora of internet sources that provide sheer consistency to both eyewitness reports and repeatable scientific evidence that substantiates the idea of "fantasy creatures".
I'll say it again... It must burn to know that someone 4,000 miles away can school you about what's in your own back yard. I'd be pretty upset if I were you too.
Spot on 6:13, poor iktomi fancies himself as a master philosopher who can debate an imaginary creature into being accepted by the scientific community as real.
RW I have reached the same conclusion after an interest in the subject of over 50 years. Although I never did the research that you have, I can no longer even entertain the possibility (at least here in the continental United States). My interest now extends to those who continue to believe. I don't believe they can all be outright lying however I think they are mistaken in their assertions. In spite of what is being put forward there is NO strong evidence to prove conclusively they exist - period.
Believers such as Dr. Johnson do hold a certain fascination for me because they seem to actually have followers who endorse them in spite of the most ridiculous claims. You are correct - no end to belief is in sight despite all the years passing with no proof.
For the past 27... 50 years even, there has not only been an adequate flow of eyewitness reports from very reliable, very experienced people in wilderness areas... But the footprint evidence has equated to something that is pretty much irrefutable as far as evidence goes.
http://www2.isu.edu/rhi/pdf/JSE-303-Meldrum.pdf
In the above link is a paper published in the Journal of Scientific Exploration, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 356–374, 2016. You'll notice that Dr Jeff Meldrum presents the exact same foot morphology from two casts found in North America, with that of one sourced in China.
Essentially, this provides irrefutable proof that the track impressions are from the same species of biped. Hoaxers from different continents would have to have guessed a shared morphology of Sasquatch foot inline with bipedal evolution that only very few academics understand. To see this evidence as inadequate, is to see it through agenda-ridden or bitter eyes. It's really all that simple. And that's without even getting into the footage, audio recordings and hair samples.
The amount of people who spend a lot of time in the wildness who don't come across anything, compared to those who do, is exactly what one would expect from a hominin that has evaded classification for hundreds of years. It's left a lot of people flat but that's unfortunately the way it goes. The rarity of those sightings and sourced evidence, does by no means tarnish the evidence that does exist. If you wanna spend time watching the kooks, that's cool... But step up to the standard of experts starting to publish solid evidence, or end up just as bad as he kooks for giving them the attention they crave.
If you review ikdummys own posts on this page alone, you'll note he mentions alcohol, incorporates his go-to big science word "morphology", goes on about the "all important" plaster casts, and returns to his worn out debating schtick...he even says he "schools" people...ironic because he lacks formal education beyond high school but seems desperate to compensate for his obvious lack of schooling. If you've read my above posts you'll see I hit the nail on the head regarding ikdummy.
Would you like a tissue? I keep reading a lot of crying... a lot of insults... a lot of answering your own comments like a loon... but no logical explanation for the evidence for these "fantasy creatures"?
It is true Ikdummy sits in front of his computer screen across the ocean and he thinks he's an expert but he's never been into the woods to do research in his life, laughable ! I go out into the woods every single day and almost every time I get something 5 minutes in ! still waiting for your awesome photo of bushes Ikdummy ! in the meantime he's an awesome super unreal Bearman and Buddy I got ! *****SUPER KABOOM !******* GO AHEAD AND DEBUNK THIS STUPID IKDUMMY ! I'll be waiting and tomorrow I'll have even more awesome evidence while you pick your nose in shame !
That want me above, and my proof is over the top lately! Still no pics Ikdummy? What are you waiting for? EW flat out admitted that in 27 years, he hasn't put hardly anytime into it, or he would have proof!
If Joe/iktomi was smart, which he's not, he would see that he was not only repeatedly x rayed and exposed but was also set up to expose himself. Instead of a time of serious reflection, Joe/iktomi has no clue what happened and will learn nothing.
Got some bushes you need to replicate ikdummy! YOU STILL DON'T HAVE ONE PIC YET??? FOR REAL??
