The Bigfoot Files with Dr. Bryan Sykes
This documentary caused quite the stir in the bigfoot world. Geneticist Bryan Sykes collected various samples from around the world, looking for proof of sasquatch dna.
Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from...
Sykes determined that the sasquatch is actually a negroid with harry, unshaved nuts. No news here.
ReplyDeleteNot Iktomi Joe then, Joe has his mommie shave his nuts.
DeleteHey Danny!
DeleteIktomi, PIB, Joe and the other Enthusiasts, Happy New Year. Do any of you know if Dr. Sykes is still continuing his research, or has he walked away from the topic? Cheers, Tim,U.K.
ReplyDeleteHey Tim! On Coast to Coast AM of March 19th 2016, Sykes made two very interesting statements;
Delete"You can tell the difference between modern and ancient human within DNA."
"I've almost finished studying Zana's DNA."
... Hopefully his results won't be much longer. What will be interesting is seeing if first he finds ancient DNA, and then if he attributes this find to either what is as widely reported as a relict hominin in the US, Asia, Russia and Australia, or something completely different. It's all subjective to what Sykes thinks "Bigfoot" or the "Yeti" are in the end (Ancient human or whatever else). Personally, & considering Zana's descriptions are exactly what we have come to know in "Bigfoot" of the US, it'll finally be a no-brainer as to what we're dealing with.
Ancient human.
Thanks for the reply, mate. I think you may well be right. Cheers, Tim,U.K.
DeleteHappy New Year buddy!!
DeleteRemember when Iktomi was all like, "Wait for Sykes! Wait for Sykes!"
ReplyDeleteLOL. Well Sykes has confirmed that he found nothing in the way of conclusive evidence of bigfoot.
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteSykes was the first kick at the cat, doctor Melba Ketchum was way better at the task.
DeleteWhat is this? Some blog about some creature called bigfoot? And some story about bigfoot files and somebody named Sykes? More liberal propaganda from the lame stream media. I'm not interested. Done.
ReplyDeleteAnonymousFriday, December 30, 2016 at 1:49:00 PM PST
DeleteYou n*ggas erased my post. Typical libtards trying to suppress free speech! Fuck Bigfoot evidence!
https://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2016/12/cloaking-bigfoot-caught-on-camera.html
What a lovely guy.
You mean looking to make sure the concept of unknown creatures remaining unfound stays nothing more than a subject to be cackled at and about. Sykes is another one of those people who KNOWS there IS no such thing as bigfoot-or at least he HOPES there isn't...he's very sceered
ReplyDeleteThe problem with Sykes is all the samples he found had human contamination. Well if the thing is part human its going to have human contamination. He spontaneously rejected all those samples because they were part human at least on the mother side. So his study was doomed from the start.
ReplyDelete