Oh, Here's a email I sent Kulls. "Hey Steve, Dr. Squatch here. I saw a post you did about me, and wanted to pass along the truth to you. First, My name is Dr. Joe Kiray, Not Bruce, I handed you my business card, and chatted with you for a bit. You said that two auidence members grilled me? Wouldn't that be hearsay, since you were upstairs, in the conference room the entire time of my presentation? You're not being at all truthful Steve, you don't even know what they asked me??? It's not possible for anyone to Griil me Steve, especially people who don't field research."
Joe, as a public and private investigator with over 28 years of experience as well as a background in modern cryptic research and investigatory follow up and maintainence, I must say that I have never encountered any research such as yours.
No one can F with Iktomi,I've read a few posts that were pretty witty and had some humor attached to them but as far as trumping his superior intellect ,it hasn't happened and I doubt that it will.
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from...
Rumors abound on whether or not Finding Bigfoot will continue, but hopeful news is on the horizon. Snake Oil Productions, the production company responsible for Finding Bigfoot, is seeking a permit for filming in the Monterey, Virginia area. Monterey lies between the Monongahela and George Washington National Forests. Definitely a good place to look for bigfoot. We can only speculate if this means Finding Bigfoot has been signed on for additional seasons, or if perhaps a new bigfoot show is in the works. We'll keep you updated on any further announcements for sure.
Editor's Note: This is a guest post by Suzie M., a sasquatch enthusiast. Crypto-linguists believe that the species known Bigfoot/Sasquatch/Yeti/Yowie ect speak and understand a complex language, which by all accounts seems to stem from Asia. When one listens to it there is definitely a sense of it being Chinese or Japanese. It is a very odd mix of sounds, clicks and what could be actual words. This is the reason some experts are looking into the Asian dialect theory, some have said it could be a lost dialect, which was carried from Asia by the Bigfoot species that colonised America.
HI EVERYBODY I'm First yes!
ReplyDeleteit wuz YUUUUUUGE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
DeleteThe Man-eating Leopard of Rudraprayag -
Deletehttps://archive.org/stream/TheMan-eatingLeopardOfRudraprayag1947#page/n5/mode/2up
Just when you thought you'd heard the stupidest thing ever, then you hear this. Pathetic creationist drivel.
ReplyDeleteLow IQ ^
Deleteclench yer winky Stinky.
DeleteAC COLLINS
Drivel it may be..but it is you who delegates this drivel to "creationists"..can we take it that were the tale told by a member of your own creed,an "evolutionist" that you would believe?
DeleteYou`ve rather a hefty load to prove before accusing others of drivel.
Bend down and get ready to receive a long throbbing "truth".
This summer I will have been researching sasquatch for 27 years. Athough not my profession I have held a keen interest in biology especially ecosystems. I have spent countless hours out in the field, reading literature, even interviewing eyewitnesses and following any bigfoot related media I could find.
ReplyDeleteAs the years fall behind me my enthusiasm for the subject has slowly faded with each and every disapointment, dead end, charlatan and wild claim.
Despite having an open mind in all my years I have never come across a single piece of evidence that has convinced me it could have come from such a species.
With my own shortcomings in the field I looked at what others were doing who could perhaps get into the more remote areas that I couldnt. But nothing has come from these people either. Blurry tree pictures? No thanks.
Each promised "evidence will be released soon" has turned out to be nothing. Biscardi, Dyer, Meldrum, BFRO, Standing, Ketchum, Sykes, Smeja, Brian Brown, Johnson the list goes on. No end in sight and ultimately no definitive bigfoot evidence.
I always held out hope that in this sea of madness technology would catch up and these elusive creatures would no longer be able to hide (how can a 9 foot hominid hide its heat signature from an aerial thermal survey for example). What we actually find is further excuses from proponants, of which I myself am guilty, of applying impossible attributes to try to explain away why we have no substantiated evidence. This which I have now realised is a one way road to insanity (see dr johnson).
With everything said and done I have made up my mind on the subject. There simply is no such species.
-RW
I SWILL GOOSE PISS WITH MY LEFT PINKY EXTENDED!
Delete^ Insanity,,,Iktomi level INSANITY!!!
Delete^ Wasted, AC collins cement head level WASTED!!
DeleteJoe
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteWhen you're trying to incorporate all your failed debates of the last few years into one long tedious role play... Just remember that people would rather you just stick to your "bigfoot don't exist" jig. It simply sums up your average intelligence, and articulates the logical fallacy you're left with after having all said arguments rammed down your throat 100 times already.
DeleteHello Iktomi, I dont frequent the comments section here much so I believe you may be slightly mixed up. Not to worry happens to the best of us. You remind me of a younger me with much passion for the topic -nothing wrong with that. Anyway I will be happy to discuss any of my past experiences with you in a civil manner should you wish to do so.
Delete-RW
RW, ikdummy is from Wales, never stepped foot in the US, and mentions alcohol in his posts frequently. He is also not formally educated but goes overboard compensating by trying to sound scientic, his overuse of terms like morphology can become annoying. In actuality, he looks at the existence of bigfoot as his "intellectual" exercise where he "proves" a fantasy creature as being real through "logic", plaster casts, and anecdotal evidence. It's a drunken, uneducated fool's way of getting back at the world.
DeleteI can sit in front of the TV 4,000 miles away, communicate with people who have spent 20, 30, even 50 years in the American wilderness that you're too scared to venture and ask their educated opinions about these "fantasy creatures". I can sit 4,000 miles away in the garden with a cold beer and research the plethora of internet sources that provide sheer consistency to both eyewitness reports and repeatable scientific evidence that substantiates the idea of "fantasy creatures".
DeleteI'll say it again... It must burn to know that someone 4,000 miles away can school you about what's in your own back yard. I'd be pretty upset if I were you too.
Spot on 6:13, poor iktomi fancies himself as a master philosopher who can debate an imaginary creature into being accepted by the scientific community as real.
DeleteRW I have reached the same conclusion after an interest in the subject of over 50 years. Although I never did the research that you have, I can no longer even entertain the possibility (at least here in the continental United States). My interest now extends to those who continue to believe. I don't believe they can all be outright lying however I think they are mistaken in their assertions. In spite of what is being put forward there is NO strong evidence to prove conclusively they exist - period.
DeleteBelievers such as Dr. Johnson do hold a certain fascination for me because they seem to actually have followers who endorse them in spite of the most ridiculous claims. You are correct - no end to belief is in sight despite all the years passing with no proof.
To sum up, ikdummy is often wrong but never in doubt.
DeleteHe's the archetype dumb guy with loads of confidence.
For the past 27... 50 years even, there has not only been an adequate flow of eyewitness reports from very reliable, very experienced people in wilderness areas... But the footprint evidence has equated to something that is pretty much irrefutable as far as evidence goes.
Deletehttp://www2.isu.edu/rhi/pdf/JSE-303-Meldrum.pdf
In the above link is a paper published in the Journal of Scientific Exploration, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 356–374, 2016. You'll notice that Dr Jeff Meldrum presents the exact same foot morphology from two casts found in North America, with that of one sourced in China.
Essentially, this provides irrefutable proof that the track impressions are from the same species of biped. Hoaxers from different continents would have to have guessed a shared morphology of Sasquatch foot inline with bipedal evolution that only very few academics understand. To see this evidence as inadequate, is to see it through agenda-ridden or bitter eyes. It's really all that simple. And that's without even getting into the footage, audio recordings and hair samples.
The amount of people who spend a lot of time in the wildness who don't come across anything, compared to those who do, is exactly what one would expect from a hominin that has evaded classification for hundreds of years. It's left a lot of people flat but that's unfortunately the way it goes. The rarity of those sightings and sourced evidence, does by no means tarnish the evidence that does exist. If you wanna spend time watching the kooks, that's cool... But step up to the standard of experts starting to publish solid evidence, or end up just as bad as he kooks for giving them the attention they crave.
If you review ikdummys own posts on this page alone, you'll note he mentions alcohol, incorporates his go-to big science word "morphology", goes on about the "all important" plaster casts, and returns to his worn out debating schtick...he even says he "schools" people...ironic because he lacks formal education beyond high school but seems desperate to compensate for his obvious lack of schooling. If you've read my above posts you'll see I hit the nail on the head regarding ikdummy.
Delete8:42 has hit the nail right on the head - spot on appraisal of the blogsite dummy.
DeleteWould you like a tissue? I keep reading a lot of crying... a lot of insults... a lot of answering your own comments like a loon... but no logical explanation for the evidence for these "fantasy creatures"?
DeleteF'n schooled.
It is true Ikdummy sits in front of his computer screen across the ocean and he thinks he's an expert but he's never been into the woods to do research in his life, laughable !
DeleteI go out into the woods every single day and almost every time I get something 5 minutes in !
still waiting for your awesome photo of bushes Ikdummy !
in the meantime he's an awesome super unreal Bearman and Buddy I got !
*****SUPER KABOOM !*******
GO AHEAD AND DEBUNK THIS STUPID IKDUMMY !
I'll be waiting and tomorrow I'll have even more awesome evidence while you pick your nose in shame !
Ikdummy can't help himself and is too dumb to see that he's not helping himself.
DeleteHello Bruce... What images of foliage do you have for us today?
DeleteHey DS, it's cool that your cryptids have buddies. Bearman has a friend that he gets to hang out with.
DeleteBirdman,Catman,Barkman,Lionman,Bearman and Ratboy!Hong Kong Fuey Bruice's been reading too many comics xx
DeleteKnock it off PIB, you know you like Ratboy and his buddies!
DeleteJoerg boy is a little upset today. Must be because he got ran off the blog along with all his friends. AHHHHHHHH HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
DeleteFor those new here, joerg is imdummy is Joe f1tzgerald...all the same idiot.
DeleteThat's very true 9:57 :) xx
DeleteThat want me above, and my proof is over the top lately!
DeleteStill no pics Ikdummy? What are you waiting for?
EW flat out admitted that in 27 years, he hasn't put hardly anytime into it, or he would have proof!
BLAH BLAH BLAAAAAAAAHHHHH^
DeleteAlso: FLARRRRRRRRRP!
DeleteIf Joe/iktomi was smart, which he's not, he would see that he was not only repeatedly x rayed and exposed but was also set up to expose himself. Instead of a time of serious reflection, Joe/iktomi has no clue what happened and will learn nothing.
DeleteGot some bushes you need to replicate ikdummy!
DeleteYOU STILL DON'T HAVE ONE PIC YET??? FOR REAL??
Oh, Here's a email I sent Kulls.
"Hey Steve, Dr. Squatch here. I saw a post you did about me, and wanted to pass along the truth to you. First, My name is Dr. Joe Kiray, Not Bruce, I handed you my business card, and chatted with you for a bit. You said that two auidence members grilled me? Wouldn't that be hearsay, since you were upstairs, in the conference room the entire time of my presentation? You're not being at all truthful Steve, you don't even know what they asked me??? It's not possible for anyone to Griil me Steve, especially people who don't field research."
And he's pics you can replicate, right?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rJhTwxcS7ug
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ow3sbRz5wM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oOUkqejwK6w
Joe, as a public and private investigator with over 28 years of experience as well as a background in modern cryptic research and investigatory follow up and maintainence, I must say that I have never encountered any research such as yours.
DeleteYou don't research!
Delete^ Bruce
DeleteShows your serious lack of Research once again!
DeleteLiar!
No one can F with Iktomi,I've read a few posts that were pretty witty and had some humor attached to them but as far as trumping his superior intellect ,it hasn't happened and I doubt that it will.
DeleteLol Mazzini looks up to ikdummy intellectually. We have found the smallest particle on earth, mazzini's "brain".
Delete9;19
ReplyDeletesuck a dick you queer